User talk:Maakhter

Welcome!

Hello, Maakhter, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! AdamBiswanger1 23:57, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem. Feel free to ask me a question if you have one. Happy editing, AdamBiswanger1 01:29, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot find page The Role of United Nations in Kashmir using the search on Wikipedia's main page. I did find it before using the following link:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Role_of_United_Nations_in_Kashmir

Thank you.

Is it a new page? if it is... more than likely the search does not have it indexed yet... :) Put helpme back up If my response was not sufficient. Eagle talk 17:24, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it is. Thank you.

October 7, 2006

Please help.

I typed “The role of United Nations in Kashmir” in the search box and pressed Go. It took me to following page.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_role_of_United_Nations_in_Kashmir&action=edit

It says, “Wikipedia does not have an article with this exact name.” However, this page was created long time ago.

I also book-marked the page at the time of its creation. Here is the URL:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Role_of_United_Nations_in_Kashmir

If I use this link then I can open the page.

I had this problem before as well. See the following discussion on October 2, 2006.

Please do not remove the Help me tag until unless you are sure that you have fixed this problem.

Maakhter 05:50, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is working right now. As for the 2 october, the links are case sensitive and you wrote role without a capital R. A redirection was made that day. I remove the helpmetag, if you need something else, please put it back :) -- lucasbfr ^talk 06:13, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

October 2, 2006

Sorry about the <big>, but this thread is all over the place. Your problem has been solved. Thanks --D e on555^talk_Review 02:06, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. You have added the helpme tag several times, without a question. The times you did have a question it was ambigous. Please do not add the {{helpme}} template again, unless you are prepared to clearly ask your question. Thanks --D e on555^talk_Review 01:59, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you used the {{helpme}} tag. How may I help you? When you've asked your question, please put the tag back so we know to check back. Alternatively, you can join the Wikipedia Bootcamp IRC channel to get real-time help. (Use the web-based client to get instant access.)

I cannot find following page using Wikipedia search.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Role_of_United_Nations_in_Kashmir

However, I can find same page using Google search. Here is the URL:

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=the+role+of+united+nations+in+kashmir+wiki&btnG=Search

Can you please explain why it is happening?

I had same problem on 1 July 2006 and I got following response:

"Is it a new page? if it is... more than likely the search does not have it indexed yet... :) Put helpme back up If my response was not sufficient. Eagle talk 17:24, 1 July 2006 (UTC)"

Maakhter 00:01, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Most likely the page has been deleted since, take a look at the deletion log.. When Google last "Crawled" Wikipedia, the page was alive, so it indexed; sinced then the page has been deleted, and Google hasn't crawled yet since.. :) --D e on555^talk_Review 00:11, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Err hang on a minute... the page is here The Role of United Nations in Kashmir. I'm not sure what the problem is? --D e on555^talk_Review 00:11, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The page is right there where you linked it above. What exactly is the problem? Elaborating that might be better. Thanks. --Ragib

On the following page:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page

I entered the following text:

the role of united nations in kashmir

Then I pressed Go and the following page appears.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=the+role+of+united+nations+in+kashmir&go=Go

It does not take me to the page of titled “The Role of United Nations in Kashmir”.

Is the search case sensitive?

Maakhter 01:17, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The response from the developers is that the search engine sucks. —Centrx→talk • 01:32, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The search is case-sensitive, as far as I know, yes. You may be able to work around it slightly by using the "search" button instead of the "go" button, but I'm not sure. —K e akealani 01:42, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have tried other pages but it seems that the search is not case sensitive.

Maakhter 01:52, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think search is case sensitive. There are problems with the search engine though. The best way to direct people to the article is to link to it in other articles. That is the source of most traffic to articles, not the search engine. Someone searching for "Kashmir" is going to end up the at Kashmir page regardless, etc. It may also be appropriate to integrate the contents of that article into one of the main articles. —Centrx→talk • 02:01, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging articles

Greetings, it appears that you are tagging article after article with {{totally disputed}} , {{POV}} or similar. Please do not do this. If you are going to add such tags you must correspondingly add to the targeted articles' talk pages which it appears you are not doing. Thanks. Netscott 02:34, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would concur with Nescott about this. Your one liner rationale states Pro-Indian Bias. It seems that more space is given to pro-Indian views. There is a need to balance this article. This is not clear, nor a logical argument at all. If you don't have something specific to say, please do not tag articles. Thank you. --Ragib 03:24, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging of Articles by Maakhter

Please have a look at the following:

I have provided specific criticism for each and every article I tagged. In many articles wrong map is used. I cannot write an article about the use of incorrect maps. All I need to do is to tag and then raise the issue in the discussion.

Here is an example:

Article labeld ‘Terrorism in Kashmir’ is biased and represents pro-Indian View.

For example “India says that over the last two years, a militant group, Lashkar-e-Toiba has split into two factions: Al Mansurin and Al Nasirin. Another new militant group reported to have emerged is the Save Kashmir Movement. Harkat-ul-Mujahideen (formerly known as Harkat-ul-Ansar) and Lashkar-e-Toiba are believed to be operating from Muzaffarabad, Azad Kashmir and Muridke, Pakistan respectively.[6] Other less well known groups are the Freedom Force and Farzandan-e-Milat. A smaller militant group, Al Badr, has been active in Kashmir for many years and is still believed to be functioning.”

How much space are you going to provide to explain Pakistani point of view?

There is also a huge list of anti-Pakistani films and books in this article as well.

Maakhter 03:40, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.

United Nations

Here is what the United Nations thinks about this dispute. People who want to contribute should use facts. This is not a space to express personal opinion.

http://www.un.org/Depts/dpko/missions/unmogip/docs.html

http://www.un.org/Depts/dpko/dpko/bnote.htm

http://www.un.org/Depts/Cartographic/map/dpko/unmogip.pdf

Thanks.

Maakhter 03:57, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Repetition of Same Mistakes

Same mistakes are committed in all of the articles I have tagged. It is not necessary to repeat same arguments in each tagging.

I have also posted the above to you in your talk page.

Maakhter 05:09, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.

Map of Pakistan

I have seen the map of Pakistan at the following web-page of United Nations.

http://www.un.org/Depts/Cartographic/map/profile/pakistan.pdf

The above web-page confirms my point of view. This map clearly shows line of control and does not show Azad (Independent) Kashmir (Pakistani controlled Kashmir) as a part of India.

Maakhter 05:43, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.

Please Help me

I cannot find page The Role of United Nations in Kashmir using the search on Wikipedia's main page. I did find it before using the following link:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Role_of_United_Nations_in_Kashmir

This page was created almost a month ago.

Thank you.

It would seem as though that is the correct link. What exactly are you asking for? GofG _|^|_| Contribs 03:19, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you mean it doesn't show up in search results, it may be because there are few links in the article. You can link important, related words with brackets, like [[United Nations]] . I have done the first paragraph of that article as an example. The search engine may base its results partly on those links. You should also creates link to the article in appropriate places, such as articles about the history of India and the history of Pakistan. —Centrx→talk • 03:28, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

mediation!!

What exactly are you trying to imply by adding fake mediation case links to various talk pages? You are not even a party to any serious discussion in the talk page. Mediation cases are for real disputes, and any request made without any discussion (let alone dispute) in the relevant talk pages are quite likely to be rejected. So, if you have any problem with anything, first try discussing in the talk pages. Thank you. --Ragib 23:23, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is not fake you are trying to misguide people. Here is the link for mediation request:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_mediation/Indo-Pakistani_War_of_1971

Well, anyone can check out the timestamps and see your interesting attempt to game wikipedias process. You *DID* start adding RFM tags when you hadn't even filed such a request, you then went on trying to make it look you put an RFC, and also an AN/I report. I understand that you are a new user and perhaps not familiar with wikipedia's processes, policies etc. Please feel free to contact me with any questions. I can help you with the proper processes and other things. Your claim of a "dispute" where you hadn't even replied to the reply to your comment, is a good example on why you need to read policies, processes. Anyway, feel free to contact me with any confusions. Thank you. --Ragib 17:14, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Mediation

A Request for Mediation to which you are a party was not accepted and has been delisted. You can find more information on the mediation subpage, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Indo-Pakistani War of 1971.

For the Mediation Committee, Essjay (Talk)

This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to perform case management. If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.

This message delivered: 03:17, 29 July 2006 (UTC).

Advice

Hi Maakhter - welcome to Wikipedia. I wish you talk to you about some important things that are very necessary for you to understand and follow while editing here. Please read WP:NPOV, WP:POINT, WP:NPA and WP:CIVIL. These are Wikipedia policies that you must, like all others, adhere to. Placing fake mediation tags, making accusations on WP:ANI is making personal attack on another editor and may result in punitive blocks.

Please try to understand that if you have concerns and questions about the content of articles on India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Kashmir, you must discuss them with other editors on the article talkpages and not remove data or write unsourced and POV data to prove a point. You have been doing so, and these are very serious offenses that hurt our purpose of building an encyclopedia.

Please read these policies and think about my advice. All Wikipedians have to work with these rules, you, me and Ragib have to learn to work by these rules. Rama's arrow - this Fire burns always 03:27, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

To add, it is very, very serious and unjustifiable to state that the Bangladesh genocide was a fabrication. It is a serious violation of WP:NPA - no personal attacks. First off, the entire statement loaded with political intention, not the desire to build an encyclopedia. Please don't come here to fight political battles. If you genuinely doubt that the genocide occured, you should express your views in a respectful and open-minded way, backed with facts and credible sources, and with the intention of improving Wikipedia and not defending Pakistan. Rama's arrow - this Fire burns always 04:35, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fake allegation of genocide

Has any Pakistani been charged for genocide? What about the current relations between Pakistan and Bangladesh? The relations between Pakistan and Bangladesh are very friendly. If someone accuses Pakistan for genocide then why Bangladesh is so friendly with Pakistan, while no one has charged any Pakistani for genocide.

Has Bangladesh given up its allegation of genocide against Pakistan? If not then, why they are so friendly with Pakistan? Why Bangladesh does not want to chase its allegations of genocide against Pakistan?

Do you mean that United Nations and everyone else in the world kept quite at this alleged genocide? Who gave you the figure of three million people dieing in the conflict?

Therefore, its not just Pakistani who are denying it, the rest of the world by not asking for investigations, actually supported the Pakistani point of view. The allegations were not worth a formal investigation.

The reason is that there was no genocide. It is Indian propaganda.

Maakhter 09:50, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Rama's arrow - this Fire burns always 17:03, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Mediation

A Request for Mediation to which you are a party was not accepted and has been delisted. You can find more information on the mediation subpage, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/India.

For the Mediation Committee, Essjay (Talk)

This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to perform case management. If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.

This message delivered: 00:00, 1 August 2006 (UTC).

Message

Bascially, what I meant was the thread wasn't very orderly, and so I used larger text.

I'm not sure what the problem was, but I just created a redirect, and everything worked out fine :) Let me know if you need anything else.. -D e on555^talk_Review 02:34, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

United Nations Resolutions on Kashmir

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of United Nations Resolutions on Kashmir, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.mofa.gov.pk/Pages/UN_Resolution.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:27, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of India: Elections and History of Violence

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article India: Elections and History of Violence, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Unreferenced original research essay

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Renata (talk) 21:44, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of India: Elections and History of Violence

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article India: Elections and History of Violence, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

OR article without any tangible references

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. -- Tinu Cherian - 11:11, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of India: Elections and History of Violence

I have nominated India: Elections and History of Violence, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/India: Elections and History of Violence. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Tinu Cherian - 04:58, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Kashmir - the most dangerous place in the world) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Kashmir - the most dangerous place in the world, Maakhter!

Wikipedia editor Akdulj just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I would say delete it.

To reply, leave a comment on Akdulj's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Proposed deletion of Threat of nuclear war between India and Pakistan

The article Threat of nuclear war between India and Pakistan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NickGibson3900 ^Talk 22:24, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kashmir - the most dangerous place in the world for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kashmir - the most dangerous place in the world is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kashmir - the most dangerous place in the world until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. NickGibson3900 ^Talk 22:28, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Request for mediation rejected

The request for formal mediation concerning Threat of nuclear war between India and Pakistan, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 13:52, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

Request for mediation rejected

The request for formal mediation concerning Kashmir - the most dangerous place in the world, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 14:05, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

Removing AfD template

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Kashmir - the most dangerous place in the world. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 21:15, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Threat of nuclear war between India and Pakistan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Threat of nuclear war between India and Pakistan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Threat of nuclear war between India and Pakistan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. NickGibson3900 ^Talk 01:47, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WP:PAK

Welcome!

Hello! You look like someone who might be interested in joining the Pakistan WikiProject and so I thought I'd drop you a line and invite you! We'd love to have you help us :-) lTopGunl (talk) 00:20, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia. I'm from WikiProject Pakistan. We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Pakistan.

There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:

You can give your input at project's main discussion page and keep it on your watchlist: Wikipedia talk:Notice board for Pakistan-related topics.
You can !vote and work on saving articles that are up for deletion at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Pakistan.
Want to know how good our articles are? The assessment department is working on rating the quality of every Pakistan article in Wikipedia.
Can you code? The automation department uses automated and semi-automated methods to perform batch tasks that would be tedious to do manually.
Please participate in any of our descendant workgroups that might interest you.
Add your name in the members at Wikipedia:WikiProject Pakistan/Members. There's also a user box template which you can put on your user page to identify yourself as a member: {{User WikiProject Pakistan}}

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask me or at the Wikiproject Pakistan noticeboard and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We are looking forward to see you around!

lTopGunl (talk) 00:20, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Creating new articles

Hi, I saw that you were creating new articles on wikipedia but they are being deleted as they are not actual topics that an encyclopedia would cover, rather they are content that would go inside an already existing topic. It might be a good idea to create your first article via Articles for Creation where experienced editors will help you create the article and review it for you so that it wont get deleted once approved as it will meet the wikipedia standards. If you think you don't have a good idea on how to choose an article topic so that it is not a duplicate of another topic, you can see this list or ask me about a topic that is not yet covered (given that Pakistan related topics are not well covered). If you need help, leave me a message on my talk page. --lTopGunl (talk) 00:37, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kashmir - the most dangerous place in the world

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Kashmir - the most dangerous place in the world, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is unambiguous vandalism or an obvious hoax. (See section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia; doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Human3015 Say Hey!! • 02:22, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]