User talk:Mapsfly

Status: Online

Welcome!

Hello, Mapsfly, and welcome to Wikipedia!

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! NeilN ^{talk to me} 22:34, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding New Orleans Bounty Scandal

There is already a listing of scandals ending in -gate I believe. It is therefore nonsensical to add deflate gate to the list, as it is already covered. k_scheik (talk) 23:48, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Panspermia

Please do not attempt to lecture me on the 3RR rules. I have edited Wikipedia long enough to be aware of Wikipedia conventions. I merely pointed-out that your last edits did not contain a reliable source, which Wikipedia rightly insists on. I note that you are a relatively new editor and you would do well to abide by the conventions of the encyclopedia. Experienced editors are here to help, but will not stand by when sources are not given or unreliable. Case closed. David J Johnson (talk) 23:46, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Optoutprescreen.com

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Optoutprescreen.com, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! - Cwobeel (talk) 03:55, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Your recent editing history at KIC 8462852 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Guy Macon (talk) 16:21, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Mapsfly. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Mapsfly. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Mapsfly. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve 2019 Radio Disney Music Awards

Hello, Mapsfly,

Thanks for creating 2019 Radio Disney Music Awards! I edit here too, under the username Meatsgains and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Meatsgains}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains^(talk) 02:28, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

thank you--Mapsfly (talk) 23:14, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2019 MTV Movie & TV Awards for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2019 MTV Movie & TV Awards is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2019 MTV Movie & TV Awards until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 07:52, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Hello, I'm Eagles247. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Josh Norman, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Eagles 24/7 (C) 21:55, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Josh Norman, you may be blocked from editing. Eagles 24/7 (C) 21:59, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --Eagles 24/7 (C) 01:12, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Acroterion (talk) 03:31, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

unblock review

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mapsfly (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

User that blocked me states clearly I am not here to build a better encyclopedia, they stated 2 instances of me deleting, which I agree should not have, and if I'm unsure it violates opinions, will not delete in the future. They do not show hundreds of helpful edits that do clearly build this encyclopedia for many years. Even if there was a block, they chose indefinitely? Also that was not even the reason I was brought up on the Admin board. Almost as if they had to scour for something to block me on indefinitely

Decline reason:

Although the discussion is not yet complete, WP:ANI consensus is uniformly of the opinion that your edits are generally inappropriate. This isn't a case of just two instances, this is a long-term pattern of disruption. Yamla (talk) 11:24, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

We all agree including myself that there are very few edits that can be deemed inappropriate. But there are overwhelmingly more edits that are helpful. This is my entire premise. Any chance you think a shorter block or unblock would narrow my edits to all helpful? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mapsfly (talk • contribs)

That's not how the thread on WP:ANI is playing out. Instead, the opposite appears to be the case. Many or most of your edits (at least, all of the edits under discussion) are inappropriate. There's no consensus whatsoever that "very few edits that can be deemed inappropriate". Indeed, if that was the case, nobody would have been pushing for a block under WP:NOTHERE. --Yamla (talk) 12:23, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is beyond doubt and again my entire premise that most of my edits are helpful, so Yamla that is just simply not true and I vehemently refute what you are saying. It is actually impossible to not agree that most of my edits are helpful. please go through all of my edits. You are talking about just the edits brought up in the admin board.

You are acting like all of my edits for years are the ones being discussed on the board. Its a few, I have hundreds of edits.--Mapsfly (talk) 12:54, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are free to make that case in a new unblock request. I have already reviewed your block and found your unblock request unconvincing, but another admin will review your next unblock request. I do strongly suggest addressing the multiple concerns raised in the WP:ANI thread, though. --Yamla (talk) 13:02, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think indefinite was an awfully long block but you have to explain why you would post this edit to the talk page of an administrator and why you edit warred on Josh Norman. It is also incorrect to edit a guideline page to suit your own disposition. Policy and guideline changes must be first discussed on talk pages. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:21, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As I've told Liz, I regard this block as indefinite in the literal sense rather than the infinite sense, and I'm prepared to change the term if you can assure us that you are going to respect policy - your post at RSN appeared to be a declaration to disrupt to suit your own purposes. Acroterion (talk) 23:54, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Liz, there was no good reason, got out of line for a short period of time.

Acroterion, I am prepared to resume normal editing behavior only for the benefit of Wikipedia if unblocked.--Mapsfly (talk) 22:11, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think you'll need to address Yamla's note as well, rather than concentrating on a short period. Otherwise, I'm prepared to unblock if you can give assurance that this will not recur. Acroterion (talk) 00:06, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yamala, Over a longer period of time, not just recently, bad faith edits have been apparent, even though they are mixed in with many good faith edits. Any bad faith edits will be zero going forward.--Mapsfly (talk) 11:10, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Since I noticed you had edited, I'm inclined go go ahead and unblocked based on your responses above, without inpiut from Yamla. Doing so now. Acroterion (talk) 03:15, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Acroterion.--Mapsfly (talk) 03:20, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:46, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 14:48, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You can disagree without the "pound sand" nonsense. Don't make me regret unblocking you. Acroterion (talk) 14:50, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:28, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]