User talk:ManyVersions

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

Your submission at Articles for creation: DarkViperAU (December 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:ANYBIO - YouTube is not an acceptable or reliable source. Neither is Twitter or Twitch.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:DarkViperAU and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 04:36, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ManyVersions! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 04:36, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: DarkViperAU (January 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JML1148 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:DarkViperAU and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

JML1148 (Talk | Contribs) 10:53, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: DarkViperAU (January 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

YouTube, Twitter, and Google docs are not reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:DarkViperAU and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 13:02, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Draft:DarkViperAU, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 13:04, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The resources of the post is correct and reliable. Any YouTube, Twitter or Twitch citation should and could easily be removed allowing the draft to be accepted as it meets the requirements. This makes the declines incorrect. ManyVersions (talk) 13:11, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 02:52, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: DarkViperAU (January 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:DarkViperAU and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 13:51, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stop declining the draft. It meets the requirements to be accepted. ManyVersions (talk) 13:56, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:DarkViperAU has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:DarkViperAU. Thanks! bonadea contributions talk 14:55, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry ManyVersions, I didn't notice that my edit summary when I removed your comment from the draft had been cut off – I mentioned the fact that I was moving the comment to the talk page, but I must have saved the edit too soon. Apologies. Fact is, the AfC script has sometimes gone haywire in drafts with comments added manually, so that each new edit created duplicate AfC decline templates, and for that reason it is better to keep the discussion on the draft talk page. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 15:00, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion contested: Tyrone (rapper)

Hello ManyVersions. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Tyrone (rapper), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Please do not re-add a speedy tag. Use AFD instead. Thank you. BangJan1999 15:40, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

When you are a single purpose account and you add unsourced personal details to a draft it would be a natural assumption that you were connected to them in some way, my apologies if this is incorrect.

WP:BLP requires that ALL biographical content is reliably sourced. Theroadislong (talk) 19:07, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That is fine and understandable. I have no connection to the subject. Thanks. ManyVersions (talk) 19:11, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.JML1148 (Talk | Contribs) 23:42, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Targeted Harassment From Users Who Abuse Their Power.

Recently I have had three user continuously target and harass this account due to the there being factually wrong. I’ve continued to state valid reasons on why these individuals were wrong in declining a draft, however they continue to ignore my comments whilst claiming to be correct. I have two who continue to harass me and ignore every comment to which I replied to them. One is even attempting to get this account deleted because I hurt their ego. Wikipedia needs to clamp down on Users that are abusing their power. A power which can be easily attained be any user. These individuals are not doing their ‘job’ properly.

-ManyVersions ManyVersions (talk) 00:20, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do not be shocked if you see these individuals reply to this topic. They are following my every move it seems. ManyVersions (talk) 00:21, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

These users did no harass or target me. This should be ignored. ManyVersions (talk) 00:37, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Request to delete page and topic ManyVersions (talk) 00:37, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Goodbye

Due to false accusations and abuse from Wikipedia users, I have made the decision to vanish from this account. Wikipedia will not take any actions in this matter as they focus on the little things instead of things that need to be said or heard. To the user who harassed me and showed poor behaviour, good luck in the future. Please change your attitudes for the better.

For the last time on Wikipedia. ManyVersions (talk) 00:26, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I did not get harassed please delete page ManyVersions (talk) 00:38, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User talk pages are not deleted, but you can remove content from them. If you want to delete your user page, replace any text there with {{db-author}}. Schazjmd (talk) 00:51, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

==

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

==

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

ManyVersions (talk) 00:28, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: DarkViperAU (January 4)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Curbon7 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Rejecting until the source concerns are met. Once they are, the rejection can be removed and the draft resubmitted.

Curbon7 (talk) 02:24, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 18:24, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: DarkViperAU (January 11)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Curbon7 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Curbon7 (talk) 22:31, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]