User talk:Machli jal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Machli jal (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have blocked for vandalism. I know that I harm Wikipedia's policy by spreading vandalism but I promise now I never spread vandalism. I have no sock puppet.

Decline reason:

You are blocked as being a sockpuppet, not as having one. Apply for unblock at your primary account. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 11:12, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Request for unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Machli jal (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have blocked for vandalism. I know that I harm Wikipedia's policy by spreading vandalism but I promise now I never spread vandalism. Trust me…

Decline reason:

There's no indication that you intend to follow Wikipedia's guidelines and policies, particularly since you are asking for several of your socks to be unblocked repeatedly. "Trust me" doesn't work for people with a history of policy violations. Huon (talk) 08:28, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Machli jal (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Now I never spread vandalism.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:34, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or sock puppetry.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 17:25, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Hello, I'm Alessandro57. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Europe has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Alex2006 (talk) 10:37, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indian maps

Please not not replace standard locator maps with other versions. There are agreed guidelines for location maps that are designed to standardise map format across the encyclopedia. Thanks. Philg88 ^♦talk 12:49, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

You did the same thing at Bagpat district, replacing a locator map with an image that didn't render. Please be careful about changing such infobox items. Dhtwiki (talk) 23:08, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copy and pasting

We run "copy and paste" detection software on new edits. One of your edits appear to be infringing on someone else's copyright. See also Wikipedia:Copy-paste. We at Wikipedia usually require paraphrasing. If you own the copyright to this material please follow the directions at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials to grant license. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 06:48, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

From http://www.oneindia.com/feature/know-your-leader-profile-oommen-chandy-indian-national-congress-2042910.html

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 06:48, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-warring at List of current Indian chief ministers

Please refrain from edit-warring at List of current Indian chief ministers. The article is a featured list which I work very hard to maintain. Please start a talkpage thread for why you want to change the colour scheme in the article.—indopug (talk) 16:38, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your self-revert and your comment, now we can discuss.

What are the changes you want to make? I don't see the point of changing the Congress colour to cyan (whole Wikipedia uses that other blue as the standard Congress colour) or the third parties' colour to purple (most of the third parties (SP, ADMK, TMC, BJD) are green so it's better to use this colour).—indopug (talk) 07:54, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So, can I change other parties colour to purple?—Machli jal (talk)

Why do you think that would improve the article?—indopug (talk) 16:39, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see how changing the green just because it was there "for a long time" will improve the article. As I wrote above (on 23 May) there is a good reason why the third-party colour is set to green.—indopug (talk) 16:33, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 13:26, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

IPL template colours

Hi. I changed them back to the previous ones, mainly on the grounds that the colours you changed them to aren't web safe and, frankly, because you hadn't, as far as I can tell, discussed the change at all. Let me know if that's incorrect. Blue Square Thing (talk) 14:41, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Machli jal (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Jhony jhony yes papa". The reason given for Jhony jhony yes papa's block is: "Block evasion".

Blocking administrator: Yamaguchi先生 (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Seems very likely you are that blocked user, so I will now block you directly and consider rolling back all of your changes. Yamla (talk) 10:55, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

To other reviewing admins, note that this user admitted to being blocked at Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Machli_jal. --Yamla (talk) 10:57, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Machli jal

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Machli jal, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Machli jal and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Machli jal during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Jasper Deng (talk) 07:33, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New request for unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Machli jal (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

OK but I am not a sock puppet. Please unblock me. I promise I don't spread vandalism and upload copyright images. Please unblock me.

Decline reason:

You were doing just that with your latest sockpuppet not more than one hour ago. This is getting tiresome, I'm also revoking talk page access. —SpacemanSpiff 08:41, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Machli jal. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]