User talk:Matthew R Dunn/Archive 1

Welcome!

Hello, Matthew R Dunn! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξ φ 11:32, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

2 Comments

You can upload images by clicking on "upload file" on the navigation to your left.
You may want to remove the word "git" from your "contributions" sections or you could get into trouble (read: WP:Attack to find out why!

PS: If you need general help feel free to ask or put yourself up for wiki-adoption. = ) --Cameron (T|C) 11:06, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm terribly sorry about the word "git". I have just removed it. Thank you, for your advice. Matthew R Dunn (talk) 16:06, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: 24 Redemption Page Hi, I am new to this and I am sorry if I have put this in the wrong section of your page. I was the person who edited the 24: Redemption page to include "soccer for viewers in the U.S.". I believe you re-edited the page today to remove the new remark. The reason I thought this should be included on the page is that the show is an American T.V. program and a description of the T.V. show would use vernacular American English when describing the scene. To clarify between American Football and Association football, I thought the extra few words were needed. The page does contain the 'Association football' link when it mentions football in the sentence I edited. However, in my career and opinion, clarity of an item discussed should be included in the text that was written and should not require extra links or further research. I am sorry that I do not have a Wiki page for you to comment to, but I will monitor this page if you have another comment. I do have an email address that you can send an email to if you would like to contact me privately. Ask me to post it if you are interested.

Ben —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.62.16.98 (talk) 03:44, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I just did kind of changed the word to soccer to make everyone happy at the end of the day, though the link of association football stays the same, because linking soccer would redirect you to the same association football page. -- Matthew R Dunn (talk) 12:58, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Spooks episode titles

Hi. Could you please source where you have got the Spooks episode titles from? The titles are never publicly shown on the episodes, and I don't even think the official website has them. If they can't be sourced, they probably need changing back to the "Series x, Episode y" format. ~~ [Jam]^[talk] 07:43, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, It's just I saw that title on the infobox of Aftermath. I'll revert them now. Matthew R Dunn (talk) 08:19, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- No worries - it isn't a major issue, but if we can't find reliable sources for those titles (and I don't think any of them do) then they will probably need changing back to the format I suggested. If you can find a source, then I'm happy to use the other titles. ~~ [Jam]^[talk] 15:08, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice

Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

Addbot (talk) 07:39, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:PB

Great. I'm a fan myself. What bothers me though is that anon IPs are actually taking the notices down. --Erroneuz1 (talk) 06:05, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Laughable

Re on the afd "I think that whoever said that it isn't notable is laughable". You may want to be more careful in your wording. — Rlevse • Talk • 03:06, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm very sorry for saying that, I was just getting stressed out recently. I'd like to say I won't do it again, but I'm afraid I can't promise that. Again, I'm sorry. -- Matthew R Dunn (talk) 11:15, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bantos fighting

I had planned on creating a page (or pages) under the topic of "Bantos Fighting" but it's over my head. I figured because you're such a fan of Atlantis, and you have a lot of experience, you'd like to do it. Basically, it's Teyla's fighting style seen in tons of Atlantis episodes, and a lot of character building happens during those sparring scenes. It is named just before the explosion in the first scene of "Sunday". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.70.67.34 (talk) 05:57, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I know what bantos fighting is. There is also "Sparring" as well. I do have a question though, are you User:Ka'lel from Stargate Wiki? If so, you should really leave me a message on my SG wiki talk page, since you'd have better luck at an answer from me there concerning Stargate. I'm sure I could create a page on bantos fighting and sparring, but I'm sure you can do it yourself, as I'm a little busy with expanding plots for season four episodes there at the moment. And I hope you would want it created on SG wiki, because I don't think they would allow that kind of page to be put on Wikipedia, especially with all the mergings on Stargate-related articles here. -- Matthew R Dunn (talk) 14:58, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Invite for Wikipedia:Prison Break

This Project has just been created and needs participants. You seem to be a Prison Break fan so how about you become a member of the project? :) --Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 12:04, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I'll be happy to do what I can to help, though I am currently a little busy with other things, due to my student days starting up again, meaning editing will be somewhat constrictive at times. Still, thanks for giving me the invitation. :) -- Matthew R Dunn (talk) 13:24, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for coming to the wikiproject and thanks for the great User Template. It is a really good idea. Real appreciate your participation.

Prison Break is being reviewed

I requested a peer review and it is up and running. I'm now trying to fulfil the needs of the prison break article and would be very thankful for your help. --Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 17:49, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll see what I could do. -- Matthew R Dunn (talk) 18:34, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Prison Break characters

Well, I think it depends. We can add some images but I think in general images just for decoration should be avoided. Better back them up in your hard disk for any case. -- Magioladitis (talk) 20:43, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not hoping to keep every image, just to keep the odd one there. I've been thinking, and since much of the character images are put into the actor articles which don't have their own images, I could just place them there (putting Frank Tancredi image to the John Heard article). Nonetheless, I'll take your advice, and save them just in case. -- Matthew R Dunn (talk) 20:56, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you. I think we have to merge every secondary character in the List and then perform a serious cleanup. It's a shame such a popular TV series to have such bad articles. -- Magioladitis (talk) 20:59, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How do i join WikiProject Prison Break

Everyoneandeveryone (talk) 23:03, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject James Bond New Collaboration of the fortnight

WikiProject James Bond
Collaboration of the fortnight (two weeks)

WikiProject James Bond:Collaboration of the fortnight
The collaboration has returned!!

THE COLLABORATION OF THE FORTNIGHT (6 September 2011 - 20 September 2011) is

Production of the James Bond films

edit this

Please contribute by editing this article, in an attempt to get it to good article status
For more information see the page here or contact SpecialWindler.
Get in and Participate

The Windler talk 21:17, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

Hiya. I've fulfilled your request. Please remember to only use the tool for vandalism. In edits where further elaboration of your decision to revert would be beneficial continue to use WP:UNDO and add a more explanatory edit summary (as you have done in the past) as Rollback is not a replacement for the undo tool. Any problems please see WP:RBK or feel free to ask me. Thanks for your hard work and happy editing. Pedro : Chat 13:15, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, that was quick. Thank you for granting my request. -- Matthew R Dunn (talk) 13:17, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Prison Break

Thanks for the welcome. I have taken Prison Break (season 2) to FLC, so hopefully the candidacy goes smoothly. I have also been working on the Alexander Mahone article in my sandbox, which I will publish soon and nominate for GA. :) Corn.u.co.pia / Disc.us.sion 03:47, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey again. I have finished and nominated Alexander Mahone. Please take a look. :) Corn.u.co.pia / Disc.us.sion 02:23, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nice job on expanding all the episode summaries. :) I'm going to start working on Prison Break (season 1), and hopefully take it to FLC soon. Corn.u.co.pia • Disc.us.sion 06:38, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, thought I'd make myself useful by adding stuff rather than fixing and cleaning up stuff regarding PB. I'll also see what I could do about helping season 1 to FLC, though I'm afraid I can't make any promisises (though the episode summaries seem to help making season one an FL). -- Matthew R Dunn (talk) 12:34, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. I'm going to be busy for the next few weeks, so I'll start working on it then. Corn.u.co.pia • Disc.us.sion 01:09, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:WikiProject Prison Break participants

I have nominated Category:WikiProject Prison Break participants (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:Prison Break Task Force participants (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 00:06, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use images for performers

So you're aware, fair use (non-free) images are considered replaceable for identifying living people, per Wikipedia:Non-free content#Unacceptable use, Images - Item 12. This means you can use an image captured from a film/TV series to illustrate the character in the character's article, but not the performer in their article. Thanks.— TAnthony^Talk 20:28, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Earth starships in Stargate

Copy that, it's protected. — Huntster (t • @ • c) 23:26, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Enemy at the Gate

Hi. I see you have "Enemy at the Gate" in your sandbox. Do you intend to work on it and create an article soon, or is it more more of a workpit on indefinite hold (I got a couple of such half-alive-half-dead projects lying around in my userspace as well)? I am asking because I'd like there to be an article for the finale (notability is not an issue), and I don't want to intrude on your plans when/if I dig up usable sources. – sgeureka ^t•c 23:00, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I do plan to expand on it and create an article if I wasn't caught up on other things, both wiki and real-life related. Now that I have some spare time, I could expand on it and probably have it done by the end of tomorrow, and since you said that notability isn't an issue, nothing would stop me from creating the page now, but I would like to poke around for the odd refs and sources first. -- Matthew R Dunn (talk) 23:14, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want to hurry you in any way; I am busy with various things too. I agree that it's better to have a couple of sources at hand before the article gets created in mainspace, but we can reduce work if I see what sources you use before I go on source hunt (or vice versa). – sgeureka ^t•c 23:29, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I'm already planning to use these ([1] and [2]), since those types of things are easily accessible (and in my opinion finding reception info is a little easier to find. Though I would like your help in finding a source concerning the leaked episode/s, since I am so far unable to find it. -- Matthew R Dunn (talk) 23:47, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

These google searches have plenty of usable (wiki-reliable) sources:

If you want, I can dig through them and come up with about 10-30 good sources.– sgeureka ^t•c 01:19, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that could do, I just took a quick look and saw some pretty reliable stuff myself. -- Matthew R Dunn (talk) 01:52, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'll work on the article as time allows. – sgeureka ^t•c 23:09, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Sometimes a Great Notion (Battlestar Galactica)

The article Sometimes a Great Notion (Battlestar Galactica) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . It hasn't failed because it's basically a good article, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Sometimes a Great Notion (Battlestar Galactica) for things needed to be addressed. Million_Moments (talk) 20:54, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

He That Believeth in Me GA Nomination

Hi, I've placed the GA nomination of He That Believeth in Me, I found one flaw in it, one that's easily fixed. so check out my comments, address the problem and get back to me and it'll be GA in no time. MPJ-DK (talk) 05:50, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Teal'c in Atlantis

Hi. Since you seem to have an in-depth knowledge about and interest in Atlantis, can you add two or three sentences of plot summary to the article Teal'c about what the character did in the two SGA eps? I think I can spend the 90 minutes better than (re)watching episodes that didn't interest me the first time around, when it would just take you five minutes digging in your memory I guess. :-) I'd do the whole copyediting etc. – sgeureka ^t•c 16:20, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. I'll get right to it. -- Matthew R Dunn (talk) 18:34, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. – sgeureka ^t•c 21:55, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

500d

you didn't bother to see I had already started a 500D / T1i article last night.Evilarry (talk) 15:36, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, what was that about? I was never aware of what you did last night, and I even heard of you before today. Just what is it you want with me? If it's about the user who suggested the article to be merged, then please leave a message to User:Rcawsey, as it was him or her who was responsible, I never even heard of the 500d before today, I only deal with articles regarding fiction. -- Matthew R Dunn (talk) 19:48, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Check the Beckett talk page...

... and look for the press scans. That may be exactly what you were looking for. – sgeureka ^t•c 17:27, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll take a better look through the list tomorrow (and I noticed that some of them I may have used already). -- Matthew R Dunn (talk) 22:56, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

24: Redemption

Hi Matthew, i've restored the word "football" in the plot section due to the fact it was called football in the film. US film or not, the term used in the film must take precedence. I hope you understand and if you feel there is an issue with this, i'd ask you to please engage in a discussion here or on the articles talk page before performing any reverts. Thank you John Sloan @ 22:28, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I have no problem if it was mentioned in the movie afterall, just as long as the link is association football, which I notice it is. Thanks for keeping me posted :) -- Matthew R Dunn (talk) 23:04, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, thanks for being so understanding :-) John Sloan @ 23:31, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stargate Atlantis (season 1) rating

Since you disagree and revert most of my ratings (no harm ment), can you rate the Stargate Atlantis (season 1) for me. Does it need a season cover to become a C or a B class? --Trust Is All You Need (talk) 16:04, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it looks worthy enough to be a B class, since season articles don't have that much (see Lost (season 1), or The Simpsons (season 9), which are featured list articles). I'll rate it and have a quick look through the article and see what I can do about cleaning it up. Good job on the article so far by the way. -- Matthew R Dunn (talk) 16:18, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your time. --Trust Is All You Need (talk) 16:59, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since you are the main atlantis editor here on wikipedia, do you know anything about Aiden Ford's reception? I'm wondering since i've expanded the article and i'm having hard time finding any reception talk about him. So can i get your help on this one? --Trust Is All You Need (talk) 14:28, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid I can't help you there, since I too once tried to look for Aiden Ford reception notes, with not much luck unfortunately. I'll see if I can try again, but I wouldn't hold my breath on this one. -- Matthew R Dunn (talk) 14:33, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since you know so much about SG Atlantis, i'm wondering if you can add the story arc for season five to the Stargate Atlantis article, the season paragraph on the article has only information on the cast and casting for the season. --Trust Is All You Need (talk) 09:04, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I'll give it a go, and I'll also take the casting information to the season 5 article. -- Matthew R Dunn (talk) 11:29, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

thanks again. --Trust Is All You Need (talk) 14:39, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really know were i can find the British viewership for each episode of Stargate Atlantis, therefor i'm asking for your help. Can you find the British viewership numbers/ratings for "The Siege, Part 1, 2 and 3" . Thanks again. --Trust Is All You Need (talk) 14:18, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There's a website called Broadcasters Audience Research Board, so sure, I'll help, though there is one hick-up, I don't know when the first two parts aired, and there is no guarantee that Atlantis will show up, since it doesn't show up in the top ten ratings for Sky One 100% of the time. I'll see what I can do. -- Matthew R Dunn (talk) 16:43, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As I feared, parts 1 and 2 aren't in the top 10 at all at around March or April, 2005 (which is when the finale aired more or less) though on a lighter note, I found out about 680,000 tuned in to see Part 3 (placed 6th on Sky One for that week). -- Matthew R Dunn (talk) 16:50, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, can you give me the link or if you want to you can do it yourself... A question, do you have any audio commentaries for the character Major Evan Lorne? I just re-created the page with much conceptual history, but wondered if i could get some more information from you, since you have many of these Stargate Atlantis audio commentaries. --Trust Is All You Need (talk) 22:16, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nearly every episode on the Atlantis DVDs have commentaries, and I have all Atlantis DVDs that are currently available, so there's bound to be some info behind Lorne. I'll do what I can, but I'm currently quite busy with real life and other wiki-related projects. Don't get this wrong, I'd love to help anybody who'll need it, but listening to commentaries isn't the best use of my time currently. I will get round to them, slowly. And I'll get round to the UK ratings -- Matthew R Dunn (talk) 23:10, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thats okay, last time i checked real life was important than computer life, so see you around. Thanks for adding the information on "The Siege" article. --Trust Is All You Need (talk) 05:53, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

First thanks for your comment on my talk page. Since you are the big Stargate Atlantis fan around here, is the show as arc-driven as Stargate SG-1 and if so, can you help me? --TIAYN (talk) 13:51, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I spent the last 10 minutes or so trying to figure out how to reply, but I still haven't much of an idea on what to say. My answer would point towards the fact that Atlantis seems more arc-driven than SG-1, but that would of course depend on what sort of help you need of me. -- Matthew R Dunn (talk) 23:08, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, my question was a bit unclear... What i mean to say, is it like Stargate SG-1 which has the Goa'uld arc, Ori arc and Anubis arc or is the only main story arc in the show the Wraith arc. --TIAYN (talk) 09:24, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, see what you mean now :) There are other arcs in Atlantis, particularly Asuran, or Genii-related. Now let me ask you a question; does that help involve rewritting the plot section on the Atlantis page, like on the SG-1 page? -- Matthew R Dunn (talk) 13:36, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well no, doesn't have to bee. But then you need to help me or tell me about the different story arc's, since i've only seen season 1, half of 2 and 5.... So i'm not the big SGA expert around here. But to answear your question, no, if you don't want to, its okay. --TIAYN (talk) 14:54, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Scofield

I think you misunderstood the point of my edits - I've made them quite plain in the talk page of the article. Michaels death is (currently) fact and can be cited using interviews with the writer Olmstead and I did so in the talk page. What aren't facts are whether he died from the Electricity or from the Guards entering (and presumably shooting him) - as a trained electrician I find it highly unlikely that he would have been electrocuted putting the wires together (as opposed to ripping them out) yes suspend disbelief as it's fiction but it's not explicitly stated either way - the guards were bursting through the door at the same time as he put the wires together. Implying it was caused specifically one way or another without an answer from the writer constitutes original research. Secondly it's not explained or made clear whether his body followed Linc and Sara down to South America - So calling it a "grave" or "Tombstone" - again without reference proving it is where Michaels body resides is again Original research - Marking it as a "memorial" could be seen to represent either a grave or a marker in lieu of a body. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.254.217.56 (talk) 20:06, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Those are fairly interesting points. Apologies for the misunderstanding. -- Matthew R Dunn (talk) 08:16, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FLC 3b review

Hello, I noticed that a recent FLC that you nominated failed because of the criterion 3b. I have started a review of the criterion here, and any comments or opinions that you have about it would be more than welcome. Thanks, Scorpion ⁰⁴²² 23:21, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Refimprove tag

The refimprove tag is needed in the Stargate SG-1 article as about 5% of that article is unsourced and in the Stargate Atlantis article as about 15% of that article is unsourced per WP:Verifiability and WP:No original research, as WP:Verifiability says "Any material lacking a reliable source may be removed, but editors might object if you remove material without giving them sufficient time to provide references, and it has always been good practice, and expected behavior of Wikipedia editors (in line with our editing policy), to make reasonable efforts to find sources oneself that support such material, and cite them. If you want to request a source for an unsourced statement, consider tagging a sentence by adding the {{fact}} template, a section with {{unreferencedsection}}, or the article with {{refimprove}} or {{unreferenced}}" and WP:No original research says "Material for which no reliable source can be found is considered original research". Powergate92Talk 00:00, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Arcs

I've tried to make arcs for the Stargate Atlantis article, are these one missing anything? (below)

Wraith arc

The pilot episode, set in 2004 after the events of Stargate SG-1 season seven episode, "Lost City". The pilot introduces the Wraith, a terrible foe that defeated the Ancients thousand of years ago. With not enough power to redial Earth, the Atlantis expedition is forced to search the Pegasus Galaxy for a power sources and new allies against the Wraith. In one of their first missions, they make another enemy in the Genii, a human militaristic civilization with a 1950s level of technology. Meanwhile, in season two First Lieutenant Aiden Ford escapes Atlantis after being injected by the Wraith enzyme. After a Wraith civil war lasting through late season 3 and season 4, the Wraith remains the major for in Stargate Atlantis throughout the shows run, topping in the final when they attack Earth.

Michael arc

The central plot of the second season is the development of Dr. Carson Beckett's retrovirus, which can, theoretically, turn a Wraith into a human, after a failed attempted on a Wraith known throughout the series as "Michael Kenmore". The experiment met with mixed results. Michael's wraith faction proposes an alliance with Atlantis, but they betray the team. After the defeat of the Asurans, the main antagonist of the series becomes Michael because of his efforts against both humans and the other Wraith. In the beginning of season five, Michael and his forces are seemingly crippled by an attack. Michael eventually tries to invad Atlantis with a commandeered Puddle Jumper to take Torren and to destroy the city, but the attacks fails and Kenmore is killed by John Sheppard.

Asuran arc

The first sign of another advances lifeforms other than the Wraith in the Pegasus Galaxy is first revealed in season one episode, "Hot Zone". In season three episode, "Progeny" the Atlantis expedition makes first contact with the Asurans. When the Asurans learned that the humans of Earth are their favoured "second evolution", they bulster the forces for an attack on Atlantis in "The Return" were they kill all remaining Ancients living in Atlantis. The third season finale starts off with Earth launching a first strike against the Asurans who are building an armada to attack Earth. The Asurans counterattack by attacking Atlantis by means of a powerful beam weapon fired through a satellite housing a Stargate. As the last resort, the Atlantis team fires up the city's stardrive and escapes into space. The finale ends when the hyperdrive malfunctions, leaving the city flying through uncharted space with a day's worth of energy left in their sole ZPM and Elizabeth Weir being critically injured. With the city damaged and running out of power the Atlantis expedition raids Asuras to obtain a ZPM and is able to travel to a nearby planet. Weir is captured by the Asurans and Samantha Carter becomes the new leader of the Atlantis expedition. Season four focus on the Atlantis expedition's ongoing war with the Asurans. Midway through the season, they are seemingly killed off.

--TIAYN (talk) 22:26, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Prison Break GA Sweeps: On Hold

I have reviewed Prison Break for GA Sweeps to determine if it still qualifies as a Good Article. In reviewing the article I have found several issues, which I have detailed here. Since you are a main contributor of the article (determined based on this tool), I figured you would be interested in contributing to further improve the article. Please comment there to help the article maintain its GA status. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 22:56, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Lifeline (Stargate Atlantis)

The article Lifeline (Stargate Atlantis) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . It hasn't failed because it's basically a good article, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Lifeline (Stargate Atlantis) for things needed to be addressed. Vicenarian ^{(T · C)} 17:47, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

UK viewership numbers

How do you find out what episode is which in these lists on this page? http://www.barb.co.uk/report/weeklyTopProgrammes/? You've been able to use it many times, so can you learn me? --TIAYN (talk) 21:10, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you know which channel and date an episode aired in the UK, it should be quite simple. I'll put up steps in bullet points to be a bit more understandable;

There are two parts; the link you gave shows the top ten of every channel in the UK, while http://www.barb.co.uk/report/weeklyTopProgrammesOverview?_s=4 shows the top 30 for terrestrial channels (BBC 1 and 2, ITV1, Channel 4 and FIVE).
There is a panel on the left of the page, showing the weeks and channels, where you should be able to scroll down to find the correct channel, or find out the date in which it aired, which are usually recorded weekly. If you highlight a certain week and channel, then press "view figures" it will only show the top 10 of this channel.
The most upgraded version seems to always be ratings from two to three weeks ago.
If you got the dates and channels right, and yet the episode you are looking for are is not there, then this usually means it wasn't viewed enough to be in the top 10, I also know certain times, there is no data.
I happen to know where to look because I happen to be from the UK, so I should know where and when to look.

If you don't understand certain parts, please tell and I'll probably help some more in more detail. Thanks. -- Matthew R Dunn (talk) 23:32, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a special website where can find british airdates because its hard to find episodes without their names without the airdate to actually know what episode they are talking about! So is it a place? --TIAYN (talk) 15:18, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not that I can think of, sorry. You could do some looking on Google (if you haven't already). Tell you want, if you really want some information regarding UK airdates, ask me nwhat you need, and I'll see what I can do. It could take me a while, as I'm going camping over the weekend, and will have no internet access at all in that time. I will help when I return. -- Matthew R Dunn (talk) 14:15, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for this late reply. I've found the british airdates for the different X-Files episode on this website, http://www.geos.tv/. So i cracked the code. So no, you don't need help me with this! --TIAYN (talk) 09:53, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Jack sulute.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jack sulute.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 08:43, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SGU

Why not, you'll probably do a better job than me :D --TIAYN (talk) 19:17, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, i'll see if i can find any references about Blue being a Stargate fan (or Gater). --TIAYN (talk) 21:40, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since your working on the Matthew Scott page, here: http://www.mediablvd.com/magazine/the_news/celebrity/brian_j._smith_is_one_to_watch_on_stargate_universe_200910081858.html. Its an interview, maybe it will be of some help to you? --TIAYN (talk) 06:05, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, i'll do that. Thanks for your help :D --TIAYN (talk) 13:30, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Episode list moving

Just an FYI, Template:Episode list#Sublists states "Sublists should be named as "List of X episodes (season y)"". (ie not "X (season y))". --AussieLegend (talk) 00:03, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, I've been editing here for two years now, and I guess I'm still learning the ropes. I'll think twice before moving season articles in the future. -- Matthew R Dunn (talk) 00:39, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Sleepers" in Sanctuary

Hello,

Actually, my source for the title "Sleepers" in the list of Sanctuary episodes was Syfy schedule. I just did not see I had to add a source for the title of an episode. I tell you that because I think Syfy website is a more reliable source for Sanctuary than MSN, and also because you seem to be used to editing the list of Sanctuary episodes. What do you think?

-- Aither (Talk to me) 01:35, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, there's no better source more reliable than its home network. Although, I'm pretty sure MSN is also reliable, but I'm no source expert (I just generally go with ones that aren't blogs or forums). I have no issue on which source to use. You could change it if you'd like. Since the source is already used on the airdates section for upcoming episodes, type <ref name=season2airdates/>. Thanks. -- Matthew R Dunn (talk) 01:45, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the reference. But I think it is not really important, since the reference will not be needed as soon as the episode airs. By the way, thanks for the fix for the bug with the reference. I was trying to replace "=" in the URL with "=", but then I found out you already had submitted your fix.

-- Aither (Talk to me) 02:15, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sources like that should be kept until after said episode airs; afterwards, people can just see the episode for themselves and see the title. PS, happy to help. -- Matthew R Dunn (talk) 03:01, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of Criminal Minds Episodes

Hi! I just wanted to say thank you for the insane amount of work you put into the article List of Criminal Minds episodes in the past day or two. Reformatting all of those tables and putting in the writers and directors was a lot of work, and it's really improved the list. Just wanted to let you know that somebody noticed the work you put in! Cheers! Jhfortier (talk) 06:09, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your welcome. I'm happy to help, it took me all weekend. -- Matthew R Dunn (talk) 10:34, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Again, amazing work with that list (and the new pages!). I'll be working to expand some of the episode summaries, as they're far too brief or (in some cases) even a bit wrong. There's an IP (I'm sure you've noticed) that is reverting the changes you've made. I put something up on the List of Criminal Minds episodes talk page about the reformat. Please chime in there if you feel necessary, but I think I've made a pretty decent case for the new format (which follows shows such as 24, Law &Order: SVU, Lost etc etc). Jhfortier (talk) 20:15, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I just reported the IP for edit warring (Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:74.12.5.73 reported by User:Matthew R Dunn). -- Matthew R Dunn (talk) 20:34, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Could you transclude the List of Law & Order: Criminal Intent episodes, please?

Could you transclude the List of Law & Order: Criminal Intent episodes, please? It seems neater to transclude episodes.--66.217.112.3 (talk) 20:20, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I'll be happy to help out. Hopefully, I'll finish in an hour or so. -- Matthew R Dunn (talk) 20:30, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, this may take some time; the translucing is ready, but for some reason, the synopses are present on the main episode list whenever I preview it, and I haven't a clue why. I'll keep trying, but this may take longer than expected. -- Matthew R Dunn (talk) 21:31, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I don't know why the IP user came to you to ask you to do this. Obviously he does know something about it, and so do you, but perhaps you were not aware of the negative aspects of transcluding.

I ask that you please do not transclude them. I am allowing the page to become stable before I renominate it at WP:FLC, and transclusion is generally not permitted for Featured lists for a variety of reasons:

Reviewers are not actually reviewing the nominated page, but many other pages that are not nominated but are being transcluded into the nominated page. Of all the FLs that do transclude, they only do that because the originals are also Featured lists or articles, and even this is being phased out.
Having an overall list of episodes and nine season episodes lists that show the exact same information because of transclusion does not make sense -- it is just pure redundancy.
It is a backdoor way of merging the seasons back into a single list and it turns the season lists into maintenance articles.
Information should not be repeated on two pages. A LoE for series with season pages does not need the same information because the LoE is summarising the information found in the season pages.
If errors are present in the season articles, they are transcluded onto a second page, which means that two pages are now incorrect
IP editors, who make up the majority of Wikipedia's readers, often do not know how to edit transcluded pages if they see an error. Transclusion favours seasoned editors, not readers. An unregistered, new-to-the-site editor will almost definitely have a better understanding of editing something like

{{Episode list
 |EpisodeNumber= 11
 |Title= [[The Third Horseman]]
 |RTitle=<ref>reference goes here</ref>
 |DirectedBy= Constantine Makris
 |WrittenBy= René Balcer
 |OriginalAirDate= {{Start date|2002|1|6}}
 |ProdCode= E2115
}}

than if he came across {{:Law & Order: Criminal Intent (season 1)}}. It is likely that they would not understand that "Law & Order: Criminal Intent (season 1)" refers to Law & Order: Criminal Intent (season 1), they almost certainly won't be aware of transcluding, and it may turn them away from not only editing this page, but any of our pages.

7. If a vandal removes or adds just a single character to the transclusion code, it messes up an entire table on both pages

8. If people are watchlisting the main LoE page, and not the season pages, they do not notice when an error or vandalism has been introduced

9. Wikipedia:WikiProject Television and MOS:TV are attempting to do away with transcluding lists and last time I checked their pages, strongly suggested avoiding it.

I worked on Law & Order: Criminal Intent (season 1) and got it listed at WP:GA with no help from any other editor. I standardized List of Law & Order: Criminal Intent episodes by using {{episode list}} to WP:TV's guidelines, with no help from any other editor (which was completely hacked away at earlier this year and has only just be restored, again, with no other assistance). As I said, I wish to nominate the list at WP:FLC, so I respectfully ask that you don't transclude. Regards, Matthewedwards : Chat 03:46, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stargate Atlantis

Dude, you removed the airdates from the Stargate Atlantis episode page. I get it, Canada had them first, not trying to start a who is better flame war or anything, but seriously, some of us like to watch the episodes as they were aired, paired with SG-1, and I come to wikipedia all the time to get my airdates because it is the easiest way to quickly find out which episode aired on what days. Being from the USA, I want to watch the episode that aired the same day as SG-1 aired in seasons 8, 9, and 10 of SG-1. I "get it" that you are trying to say they can only have one official airdate, but thats not true exactly, and you have to be open to the possibility that the air date in the USA is the first time that these things were aired for any of us over here. Syfy paired them together for a reason for viewing purposes, and just because Canada and the UK got them before the USA doesn't make their airdates not valid. 173.26.134.93 (talk) 20:54, 9 August 2010 (UTC)--63.230.156.175[reply]

Original means first, even if a US TV episode airs in Canada, or the UK, Germany etc. What you just said defeats the purpose of "Original Airdate". Also, in regard to a comment you made in one of your edits, Wikipedia is not a dictatorship, and I am not treating it as such. Wikipedia is governed by rules that I am following. If you still have a problem, I suggest you look up the TV.com episode list, where they use the US airdates, dude. -- Matthew R Dunn (talk) 19:28, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also, feel free to start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television about it, but they'd tell you what I told you regarding Original airdates. -- Matthew R Dunn (talk) 19:36, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User Page

Just wanted to say I love your user page, well done. I need to revamp mine and yours and others are good examples for me. :D

Wolfnix has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can Spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Thank you, glad you like it. It was infact a revamp from my rather tacky previous version. -- Matthew RD 00:08, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your page led me to knowing about the infobox user temp. I love who, stargate and bones, justa bout every show you do, my god >.> --Wolfnix • Talk • 01:17, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Adam Carter

The article Adam Carter you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Adam Carter for things which need to be addressed. -- Cirt (talk) 16:42, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]