User talk:Lysvincent

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:I'm in Control by Aluna George feat Popcaan.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:I'm in Control by Aluna George feat Popcaan.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 09:19, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Benny Benassi discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vassy. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

French peaks

Please stop changing album peaks with links to the Top Albums Téléchargés section of SNEP. This is the album downloads chart and not the overall chart, which is Top Albums Fusionnes. They differ significantly. Ss 112 06:00, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Following my edits

Do not follow my edits or look at what I edit so yo can update things before me, as you just did with the Australian charts. You would have no other way of knowing the data you changed without looking at my contributions, and you clearly copied my reference. This is against Wikipedia policy, so don't do it in future. Stick to your own interests, thanks. Ss 112 08:48, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but I've edited worldwide charts, Iincluding the French chart data, on Wikipedia for years (and more particularly this last year). You have never edited Australian chart information before and to even know about it, you would've had to look at my edits, the webpage I linked to, copy my reference (which isn't technically against rules, but is frowned upon to copy it exactly) and then update things. That's like following somebody around and deciding to start doing what they do when you are going to run into editing the same pages as them, and that is against Wikipedia policy. Also, "wrong format" means you didn't adapt the datr format for the page. Little Mix are British, which uses a date format that puts the date before month. Ss 112 09:37, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not trying to tell you what to do, and it's not up to me to decide what you can and can't edit. If you find them yourself like you found the French chart, then that's what you do. Ss 112 09:57, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Most don't announce it, so people find out themselves. Ss 112 10:35, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There's section on the Wikipedia preferences page where you can customise your signature. Ss 112 10:44, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's on Special:Preferences under signature, yes. I'm not sure what more I can help you with. Ss 112 11:10, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What will you remove 12 hours later and why? Ss 112 11:54, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You can delete whatever you like on your own talk page. Ss 112 09:42, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Lysvincent/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:02, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Lysvincent, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:02, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Your recent edit to Ocean (disambiguation) appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 17:04, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Please stop unnecessarily disambiguating article titles, as you did with I Hate U, I Love U. There is nothing else on Wikipedia that shares this namespace that it would need to be moved to I Hate U, I Love U (song). Additionally, I don't know and don't care how you came across my "wrong peak" on Hello Friday so quickly, but if you are still looking at my edits to follow what I do, I have told you to stop and there will be no more warnings. Ss 112 08:46, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't saying the article was right (obviously it was a simple mistake), I was saying that's what I read and I didn't need to be corrected by you because i was on my way to correct it myself—see the history of Flo Rida discography, as I corrected myself already. Again, like I said to you the other week, the ARIA Chart is something I find it hard to believe you ever found on your own because it doesn't readily say on the Internet what time it updates of a week, so from past evidence (namely me messaging you of a Saturday in weeks past over other mistakes and you replying to me around the time I was updating Australian chart information) I'm assuming you saw what I was editing at what time and checked the website out yourself and now you're going to do that every Saturday. If that's a false "accusation", please tell me how you ever came across the Australian chart yourself out of all the charts there are in the world to add to Wikipedia. Also, your reasoning that people find an article with "song" at the end of it more easily is a strange assumption; adding more unnecessary text to a namespace is not how Wikipedia works. Please stop adding unnecessary disambiguation to titles. Ss 112 09:47, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Some of those charts don't update at the same time every week, and I find it a little coincidental that some of the charts you named already have other dedicated editors (including myself) "quickly" updating the information. Also, the edit to Lay It All on Me (song) was your mistake that I had corrected on other articles you added "Official Chart AFP" to, so you edited it to be in line with what I had pointed out. Ss 112 10:15, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why would I need you to tell me the time the ARIA Charts update when I already know myself and have known for years? To prove you know it yourself? I already know you do. Ss 112 10:21, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Ss112:Yeah, right.lysvincent (Sthg wrong with my edit?Tell me!) 10:32, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That sounded sarcastic when there was no reason to be. I know you do because I believe you probably don't have anything better to do if you tell me you sit around all week waiting for charts to update and "note" the time charts update just so you can, what? Be the first to do it in future when others already have it covered and beat them like it's some sort of competition? Ss 112 10:36, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Lysvincent! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 08:03, Monday, June 13, 2016 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Reference errors on 13 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Imany page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Dude

I Just told you in an edit summary, lescharts.com represents sales and streaming combined. The chart you're looking at on snepmusique.com is téléchargés, which means DOWNLOADS (so, sales) in French. Ss 112 09:06, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Because it's usually a pretty accurate indication of what its final peak will be. It's based on SNEP's data, so it's not a midweek chart or something that shouldn't be added. snepmusique.com just doesn't publish a combined downloads and streaming singles chart. Ss 112 09:39, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Diplo discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to Treat You Better

I'm really mystified by your edit to Treat You Better here. Why did you remove my update to the Danish peak quite a few hours before? Please watch and be careful of what you're doing in future, because that edit was not helpful at all. Ss 112 15:59, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Ss112: I doin't know why it has changed but I swear to god I just changed the date format in Treat You Better!!!! Also I won't changed anyones edit before I've checked, and the Denmark one's? I've never clicked into it before!! So I won't change your edit for no reason?!lysvincent (Sthg wrong with my edit?Tell me!) 00:28, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Ss112: Maybe it's an accident, I will be careful next time, but I REALLY only changed the date format in it!!Maybe someone hacked into my account....lysvincent (Sthg wrong with my edit?Tell me!) 00:28, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Ss112:I feel sad about this, you should too.

Stop removing sources

I'm looking at this page that We Don't Talk Anymore (Charlie Puth song) links to, and no, it hasn't updated. Stop reverting people and being a condescending imitator. Ss 112 12:35, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit: It just updated for me. Still no reason for your attitude, and you should always be checking. Ss 112 12:36, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Ss112:sometimes different places won't have the exact same update time, and mines are updated already 15 minutes before you saying that I'm wrong. If I could just send a photo of Charlie Puth's chart history page that I'm staring at out 15 minutes ago?, it would definitely shuts your mouth.(sorry for being too ruse but this is the truth, and you should trust others edits, you aren't always right :( ) lysvincent (Sthg wrong with my edit?Tell me!) 12:44, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Ss112: I feel sad about this, you should too.　

"I should trust other's edits"? I don't know you. Most people on Wikipedia do not know each other and have no reason to inherently trust others are doing things for the right reason. Also, it wouldn't be "shut[ting] my mouth", considering this is the Internet and I wasn't speaking to you verbally. Ss 112 12:53, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Ss112:Daaaaaa.....never mind, I just wanna note that I now have do things(including edit) more careful than before already, as same as the edit in We Don't Talk Anymore (Charlie Puth song) , so....ya.lysvincent (Sthg wrong with my edit?Tell me!) 13:00, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Are you going to do this every week now? You do not need to remove the extra sources as soon as charts update, you know. Besides, I do it myself. It just seems like a pointless exercise for you to take on yourself. Ss 112 14:18, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 23 August

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the The Weeknd page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:17, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Lysvincent. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Lysvincent/sandbox

Hello, Lysvincent. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 03:06, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that a recent edit of yours to the page Jamiroquai discography has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. Please do not swear in edit summaries, as you did here. There is no need for it. Ss 112 18:17, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry :/ lysvincent (Sthg wrong with my edit?Tell me!) 10:54, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Walker Tour (Alan Walker)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Walker Tour (Alan Walker), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Ronz (talk) 15:24, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alan Walker (music producer) and the related articles need cleanup per WP:SOAP#5. If you don't understand the problems and solutions, I'm happy to explain or point you to ways to discuss it with others. --Ronz (talk) 16:37, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Martin Jensen

You should have created the content for "Solo Dance" at Solo Dance (song) over the top of the redirect, and not at Solo Dance (Martin Jenson song) (which has a spelling error and adds unnecessary disambiguation). The page will now have to be moved by an administrator. Please don't go down the path of all these editors who create articles with spelling errors or unnecessary disambiguation they know are wrong and know will have to be moved just so they can be "rightfully credited as creator of the page". It's disingenuous and creates tasks for admins to do. Ss 112 15:47, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know how to create the content for "Solo Dance" at Solo Dance (song) over the top of the redirect, so I instead created Solo Dance (Martin Jenson song), sorry for that. lysvincent (Sthg wrong with my edit?Tell me!) 16:02, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So should I move the page back to "Solo Dance (song)"? lysvincent (Sthg wrong with my edit?Tell me!) 16:04, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alan Walker discography

It is debatable that releases of "Faded" as remix EPs should even be listed on discographies. Plenty of musicians release remix EPs for singles; these are usually not listed under the EPs section. Please discuss on Talk:Alan Walker discography per WP:BRD, or list them on the article for "Faded". Also read WP:DISCOGSTYLE, or see any featured discographies on Wikipedia: We do not include track listings on discographies. Thank you. Ss 112 13:01, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Vince Staples discography, without citing a reliable source using an inline citation that clearly supports the material. The burden is on the person wishing to keep in the material to meet these requirements, as a necessary (but not always sufficient) condition. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 12:39, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Simple question: Why it should be sourced?lysvincent (Sthg wrong with my edit?Tell me!) 15:26, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Because when you add unsourced content, it diminishes the reliability of Wikipedia, and undermines the hard work of other editors. Please read WP:V, and do not edit war over unsourced content. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 00:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Fetty Wap discography. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:57, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well you are now undermines the hard work of my edits. Oh and btw, why some singles(or album, for sure) wasn't sourced and you don't go remove it cause it's unsourced? Also, please read things that I've edited before you revert my content, as you did in Betty Who page, TBA should be placed in the album column cause it wasn't released, and doesn't fit your reason for "removing unsourced content". lysvincent (Sthg wrong with my edit?Tell me!) 13:03, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at LunchMoney Lewis. Magnolia677 (talk) 13:51, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why it should be sourced while other singles and that page don't have to, explain to me!!!! If you ain't explaining at all and blocked men it was rude and ain't good for the future of Wiki. 15:19, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

See what I'm talking about? I hate editors that point out the problems without further explanations. Too bad. lysvincent (Sthg wrong with my edit?Tell me!) 14:22, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 6 February

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Marshmello page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:28, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak (AJR song)

Please manually move your content to Weak (AJR song), then turn Weak (AJR Song) into a redirect there. I think you know that it's not correct to capitalise the s in "song" when disambiguating titles, and I also think you know how to create content over a redirect (if you don't, click edit on this page). I told you this when you created a mistaken page for "Solo Dance". Ss 112 14:08, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I can't explain why other editors do the things they do. Some editors prefer to remove unsourced content entirely, I prefer to tag it. Ss 112 14:09, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thx for the explanation and the teach, a lot. I appreciate that Wiki has this kind of editors that love to help others and make Wiki better, hope you can continue make good effort on it, cheers mate:). lysvincent (Sthg wrong with my edit?Tell me!) 14:21, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at AlunaGeorge discography. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:37, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 06:59, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lysvincent (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It said it was the next time I do the same thing, well I hadn't edit anything for a total of 12hrs before you blocked me and after Magnolia told me the warning, why I should be blocked then ? And why you guys just can't explain the consideration from me? 175.45.24.130 (talk) 08:26, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If this request is made by Lysvincent, please note that you should be signed in before making requests. Otherwise, we don't know if it's you or some passer-by. Peridon (talk) 11:34, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Again, the unblock request must come from this account. Any unblock requests from other accounts or from IP addresses will be reverted. --Yamla (talk) 14:28, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You set up an account to get around this block, in violation of WP:BLOCK and WP:SOCK. As such, I have extended the block on this account. Any admin is welcome to unblock you on or after 2017-02-10, if but only if you show you understand why your behaviour was unacceptable. This requires that you demonstrate an understanding of these two policies as well as the policies that lead to your initial block. --Yamla (talk) 14:32, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

To @Yamla:: I think you guys will block me forever, and NO ADMIN will come unblock me, although I've had shown my understand why my behavior was unacceptable, am I right. Btw, how to show that I "understand my behavior was unacceptable? And spelling mistakes was found in your article. 175.45.24.130 (talk) 08:53, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You've shown no understanding whatsoever. You haven't even discussed your violation of WP:BLOCK and WP:SOCK, let alone demonstrated understanding. Once you do this, you are free to make an unblock request. --Yamla (talk) 14:22, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

To @Yamla: There are a few questions

How to discussed my violation of WP:BLOCK and WP:SOCK?
Is it to explain my behavior?
How to show understand? Finish the discuss??
Why some admin not willing to answer questions I've mentioned above?
Just what if, what if I am unblocked with this account, so can I create a second account. and use two account at the same time to edit WIKIPEDIA?

Thanks for your attention, hope you'll answer my consideration. :) 175.45.24.130 (talk) 08:54, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You need to explain to us that you understand WP:BLOCK and WP:SOCK, that your earlier violations of these were inappropriate, and convince us you won't violate these again. As to "Why some admin not willing to answer questions I've mentioned above?", I don't see any unanswered questions. If this account is unblocked, you are not free to use two accounts at the same time to edit Wikipedia. Come on now, this is clearly explained in WP:SOCK and I'm beginning to think you are just deliberately wasting our time. --Yamla (talk) 11:45, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla: Lysvincent has clearly created yet another account to get around this; No Mono (talk · contribs) has had the exact same user page created for them as Lysvincent 2nd had here. Ss 112 13:41, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed. I've now blocked that account and will soon roll back the contributions. It is now clear that Lysvincent is deliberately wasting our time. --Yamla (talk) 13:57, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla: It's okay, I already undid their contribs. Ss 112 14:07, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Engaged in block evasion on 2017-07-10 via 103.192.44.165 (talk · contribs). --Yamla (talk) 12:05, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Engaged in block evasion on 2018-02-01 via 58.152.157.169 (talk · contribs). --Yamla (talk) 12:25, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]