User talk:Malevious

This belongs here...

Hey, this is a geniune and wide spread belief about Austin St. John, it shouldn't be removed. A simple internet search using http://www.google.com will reveal countless hits of pages that believe it to be true. It belongs on his page, for both posterity, and to prove to others that he is not one in the same with this gay actor.

http://gayredpowerranger DOT ytmnd DOT com is one an example of the image that is WIDELY spread around the internet, claiming they are the same man.

Sprouse Feet

Ok, you probably don't remember me, but you erased my edits on how attractive the Sprouse twins' feet are. Well, now I got proof! http://www.geocities.com/zacefronfeet/ So, I'm going to go edit the Sprouse page soon and I trust you won't be reverting it. Thank you Malevious. Signed, Sprouse Foot Worshipper

A geocities FANPAGE does not qualify as a reliable source. Visit WP:RS WP:V and WP:EL to find what kind of sites WP allows. Geocities is not one of them. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 02:20, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

HELP ME PLEASE

I am new to Wiki. I researched and even interviewed the person I wrote an article about. I titled the article Troy Hobza. He is a Profesional Wrestling Ring Announcer for MWA Professional Wrestling on TV. It wasn;t any more than 20 minutes later and some warning appeared on my artcile stating that it was going to be deleted. This is why I left Wiki before. Because I cant communicate with anyone on here. Everything I wrote about Troy hobza was completely factual and there is no reason to delete the article. I put alot of time and effort into the article. Please tell me how to fix this so my article doesnt get deleted. Please?

Journal247 (talk)MelissaJournal247 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 22:54, 10 March 2010 (UTC).

Help

I need help putting up a picture from a website.CrocGator

Can you please get it off the internet for me?CrocGator

It's located if you go to goodsearch.com and search for images and search for Alimuddin and you'll see a picture of two people walking out onto a field with cricket bats.CrocGator

Can you help find a another picture of Alimuddin, a famous Pakistani cricketer, that is fair use please? CrocGator

Can you search for one please? CrocGator

Can you please try to load the image of him off cricinfo.com?CrocGator

Can you look in the wikimedia commons? CrocGator

Hello again I found a picture of Alimuddin at Getty Images website can you get for me?CrocGator 20:19, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

DCOMS

ok thanks for advice, but why cant we put 2008 movies even if they're confirmed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ndrwatthedisco (talk • contribs)

We don't want to put things too early. Things starting in 2008 can change before then. Titles, air dates and more can change. When its gets within a few months of airing OR commercials start airing it's able to be added. Theres also a chance of the movie going nowhere and not actually airing at all. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 02:45, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Recent edits to Prue Halliwell

Why did you revert my edit? --Charleenmerced ^Talk 23:45, 1 April 2007 (UTC)Charleenmerced

• Well, I am watching that episode right now and it appears on Prue's obituary. So, I am adding it in again (I guess, I wont add a source). I am also adding in 2 other things, she died on a Thursday and she graduated with honors.--Charleenmerced ^Talk 23:51, 1 April 2007 (UTC)Charleenmerced
  • I agree, I thought it said Gold State High School. But, I just saw it again, and the blurry word looks like university. I'll make the necessary edits, you can check them in a minute or 2--Charleenmerced ^Talk 00:13, 2 April 2007
    • I just finished making the edits. I also fixed all the citations so they all go together. --Charleenmerced ^Talk 00:20, 2 April 2007 (UTC)Charleenmerced

Minor edits

Malevious, a bit of advice: I notice that many of your contributions are marked as "minor edits" but are reverts or undos. Per Help:Minor edit, however, a minor edit is a "...typo corrections, formatting and presentational changes, rearranging of text without modifying content, et cetera. A minor edit is a version that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute." Though you may disagree with a user's contributions and regard them as vandalism, nonsense or information-cruft, reverting anyone's additions is likely subject to review and may be subject to a dispute. Indeed, "...any change that affects the meaning of an article is not minor, even if the edit is a single word." May I suggest that you only mark edits as minor when they fail within the criteria set out at Help:Minor edit? Regards, Iamunknown 06:41, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

List of bootleg albums featuring Radiohead

Thanks for restoring this article :) -- [[User:ricmitch|ricmitch]] 23:32, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Too Ealry?

• I don't understand, how is that a legitimate reason for something? I mean if it has been announced and confirmed by the actors, then what matters? Its encylopedic information and I don't think that "too early" is a reason for anything. The article has sources. So...WHY? Jtervin 01:53, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Because things change over time. In a years time a lot can change. Something in 2008 can't be added. There is a high chance of, title change or even being scraped. And you can't just add things because an actor confirmed it. Unless its either coming up really soon, or you've seen advertisements on TV, then its too early to add things. WP:CRYSTAL says you can't add things that are not 100% positive. If you tell me exactly which thing I took out I can tell you my exact reasoning why I took it out. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 01:56, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

The Cheetah Girls 3 from the Disney Channel Original Movies. It's been confirmed, they're working on researching India and Bollywood RIGHT NOW and they start rehearsals in like November, and begin shooting in January. Then they will film through March and the film will be another SO HOT SUMMER thing. Jtervin 16:20, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Adding something for the summer over 2008 is way too far in advanced. There are so many things that could change before then. Its over a year away. There's no guarantee that it will be made or that it will be called The Cheetah Girls 3. When it gets closer to the movie being aired, or commercials start playing for it like HSM2, then I'm all for readding it. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 19:00, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Of thats how you feel thats fine. But I will continue to work on the movie's page. I just won't add it to the list. Jtervin 04:32, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Where There's Smoke (That's So Raven)

Making these article redirects has been discussed and decided upon at the Administrators' Noticeboard; please don't revert — and giving no edit-summary and calling your revert a minor edit make your action even more disruptive. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 23:12, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

All I saw was someone removing info from a valid page and redirecting it to the list. I would like to know where you discussed redirecting episode pages to the list, because it certainly isnt at WP:EPISODE. Please do not immediately call things "disruptive" maybe you need to take a look at WP:AGF. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 00:36, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Your revert of the edit without explanation or discussion assumed good faith on my part? Glass houses, stones, people. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 08:54, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

I reverted what appeared to be vandalism. Any user would've done it too. When you see a legit article being blanked and redirected to another it registers as vandalism. Please from now on not jump down editors throats when they make a mistake. It happens to everyone. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 02:47, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Tone

First, the linked WikiProject said nothing about tone; secondly, WikiProjects don't override the Manual of Style (it's the other way round); thirdly, what is it about the language that you think I'm referring to? As you haven't bothered to ask, I assume that you're certain you know. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 10:00, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

There is nothing on the manual of style page about list of episodes. It is written the same as any other list of epsiodes, even ones who has featured list status. If it's the same as pages at FL status how is it not written in the correct "tone"? --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 16:40, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

You seem to be making my point for me — that lists of episodes are no different from any other article, and thus should be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopædia. Use of slang terms like "guy" isn't appropriate. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 21:33, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Where do you see slag terms? And last I checked guy isn't a slang term. And even if you consider it a slang term it's used once, which you easily could've fixed. Tell me what you consider slang terms and I'll remove them for you. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 22:16, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Why don't you wait until someone whose first language is English, and who can tell the difference between formal and slang English, can overhaul it? I'll do it myself when I get a chance, if no-one beats me to it. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 23:08, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

My first language is English and I'm an English major so I think I'd know the difference between formal and slang and I haven't noticed any slang. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 23:23, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

That you think that "guy" isn't slang trumps your other claims.

Tell me, can you find any other reference work, any academic work even, that uses "guys" to refer to men?

The list (in common, it's true, with many other lists relating to children's and adolescents' interests) is generally written poorly; the use of slang is only part of it. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 09:25, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

I went through the article and rewrote anything that had poor grammar or words that appeared to be "slang". Does it look better now? --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 16:10, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, you probably think that I'm being stubborn for the hell of it, but if anything things are a bit worse, with sections like: "Zack overhears Maddie saying she likes a boy but there is an age difference and think she means him. It turns out Maddie is interested in a boy who is 3years older than her.." I'll try to do a copyedit in a minute. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 18:09, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

sory

im sory if i cosed truble the dark king will never die 19:07, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Mel Etitis

Hi there. I was reverting Mel Etitis' edits this morning, but stopped I think you two need to talk things through, you two aren't really sorting things out as best they could be. I think you were right about consensus. Whiskey in the Jar 15:13, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

I'm finishing reverting his edits and I've asked him not to redo them until we settle this. What he's doing isn't based on consensus it's based on a select few editors who don't like having episode pages. If he can get consensus on this I'd be more than happy to help him redo the edits. Thanx for your support :) --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 15:15, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

I think thats the right approach to take, I'll pop over to his page and suggest the idea again. Ultimately, the only way to solve these approaches is through consensus. Safety in numbers and all!Whiskey in the Jar 15:21, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Alright :) glad to have another editor on my side. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 15:23, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

What is encyclopædic about the fact that an episode of a children's television series was an hour long? Why does that deserve more than a mention in the list of episodes? --Mel Etitis (Talk) 17:25, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

You haven't answered my question. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 17:40, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

You've said why it's unusual for a Disney programme; trhat doesn't mean it's notable or encyclopædic. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 17:50, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

I totally feel insulted by your allusions to me being a single account whatever (saw that in your edit summary and in your totally misleaaaading note). I think calling me a sockpuppet would totally equal the situation of calling you a troll. It's totally easy to lash out at ppl so you'd better cease that. Your conduct has totally angered me. This totally needed to be said. Goodbye--Biotudor 18:54, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

You need to read up on WP:CIVIL. You vote on a matter and I use a legit notice alerting users that you have few edits outside the debate. Looking at your contributions make it easy to insist you are a sock puppet attempting vote stacking. Please refrain from insulting another user for adding a legit notice. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 18:57, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Totally marvelous. Do not attempt to slander me. I have not insulted you whatsoever as you perfidiously suggest. I just pointed out accusing me of sockpuppetry it's as easy to make as accusing you of disruptive misconduct. It is you who are continuously assuming I am a sockthingy and thus questioning my very existence as an independent human being. Now THIS is totally insulting.--Biotudor 19:05, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

I'm not going to sit here and listen to you insult me. I have alert admins to deal with this. You really need to read up on WP:CIVIL and learn to be civil to other editors. I'm not going to debate with you about you being a sock. If you wish to talk to me further about this, remain civil and polite otherwise I will not respond again. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 19:16, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

The truth is your just trying to make me appear as a sock and a vandal, and if you feel insulted by me feeling insulted, well, what can I say... just keep ignoring the fact that other editors are humans too, just like you.--Biotudor 19:27, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Your RfA

I think it would help you to look at WP:BITE and WP:AGF, because these are important guidelines for users, especialy administrators to follow. And comments like "The edit was made by an admin who has more authority on the matter than you do. End of story." would be considered biting, I think. If this RfA doesn't pass, I would encourage you to work on those guidelines and eventually re-apply, and will wish you good luck on that.--U.S.A. cubed 19:57, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

I left a comment on my RfA regarding that. I was not trying to be rude on purpose. He cited a policy which stated the opposite of what he tried to say. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 20:01, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

I believe you. I know you're trying to improve, and I switched to neutral on the RfA.--U.S.A. cubed 20:07, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Thank you :) --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 20:09, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

BS

Thanks for the star. =] Imageboy1 21:36, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Nick Garvey

If you look at the article Scotia-Glenville High School, you can see how the lines stay even if I leave it blank. I'm not sure how to avoid this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nick Garvey (talk • contribs)

Jack Szwergold Notability Citations

I have added references to the three books I have writen for when employed at The Onion. I will be adding more non-Onion material soon when I can get dates/ISBN numbers organized. If there is a better way to cite this information, please let me know. Thank you. SpyMagician 19:57, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

I looked at it again. What makes these books notable? Anyone can write a book but that doesn't mean they deserve and article. So far the only sourced claim for notability is the webby. And if this article is about you, you should not be working on it at all. That is a serious COI issue. You've already been into 1 edit war over it you should refrain from editing it and let others do the work. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 20:02, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Wow. Quite an odd response. The books are notable because I was an author of them and they are directly connected to The Onion website which is a major comedy source online and one of the first comedy sites to make the transition from web to book-world back in the day. While I understand COI, might I point out that the editor I got into a conflict war about it (Chris Griswold) has a massive COI when it comes to Friday Nite Improvs. If you're going to chastize me over COI in my article, can you please explain to me why Friday Nite Improvs is not a COI based on Chris Griswold's sole involvement with the group[1]? —SpyMagician 20:08, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

I am not an admin and I don't investigate COI. If you have a problem with another editor violating COI bring it up at WP:COIN. A book being written by you (who's notability is in question) doesn't make them notable. Being about a notable subject doesn't make them notable. Find multiple news articles that write about you (or the books) and use them to source the article. Then notability will be established. As well I looked 2 of the books you listed and neither of them list you as a writer or illustrator. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 20:14, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Adrena Lynn

She appears in TVF-VillainParty, in Global Gemini and his suposed as a major villain, and his not a single episode villain

Please, errase the deletion police avise

Thanks, Ben-spam

Disney Movies

• How is Laughing Place not a credible source? A lot of stuff there is proven truth. So High School Musical 2 is not happening this summer, neither is Johnny Tsunami 2? Their is even an IMDB page for "Twitches Too". I put up VERY credible sources, you cant just take them down just because YOU dont think their credible enough. And Disney Channel had a PRESS RELEASE for this. Just type the press release name on Google and you'll see I'm telling the truth.LAUGH90 01:15, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your help on List of Disney Channel Original Movies. Lord Hawk 02:37, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Just a note

With respect to your recent AFD nominations on Kim Possible characters, you may be interested in reading WP:MERGE and WP:FICT. The short answer is that you're entirely correct and you can fix such problems by editing yourself, without the need for a deletion debate. Happy editing! >Radiant< 13:21, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

The Importance of Being Phoebe

Please see the article's discussion page. Thank you. Artemisboy 23:51, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Stop vandalizing Danny Phantom

Stop adding a final air date of June 2007 without a source, and read the comment that it CONSTANTLY says next to it:

“ If you wish to modify the final airdate, please do so only with the accompanying addition of a reliable source specifically supporting your claim. If you are unaware of what constitute reliable sources, please see WP:RS for details. ”

Do you not see that quote?

Now STOP vandalizing the PAGE. 74.225.211.177 02:28, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

LessHeard vanU's RfA

Hello. I'm writing to invite you to reconsider your opposition on the RfA of LessHeard vanU. It's not that I have a particular stake in it and it's not like it's likely to matter much given the support he's receiving but opposing on the basis that the candidate does not have a full map of the work he intends to do as an admin is quite simply and really has little to do with the RfA process which should be about a particular user's experience, trustworthiness and behaviour on Wikipedia. If I recall, your answer to that very same question 1 in your RfA was pretty vague and that wasn't held against you (as far as I remember). Pascal.Tesson 02:46, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

The way I interpreted his answer to Q1 was that he just wants the tools just to have them. The main things he said he would do are things he doesn't need the tools to do. I personally can't support a person who gives me the impression of just wanting the tools to have them. If you can convince me he is an outstanding candidate, I'll gladly switch to neutral, or even support, but currently I'm staying as oppose.

After find some difs posted by another editor, I cannot support this editor. Those who disregard the safety of a minority group simply because they are a minority group don't deserver the mop and bucket. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 04:41, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Hmmm, I came here to thank you for your participation in my successful RfA and to ask if there was any particular area you think a new sysop would be useful (being your initial concern). The thanks and enquiry stand.

Another editor also commented, at the time, regarding my position in respect of the liklihood of physical danger from authorities should they have their identities revealed. This is the explanation I gave (you already may have seen it)

You are right, it cannot be "known", but the likelihood is very slight. A citizen of a non English speaking nation, editing the en-Wikipedia on a subject which is a sensitive matter for their culture, being exposed on a non-Wiki (English language) site and then being discovered by an authority from the non-English speaking nation... there are far too many variables to justify an extension of policy on that basis. My other assumption is that the English speaking cultures are not prone to execute citizens for holding opinions outside of the excepted norms. LessHeard vanU 13:05, 9 May 2007 (UTC)</bockquote>

I am not talking about minority cultures or groups but about individuals. It would be impossible, IMO, to provide an encyclopedia with any great range of material if we were constrained by the potential harm to an individual editor by their State whose identity might be disclosed by an off-wiki site. Even if such an editor is outed (and as these sites are generally 'scandal mongers' more interested in personality issues than subject matter this would be extremely unlikely) then linking the site or not is unlikely to be a factor in whether this comes to the attention of the authorities.

Also, as I am not US-centric, I included the UK, Australia & New Zealand, Eire, Canada, and South Africa as cultures who do not seek out and execute/imprison individuals who hold views contrary to official ones. I suppose there may be a case for Zimbabwe, and some other countries where English is the second (or business) language. However, I would still maintain that the amount of variables required to come about to make this a matter over which policy making should be concerned is too considerable. You may have a different opinion.

To end, thank you again for your contribution to my RfA. If you need a wet behind the ears sysop, you can call on me. LessHeard vanU 21:43, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

I understand completely that while most English speaking countries no long threaten citizens with differing opinions, (though I do not know the laws/languages of every country), but not all English speaking people live in an English speaking country. There is always the chance that a user is specifically editing on En-wiki so that their chances of being identified by their government is slim. I was not involved in the debate, but from what I read, my understanding was this debate was over posting links to attack sites and other sites used to identify or harm editors, and editors felt we needed a stricter policy to deal with such events. (If I am wrong in this understanding please let me know). I personally feel editors safety should be one of the highest priorities here, for if editors feel they are not safe contributing they may not and we could lose valuable editors.

I do congratulate you on a successful RfA. Contacting opposing editors about their concerns shows that you really do care about improving your editing and the encyclopedia in general. Regarding areas a sysop could be of use, they always need some people helping with the backlog especially at CAT:CSD. My original concern with your answer to Q1 was that it appeared you only wanted the tools just to have them. You do otherwise seem like an excellent editor who even when other editors have a difference of opinon, remains civil. Happy Editing :) --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 23:10, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Your understanding is correct, the debate is over linking to sites which contain attack pages/attack sites. I was opining that an argument for blanket banning involving state sponsored retribution was an appeal to emotion rather than statistical probability. Editor security is important to me too, but I feel there needs to be a balance between what is possible and retains WP's ability to source the best references and what is desirable but constrains WP.

I will look over CAT:CSD. I am not so hot on technical stuff, but perhaps this is an opportunity to learn. Speaking of learning, I believe you can get far more relevant information from those who disagree (and say why) than sometimes from those who simply say "I concur". Which is to say, thanks. Catch you around. LessHeard vanU 00:04, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Malevious, thank you for your kind words in support of my RfA, which successfully closed yesterday; and for your support of my sig. In the end, it seemed easiest and least disruptive to just change it back. Please feel free to drop me a line any time if I can help you in any way. Pastordavid 14:56, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:CharmedSeaHag.jpg

Hello, Malevious. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:CharmedSeaHag.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Malevious/Charmed Info. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 20:23, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Please revisit Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/3WC

I tried to removed the copyvio and promotional tone from the 3WC article. The original version of the article was a bit confusing, but the station is an FCC-licensed broadcaster, not an Internet-only one, and therefore would be automatically considered notable. --Eastmain 04:12, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Smokefree.png

Hello Malevious, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Smokefree.png) was found at the following location: User:Malevious/smoke-free. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 18:59, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:The Suite Life of Zack and Cody s02e20.png

Hello Malevious, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:The Suite Life of Zack and Cody s02e20.png) was found at the following location: User:Malevious/Carey Martin. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 01:03, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

AWB

Replied on my talk page. Viridae^Talk 01:56, 29 May 2007 (UTC) I see you are in the process. Thanks. Viridae^Talk 03:37, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Not So Suite 16 and other TSL episodes should be left alone!

What the hell is up with you & Ned Scott deleting episodes of The Suite Life of Zack & Cody? Maybe you haven't read that Ned's excuse for deleting it was unjustified. ---- DanTD 16:33, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Maybe you haven't read WP:CIVIL. Barely any of these episodes pass WP:EPISODE. I don't have time right now to go through them all and work on them. Leave them as a redirect and work on it before you remake the page. I'm not going through another AfD over this. I fought for them once and won, now editors are at it again and no one has even attempted to fix these episodes. I'm not fighting for them again until someone gets off their ass and actually attempts to clean them up. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 17:40, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

I've read WP:EPISODE, don't see how this is a "problem article." From what I remember Ned removed it on May 10, with the following tag: "expand when there is something more than plot summary." There was something more than the plot summary. ---- DanTD 20:47, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Yes, trivia. When you can add more info to it, you can put it back. Just having a plot summary, cast/crew, and trivia isn't enough for an article. Though I don't agree with their guidelines I'm enforcing them. If you can add some info to it that can be sourced, do it and I won't argue with it. Hell, I'd be happy if it was a statement about what cast/crew member thought about the episode as long as it's sourced. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 21:17, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Okay, fair enough. But I'd like to point out that I did add links, extended the lead paragraph, and the current image(which I uploaded)was a replacement for the previously deleted image. I also added a description of that image in the last revival. ---- DanTD 23:33, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

My Rfa

Thank you for contributing at my recent request for adminship. A few issues were brought up there. I would like to tell you that I am not anti-gay. The creation of the userbox was for other users. If I was, I would have used the userbox within my own userspace. Nor do I seek power; just more ways to help the goals of Wikipedia. Thanks for not being a jerk about it either, as some editors where violating be civil and assume good faith. Its very discouraging, but the editing must go on. Again, thanks for your comments. --Wikihermit ^{(Talk • HermesBot)} 04:13, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

I agree. I have gay friends as well. I didn't think creating a userbox for other users would anger anyone... --Wikihermit ^{(Talk • HermesBot)} 04:26, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

help

Can you stop user ZanessaYay from moving pages please, I saw you did this: moved List Of Disney Channel Original Series to List of Disney Channel series over redirect: this isn't just a list of DCOS)

Which I was grateful for, but ZanessaYay keeps mobing it back

The same issue with this article: List of Series Broadcast By Disney 53180 20:19, 16 June 2007 (UTC)53180

Someone still keeps moving the the page List of programs broadcast by Disney Channel to List of Series Broadcast By Disney, is there a way to fix it and make sure it wont be moved again? It won't let me move it myself anymore. 53180 20:19, 16 June 2007 (UTC)53180.

The hell?

I'm not sure why you had to use popups to revert me[2], I can assure you that the top template isn't needed at all. Lord Sesshomaru

Yes it is. The template is to link to pages with a similar name. The edit appeared to be vandalism so i used pop-ups to revert it so that I didn't have to do it manually. Please don't remove it again. And take a quick peek at WP:CIVIL, addressing a problem by saying "The hell?" isn't the way to go about things. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 01:31, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Calm down — I know about civility — I wasn't even addressing that header title to you. I was just completely dazed, in fact, that you reverted it as if it were vandalism and used such a powerful program. Why didn't you read my edit summary? Lord Sesshomaru

You are a Gimp

I really dont get what your problem is. You stop vandelism, but its only a bit of fun! stop being a computer nerd and go out into the real world. Special:Contributions/Dunks2612

OK I don't even know who you are. And for your information, I do go out into the "real world". I have a job, I goto school, I do martial arts, I babysit so, sorry if i don't find petty vandalism "fun". --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 21:19, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Listen to yourself. That comeback probably took you ages to complete. Your country produces more fuel than the rest of the world and your dumbass president isnt doing anything worthwile. Your country sucks.

The Suite Life of Zack & Cody

When I removed the "Almost all of the primary cast of High School Musical have appeared ..." text, there were 3 exceptions, and 3 of 6 is not most. You changed that to 2 exceptions, which I agree with you classifies as most. I wonder if the phrase "Almost all" is correct though? Enjoy your Wikipedia break. Truthanado 15:50, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

The original sentence listed Olesya Rulin as being one of the primary members to not appear. According to the HSM article she isn't a primary cast member so I took her out. I believe there were 2 other cast members of HSM to appear on the show too, but I forget their names. If you think Almost all is better, feel free to change it. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 16:54, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

'Please help stop redirecting episodes for Zack and cody and having separate episode pages .'

Corner Pocket

Hiya! I remember you giving some good advice on the deletion issue with Corner Pocket. Because a lot of other people seemed to want a page for the comic, I did as you suggested and made a page for the comic itself and added a disambiguation link. But I'm really new at this... so maybe if you have any other suggestions, I'd really appreciate em. :)

Thanks again! Angerpeas 14:54, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Re: Copy edit

Hey, I did a quick copyedit on the page, fixed some spelling, minor grammer and external links. Without knowing anything about the show, however, I'm somewhat limited in what I can do. Cheers! -- Huntster ^{T • @ • C} 19:22, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

List of Disney Channel Original Movies

What you say me ? Look IMDB it write !Mikani 17:11, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

IMDB is not a Reliable Source. Please find official disney channel sources. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 19:14, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for bringing the lack of fair use rationale on the Power Chamber images. I've tagged them as such, and they will be deleted in a week unless a rationale is provided. SchuminWeb (Talk) 23:15, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

WHAT THE HECK

American Dragon is ending, and that show is confirmed, why did you delete them? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yankeesrj12 (talk • contribs)

American Dragon is still airing. Therefor it is 2005-Present. I haven't seen anything on the Disney channel website, nor commercials, nor anything else affiliated with them confirming this show. Fansites do not count. Also, Please review WP:CIVIL, it's frowned upon to have editors leave messages titled "WHAT THE HECK". --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 02:24, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Once Again

Every website says it is ending, 57 episodes. in my books thats cancelled!

AfD nomination of List of terms in Charmed

An article that you have been involved in editing, List of terms in Charmed, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of terms in Charmed. Thank you. Corpx 07:07, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Re: Book of Three...I have no idea. Given they are both primary documents, it really wouldn't make a difference. -- Huntster ^{T • @ • C} 17:11, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

To be perfectly blunt: yes. Next up for deletion will be supporting articles (characters, main artifacts, etc). Main articles will remain because there can be absolutely no justification for removing television series main articles. It has been tried. As I'm dealing with over on a Stargate article, it might be a good idea to archive all the Charmed articles and re-establish them over on a Wikia site (have I discussed this before?). -- Huntster ^{T • @ • C} 17:16, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Wolff family

Hi, Malevious. It has come to my attention that you're carrying on the attention to Nat Wolff, Alex Wolff, Michael Wolff, Polly Draper and the Naked Brothers Band pages. I grew weary to the task on those pages some time ago, and sincerely thank you for keeping up on them! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 19:07, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		In recognition of your ongoing work in the tedious defense of the Wolff family articles against nonsense and vandalism. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 19:07, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

PLEASE STOP

Malevious, I have real info about the Dylan is heavier than Cole thing. DO NOT DELETE IT. IT IS NOT VANDALISM. People don't recieve barnstars for deleting real info, do they? I thought so. 69.115.9.165 02:09, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Please see WP:V and WP:RS. What you added is unsourced information, and it appears as vandalism. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 16:43, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

That makes no sense. On this very talk page, you have a complaint for adding information without sources. So who are you to tell me what to do and what not to do? --69.115.9.165 18:11, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Uh huh. Where do you see that? I always try and keep unsourced info to a minimum. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 18:48, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Postscript to this

Malevious,

The anon you reported to AIV, whom I later blocked, for his consistent reversion of your removal of his unsourced additions to Dylan and Cole Sprouse, wrote to me after it expired. I wrote back explaining myself, and as I did it occurred to me that I ought to remind you to not bite newcomers, not in the sense that you were discourteous or uncivil to him but that you might have checked and seen that, even though an anon, had >50 edits and that you didn't necessarily need to assume the worst. Like so many newcomers, he didn't understand policy, and if you had realized that and done something a bit gentler with his edits like tag them with {{fact}} instead of deleting them outright and more patiently explained why you might have been a bit concerned with why he should wait till he had a source for that, it might not have escalated to the point where an AIV report was necessary.

You were right to bring it there, as an edit war was developing. But we should have been able to leave ourselves more of a choice. Just a reminder to think about how you can resolves things like this better next time. Daniel Case 03:49, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

I treated it initially as vandalism, as many IP users attack that page with derogatory info about them (as with all child actors). He was repeatedly asked to provide a valid source for the information, which he simply said "its exists." and readds it without supplying the source. In my last warning I specifically asked him to provide a source for the information before he readds it, yet he ignored me and added it unsourced anyway. If it was some obscure fact, I would've been alright with simply adding a {{fact}} tag, but info that is unsourced AND rude/vandalism-type doesn't belong in articles, in my opinion. If he had simply provided a valid source for his statement, I wouldn't have had a problem with it at all, but with the waves of anon vandals who attack the page, it's becomes hard to assume good faith to every new editor who says they're gay or they're ugly, ect. I could've sworn I used my template for unsourced info on him though, unless it was another IP that added the same statement that I'm thinking of. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 04:41, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for helping revert Allie DiMeco for me. It gets tough sometimes. :P Signed by Tommy (Talk/Contribs) 04:56, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Arwin! and others

You recently deleted multiple shows on the List of Disney Channel series, and you added the comment that Arwin! was cancelled. First off, please provide a source that states this. If no source can be provided, then this a rumor and Arwin! should remain on the list. Second off, you removed the entire sectino for 2008, including 3 shows. Please be careful when you make edits. For more discussion on the topic of Arwin! being cancelled, please see Talk:Arwin! (TV series) --Pilotboi / talk / contribs 23:50, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

They were removed for a reason. Each of those series lack a reliable source for there air date. When you can provide a source for when they are going to air, then I will have no problem with readding these series. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 23:55, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

FYI, I didn't add the info in the beginning, I simply reverted it. I don't think that was the appropriate template to use on my talk page. Anyway, I can see that the List of Disney Channel series is used for current shows, and confirmed shows. You should have stated this when you edited it, so it would have been more clear. As for Arwin! being cancelled - that's where I believe your just running your mouth. There have been sources that have stated this show may possibly air, but if it's really cancalled, PLEASE GIVE A SOURCE! Thank you. :) --Pilotboi / talk / contribs 00:01, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

I removed the part of Arwin! being canceled. That comment was added by an anon user and I simply reverted to that version. This time though, I removed that statement. From what I've heard though, the series was canceled or postponed as it was originally supposed to air in 07, but the Suite Life was renewed for a 3rd season. I added the warning to your talk page out of habit, with the amount of users who add unconfirmed shows on that page daily, it was merely bad faith on my part, and for which I apologize. The page is not just for confirmed shows, as it appears that those shows are indeed confirmed, but for shows that have confirmed air dates. If they are set to air sometime in 2008, much could happen that can lead to them never airing and as such it violates WP:CRYSTAL. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 00:07, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

That's all understandable, and no hard feelings. I think there should be a note on the list page that states that it only lists shows with confirmed air dates, to prevent this from happening in the future. Do you agree? --Pilotboi / talk / contribs 02:39, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

I do agree. You can add it if you like or I'll do it when I get a free second, but things have been hectic around here lately so I don't have much time for editing. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 03:29, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

List of Disney Channel series

I saw that you recently made a reversion on this article. Part of what you reverted, though, was correct. That's So Raven ended in Febuary 2007 and no new episodes are scheduled. So the list can be changed to reflect this. Please let me know if you feel that is incorrect, otherwise I'll assume you'll fix it. --Pilotboi / talk / contribs 04:49, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

I have kept it as current because the series finale (Where there's smoke) has yet to air. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 15:29, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Okay, I wasn't sure, since I saw that the last new episode was in Febuary, at least according to the Wikipedia article on it. No probelm. --Pilotboi / talk / contribs 22:02, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Simtropolis deletion

Just to let you know, I have added the not a ballot template to the AFD. This is because many single purpose accounts may comment if this discussion reaches the Simtropolis forums - something which appeared to happen in previous AFD's of this article. Camaron1 | Chris 20:08, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Alright, thank you very much :) --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 20:42, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

As expected: [3] Camaron1 | Chris 10:59, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanx for bringing that to my attention. A user went to WP:ANI for me to find out what we should do with the AfD, I suggested Semi-protection to keep out IPs and single purpose accounts from there, but i was turned down. A few users are over there asking them not to canvass and such. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 22:15, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Suite Life DVDs

I think you could have at least talked about perging the two Suite Life DVD articles before actually doing so. --Pilotboi / talk / contribs 19:36, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

The information was already on the LOE before an editor decided to make articles on them. The individual DVD articles aren't needed at all. It's like going onto the charmed articles and making an article for each individual season boxset. It's just overkill. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 01:18, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

EARTH TO MALEVIOUS!

PHINEAS AND FERB IS CONFRIMED LEAVE IT ON THE DCOS PAGE! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yankeesrj12 (talk • contribs)

First of all. Learn to sign your posts. Second, watch your tone, and learn to be civil. Phineas and Ferb only has a confirmed sneak preview. It still has no confirmed air date. For all we know the show could've bombed with todays preview and never see the light of day again. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 03:00, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

"For all we know the show could've bombed with todays preview and never see the light of day again" who cares if it never airs again! it still was shown, and that still makes it an original series...and sorry im not on here 24/7 to learn how to operate things, who cares if i dont sign...when i do the episode thing i copy and paste the other "episode" info from another one and put it in there so i dont screw it up if you havent noticed as well everything people complained about here ended up being right! TO PHINEAS AND FERB! HAHAHA! NOW YOU LEAVE IT THERE!— Preceding unsigned comment added by Yankeesrj12 (talk • contribs)

Please sign your posts. If you continue to argue with me and leave unsigned comments on my talk page, I will lose patience with you and begin ignoring your comments. For the show to be considered a Disney Channel Original Series, especially on the list, the show needs to air more than a single, sneak peak, episode. Both of the sources you provided contradict each other. One says Winter 2008 the other says March 2008. I would prefer we wait until a source comes out listing an exact month especially when a lot can change in over a year, but I'm not going to start an edit war with you over it. Also please leave Phineas and Ferb and Wizards of Waverly Place off the DCOS template. The template is for current and past shows, not future. Once those shows begin airing I have no problem with them being readded. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 04:04, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Phineas and Ferb

But March is Winter, spring begins Late March early April - yankeesrj12 Userpage

DRASTIC?

I Just changed it back to the way it was, someone else changed it completely, i put it back to normal - yankeesrj12 userpage

My mistake. I saw drastic changes and about 20edits from you. I did not notice the original edits were from another editor. I apologize. :) --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 02:09, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

YEP

i figured someone would think that...someone deleted all of the original movies (86-96 or w/e it was) and i fixed it all back up, and i accept the appology —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Yankeesrj12 (talk • contribs) 03:18, August 20, 2007 (UTC).

Removal of criticism at TSL

You removed my addition to the article, saying it wasn't menitoned on the page. It appears in "Act Four: My Other Dog's a German Shepherd." Unfortunately, the page doesn't say which TV show he is referring to, but if you listen to the recording offered on the page, he says it (it is a radio show, after all). If you don't want to pay the 95 cents to find out, look at the numerous references to it that I didn't cite because they aren't quite reliable sources: [4], [5], [6]. Unfortunately reliable sources are not always free. This should be included in the article because it offers an adult perspective on the show, by somebody whose job is relevant here (as a love/sex columnist). I don't think that WP:V requires that sources be in print (meaning, I think broadcasts can be cited), nor that they be free, although of course such a source would be preferred. By the way, I appreciate that the page gets a lot of vandalism and you're just trying to prevent more, but I do think this is verifiable and notable. Rigadoun (talk) 17:26, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Last i checked, yes they can be broadcasts, but I don't think we can use sources that require a user to pay to view. I'm not 100% positive though. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 01:24, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

3RR warning

Please do not undo other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in Bleach (manga), or you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. The three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the 3RR. Thank you. -- _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk}  20:43, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

FYI, I am quite familiar with 3RR rule. Please use talk instead of disruptive revert warring in mainspace. Thank you, -- _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk}  20:43, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Wikihermit's RfA

Regarding this, the user had asked me to do it :-) Happy editing! --Boricuæddie 20:56, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Sorry I just realized that. It looked like you disagreed with his vote and crossed it out. I just saw his message asking you to do it for him, my bad. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 20:58, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Oh, I would never do that. I have participated in hundreds (exaggeration) of RfAs; I know how it works :-) Don't worry about it, we all make mistakes. Happy editing! --Boricuæddie 21:00, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

9/2007 (TSL)

When you did a revert to an earlier version of the TSL article, unfortunately it re-introduced some vandalism in the process. I fixed it. WAVY 10 20:19, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

I fixed it myself before you did and all your edit did was change Chivers to Shivers. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 20:46, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Okay. WAVY 10 21:25, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

1981 Wheel of Fortune Puzzle Board

I thought I did provide a fair use rationale. What's wrong with the one I wrote?

--JoBrLa 18:15, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Please see Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline for how to create a detailed and complete fair-use rational. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 20:51, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Something Wicca This Way Comes

An article that you have been involved in editing, Something Wicca This Way Comes, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Something Wicca This Way Comes. Thank you. Pixelface (talk) 19:51, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of I've Got You Under My Skin (Charmed episode)

An article that you have been involved in editing, I've Got You Under My Skin (Charmed episode), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I've Got You Under My Skin (Charmed episode). Thank you. Pixelface (talk) 19:51, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Thank You for Not Morphing

An article that you have been involved in editing, Thank You for Not Morphing, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thank You for Not Morphing. Thank you. Pixelface (talk) 19:51, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Asian Paints AFD

I appreciate your enthusiasm in clearing copyvios off Wikipedia, [7], but it would help if you do look at the page history before suggesting it be deleted. As per our policy on copy violations, we do not delete the entire article off the face of wikipedia, we only delete the copy violations. Due to the ever changing nature of Wikipedia, copy violations may be added at some point of time by an anon. It would be counter productive to delete an article just because one version was a copyvio. In the future, please do check an article history before declaring it to be a speedy. Thanks! =Nichalp «Talk»= 08:44, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

We don't deleted articles with poor references, we tag it. A simple Google search would definitely throw up interesting results to answer notability claims. =Nichalp «Talk»= 06:02, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Naruto participants

The category should be deleted since you've already nominated the templates, correct? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 06:15, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

It can be speedy deleted once the templates are deleted. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 20:50, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

This is True

if u watch Disney channel or read magazines the you will be able to confirm the movie. It has been confirmed many times, so it needs to be on the page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Setnick (talk • contribs) 03:36, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Happy birthday fellow Wikipedian!

Happy Birthday, Malevious, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day!

Cheers from Canada!  ;-) --RobNS 01:59, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

	Happy Birthday	from the Birthday Committee
	Wishing Malevious a very happy birthday on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Don't forget to save us all a piece of cake!

Idontknow610^TM 19:24, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:FullmetalFantasy.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:FullmetalFantasy.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:10, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Image deletion discussion on Commons

Hi, Malevious. An image of yours that was uploaded to Commons is under consideration for deletion. Please feel free to view the discussion and comment on the proposal. The image is commons:File:Tree of Life close up.jpg, and the deletion discussion is at commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Tree of Life (Disney). Thank you. Powers ^T 00:31, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of International Black Belt Federation

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is International Black Belt Federation. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Black Belt Federation. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:03, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Happy Birthday 2013!

Hey, Malevious. Just stopping by to wish you a Happy Birthday from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! LovelyEdit talkedits 19:13, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Malevious/Carey Martin

User:Malevious/Carey Martin, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Malevious/Carey Martin and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Malevious/Carey Martin during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:52, 31 March 2016 (UTC)