User talk:Edouard-lopez

Welcome!

Hello, Edouard-lopez, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! , SqueakBox 17:34, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Request for edit summary

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labelled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

When you leave the edit summary blank, some of your edits could be mistaken for vandalism and may be reverted, so please always briefly summarize your edits, especially when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. – Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 19:16, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Summary

Hi, I´m sorry, mainly i just done little and quick modif and i forgot to put summary >.<.
PS: i din´t know of which article youb are talking about, but i forgot often time.
As a courtesy for other editors, it is a Wikipedia guideline to sign your talk page and user talk page posts. To do so simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments and your user name or IP address and the date will be automatically added along with a timestamp. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). For further info read Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you.

I don't know myself which article I am talking about. :) But there was one I guess. :) Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 22:32, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On a second look, it appears that you almost never put edit summaries, too bad. :) A good habit to learn. :) Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 22:34, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete procedure

(respone to your msg on User talk:DESiegel):

These may be good reasons to delete this image, but not to Speedy delete it. the speedy delete criteria page says (under Images/Media, item #1) "Redundant. An image which is a redundant copy, in the same image file format and same or lower resolution, of something else on Wikipedia. This does not apply to images duplicated on Wikimedia Commons, because of licence issues; these should be tagged with {{NowCommons|Image:newname.ext}} instead." So go to Images for Deletion to propose that this image be deleted. DES ^(talk) 20:43, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talk section deletion

I notice you recently removed a discussion in Talk:Portuguese language. Please don't. While talk page overcrowding is a relatively common problem, that's why we archive talk pages, making it a little easier to look up older content later. Thank you and good editing! :) ≈ Ekevu (♥ • ★) 13:25, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pseudo-category on your .js page

While looking at the full list of categories, I found a link to your monobook.js page. That's because it contains the string "[ [Category:" (without the embedded space). You can remove this pseudo-link by replacing the string with "[" + "[Category:". Matchups 04:19, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

t'es encore a l'apart ? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 147.210.201.7 (talk) 15:26, 11 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Hello Lyh

There an interesting video : http://download.srv.cs.cmu.edu/~pausch/ , ind the one about Time Management using F3 in firefox. mbye Yug 16:01, 8 November 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.120.55.73 (talk)

Disambiguation link notification for September 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Pleade (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Cocoon, CSV, ILS, EAD, TEI and SDX

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hypertext Application Language

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Hypertext Application Language, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 18:44, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your request for undeletion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that a response has been made at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion regarding a submission you made. The thread is Hypertext Application Language. JohnCD (talk) 10:47, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

318 Taiwan event

Hello, you can vote there to push this event into the news. Yug (talk) 05:32, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hypertext Application Language

At Yug (talk)'s request, I emailed you the text of this. I also promised Yug that I would give you some advice - sorry to have been slow about that.

The main point is that Wikipedia is not a "list of everything". It is actually quite selective about article subjects. The criterion used is called Wikipedia:Notability, and is not a matter of opinion but has to be demonstrated by showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Significant means more than just listing-type mentions; reliable excludes Myspace, Facebook, blogs, places where anyone can post anything; independent excludes the subject's own website, affiliated ones and anything based on press releases. The test is, have people not connected with the subject thought it significant enough to write substantial comment about?

That has the advantage of being a more objective test than "Do we think it's important?" and also of ensuring that there are independent sources for the article. It is quite a tough test, and many perfectly worthy people, things and organizations, especially new ones, cannot pass it. That is not at all to their discredit, but it means they are not suitable subjects for a global encyclopedia.

The rest of what I have to say is in User:JohnCD/Not a noticeboard, which I wrote because I find myself having the same conversation so often. It's a general essay, so it may not all apply.

You can post any questions below here - I will watch this talk page. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 23:17, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Pleade-logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pleade-logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Necrocapitalism (July 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Festucalex was:

Neologisms are not considered suitable for Wikipedia unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong evidence in independent, reliable, published sources. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish its notability.

The comment the reviewer left was:

More sources are needed. Please read WP:RS and WP:PASSING, edit accordingly, and resubmit.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Necrocapitalism and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

〜 Festucalex • talk 12:46, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Edouard-lopez! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 〜 Festucalex • talk 12:46, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thanks for the message. I'm indeed surprised by its slamming nature, as I took some time to create a draft (not an article) so other people can contribute. I'm adding more links and content to the article (i.e. open access article, other academic link). But I'm not a regular contributor anymore

- edouard-lopez (Talk) 09:37, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Necrocapitalism has been accepted

Necrocapitalism, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 03:40, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]