User talk:TimK MSI

The Original Barnstar

For adding massive amounts of content, sometimes under the radar, I hereby award you The Original Barnstar. youngamerican (talk) 12:55, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

		The Minor Barnstar
		I award you the Minor Barnstar making minor edits of the utmost quality to the rivers of the United States. Congratulations! Royalbroil 13:50, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

		The Photographer's Barnstar
		For traveling to some of West Virginia's most scenic locations and to some of the state's biggest crap-holes to enhance Wikipedia's visual coverage of WV, I hereby award you The Photographer's Barnstar. youngamerican (wtf?) 13:01, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

		The Photographer's Barnstar
		To Malepheasant, for photographs of main streets in Minnesota. Together they could be a book—maybe they are. For now part of a feature on the state Wikipedia portal. Thank you. Susanlesch (talk) 04:55, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Archive 1, to 22 Feb 2007

An article which you started, or significantly expanded, Weston State Hospital, was selected for DYK!

On February 26, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Weston State Hospital, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Thanks for your contributions! Nishkid 64 00:25, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Weston State Hospital

My understanding is that bolding is useful if:

The title is in reasonably common use (how likely is it that this "alternative title" will be used for a link, or in the search box?)
The alternate title is in the first sentence, or at least, the first paragraph.
The title is an alternate name for the article topic (e.g. Brady Leaf goes to Ryan Leaf but is not bolded).

Since this is neither the first (it's been called "Weston State Hospital" for nearly a century), nor the second case (the titles are much lower in the article), I don't think it's pertinent to bold randomly in the article. Circeus 13:28, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Geobox River

Fixed, there was a bug in the subtemplate that handles unit conversions, must have been there for some time. Thanks. – Caroig 08:19, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New NRHP Collaboration Division

Hey, saw you were a participant in the National Register of Historic Places WikiProject. I thought I would let you know that there is a new Collaboration Division up for the project. The goal of the division is to select an article or articles for improvement to Good article standard or higher. There is a simple nomination process, which you can check out on the division subpage, to make sure each candidate for collaboration has enough interested editors. This is a good way to get a lot of articles to a quality status quickly. Please consider participating. More details can be seen at the division subpage. IvoShandor 11:11, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

tributaries

Thanks for setting me "right" on the left/right thing (I guess I stuck with the way we list crossings, going upstream rather than down. Daniel Case 13:58, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Discharge figures

I see what you mean ... sort of assumed without looking too closely that those were the avg daily figure.

Is this something more like what you want (average daily discharges per year)? We could add (2005) to the footnote in question. Daniel Case 04:00, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Or you could find a way to derive an all-time average from this data. Daniel Case 04:01, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That math, I believe, would be OK under the new policy:

Editors may make straightforward mathematical calculations or logical deductions based on fully attributed data that neither change the significance of the data nor require additional assumptions beyond what is in the source. It should be possible for any reader without specialist knowledge to understand the deductions.

I've been incorporating this new data into the geoboxes I've been adding, starting with Wallkill River (which I can look at out my window as I'm typing, and definitely hear ... I live near this. It makes what's already a very time-consuming and painstaking process even more so, but it's worth it.

I love these geoboxes. Since I added one to Catskill Mountains and then Hudson River, I've been on one of my obsessive little tears putting them into every article for which a map was available in the Northeast. That's how I wound up getting so involved in those West Virginia rivers ... you've done a good job there! Daniel Case 16:55, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Geobox River Clean-up

I'm planning to do some major cleanup to this Geobox. Based on this one I developped a few more similar Geoboxes to cover other geographic features and the "framework" has developped too. I'd like to bring the Geobox River template up-to-date with all other templates in this series. Don't worry, you would probably not notice – no fields are going to be removed, there will be no changes in the output, it's just cleaning-up the code.

Anyway, you seem to be definitely the most active user of this template, the most experienced one so I'd like to ask for some obeservations. Are then any issues, bugs, do you have any ideas for improvement? These would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. (I've checked your edits, there's some inconsistency in some of the note fields concerning the field names, I see you corrected some, thanks for that, I'll try to track all remaning down.) – Caroig 19:57, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The cleanup's finished. I've checked the cleaned template on some pages and it seems everything's alright, I'll update the documentation and blank templates accordingly. I've renamed (shortened) a few fields but their old names are accepted too. If there are any issues, I'd appreciate if you report them. There are also some extra functions and a field for a second map. I've made some rather cosmetic changes concerning home some values and fields are displayed. I don't think the label Discharge elsewhere sounds very good, any idea? I'm also not very sure whether it wouldn't be better English to have Source confluence instead of current Sources confluence. – Caroig 19:55, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Second attempt. There's certain inconsistency in the template implementation which, until now, hasn't been very clear to me. Well, now I know. The problem was that some older pages have blank fields for metric fields when the values are in the imperial fields. Unfortunatelly, I was checking the imperial units (and actually the whole new code) on Monongahela River which is of a later date and doesn't have those blank metric fields. On initial lauch of the Geobox River I provided only one template which contained both types of fields, the newer blank templates have either metric or imperial values so one can't have problems with this. If you can, please start new pages with one of those blank templates from the bottom of the Geobox River page, they should always contain up-to-date fields. And another thing, when specifying the image or map width, you don't have to (actually shouldn't) put in px, just the number. Under certain circumstances it causes problems with alignment in some browsers. I apologize for the temporary broken output. Should be Ok now. – Caroig 21:01, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed, the problem was that all newer Geobox use long_EW fields instead of long_WE which is in the Geobox River. The template now accepts both, I'll probably swap this using AWB fro better consistency. I've also corrected this in the blank templates. Again, thanks a lot for your feedback. – Caroig 07:47, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Big Wheeling Creek

Thanks for joining me on Wheeling Creek and creating the article. I simply started the watershed list and graph because I was curious. I've asked the Wikiproject editors about historical crests and floods, but do you think that should be on the article page or on a separate entry? Mphamilton 06:51, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe I need clarification...

Maybe you could clarify this for me. I really would like to include flood information on Wheeling Creek most notably the 1963, 1972, 1990, and 2004 floods on Big Wheeling Creek. Can these go on the Wheeling Creek article page rather than in separate articles for each event, or can a subsection be created on Wheeling Creek for historical flood events? Mphamilton 11:44, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguating Ohio townships

Thanks for seeking to disambiguate the names of a couple townships in Ohio, but the Ohio townships Wikiproject guidelines want all township articles to include the name of the county. Nyttend 23:27, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: USACE pictures

See my reply on my talk page. ●DanMS • Talk 03:03, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Williamson Again

Here is another USACE picture of Williamson, WV. Maybe better than the other one? This one seems to have the floodwall finished. [1] ●DanMS • Talk 03:29, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops! My mistake. That picture is West Williamson. ●DanMS • Talk 03:30, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Matewan

Matewan, WV Here is another WV picture for you, not too far from Williamson. This one did not have a date specified. If you can estimate a date, feel free to put it on the picture description. ●DanMS • Talk 04:37, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wheeling Creek

On 23 March, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Wheeling Creek (West Virginia), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--howcheng {chat} 06:20, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

USACE Picture Dates Again

Here is another reason to seriously question the dates given in the descriptions of the pictures on the USACE website. The date on this picture is given as August 1, 1992. Looks a lot more like October than August. ●DanMS • Talk 03:17, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New Philadelphia, Ohio, photo

Do you really think the photo of parked cars is a better first impression of New Philadelphia, Ohio, than the photo of Tuscora Park? Why? r3 19:57, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination

Hi, I've nominated an article you worked on, Yellow River, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Wikipedia:Did you know. You can see the "hook" for the article at Template talk:Did you know#Articles created on April 24 where you can improve it if you see fit. MeegsC 20:36, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

On 28 April, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Yellow River (Indiana), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--Carabinieri 21:42, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links

Dear Malepheasant,

Why are our links being removed? These maps are community based and official maps of the city commissioned in some cases by the chamber of commerce, parks amd recreation department, or other local community group?

If a the local newspaper or radio station in a community has a link on this Web site for their respective community, then there should be a place for our community based maps.

The cartoon maps are not spamming nor are they commercially selling any item.

I would appreciate a dialog over this issue.

Best regards,

Mark --—Preceding unsigned comment added by Cartoonmaps (talk • contribs) April 28, 2007

External Links / City Articles

Don't you think valid links on how to form a business in the city of Rochester is a valid external link. I don't see how it's not. Kiamori 00:34, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Was it necessary to come to my talk page to respond and then leave a rude/arrogant comment? Apparently so.

I have to disagree with your response.

Regarding your question about the external links you're wanting to add to articles about cities in Minnesota -- the links aren't appropriate because Wikipedia is not a directory and it's not an indiscriminate collection of information. Per Wikipedia's external links guidelines, "it is not Wikipedia's purpose to include a comprehensive list of external links related to each topic." "Links should be kept to a minimum." Avoid linking to "sites that are only indirectly related to the article's subject: the link should be directly related to the subject of the article." Using more general logic, what if I'm in Minnesota and I want to obtain a driver's license? Should I look to the Wikipedia article about Rochester? No, because that's not Wikipedia's purpose. The same applies to learning how to start a business.

If someone were to want to start a business in Rochester, they would follow those same links to legally register the business. Kiamori 00:41, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with your removal of those links, having seen the discussion at WT:EL and your additional comments here. I hope the editor will not persist. EdJohnston 03:33, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cranberry River (West Virginia) anon edit

The anon is correct, though :) youngamerican (ahoy hoy) 22:45, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, it doesn't belong in the article unless sourced. You were right in removing it. I was just being a smart-alec. youngamerican (ahoy hoy) 03:41, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chicago Landmark Stubification

I noticed that you have edited Wabash Avenue YMCA this week, which is one of the new WP:CHICOTW stubs. This week, we WP:WPChi are focussing on stubifying the numerous redlinks in Chicago Landmark with a goal of getting over half the redlinks stubified (we began with about 25%). This will improve our chance of getting it approved as a featured list candidate. When reviewing this week's new stub contributing editors your name was absent. You may want to choose a redlink or two from Chicago Landmark and create a stub before this week's project ends on 5/16 so that you can be a part of our drive for featured list status. TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 15:34, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Minor barnstar

I have awarded you the Minor Barnstar because I keep finding your name by fine edits on article's histories. This time it was on the Mullet River article. Keep up the great work! Royalbroil 13:56, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CHICOTW

	Chicago Collaboration of the Week
Last week you helped edit the Chicago COTW, but did not vote. Thank you for your help! Your input in future selections would also be appreciated. This week Magnificent Mile has been chosen. Please help improve it towards the quality level of a Wikipedia featured article. See the To Do List to suggest a change or to see an open tasks list. See past CHICOTWs. Note our good articles.
	Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago

TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 00:52, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chicago Landmark Stubification

I am writing you because you either (1) edited Chicago Landmark 5 weeks ago when it was the WP:CHICOTW (2) edited it or created a stub last week when we had the stubification drive for it or (3) you nominated an article to be the CHICOTW in the last few days.

I have finally had a chance to take a tally on last week’s stubification effort. Based on my manual count we now have 109 bluelinks on a total of 241 landmarks. Preliminary indications were that for our article to be successful at WP:FLC we would need to eventually rename it (something like List of Chicago Landmarks) and get the majority of the landmarks linked. Based on my cursory count we need to write 12 more articles to get to a majority. It would be great if you might be able to assist by creating a couple stubs to assist in this effort. Here are some of the stubs that were created during last week’s efforts: Black Metropolis-Bronzeville District, Historic Michigan Boulevard District, Arthur H. Compton House & One North LaSalle. Among the articles still redlinked are 2 buildings on this week’s CHICOTW, Magnificent Mile (Perkins, Fellows & Hamilton Office and Studio, Woman's Athletic Club). Recall that each redlink on Chicago Landmark has a footnote to a reference that gives you enough info to create a stub. If you create a new stub please add it to Wikipedia:WikiProject_Chicago#Newly_Created_Chicago_Related_Pages so that we can keep track of the progress. TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 15:46, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fargo pics

You added some really great pics to the Fargo, North Dakota article. They really add to the article...thanks for including them here. If you have any more of Fargo or other ND cities, don't hesitate to add them. Many of our articles are lacking pics. --MatthewUND^(talk) 21:42, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know?

On 20 June, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Pomme de Terre River (Minnesota), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--GeeJo ^(t)⁄_(c) • 00:09, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chicago Landmark WP:FLC

You helped us at WP:CHICOTW create and improve List of Chicago Landmarks. This week we have nominated it at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Chicago Landmarks. Feel free to make comments about its candidacy or to come by and help respond to the comments of others. TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 00:29, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Straight River

Hi Malepheasant. I nominated Straight River to appear on the Main Page under the Did you know... section. The nomination hook appears here. There is a five day from creation window for DYK nominations, so I wanted to make sure it was in the cue. Please feel free to revise the nomination hook as you see fit. Great job on the article. -- Jreferee ^(Talk) 01:50, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently, it already appeared on the front page a few hours ago. See Wikipedia:Recent_additions. -- Jreferee ^(Talk) 04:07, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not too many river articles make DYK. It probably moved up the queue to balance other articles that appeared with it. -- Jreferee ^(Talk) 04:17, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't receive a pretty message box, so I'll give one to myself:

On June 26, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Straight River (central Minnesota), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Malepheasant 05:05, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

More help needed

If you have been following along at WP:FLC#List_of_Chicago_Landmarks you know we need help creating stubs for the List to make it a more useful list and help it achieve WP:FLC status. Since I reminded people of this 7 stubs have been created. We need about 40 more to be safe although we may have a successful candidacy with the article as it stands.

Some of you may also be following the success of WP:CHICOTW at Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago/COTW/Good Articles. For the last 4 weeks no one has been very active. Thus, I am fearful that Historic Michigan Boulevard District, Harold Washington Cultural Center, Crown Fountain, & Art Institute of Chicago Building will all fail at WP:GAC when their turns come up. Also, Magnificent Mile did not experience the collaborative spirit. Our reputation as a successful collaboration is at stake. In addition to making stubs for the FLC we need your contribution to our collaborations. I am sorry to pull you away from whatever other wikipleasures you may be experiencing, but we need your help. TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 17:00, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for the intrusion and thank you for your single edit. TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 22:42, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Link

Why would you remove my link from the Mason/Point/Mason County sites? That link is for people who do not know about that site who are from Point Pleasant, Mason, or Mason County to look at and keep up to date on people in their home town and even look at the past. It's nothing bad so why delete it? I mean honestly. It's a great thing that I do and people here LOVE my site and want people to find out about it. I didn't know that showing people a link to the sports of their hometowns was a bad thing

Pretty bad thing to do to take people away from a chance of seeing their past.--—Preceding unsigned comment added by Gobigblacks (talk • contribs) 22:38, 11 July, 2007

First off, I was not ADVERTISING the site. I was putting it on there because it has something to do with POINT PLEASANT kind of like the MOTHMAN or anything of that sort. People appreciate that site and i'm sure people across the nation that went to our school would love to know that it exists. That site is a 100% volunteer site and I do not need to advertise so try again on that one.

People have Mothman links on the Point Pleasant page. Mothman is a figure in Point Pleasant just like high school sports are a figure in Point Pleasant. The Mothman has nothing to do with Point Pleasant, it just happened to happen here.

It was not adverstising. People deserve to know that sites like that exist. ----—Preceding unsigned comment added by Gobigblacks (talk • contribs) 13:15, 12 July, 2007

Very belated reply

Some months ago I prodded you to disambig Laurel Fork to Laurel Fork (Cheat River). I've meant to reply for a long time to say that you are probably right that there is no real need to disambig. Sorry to have made trouble. Contrarywise, I'm not sure if I posted here about it, but your comments wrt the Monongahela maps I made are something I reread now and then; reading them makes me feel all warm and fuzzy. Just wanted to let you know if I hadn't before. Thanks very much! Also, I think I'd read something about the "hand" shape of the tributaries including Laurel Fork. I wish there was similar lore about the rivers of Washington state. It seems that in the east, and perhaps especially in Appalachia, there is an old and deep connection to the land, at least among some people. In Washington, there is a strong love of the outdoors, of hiking and wilderness, but even so, there seems to be a lack of depth compared to the Appalachians. ...someday I'll get around to exploring West Virginia! Pfly 06:35, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Historical Population Figures

I happen to have been looking over your user talk page to see where you got those historical population figures that you contributed to some of the West Virginia city articles like Charleston and Huntington that I saw, so I went to Caponer user talk page and happen to find the web site to all that information. I added historical population figure charts to Ohio city articles like Mansfield, Canton, Springfield, and Chillicothe. If it wasen't for you then I would had never known where to look for all that information that I needed. Thank you so much for your support. Happy editing!---OHWiki 01:52, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Webster Springs anon edit

For what it is worth, he or she is kinda correct. :)

BTW, thanks for adding all the cool photos in recent months. Cheers. youngamerican (wtf?) 23:40, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Geobox 2

Hello, this message is sent to you because you've shown some interest in the Geobox templates in past. There is now a new version (aka Geobox 2) which supersedes all older Geoboxes (aka Geobox 1). The major difference is there are no feature specific templates (Settlement, River, Mountain range etc.) but just one master template which can handle all type of data. There are a couple of new features and many new fields making the template much more versatile so now it can be used for virtually any geography related feature without the need to create a specific template.

The switch to Geoboxes 2.0 is highly recommended as the new template has a much more effective code, which renders faster than the old one (with much smaller pre-expand size, it can be one third to one fourth of the pre-expand size of Geoboxes 1). To convert aa page from Geobox 1 to Geobox 2, there are two ways:

By changing the template header:
```
{{Geobox Settlement
```
becomes
```
{{Geobox|Settlement
```
Although some field names have been changed in order to be unified, the old names are accepted too. For any settlement Geobox use {{Geobox|Settlement and set the settlement type (city, borough, town, village) in category field. Calling e.g. {{Geobox|City will work as well but it's not the recommended way (from technical reasons).
By a semi-automated tool which reorders the field names in the Geobox 2 style and also renames the few changed field names.

There are several unresolved issues at the Geobox talk page, please add your comments and of course any other ideas you might come with as well as bug reports. – Caroig (talk) 09:36, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from 206.212.34.79

i don't like to vandalize I just love Jesus!!!! and you should to!!—Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.212.34.79 (talk • contribs)

Minnesota Meetup

Sunday, 2007-10-07, 1:00 p.m. (13:00)
Pracna on Main
117 Main SE, Minneapolis, Minnesota
Map

Please pass this on! RSVP here.

Spam delivered by Jonathunder 16:51, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

River Pix

I see you've uploaded a lot of river photos. I live in Pittsburgh, and if photos of rivers in these parts are needed, I could take some. We've got the big three, plus some smaller ones. I don't see the smaller ones too often, but they could be targets of opportunity. Lou Sander 15:15, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please click here broken?

I used your Please Click Here link to add the above River Pix comment. The comment was added, but in a most strange format. Lou Sander 15:20, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I fixed it -- there was an unclosed div class in the message above yours. --Malepheasant 15:51, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You went to Mullens to get a picture?

Wow, that is dedication to the project. :) youngamerican (wtf?) 12:58, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, BTW, check out your userpage. Congratulations. youngamerican (wtf?) 13:02, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lorain

Molina DOES NOT qualify using Wiki's standards. You are bastardizing this page with your holier-than-thou attitude. It is people like you who make this a useless reference site. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.241.98.171 (talk) 21:19, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I Saw My Edits Got Removed!

Hi!

I'm new to Wikipedia and I saw that my edits regarding the Wabash River were removed. I guess I didn't site them correctly -- good catch! I'm working from a massive amount of personal journals that were recently willed to me. Fascinating stuff! I do I site this so that this incredible information can be part of Wikipedia?

Thanks so much, and sorry if I scared you! I didn't mean to!

From,

Your friend, Clay (talk) 01:34, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, regarding the State Capitol Building in St. Charles

You were probably right to take that one down. I was working off some stories my uncle had told me. He was an architect. Pretty neat guy actually. I thought he knew a lot more than he did, apparently. Thanks for taking that one down. I think I probably got it wrong.

Thanks again! Can't wait to hear what you think I should do about the journals and the Wabash River.

From Your friend, Clay (talk) 01:43, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Adminship?

Have you ever though of doing a WP:RfA? It could be helpful with managing photo uploads and whatnot. y'amer'can (wtf?) 13:40, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Compliment

Hi, in case you didn't see it you received a compliment and a request at Portal:Minnesota/Suggest. -Susanlesch (talk) 04:41, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Photo request

I noticed that you loaded the Sarajevo Flicker photo Image:Miljacka River.jpg into Wikimedia Commons. I would like the Sarajevo Flicker photo at Inat Kuca brought into Wikipedia to use in spite house and Stari Grad, Sarajevo, but I don't know how to do it. Would you be so kind as to insert Inat Kuca into spite house and Stari Grad, Sarajevo. Thanks. GregManninLB (talk) 15:40, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Ohio Newsletter

This is a Newsletter for WikiProject Ohio.
Click [show] to reveal the letter.

The Ohio WikiProject Newsletter
Issue I - Month 2008

From the editor
This is the first issue of WikiProject Ohio's newsletter. The newsletter is intended to help all members of the project to keep up with new developments and coordinate new collaborative efforts. If you would like to suggest something to be included in the next newsletter please see:The Newsdesk
Project News
New features have been added to the project banner. All articles now need to be assessed for importance as well as class. There are approximately 60,000* articles under Category:Ohio that still need the banner added to their talk pages as well.
Editors and Contributors Needed
*We are in need of editors for this newsletter. If you are interested please visit:The Newsletter Project Page. Also, the The Ohio Portal is seeking Wikipedians to nominate selected articles, sports teams, biographies, and images. The portal is also seeking maintainers.

Areas needing attention
Assessment requests: There may be Requests for assessment needing to be answered. To see new assessment requests as they come in, you can watch the assessment page. Article assessment: Unassessed Ohio article need you help visit Category:Unassessed Ohio articles & Category:Unknown-importance Ohio articles
Featured and Good Articles
Recently a number of Ohio related articles have achieved featured status. We at WikiProject Ohio would like the editors of those pages for their hard work. Featured Jack Warner, William Tecumseh Sherman, and Superman Good Articles Halle Berry and Jack Nicklaus
Contributors
Stepshep 23:44, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This newsletter is delivered by bot to all project members of WikiProject Ohio. If you do not want to receive this newsletter in the future, please note this at the unsubscribe page. Thank you, §tepshep - Newsletter Bot Talk 00:30, 29 March 2008 (UTC) The above newsletter was delivered by Newsletterbot as per a request by Stepshep[reply]

"Christiana" River

Sorry, my mistake. It was in a map in today's Washington Post, and I mis-read it. Thanks! RossPatterson (talk) 18:31, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Ohio Newsletter

Issue II - May 2008

From the editor:
Here's Issue II of the project newsletter. We're trying to decide if this is sinking or floating. If you would like to contribute to next month's newsletter please jump right in at the News Desk! Have a great May.
The Ohio Portal
The maintainers of the Ohio Portal are looking to get it to featured status. They would like to ask all project members to help improve it any way they can. What needs to be done most is the supplying of selected articles and images.
Selected Article: Indian Head Rock
There is a eight ton rock in Ohio that was removed from the Ohio River. This rock is known as the Indian Head Rock Dating back to the early 1800’s, this rock was seen sticking out of the Ohio River and used as a navigational mark for barges along the river. The names of citizens from the town of Portsmouth, Ohio are carved into the rock from the late nineteenth a early twentieth centuries. Some of the names were of well known families from Ohio. They would swim out to the rock, have their picture taken with it or simply carve their names into it. With the advent of the Locks and Dams along the Ohio River, the rock eventually was submerged, but the legend lived on. A gentleman from Ironton, Ohio located the rock after searching a very long time for it, and he and a crew of scuba divers recovered the rock and took it to the shore to be donated to Ohio for historical value. After hearing the news about the rock being removed, Kentucky introduced legislation against the removal of the rock. They also want the diver who found it to be prosecuted for removing the rock. Kentucky owns the greatest part of the land the river runs on. Even the Army Corp. of Engineers got involved as to how to move the rock without damaging it. Kentucky wants to have it returned to the river. Billy Massie

Article Assessment
Reedy Bot and ShepBot are currently hard at work tagging all of the Ohio articles. We may need to have an assessment drive when the bots are finished. Think of it as a late spring cleaning. Please note your opinions on the project talkpage if you would be interested in helping! *Over 10,000* articles have been tagged with {{OH-Project}}**
Article Achievements
New Featured and Good articles Ohio was listed as a Good Article nominee; the result of the nomination was Not listed. Please help get Ohio to GA status! Port Columbus International Airport was listed as a Good Article. WikiProject Ohio Barnstar of Merit If you know of a Wikipedian who has contributed a lot of effort to Ohio articles feel free to award the new Ohio Barnstar of Merit by placing the following code on their user talkpage. {{subst:The Ohio Barnstar of Merit\|message}}
Contributors
Stepshep & Billy Massie

This newsletter is delivered by bot to all project members of WikiProject Ohio. If you do not wish to receive this newsletter in the future, please note this at the unsubscribe page. Thank you, §tepshep Delivered by ShepBot (talk) 19:14, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rights to your photograph

I was wondering how I might obtain the rights to your Wilmington, DE photograph, so I may use it on my website? Would it be possible to purchase the rights so I am not obligated to accredit the image on my website? Email me at areed@zuckerman.com and hopefully we can work something out. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Areed09 (talk • contribs) 18:44, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rights to your photograph

I was wondering how I might obtain the rights to your Wilmington, DE photograph, so I may use it on my website? Would it be possible to purchase the rights so I am not obligated to accredit the image on my website? Email me at areed@zuckerman.com and hopefully we can work something out. Areed09 (talk) 18:49, 17 June 2008 (UTC)areed09[reply]

WikiProject Ohio Newsletter

The WikiProject Ohio Newsletter

Issue III - June 2008

From the editor:
This is the third edition of the WikiProject Ohio newsletter. If you have any project announcements feel free to drop them by the NewsDesk. It's request that you watchlist our talk page; so you can chime in on current discussions. Have a great June!

The Ohio Portal
The maintainers of the Ohio Portal are looking to get it to featured status. They would like to ask all project members to help improve it any way they can. What needs to be done most is the supplying of selected articles and images.
Getting the Project Moving
WikiProject Ohio as an entity doesn't have as much action as other state projects. For this reason it has been proposed that the inactive WikiProject Ohio Townships be added as our taskforce. There is a !poll going on at WT:OH and your opinion is essential in the matter! Stepshep has also proposed sending an invite to everyone in Category:Wikipedians in Ohio with an invite to join the project. If you are already a member you would not receive the notice of course. Once again, please note your opinion on the project talkpage.
Selected Article: Central Avenue Historic District (Dayton, Ohio)
The Central Avenue Historic District is a nationally recognized historic district located at 201 to 338 Central Avenue in Dayton, Ohio. It consists of late 19th and 20th Century Revival-style houses as well as late Victorian-style houses, which were all originally single-family residences. On December 16, 1982, it was added to the National Register of Historic Places. Each month a new Ohio related stub is the selected article. If you have a new stub created feel free to nominate it at the NewsDesk.

Article Assessment
Reedy Bot and ShepBot are currently hard at work tagging all of the Ohio articles. We may need to have an assessment drive when the bots are finished. Think of it as a late spring cleaning. Please note your opinions on the project talkpage if you would be interested in helping! 'Over 15,000 articles have been tagged with {{OH-Project}} We have 5,000 articles that need to be assessed for class!
Article Info
Good Article Nominees, FAR, FLC List of Governors of Ohio was nominated for featured list status. Teh result was promote. Bruce Johnson (politician) underwent a featured article review. The result was demote. William Henry Harrison underwent a GAN The result was promote. Paul Tibbets underwent a GAN. It is currently undergoing review. Columbus Blue Jackets underwent a GAN It is currently undergoing review. Articles for Deletion Results Afd W. S. McIntosh Memorial Leadership Award was nominated at Afd. The result was Delete Homer E. Woodling and Robert F. Busbey were nominated at Afd. The result was Keep All Ohio High School Conferences were nominated at Afd. The result was no consensus keep. There is an effort to improve these articles here. Ohio Barnstar of Merit If you know of a Wikipedian who has contributed a good deal of effort to Ohio articles feel free to award the new Ohio Barnstar of Merit by placing the following code on their user talkpage. {{subst:The Ohio Barnstar of Merit\|message}}
Article Importance Scheme
A new article importance scheme has been proposed at the assessment talk page. Please comment on the propsed system.
Ohio NHLs Tabulated The 25 of Ohio's 69 National Historic Landmarks that were red-links all got articles this month, as part of a WP:NRHP drive to finish beginning the 2,430 or so NHL articles needed for nation-wide coverage. WP:OHIO members Stepshep and Sanfranman59 were busy.
Contributors
Stepshep, Clariosophic, & Doncram

This newsletter is delivered by bot to all project members of WikiProject Ohio. If you do not wish to receive this newsletter in the future or would like to receive it in a different format, please note this in the appropriate section at the NewsDesk. Thank you, §tepshep

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) 15:04, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cloquet River

Malepheasant-- as you are the go-to guy on rivers, would you be interested in turning this link blue? I've mentioned it in a few articles. (And isn't it a little dangerous for your type this time of year?) Regards, Kablammo (talk) 13:21, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

river bank

Hi Tim I'm currently making a slideshow video to accompany my performance of the Spanish Christmas song Riu Riu Chiu (for YouTube). If I use your "yellow river" river bank - (and I strongly think I will) - I will of course add you to the credits. Many thanks for the photo :-) Dwsolo (talk) 16:48, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Update: here's the video.
Riu Riu Chiu
Your river bank worked perfectly for it :-) Dwsolo (talk) 09:15, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Now Commons

File:Salt Fork Riv.jpg, an image uploaded to Wikipedia from this account in February 2006, is now File:Salt Fork Arkansas River.jpg (Commons:File:Salt Fork Arkansas River.jpg). — Athaenara ✉ 02:00, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For what it's worth...

...Salem County, New Jersey plagiarized your creek photo here: [2] 150.250.43.182 (talk) 00:27, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Birthplace of Des Moines.jpg

File:Birthplace of Des Moines.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Birthplace of Des Moines.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Birthplace of Des Moines.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 06:17, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Minnesota Meetup

2009

Proposed date: Saturday, October 10.
Details under discussion.

Please share this with anyone who may be interested.

Delivered by Jonathunder (talk) 16:03, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Great picture!

I just wanted to tell you what a great picture you took of the Buckhannon River in Rangoon, West Virginia. (Of course, I don't know it as Rangoon - I call it by it's colloquial name, Boulder. :) ) But anyway, it's a wonderful picture! Did you take it down under the bridge, or in that general area? The angle and view look like it. :) SaraWentz (talk) 07:32, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Meetup

In the area? You're invited to the
May 2018 Minnesota User Group Meeting

	Date: 31 October 2010
	Time: noon
	Place: Midtown Exchange Global Market, East Lake Street, Minneapolis, Minnesota 44°56′57″N 93°15′40″W / 44.9493°N 93.2612°W / 44.9493; -93.2612

November Minnesota Meetup

We're maturing --This one actually has an agenda! --Bobak (talk) 00:10, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In the area? You're invited to the
May 2018 Minnesota User Group Meeting

	Date: Saturday, 20 November 2010
	Time: 1:00 - 3:30 (click here for full agenda) R.S.V.P. by Nov. 17 for free lunch + parking
	Place: Minnesota History Center 345 Kellogg Blvd, St. Paul, Minnesota 44°57′00″N 93°06′20″W / 44.95°N 93.1055°W / 44.95; -93.1055

September 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States

The September 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

--Kumioko (talk) 02:18, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States

The December 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

--Kumioko (talk) 03:28, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012 Newsletter for WikiProject United States and supported projects

The January 2012 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

--Kumi-Taskbot (talk) 19:33, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-a-thon at Hennepin County Library

Minneapolis History edit-a-thon

The Minnesota Wikipedia community and local historians are invited to edit entries in Wikipedia on Minneapolis history. Please help increase the depth of information on Minneapolis history topics by utilizing materials in the Minneapolis Collection. Find your own Minneapolis History topics to edit or work from a list developed by Special Collections Librarians.

Where: Minneapolis Central Library, 300 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis
When: Saturday, February 25, 2012, 10-5 pm
10 am - 11 am Orientation to Minneapolis Collection
11 am - 5 pm Edit-a-thon
Website: Hennepin County Library, Special Collections, Map & Directions
Parking: Metered street parking or pay ramp in basement, enter on 4th Ave

For more information see Wikipedia talk:Meetup/Minnesota#2012. —innotata 01:11, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Cowichan River.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cowichan River.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 20:18, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Great American Wiknic

In the area? You're invited to the Great American Wiknic.

Place: near Minnehaha Falls at Minnehaha Park, Minneapolis
Date: Saturday, July 7, 2012 (rain date July 8)
Time: 12–3 pm

Accessible from the Minnehaha Park light rail station, bus, walk, bike, or car
If driving, free parking available at 46th Ave. S, and pay parking in the park
Food and drink options nearby, or bring your own... maybe even to share!

See the meetup talk page for more. —innotata 00:08, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Loves Libraries Seattle

Decemmber 8 - Wikipedia Loves Libraries Seattle - You're invited

Date Saturday, December 8, 2012
Time 10 a.m. – 3 p.m.
Location Seattle Public Library Meeting Room 1 on Level 4, Central Library, 1000 4th Avenue, Seattle WA, 98104
Event An editathon on Seattle-related Wikipedia articles with Wikipedia tutorials and Librarian assistance on hand.
Hashtag #wikiloveslib or #glamwiki.
Registration http://wll-seattle.eventbrite.com or use on-wiki regsistration.

Yours, Maximilianklein (talk) 03:34, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Guyandotte River

Hey there- I have lived in a few of the places you are mentioning as being on the Guyandotte, they are not. What resource are you using here?Coal town guy (talk) 01:58, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Openstreetmap; Google maps; DeLorme atlas; and clicking the coordinates link in the upper right of the page so as to get a pin on a Google map in cases where it's not clear. Perhaps I made mistakes; which ones are in question? --Malepheasant (talk) 02:04, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Corinne, Amigo, Itmann, I use the topo data at the WVGS, its far more acuurate as thefolks who did that survey, walked the area. Google maps for that area tend to use a data set that is inaccurate ti within 1 to 3 miles. Its most error prone in Raleigh, MsDowell, and Kanawha Counties...ever try to find a coal town with google maps in McDowell County, I tried, once.A biblical level bad bad dayCoal town guy (talk) 02:11, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to mix up the replying, I'll keep it here henceforth. As I noted, the GNIS/US Board on Geographic Names puts Itmann's dot on Rt. 16/10. And I see buildings between Rt. 16 and the river in the aerial photo. Malepheasant (talk) 02:24, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The USGS says the Guyandotte River begins at Amigo (these coordinates are from the GNIS entry): 37°35′51″N 81°19′18″W / 37.5976146°N 81.3217685°W Malepheasant (talk) 02:38, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

When you say on the river, what do you mean? IF you mean, I get up, open a window and see it, no, not so. If you mean on a map it looks close. Sure. By that logic, McLean VA is on the Potomac, and well, its not. I could drive 4 + miles to Great Falls and see it sure. BUT I am not on it. Sorry to seem so picky, but I have hiked Amigo, and Corinne, and filmed Itmann, and walked Mullens and lived in the area for a few years Coal town guy (talk) 02:44, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Read your "edit summary" on Stephenson WV...ha ha ha. Look, the place that GNIS calls Stphension, is actually an old town named Devils Fork and they got it wrong. AND YES, I have spoken to Lou Yost at GNIS about it anmd yes, its a creek that comes off of the river. Stephenson, had mines in Wyoming County, Devils Fork, had mines in Raleigh, BUT GNIS says one became the other, no, not so, sorry. The deal was Devils Fork is from the 20's. AND after spending a few years in the WV Culture archives and after actually interviewing people who worked at the Devils Fork mine, and recalling a creek they fished out of, which did indeed come off of the river, swell. Why not claim Arizona is on the Potomac? Its on the same land mass??????right????? I am sorry I removed the cat, please mark all of them you want, go nuts, do one just for meCoal town guy (talk) 02:52, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Beetree Creek is NOT the Guyandot

Hey there, I actually looked at the Delorme Atlas, in book form, ever hear of Beetree creek? Its that thing that comes off of the Guyandott and what local folks fished out of near Stephenson WV. I will NOT revert your edit.Coal town guy (talk) 03:40, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(discussion was continued here) -- Malepheasant (talk) 18:17, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chunky River.jpg and many others

Hi. You have uploaded many good photos :-) I think the files should be copied to Commons so they can be used on other Wikipedias. The transfer to Commons will look much better if the license is changed to "self" but I will not do that unless I'm sure to do it right. Just to be 100 % sure could you perhaps confirm that you are the photographer when Tim is mentioned? --MGA73 (talk) 13:13, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

would like to use your image of the Missouri River at St. Joseph, MO in a children's book, please contact me!

Hello Tim Kiser! My name is Wanda and I'm a media researcher for Capstone, we publish children's educational books for struggling readers. I'm working on a book titled "The Diary of Sally Hester, A Covered Wagon Girl" and in my search for an image of the Missiour river found your great shot on Wikipedia!

I would like to ask for permission to use your image in our book..if you let me know your email I can send you the image I am looking at so you can see just which one I'd like to use. You would get a photo credit in the book as well as a copy for your archives when it is printed.

Well I guess I'll start there and see what you think Tim! Hope to hear from you soon and have a great day!

Sincerely,

Wanda Winch Senior media researcher

Capstone 1710 Roe Crest Dr. North Mankato, MN 56003 Ph: 507.385.8488 Fax: 507.345.1729 Email: w.winch@capstonepub.com URL: www.capstonepub.com

≠≠≠≠ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.114.233.212 (talk) 17:25, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Smithers Creek (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mount Olive, West Virginia

Witcher Creek (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Diamond, West Virginia

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Indian Creek (Middle Island Creek), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stringtown, West Virginia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Apology

Hello Malepheasant,

First off, my sincerest apologies for tagging the disambiguation articles, terrible mistake, in fact ... got carried away. Thank you for pointing out the blunder. I'll pay more heed to it in my further edits. Sorry, once again. Have a nice day, sir. Best regards, (MrNiceGuy1113 (talk) 10:09, 21 December 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jan BenDor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Green space (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Interview for The Signpost

This is being sent to you as a member of WikiProject Ohio

The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Ohio for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Thanks, Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (confess) @ 19:31, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Global account

Hi Malepheasant! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 16:54, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

River categories

I'm startubg a new discussion at WP:CFD about the naming of river categories. Since you have participated in t least one of the recent discussions in the matterm you nay want to express your opinion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2016 July 11#Rivers. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 02:40, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, TimK MSI. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.^{[survey 1]} The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.^{[survey 2]} The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 19:20, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

^ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
^ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Event page

Hello, thanks for creating this page! I hope this event goes well. Just a recommendation - when you create an event like this, it's best to add categories for the event so it can be tracked (I've done this), and add it to the calendar and template. This allows people to find and track it, and also will likely increase the likelihood of remote support from experienced contributors who can correct mistakes on pages created and give feedback to new contributors. Hope this is helpful to you, let me know if any thoughts or questions. Blythwood (talk) 00:32, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Clarksburg, West Virginia

Hi there. You may wish to join the discussion at Talk:Clarksburg, West Virginia#Infobox image. Also, a crop to this image would be nice, but that's your call. Both photos are great. Cheers. Magnolia677 (talk) 00:13, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF). About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 08:15, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled

Hi TimK MSI, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Sam Walton (talk) 22:15, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Antoine River, Arkansas, USA listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Antoine River, Arkansas, USA. Since you had some involvement with the Antoine River, Arkansas, USA redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 21:40, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Photos

Tim, thanks for your support on the river conventions. I see you're a big photographer, too. I'm not so into rivers, but like to shoot whatever I see out the airplane window, so I do get some. See my recent pix: User:Dicklyon#Recent and User:Dicklyon#Aerials, where I got some shots of the Yampa River, Bear River Dam, Guadalupe River (California), Coyote Creek (Santa Clara County), Flathead River, Rio Puerco (Rio Grande tributary), and lots of reservoirs, bays, and inlets because they're easier to see. And on the ground, Adobe Creek (Santa Clara County, California), Stein am Rhein. Keep up the good photo sharing. Dicklyon (talk) 17:13, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, thanks! --TimK MSI (talk) 01:45, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, TimK MSI. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your March editathon

As you are organizing an editathon on March 14, you might like to tie up with Women in Red's plans for Women's History Month:

		Welcome to Women in Red's March 2018 worldwide online editathons. New: "Women's History Month" Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative
		(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Ipigott (talk) 08:20, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join Women in Red

Thank you for creating several articles on women and their works over the past few weeks. We have become aware of your contributions thanks to research undertaken by Bobo.03 at the University of Minnesota.
We think you might be interested in becoming a member of our WikiProject Women in Red where we are actively trying to reduce Wikipedia's content gender gap.
You can join by using the box at the top of the WiR page. But if you would like to receive news of our activities without becoming a member, you can simply add your name to our mailing list. In any case, thank you for actively contributing to the coverage of women (currently, 17.55% of English Wikipedia's biographies).

Our priorities for April:

April+Further with Art+Feminism Archaeology Military history (contest) Geofocus: Indian subcontinent

Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative

To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list or Women in Red/international list. To unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list. Follow us on Twitter: @wikiwomeninred

--Ipigott (talk) 08:38, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

I just commended Shannon1 for their comments but also wanted to praise you. As you know there has been a LOT of contention in this {{Infobox river}} process. I want to thank you for keeping the discussion civil and for raising some very valid concerns! Keep up the great work. --Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 19:42, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, TimK MSI. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Discord?

Ever considered WP:DISCORD?? I'm on and it might be faster to ping me there for these 1 off issues? Just a thought. I REALLY appreciate your efforts by the way. --Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 21:20, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2019 US Banknote Contest

US Banknote Contest

November-December 2019

There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons.

In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate.

If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here

Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:17, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Wheeling Creek (Pennsylvania-West Virginia))" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Wheeling Creek (Pennsylvania-West Virginia)) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 2#Wheeling Creek (Pennsylvania-West Virginia)) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 192.76.8.78 (talk) 16:22, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Eagle River name change

Hi @TimK MSI, I see that in your page about articles, you have a link to Eagle River in Wisconsin (the river, not the city). I'm writing this comment because I have moved the page title from "Eagle River (Wisconsin)" to "Eagle River (Wisconsin River tributary)" because the old title already was the same as the title of the article about the city except for having "Wisconsin" in parenthesis. But I also changed the old title from a redirect to the new page to a disambiguation page, so the link should be updated. Cyber the tiger (talk) 20:45, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Uff Da! Editing the Wikipedia for Absolute Beginners

Wiki UFF DA! - Editing the Wikipedia for Absolute Beginners

Oh, you know, if it isn't just the most basic workshop ever needed, "Wikipedia Editing for Absolute Beginners" for those who haven't had the pleasure of diving into that simple process quite yet. Bless their hearts, they're just starting out, so we thought, why not put something together? Because, you know, it's not like it's rocket science or anything, but hey, we're always happy to lend a hand where we can. And just a little bit of Minnesota Nice to help along the way. 'Uff da!' you say? Well editing the Wikipedia is not hard at all!

Join us at one of our three FREE workshops in Minnesota, where you can learn how to edit Wikipedia and add Minnesota's local history in a relaxed and supportive setting. Work alongside others and discover how easy editing Wikipedia can be. The workshops aim to enhance the ability of communities in Greater and rural Minnesota to edit Wikipedia and comprehend it's editing culture and guidelines, as well as to expand Wikipedia's coverage of Minnesota's history.

Already good at editing the Wikipedia? You're welcome to come and work on local history Minnesota Wikipedia articles alongside others.
Learn more »

Registration is required to be included for lunch.

Event 1 @ Morris, MN

Date & time: Wednesday, October 23, 2024, 11 am to 4 pm CDT
Location: West Central Minnesota Historical Center, McGinnis Room, Briggs Library, University of Minnesota-Morris, Morris, Minnesota

Event 2 @ Chisholm, MN

Date & time: Thursday, November 14, 2024, 11 am to 4 pm CDT
Location: MN Discovery Center, 1005 Discovery Drive, Chisholm, Minnesota

Event 3 @ Mankato, MN

Date & time: Wednesday, November 20, 2024, 11 am to 4 pm CDT
Location: Room 2057, 601 Maywood Ave, Memorial Library, Minnesota State University, Mankato, Minnesota

Facilitator: Myotus | Joe Hoover

These workshops are put on by the Minnesota Historical Society as part of their commitment to the Minnesota local history community and are led by Local History Services.

Myotus (talk) 21:09, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024 Minnesota User Group Meeting

In the area? You're invited to the November 2024 Minnesota User Group Meeting

The organizer of this soiree is Joe Hoover aka Myotus feel free to drop him a message.

Okay its been a while since the Wikipedia Minnesota User Group has meet. Since the last time we meet there has been social upheaval, plague, etc... - no small thing to be sure. There has been some sad lonely discussions on the Minnesota Meetup page on getting together but little action. So here it is. Come and be seen. Talk about the future of the Minnesota User Group and see what nefarious plans we can hatch.

Date: Sunday, November 3, 2024
Time: 1 to 3:30 pm (reminder - Daylight Saving Time ends)
Place: Wild Mind Ales'
6031 Pillsbury Ave, Minneapolis, MN

Look forward to seeing folks!

Myotus (talk) 02:18, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

[1] This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.

[2] Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

[survey 1]

[survey 2]