User talk:Mahesh1985

March 2014

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Veerendra Senar, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Cnilep (talk) 05:12, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Please read this page to understand how to use IMDb on Wikipedia. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:16, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sidharth Malhotra, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Sidharth Malhotra was changed by Mahesh1985 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951662 on 2014-03-10T08:22:47+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:22, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Please take note of the messages that have been posted here (including those which you have removed), and if you believe there are good reasons for your edits, then explain why, rather than just ignoring the concerns of other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:54, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Veerendra Senar has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for this specific type of article, you may want to check out our criterion for biographies. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:07, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Also, make sure that the sources you provide actually exist: a link to a nonexistent page is no help. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:28, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Veerendra Senar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Veerendra Senar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. TheLongTone (talk) 19:23, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your request for undeletion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that a response has been made at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion regarding a submission you made. The thread is Veerendra Senar (2). JohnCD (talk) 10:48, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

Your repeated requests to restore an article that will not be restored are considered disruptive. It will not be done. Consider this your final warning. You may try submitting the article through the process described at Wikipedia:Articles for creation. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:56, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]