User talk:MacCready

MacCready, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi MacCready! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Evil Morty (October 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at List of Rick and Morty characters. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Evil Morty and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Evil Morty, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 04:46, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Blair Witch Mountain Project for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Blair Witch Mountain Project is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Blair Witch Mountain Project until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheLongTone (talk) 14:13, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello MacCready, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to The Blair Witch Mountain Project have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:03, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Jana Grazer.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Jana Grazer.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 17:24, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Jana Thomson Grazer.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Jana Thomson Grazer.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 13:58, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Tangled: The Series a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. --wooden superman 16:55, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Woodensuperman: I agree with you completely, thank you, I will try that.

Problems with upload of File:Rapunzel's Tangled Adventure logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:Rapunzel's Tangled Adventure logo.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:30, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rapunzel's Tangled Adventure logo.png

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 17:59, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Tangled: The Series into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. -- /Alex/₂₁ 22:50, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Catra.png

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:06, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:The Grazers.png

A tag has been placed on File:The Grazers.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 13:25, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Hello, I'm Justlettersandnumbers. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Jana and Gavin Grazer, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:18, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Riri Williams a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. WikiVirusC^(talk) 18:30, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please do not add uncited material to articles, as you did with this edit to Miles Morales, as this violates Wikipedia's Verifiability policy. As Justlettersandnumbers mentioned to you above, Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the text in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here. If you ever have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 19:44, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019 - Unbreakable

Please immediately revert your move of Unbreakable (film series) to Eastrail 177 trilogy. Did you not consult the talkpage before making such a move? Why would you think it's okay to move something like this without first gaining consensus? There was a discussion about such a move, and consensus was firmly against it; ergo, your move is in violation of consensus. I suggest you undo it right away. Grandpallama (talk) 12:36, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have now undone this move. If you make a move like this again, which ignores consensus, you will most likely be blocked. Please follow policy and gain consensus for controversial moves, and pay attention to existing talkpage discussions. Grandpallama (talk) 10:50, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Requests

Referring to the complaints at User talk:Anthony Appleyard#Guidance, please:
- Do not move any page before checking in its talk page to see if there is a currently running discussion about whether to move that page.
- Please slow down and think about what you are doing. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 12:24, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pandemic (disambiguation)

A disambiguation page only contains links to information which exists in other articles. I have removed your addition. If appropriate, please add it to Gray asexuality or some other page, with sources, and only then add an entry in the disambiguation page. The term "pandemic" doesn't seem at present to be mentioned in either Gray asexuality or Romantic orientation (to which Panromantic leads). Thanks. PamD 14:05, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Angela LaFever listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Angela LaFever. Since you had some involvement with the Angela LaFever redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:38, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Devil in popular culture, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Time machine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:04, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fremont Police Station listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Fremont Police Station. Since you had some involvement with the Fremont Police Station redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 17:03, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jane Foster Transformation.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jane Foster Transformation.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:59, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

List of It characters moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of It characters, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 14:46, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Casey and Andy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Character development (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:28, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Hawkeye (2020 TV series)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hawkeye (2020 TV series). Since you had some involvement with the Hawkeye (2020 TV series) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. -- /Alex/₂₁ 04:46, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Cinema Blend" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Cinema Blend. Since you had some involvement with the Cinema Blend redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 17:49, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Theendoftheworld.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Theendoftheworld.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- /Alex/₂₁ 01:49, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Unexplained mass change. This is not at all what the series is known as. Please discuss the issue on the talk page and provide reliable sources that support your changes. -- /Alex/₂₁ 01:50, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"List of It characters" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of It characters. Since you had some involvement with the List of It characters redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 02:10, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Theendoftheworld.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Theendoftheworld.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- /Alex/₂₁ 22:02, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TheMaleficentSeven.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TheMaleficentSeven.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- /Alex/₂₁ 22:02, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Valkyrie Cain series.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Valkyrie Cain series.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 20:45, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. -- /Alex/₂₁ 23:21, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Alex 21: Got it. MacCready (talk) 00:28, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Full House and Fuller House characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fuller House (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:44, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Sean The King" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sean The King. Since you had some involvement with the Sean The King redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:45, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hordak, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clone (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:29, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Skulduggery Pleasant: The End of the World (November 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This is an article about one of the publications in the series Skulduggery Pleasant, a short story published after the principal novels in the series.. None of the principal books have individual articles, so a redirect for this one would be sufficient.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Skulduggery Pleasant: The End of the World and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Skulduggery Pleasant: The End of the World, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 10:12, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Artemis Fowl and the Last Guardian a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Barkeep49 (talk) 04:06, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there - I went ahead and performed the page move so Artemis Fowl is now at its correct location. Additionally I saw the decline notice above for Skullduggery Pleasant. I am quite confident that at least some, if not all, of the books are individually notable and so you could definitely create some individual articles there if you wished. I do agree with DGG that the novella is likely not independently notable and should be covered in the series article as opposed to a stand alone article. If you have questions about children's lit please do reach out - either with a ping here or on my talk page - as it's always of interest. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 04:14, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Barkeep49: Will do, I'll get right onto that. Would you be able to help me in moving Artemis Fowl: The Eternity Code and Artemis Fowl: The Atlantis Complex to Artemis Fowl and the Eternity Code and Artemis Fowl and the Atlantis Complex by any chance in addition? Thank you. MacCready (talk) 02:08, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MacCready, I don't see evidence that those two were initially published under those names - specifically first edition UK, which I would default to, seem to support current names. Do you have other sources? Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 14:25, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Skulduggery Pleasant: Dark Days

Hi there. This article looks slightly better. I would like to see some more references added to reinforce the notability, but I don't think it should be restored to the redirect. Regards, Willbb234^Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 21:03, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Star Wars Trilogy

Moving Star Wars Trilogy to Star Wars originaltrilogy was a very bad idea. Not only did you not discuss this move with anyone, but you also mis-spelled the mov "originaltrilogy" should at least have a space. You absolutely must discuss a move of this size on the talk page and reach consensus before moving an article like this. Thanks, The Mirror Cracked (talk) 18:04, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Skulduggery Pleasant The Faceless Ones book cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Skulduggery Pleasant The Faceless Ones book cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:35, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Valkyrie Cain.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Valkyrie Cain.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Username

V for Vendetta? :) ——SN 54129 06:13, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Serial Number 54129: Both V for Vendetta and The Thing. MacCready (talk) 19:09, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dark Calling

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dark Calling requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dark Calling. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Skeletor3000 (talk) 22:26, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Demonata, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Death's Shadow (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:44, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Inside of Every Demon is a Rainbow" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Inside of Every Demon is a Rainbow. Since you had some involvement with the Inside of Every Demon is a Rainbow redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 00:51, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Teen Titans (TV series) characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ashley Johnson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Merry!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2020!

Hello MacCready, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2020.
Happy editing,
★Trekker (talk) 16:53, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Jacen Solo

Just a note, I reverted your edits (mostly) and your move because a page should only contain information on one character, not multiple characters that happen to have the same name (unless they are essentially the same character, e.g. Grand Admiral Thrawn). Jacen Syndulla is already mentioned at List of Star Wars Rebels characters#Hera_Syndulla and that is sufficient, considering there is nothing else to know about the character. Jacen Syndulla already redirects there as well. I'll add a hatnote to Jacen Solo about it as well. Regards So Why 16:09, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@SoWhy: Per Filoni's quote, it appears the intent is to have them be essentially the same character, à la Thrawn, hence my including them. MacCready (talk) 16:53, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think so. Filoni said the name was "to honor the expanded universe character of Jacen Solo", not for this character to be the canon version of Jacen Solo. He also said "maybe, in some way, that lives on through this character. I don’t know yet", indicating that there is no plan to have this character live the same life or indeed re-appear at all. Also, with completely different parents and backstory, the similarities end with the name (according to Wookiepedia there are five characters named "Jacen" in all and none share the same article).

Speaking in-universe, Jacen Syndulla would have been ~30 years old when The Force Awakens takes place in 34 ABY. Jacen Solo was 31 years old when he turned to the Dark Side in 40 ABY (EU continuity), so if Jacen Syndulla was supposed to emulate Jacen Solo's life and downfall, it would have to have happened at approximately the same time as The Force Awakens and there is nothing to suggest that.

Using an example from Doctor Who, before 2005, the Shalka Doctor was the official 9th incarnation of The Doctor but was relegated to non-canon afterwards and the 9th Doctor took his place. Despite both being the 9th Doctor at some point, there are two different articles since they are not the same incarnation.

Sorry for the long fan-boyish post, to make it short, unless you can provide a reliable source that says those are the same character, we should keep them separate. To use the aforementioned example of Thrawn, the sources explicitly confirm that he is to be the same character ("reintroduced", 'reintroduced", "joins...canon"). There are no such sources for Jacen Syndulla. Regards So Why 19:27, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@SoWhy: While your first point on timelines is moot due to Thrawn having been introduced at an earlier point in time, I do see the validity in your second one. I believe that they are, but the path the character is to take is yet to be made clear, so shall wait until I can find a second source. MacCready (talk) 19:33, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Your recent editing history at F9: The Fast Saga shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. © Tbhotch^™ (en-3). 23:34, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Evil Horde

I see you moved the content of Evil Horde back to List of She-Ra: Princess of Power and She-Ra and the Princesses of Power characters#The Horde. The only reason I originally moved it to a separate article in April 2019 was because the same content had been present in both the current target article and the article about Masters of the Universe characters, and they had then developed independently. So we had two different versions of the same content. The current situation is acceptable, but if the Masters of the Universe character list starts to have a list of Evil Horde characters again, we need to take this into account. JIP | Talk 21:40, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rey (Star Wars)

See what I stated at Talk:Rey (Star Wars)#Age. A permalink for it is here. Don't just keep reverting. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 23:46, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of John Gillman

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on John Gillman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. N0nsensical.system^(err0r?)_(.log) 12:56, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Taskmaster Unmasked.jpeg

Thank you for uploading File:Taskmaster Unmasked.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Batman in film, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Robert Lowery and Neil Hamilton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:47, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Client (Star Wars), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Galactic Empire (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:10, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fast and Furious characters

That is ABSOLUTELY how Wikipedia works my great friend, so thanks for adding the source. If that wasn’t required, anyone could list any actor as appearing in an upcoming film and who’s to dispute them? Rcarter555 (talk) 13:30, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Parahumans" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Parahumans. Since you had some involvement with the Parahumans redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:52, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Massacre franchise

I don't think that the Cheerleader films are actually part of the franchise. Do you have any sources that claim that they are?★Trekker (talk) 07:33, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind I found some.★Trekker (talk) 07:38, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Massacre (franchise), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mike Elliott and Melissa Moore (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:56, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Please stop editing while logged out to continue edit wars and disruptive edits. You are technically blocked on your IPv6 and you've used at least two IPs to support your logged in edits. This constitutes block evasion and sockpuppetry, which I am attempting to ignore. Please ensure that you are logged in on all of your devices. -- ferret (talk) 00:52, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of TotalTruthTeller24 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:13, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"The Amazing World of Gumball: The Movie" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Amazing World of Gumball: The Movie. Since you had some involvement with the The Amazing World of Gumball: The Movie redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 23:50, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:FingFangFoom&Ronnie.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:FingFangFoom&Ronnie.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:00, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Tanith Low in... The Maleficent Seven

Hello, MacCready. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tanith Low in... The Maleficent Seven".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 12:06, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:FingFangFoom&Ronnie.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:FingFangFoom&Ronnie.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:KickAssComics.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:KickAssComics.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:13, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tales from the Citadel.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tales from the Citadel.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:18, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tales from the Citadel.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tales from the Citadel.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:20, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Hooligan family tree

Template:Hooligan family tree has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Axem Titanium (talk) 18:43, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Shadow Weaver Light Spinner comparison.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Shadow Weaver Light Spinner comparison.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:57, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Skulduggery Pleasant series 2.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Skulduggery Pleasant series 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:02, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of It characters

Hello, MacCready. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of It characters".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 02:23, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jane Foster Valkyrie.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jane Foster Valkyrie.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:55, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:GURPS Casey and Andy.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GURPS Casey and Andy.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:50, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:GURPS Casey and Andy.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GURPS Casey and Andy.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:09, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hazbin Hotel opening credits.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hazbin Hotel opening credits.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Blair Witch Mountain Project for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Blair Witch Mountain Project is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Blair Witch Mountain Project (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DonaldD23 talk to me 15:45, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Casey and Andy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Casey and Andy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Casey and Andy (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mccapra (talk) 11:41, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]