User talk:Marki10024

Marki10024, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Marki10024! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. We hope to see you there!

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 04:34, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sara Eisen submission

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sara Eisen.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Sionk (talk) 21:39, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Marki10024, thankyou for your message. According to the description by her employer, Eisen is a New York business correspondent. This is different from being a 'co-host' on a breakfast show. If she is indeed a regular co-host on a mainstream show, she would certainly be notable, in my opinion. However, we'd need to see convincing proof. On the other hand, if Eisen is only a news correspondent you'd need to show she'd been widely talked about in reliable news sources that are independent of her, or her employer, before she meets Wikipedia's notability requirements. I hope that helps! NB any other questions or comments, please respond here, on your Talk page. Sionk (talk) 10:19, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

=

Hi, thanks for the follow-on note about co-host status. I added some links referring to her co-host status on Bloomberg Surveillance and a previous Radio show at Bloomberg she co-hosted, On the Economy.

http://www.bloomberg.com/tv/schedule/ Bloomberg TV Schedule http://wallstreetsectorselector.com/2012/04/a-chat-with-bloombergs-sara-eisen/ thanks, mark Marki10024 (talk) 15:03, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Great, it's certainly moving in the right direction! I'll give another editor an opportunity to make a second opinion. Sionk (talk) 10:31, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

==

Thanks Sionk. Talk to you soon.

Marki10024 (talk) 11:02, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sionk, did you ask another reviewer to look at my article for submission with my improvements? Thank you very much.

Marki10024 (talk) 09:49, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry. You have correctly added a review request template, so your article is placed in the queue at AfC. Hopefully it won't be too long a wait! Sionk (talk) 11:09, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the explanation. :) Marki10024 (talk) 11:10, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sara Eisen.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! avs5221^{(talk|contrib)} 05:02, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sara Eisen

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Marki10024 (talk) 23:06, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed other TV journalists like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melissa_Francis have Wikipedia articles. Ms Eisen is a co-host of a global financial news show on Bloomberg, as reported in my article.

Please reconsider. Thanks

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sara Eisen concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sara Eisen, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 19:56, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sara Eisen

Hello Marki10024. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Sara Eisen".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sara Eisen}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 03:53, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your request for undeletion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that a response has been made at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion regarding a submission you made. The thread is Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sara Eisen. JohnCD (talk) 21:53, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sara Eisen (March 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sara Eisen.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Drmies (talk) 18:28, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sara Eisen concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sara Eisen, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sara Eisen

Hello Marki10024. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Sara Eisen".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sara Eisen}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 16:02, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Soysoys

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Soysoys requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MrOllie (talk) 13:04, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of social bookmarking websites, you may be blocked from editing. - GB fan 02:26, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for the comment. This article is not for any social bookmarking web site, but only for web sites that have articles about themselves.

Marki10024 (talk) 12:30, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(Note: This response was written prior to the editor changing their comment, three original comment can be seen in the history.) I based my assessment that you are using your edits to promote the website on your own words. In an earlier attempt to add the website to the page you said "Re-added soysoys back to list. Someone removed it. We get registered users from this site, so please do not remove it." According to that you are hoping to get people to go to the site because it is listed here. Wikipedia is not the place to try to expand your business. Wikipedia is also not a directory of anything. We work with things, people, websites etc that meet Wikipedia's definition of notable. Wikipedia starts discussing things after others do. If no one else has discussed something neither does Wikipedia. I didn't write the note at the top, but I do agree with it. If you don't agree, the place to discuss a change is on the article's talk page. It is not my page, I work within the established consensus. - GB fan 12:35, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Ok. Thank you.

Marki10024 (talk) 12:37, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]