User talk:Maslen

This user is a WikiSloth.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aurora Experiment has been accepted

Aurora Experiment, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 14:02, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Credential Guard has been accepted

Credential Guard, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Steven Crossin 16:01, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fuzzy Hashing (January 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheChunky was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fuzzy Hashing and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 12:07, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@TheChunky: Is the only issue that the citations themselves aren't "good" enough? I'm a little confused, given that most of them are scholarly articles and NIST. Would you be able to further clarify what is desired? Maslen (talk) 20:19, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Maslen! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 12:07, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Maslen, I understand that it can be disappointing to have a draft article declined, but it's important to remember that Wikipedia's notability guidelines exist to ensure that the information included on the site is reliable and verifiable. It's great that you've included scholarly citations in your draft, but it sounds like they may not be independent enough to meet the guidelines except one or two of them.

Don't let this setback discourage you! The fact that you've taken the time to research and write a draft article shows that you're passionate about the topic and have valuable knowledge to share. Keep working on improving the article, and don't be afraid to reach out to other editors for feedback or guidance at Wikipedia:Teahouse. Remember that the Wikipedia community is there to help and support each other. Keep it up! Regards. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 21:58, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @TheChunky : I've updated the references so that they are properly cited as books, journals, and conferences. 8/12 of the references are from those academic sources, which I'd think would be acceptable. Are more citations necessary or are those citations unacceptable for some other reason? Maslen (talk) 14:53, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Great work, Maslen, on improving the references in the Draft:Fuzzy Hashing. It is always helpful to have accurate and reliable sources to back up the information in the article. With the current drive of reviewers reviewing articles, I would like to pass this article on to another reviewer for further review. Keep up the good work and continue to add more relevant information with proper citations if possible. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 18:25, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll resubmit it then, so it goes back into the AFC queue. Thanks again for helping polish it. Maslen (talk) 19:13, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fuzzy hashing has been accepted

Fuzzy hashing, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 21:30, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Creating articles

Hi Maslen, you may already be aware but just in case, you do not need to submit your drafts to AfC for review (unless you have a COI or something like that). Given you are well passed autoconfirmed, you can move them directly to article space where they will be reviewed by WP:NPP. Usually if they think an article is not ready, they move them back to draft where it can be improved, then either moved back to article, where it will be reviewed again by NPP, or submitted to AfC. Of course, you are welcome to continue submitting to AfC. S0091 (talk) 15:04, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing the draft and for the guidance, both are much appreciated. Maslen (talk) 15:11, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Trust Domain Extensions (November 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Voorts was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

For a Wikipedia article to be published, it must be notable. Something is notable if it has significant coverage in several independent, reliable sources. A source is independent if it is not a person or organization associated with the article subject. Almost all of the sources cited are from Intel.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Trust Domain Extensions and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

voorts (talk/contributions) 20:11, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Trust Domain Extensions has been accepted

Trust Domain Extensions, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:12, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]