User talk:Masfilip
Welcome!
|
Speedy deletion nomination of Karosa b941
[edit]Hello Masfilip,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Karosa b941 for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ChicXulub (talk) 20:18, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
November 2014
[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Voith DIWA has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Voith DIWA was changed by Masfilip (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.956069 on 2014-11-12T16:51:29+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:51, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Karosa C 934, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Karosa C 734. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:10, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Karosa LC 735, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Karosa C 734. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:33, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 1
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited SOR NB18, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SOR. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:50, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Karosa B 932, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Karosa B 931. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:18, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 8
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Karosa 700 series
- added links pointing to Transmission, Automatic and Coach
- Škoda 706 RTO
- added a link pointing to Škoda
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 15
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Karosa 900 series, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Transmission and Coach. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
December 2014
[edit]
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Karosa B 731, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 22:32, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 22
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ikarus 280, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ikarus and ZF. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Karosa C 955, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Karosa C 954. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:28, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of SOR NB 12, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: SOR NB12. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:35, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
Moving articles
[edit]Dear Masflip,
if you want to rename an article, it is better to use the move function. It is easier and the history is kept (see WP:MOVE). Let me know if you need assistance. Inwind (talk) 14:37, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 29
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Škoda 706 RTO-K
- added a link pointing to Škoda
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
Linking and other issues
[edit]Hi, could you note this fix? Given the number of articles you're creating, it would be great if you could change a few things as you do so. Thanks for your contributions. Tony (talk) 10:26, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 8
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Karosa Š series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Coach. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Karosa LC 757, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Karosa LC 737. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 12:12, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
- Hi! It seems that when you created this article you re-used text from some other Wikipedia page. I don't know if the bot has guessed right which page that was. Copying within Wikipedia is fine as long as you provide attribution - which in this case you seem not to have done (see Copying within Wikipedia). The {{Copied}} template, placed on the talk pages of both articles, is a handy way of providing attribution. If you need help doing this, please say so here - I should see it. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:31, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 2
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Karosa Récréo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Plate. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
Copying within Wikipedia
[edit]
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into Karosa LC 757. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please either provide attribution in this case, or identify the source article so that someone else can do it. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 00:54, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of SOR BN 10,5, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: SOR BN 12. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:46, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Overlinking
[edit]Hi, thanks for your work. On en.WP, dates, years, and common terms are not usually linked. Please ask me if there's a problem. Tony (talk) 06:12, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Masfilip. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Dandy 50/125 moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Dandy 50/125, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Whispering(t) 14:56, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Masfilip. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Dandy 50/125.
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:18, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
Half finished bus articles with no references
[edit]Hi @Masfilip: You seem to be creating a whole bundle of bus articles, many of them only half finished and many of them don't have effective referencing. A lot of them are very low quality and are likely to be transferred back to draft space. I plan to do a review of then tonight. scope_creepTalk 11:22, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The article Karosa C 955 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Long-time unreferenced page. I couldn't find sources to show it is notable.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 16:52, 10 April 2024 (UTC)