User talk:Mainblades Inspections

Review of article

Hi I look forward to get feedback on this article about Mainblades.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mainblades B.V. (July 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Sources like BBC, [ABN and Gizmodo] have not even mentioned the subject's name. Also, ResearchGate is not a reliable source. Sources from forums, blogs, and social media sites are generally unacceptable (see WP:UGC). Multiple independent reliable sources are required to fulfill the notability requirements. Trivial mentions and user-contributed sources are not sufficient to demonstrate notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mainblades B.V. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mainblades B.V., click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 19:02, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mainblades Inspections! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 19:02, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mainblades Inspections B.V. (October 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

also see WP:SOLUTIONS

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mainblades Inspections B.V. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mainblades Inspections B.V., click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 12:36, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of name and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Widr (talk) 12:43, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Mainblades Inspections (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

MagicMike1995 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

As I transparently stated during my initial account creation, there is a conflict of interest. I am a fixed employee of the organization that I am creating the wikipedia article for, Mainblades. I am receiving a regular wage but not specifically because I am writing this article. However, it was/is by no means my intention to make this a commercial piece. I understand that that the word “solution” may have a promotional tone to it. But this is my first wikipedia article so I am also just learning. I am sure you were once in the same position. I am intending to remove any promotional words that may mislead the reader. For example, I will replace the word “solution” with a more neutral word such as “product” or “service”. Besides this, I want to remove any user-generated sources that are not from an external source. In general, I want to establish this article to give people the option to inform themselves about Mainblades, drones and how this technology is finding application in the aviation and aircraft maintenance industries. It is my intention to keep this article up to date and improve it over time with the Wikipedia community. I appreciate your understanding and hope to hear from you soon.

Decline reason:

Your choice of new username would be acceptable. What you state as your purpose here is considered promotional, you don't have to be soliciting customers or selling something. Wikipedia is not for merely providing information. A Wikipedia article summarizes what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the subject, showing how it meets Wikipedia's special definition of notability. Please review conflict of interest and paid editing(you don't have to be specifically paid to edit to be a paid editor). You won't be unblocked to, in the short term, edit about your company or its products. If that is your only goal here, this is the end of the line. If you are interested in being a general contributor, please tell what topics you will edit about. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 20:12, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]