User talk:Lumos3/Archive 9

Archive of comments from September 2010 to June 2012 of Lumos3's Discussion page , placed here 03 October 2012. Lumos3 (talk) 22:00, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Frontiers of science comic strip.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Frontiers of science comic strip.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude(talk 07:21, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Giles Christmas Parrot.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Giles Christmas Parrot.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description pageand edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 07:50, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Signpost

Hi Lumos3, I have noticed that you are sometimes updating Wikipedia:Press coverage. As you know, in the Signpost we are similarly trying to keep readers informed about media coverage of Wikipedia/Wikimedia, in the "In the news" section. The section has usually more than a 1000 readers [1] and islinked in the Foundation's monthly reports, but unfortunately we currently are short on good writers for it, and had to drop it in the current issue for first time since May.

Would you like to contribute every now and then? Even if you are not inclined to write a full story, a short summary (even if it is just one sentence) of a news story can be very useful - compare your summaries for the Swiss award for Jimbo, or the International Baccalaureate story, with the Signpost's likewise brief coverage of these two news items.

Work on the section is coordinated in the Signpost newsroom, where there are already some suggestions listed for the upcoming edition (Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2010-10-25/In the news, to be published on Monday).

Regards, HaeB (talk) 12:36, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Hi HaeB, thank you for your invitation. Its true I have a long standing interest in the way Wikipedia is developing and being received by the world at large. I used to post news reports in the Signpost about 3 or 4 years ago but the process seemed to grow defunct and I found my posts were being ignored so I stopped. I would be happy to post any news items I find in the page you specify above, and equally happy for any editorial changes you or the Signpost team want to make to them for publication. best wishes Lumos3 (talk) 14:28, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks! As you have seen, I added more myself, but your write-ups were very helpful. Work on the new issue has started, I listed some news items to cover here, your contribution would be welcome.

Regards, HaeB (talk) 10:10, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Freddiedreamers bw.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Freddiedreamers bw.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:13, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Sign post

I just wanted to call your attention to the November 25, 2010 issue of the satiric newspaper, The Onion which features afront page story on Wikipedia.

Thanks , I think this is covered in the Briefly section of today's Sign post. Lumos3 (talk) 11:53, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, Lumos!

I greatly appreciate the opportunity afforded by Wikipedia to freely edit within the project. My focus is on cleaning things up to professional standards, a condition befitting such an ambitious undertaking as this. Typos are my absolute pet peeve; they keep me up at night and so I try and eliminate them as soon as I see them. It gives me an excellent excuse to wile away countless hours on Wiki and I usually end up learning a great deal in the process.

In answer to your invitation, I do have one question for you. I'm particularly fascinated with early medieval history and everything connected to it. I was wondering if there is something more I could be doing with my contributions in this area. Is there some sort of history portal club or the like that I could get involved with?

I look forward to contributing more and better in the future.

Thanks for reaching out, Lumos.

TheConduqtor (talk) 05:28, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Dear Conduqtor , Nice to see an enthusiastic new recruit. Wikipedians interested in a particular topic or specialism organise themselves in "projects" where work is identified and tasks taken up. There is very little central control. Task ideas/requests are posted up and hopefully someone will step up and take them on. I suggest you take a look atWikipedia:WikiProject Middle Ages. It has discussion areas and you simply have to add your user id to its list of participants to join. You should be able to link up with others doing similar work to you there. Remember the Wikipedia motto be bold , since mistaken changes can be easily rolled back , if you upset someone just say sorry and think again.

If you find anything puzzles you I'm happy to answer further questions. Lumos3 (talk) 11:09, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Ivor the engine.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Ivor the engine.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 22:28, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

New

Thanks for the help and encouragement. First post, I'm learning. Takes times but may become gratifying.... Well c. Mundugumor (talk) 14:59, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

Need any help or questions answered I'll do my best just ask here. Lumos3 (talk) 00:24, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Not enough time to join

I was just wandering around the site and thought I had found stuff that might help and just left information on the discussion page so that any editor could look it up to see if it was of any use.86.44.71.5 (talk) 13:11, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

   * Holiday for Shoestrings
     The cartoon is done largely in pantomime , with the occasional (unintelligble) bickering of elves, many of which look like miniature ...
     2 KB (269 words) - 19:30, 13 May 2010
   * Ngöbe-Buglé
     separate linguistic/indigenous groups whose languages are mutually unintelligble The larger group, the Ngäbe, speak Ngäbere, while the ...
     17 KB (2,544 words) - 11:20, 31 December 2010
   * History of chemistry
     Egyptian alchemists whose works were largely allegorical and often unintelligble He also invented and named the alembic (al-anbiq), ...
     45 KB (6,260 words) - 15:44, 24 December 2010
   * Alchemy and chemistry in the Caliphates
     comparing his experimental and systematic works in chemistry with that of the allegorical and unintelligble works of the ancient Greek alchemists" ...
     62 KB (8,342 words) - 15:28, 24 December 2010
   * Bollywood
     movies are about an alien culture, based on a religion wholly different, and, for the most part, a language that is unintelligble to the viewers. ...
     86 KB (12,205 words) - 16:58, 6 January 2011

unintelligible These are five instances where the second "i" is missing 86.44.71.5(talk) 08:40, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

All your edits are constructive and benefit Wikipedia. Becoming a member implies no obligation to edit regularly or at all. It just gives you an identity which allows you to look back at what you have done and perhaps get some satisfaction. You don't have to reveal anything of yourself apart from an email address. Many Wikipedia editors only fix grammar / spellings and this is a useful function respected by the community. See WP:GNOME. Whatever you decide its good to see someone prepared to intervene to improve things. You can keep doing this anonymously if that's what you prefer.Lumos3 (talk) 09:37, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Carol Steen

[2] – been readingthis article? :) matt (talk) 19:44, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

So had I so I thought I'd do something about it.Lumos3 (talk) 19:46, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Exactly, good work! matt (talk) 19:54, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Autopatrolled

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

• This permission does not give you any special status or authority
• Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
• You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
• If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:29, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks Lumos3 (talk) 09:04, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the welcome

Thanks for the welcome message and links, Lumos3. Sincerely, Trouvé (talk) 05:04, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

I would also like to thank you for the welcome, the links were very helpful Lumos3! From Canada: --+Zack 02:42, 2 February 2011 (UTC)AddZack

Any quetions please ask me. Lumos3 (talk) 11:32, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Thanks from me as well. It's good to be welcomed :-) SueTwo (talk) 21:16, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

Photo request

Hi! Do you do photo requests? Is Cheshunt convenient to your location?

If so, would you mind photographing:

• Tesco House, Cheshunt, Waltham Cross, Hertfordshire, EN8 9SL (the Google maps image)

Thank you, WhisperToMe (talk) 19:14, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

• Okay, an update - I checked Flickr and found that there was a free photo of the Tesco House there, so I uploaded it here:File:TescoHouseCheshunt.jpg
• If you want to take more photos of the building and upload them, though, you are welcome to
• WhisperToMe (talk) 19:19, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

If you want free photos of places in the UK with a Creative Commons Licence then look at http://www.Geograph.co.uk. All its photos are CC and are indexed by grid square. Most have already been updated to Wikimedia Commons. Afraid I dont have the time to go about taking photos on request myself. Happy editing.Lumos3 (talk) 22:57, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Alrighty! I have used Geograph on several occasions, and I got some of my photos from there.WhisperToMe (talk) 03:16, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Architonnerre

Hello! Your submission of Architonnerre at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Schwede66 03:34, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Hello! The length of your article seems to be OK after all, please see the nomination page. GregorB (talk) 14:40, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Architonnerre

Materialscientist (talk) 00:03, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject Women's History

WikiProject Women's History needs members' input on implementing auto-assessment. You'll find the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women's History#Auto-assessment. Best wishes, Voceditenore (talk) 11:11, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Naomi Mitchison.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Naomi Mitchison.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currentlyorphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:14, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thank you Lumos3! I appreciate your warm belated welcome. The links are very helpful. Signed, JoshE3 (talk) 13:07, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

My edits to Zodiac

My edit was not vandalism. Ophiuchus is a HOAX. —Precedingunsigned comment added by 142.179.120.75 (talk) 02:02, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia aims to achieve neutrality on all subject and represent all points of view in proportion to their level of acceptance. If Ophiuchus is a hoax perhaps you'd like to explain how this came about , who perpetrated it and why etc on the page in question , giving reliable sources to back up what you write.Lumos3(talk) 10:32, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Members' input needed at WikiProject Women's History

Hello. I'm writing to you as your name is listed on the members pagefor WikiProject Women's History. In recent discussions at the project, most notably here, several members have indicated that the scope of the project may need to be more clearly defined and communicated. I have set up a workshop page for this, but it obviously needs as wide a participation as possible to achieve genuine consensus and to allow the project to move forward. You'll find the workshop here.

If you no longer consider yourself an active member of the project, it would help if you could indicate this on the members' page. This will allow us to better gauge how much people-power we actually have. Best wishes,Voceditenore (talk) 04:34, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

Thanks . I am still interested in the project . I will take a look. Lumos3 (talk) 08:52, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

DYK nomination of De Rivaz engine

Hello! Your submission of De Rivaz engine at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! —Bruce1ee^talk 15:05, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Women's History Project – Final call for comments on the Scope draft

Our workshop on revising and clarifying the scope of our project has produced a draft outlining our project's scope and criteria for article inclusion. Please join us at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women's History/Scope workshop#Scope draftto discuss this document. There's a separate section beneath it for final comments, which will remain open through Tuesday, June 14th. As Cynwolfe says "with good participation, we should be able to revise our project page soon, clearing up the issues we've been dealing with and preparing us to go on to the fun stuff." Best wishes,Voceditenore (talk) 12:46, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

DYK for De Rivaz engine

Materialscientist (talk) 12:02, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Another Year

Hello Lumos3. I reverted most of your changes to the plot summary for Another Year because to me they seemed to fall foul ofWP:FILMPLOT which suggests the length of a synopsis should be between 400-700 words and that there should be no "analytic, synthetic, interpretive, explanatory, or evaluative claims." I also thought some of the detail you added, while accurate, would only make it more difficult for a reader who had not seem the film to understand the plot. WP:PLOTSUMemphasises that summaries should be concise, stating "a plot summary is not a recap". I know you'll be annoyed, but I'd be happy to discuss things on the article's talk page if you want. Exok (talk) 11:55, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

At just over 500 words the length of the summary as I left it was not excessive. The problem is that the film has no "plot" as such just a series of vignettes about the life of a family. If the only bare plot is given then the reader will essentially have no idea what the film is about. Every scene is significant in that it help to paint the wider picture. I will take out some of the detail where I may have gone too far and feel free to amend the result in the article.Lumos3 (talk) 09:42, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for that response. Exok (talk) 09:47, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

New Age Good article now!

Amazing, I didn't read New_Age entirely, but did check a little recent history and the original discussion page. I think you deserve a lot of credit for holding off the Saracens.

Φ --BF (talk) 22:56, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Hello BF I remember you from years ago welcome back. Thanks for your comment. Lumos3 (talk) 21:43, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Caxton Hall

Hello! Your submission of Caxton Hall at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! —Biosketch (talk) 02:45, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

Still some issues. Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:16, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Caxton Hall

rʨanaɢ (talk) 08:04, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Come hang out with us!

Hi! I just wanted to let you know that we have created an IRC channel for "countering systemic bias one new editor at a time", aka closing the gender gap! Come hang out at#wikimedia-gendergap. I hope you'll join us! (And if you need any IRC help, just let me know!) See you there! SarahStierch (talk) 00:56, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Emotional Therapy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emotional Therapy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emotional Therapy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Biker Biker (talk) 15:19, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

How do I contact a User?

Dear Lumos3,

I would like to contact a User named DragonflySixtyseven who has deleted a draft article I was writing. It was deleted on the grounds of being 'overly promotional' and I want to find out how I can make the article Wiki compliant. I have written to DragonflySixtyseven using this format of Discussion but not heard anything back. Am I doing things in the right way? I am new to this and beginning to trying to find my way around.

Thanks in advance.

KidLotus (talk) 17:51, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Dear KidLotus, Go to DragonflySixtyseven's User page here User:DragonflySixtyseven. You will see that they welcome email but say they will respond on your talk page. To email a user look in the left hand column while in their user or user talk page . You will see there a link called ' email this user'. Click here and write the message in the form which appears. This will send a message to the email account they used to register with Wikipedia.

To make an article more Wikipedia compliant material needs to cite independent sources separate from its subject. The best would be ones in academic journals , books which are not self published ( ie. published by an publisher who exercises some editorial control) , and also newspaper articles for current events . See WP:RS for more on this subject. Hope this helps. Don't get discouraged it takes a while to learn the rules and norms of Wikipedia. Best wishes Lumos3(talk) 09:08, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Vernier.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Vernier.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calvin 1998 ^(t·c) 01:53, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Lumos3/Archive 9! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please seeNPP Survey

Broken redirect

Hello. You recently created Precipitation (geology) as a redirect to itself. I would fix this if I could, but I cannot figure out what article you were trying to redirect to. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 20:09, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing this out . I think I've corrected the situation.Lumos3 (talk) 23:16, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Kalki Bhagavan

Vijaykumar a.k.a "Kalki Bhagavan" has never claimed himself as the title of "Kalki Bhagavan" himself; it was a name that stuck from Indian villagers around his headquartes; though he would migh take some advantage of this - as all gurus do - theKalki_Bhagavan article has to be oriented that way. — Precedingunsigned comment added by 189.97.51.170 (talk) 00:09, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for the welcome by Lumos3.

DeepHeat (talk) 09:29, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

Thank you!

Hello, Thank you very much for your welcome message; I thought I would simply say that as a matter of courtesy. I will be sure to avail myself of the resources listed with your welcome over the coming weeks.

Kind regards. Astimolo (talk) 20:35, 25 November 2011 (UTC)Astimolo

welcome

Lumos3,

Thank you very much for the welcome !!

Here is who I am:

http://www.mpsaz.org/rmhs/staff/hljohnson/solar_information/

hljmesa — Preceding unsigned comment added byHljmesa (talk • contribs) 20:41, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

You clearly have a lot of experience and knowledge of renewable energy. Keep on sharing it on Wikipedia. Best wishes Lumos3 (talk) 23:01, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

PS When you post a comment on a talk page its Wikipedia practise to sign it by typing 4 'tilds' thus ~~~~. The software picked up that your comment was unsigned and autosigned for you.

Muktananda

thank you Lumos3.

I was not intending to engage anyone on this old business. I was just browsing and when I saw Wiki's article with its paltry mention of Muktananda's behavior issues and criminal activity by his subordinates, I suddenly had to say something. I don't know how to verify anything, but I know I was a direct witness and participant. In history, a direct source is considered a valid source. Alot of what I said is factually true. Some of it was what I believe to be true.

I suppose what really bothers me is that the Wiki article misses the meaning of the Muktananda phenomenon, which I suppose is similar to other cultish goings-on. If he were presenting himself as a teacher, many things could be excused. He was in fact presenting himself as far more than that. The followers were for whatever reason, caused to make terrible decisions. Many lives were negatively impacted. Shades of Jonestown! — Precedingunsigned comment added by Palasko53 (talk •contribs) 13:12, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia has no way of knowing who's personal testimony is true and who's isn't. We have to relay on published works where the author ,editor or publisher takes responsibility for the truth and is willing to defend it in law. Where a work has been published in this way , not self published, then there is strong grounds for including its views in the article. One day I hope someone will write such a book about SY. I have found the experiences people have in SY are not so special, they happen in all spiritual paths where there is an earnest desire to gain self knowledge. In western culture there is no framework to place a truly spritual experience. When people have one they are easily persuaded they have been "given it" by whatever individual or organisation was around at the time. Lumos3 (talk) 10:43, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

PS When you post a comment on a talk page its Wikipedia practise to sign it by typing 4 'tilds' thus ~~~~. The software picked up that your comment was unsigned and autosigned for you.

Nomination of Lee Carroll for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lee Carroll is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee Carroll until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.Orange Mike | Talk 03:19, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Margaret O'Connor, alias Máireg Béan Ó Conchubhair Fáilghe

Hi there. It seems the two articles are about the same woman. How about merging them? Fergananim (talk) 03:23, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited List of encyclopedias, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cyclopedia(check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read theFAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Light in the Piazza (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Madonna, George Hamilton, Barry Sullivan and Conversion

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

An award for you!

		Mind the Gap Award
		I, SarahStierch, hereby award you, Lumos3, with the Mind the Gap Award for your awesome and continuous contributions about women and women's history, including your work regardingThe Dinner Party. Thank you for all you do! SarahStierch (talk) 20:24, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Thank you Sarah. Lumos3 (talk) 23:15, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter

Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter Volume I, Issue III February 2012 Front cover | Feature | News and announcements | Humor | Want ads To contribute to the next newsletter, please visit the Newsletter draft page. ARS Members automatically receive this newsletter. To opt out, please remove your name from the recipients list.

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Oil pulling, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Plaque(check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read theFAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

AfD and PROD notifications

Hi Lumos3,

Back in December, you got either an AfD or PROD notification, which was part of the template testing project's experiments. If you could go here and leave us some feedback about what you think about the new versions of the templates we tested (there are links to the templates), that would be very useful. (You can also email me at mpinchukwikimedia.org if you want.) Thanks! Maryana (WMF)(talk) 23:44, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Correction I made to Big George Webley page

Hiya

I've just had message about a correction I had made saying it was incorrect. I know my information is right and can be verified by Gary/"Big George" Webley's brother if need be - will I have to get something from him to prove it?

Kind regards

Karen (aka Princess Angelique) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Princess Angelique (talk • contribs) 19:28, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Karen

I have the same problem where a relative is notable enough to have a wikipedia page. Even though I know a lot of things which are true I cannot enter them in the article because of the Wikipedia Reliable sources rules. Personal knowledge of a subject or person is not sufficient because we have no way of checking you are who you say you are. So Wikipedia relies on sources that have already been published elsewhere. If the brother has written and published a biography or newspaper article then they are sources you can use . Word of mouth is not sufficiently reliable to be used as a source. This is especially important for living people where the law of libel may come into play if we publish inaccuracies. Hope this helps. Lumos3 (talk) 11:21, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Wavendon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jim Marshall(check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 5

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Atira (goddess) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Tirawa

Baculum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mental state

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 12

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Funton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Chatham

Tiger Balm (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Tiger Balm Garden

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 19

Hi. When you recently edited Tomorrow and tomorrow and tomorrow, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageAll Our Yesterdays (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 26

Hi. When you recently edited Stonor Park, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Puddingstone(check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read theFAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Welcoming message

I really appreciate the 'welcome' message you left for me. I'm enjoying exploring the Wikipedia community.EleriWall (talk) 23:05, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

image copyright

Hello. Your page

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_and_Tide_(magazine)

makes use of an image that has been taken from my website

http://www.magforum.com/news_magazines.htm

without my permission and without a credit or link to the source.

As the owner of this image, I would appreciate it if you would add a credit and a link.

Thank you,

Tony Quinn — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.140.59.228 (talk) 22:50, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Attribution and a link is given in the Non-free media information and use rationale for Time and Tide (magazine) here.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Time_Tide_1965_Sept_2.jpg . I have expanded the credit to give your full details.Lumos3 (talk) 23:16, 14 June 2012 (UTC)