User talk:MVP988

January 2024

Hello MVP988. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:MVP988. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=MVP988|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 11:53, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

iam know writing article not a publish dude MVP988 (talk) 12:12, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what you are trying to say there, but do you work for an agency in this field? 331dot (talk) 12:28, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Wikipedia. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 12:48, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to remove maintenance templates without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Draft:MVP Development Agencies, you may be blocked from editing. Theroadislong (talk) 12:53, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. In light of your repeated attempts to publish spam articles, removing maintenance and AfC templates, and the earlier warnings already issued, I am now issuing this final warning. Please stop your disruptive editing. Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:55, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: MVP Development Agencies (January 24)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

Theroadislong (talk) 12:31, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MVP988! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 12:31, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you tell what missing my article MVP988 (talk) 13:19, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This has been answered at the AFC Help Desk. A rejected draft may not be resubmitted. 331dot (talk) 13:45, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rejected submissions

Do not remove the reject submission banner from your draft. Future reviewers need to be able to see the history of prior submissions. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 14:55, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: MVP Development Company (January 25)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Already rejected at Draft:MVP Development Agencies.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:52, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Editor788 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Editor788. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Spicy (talk) 11:03, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]