User talk:Luklear

Welcome!

Hello, Luklear! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 07:32, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Recent edit to Methylpentynol

Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Onel5969 (talk) 12:58, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Luklear, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Luklear! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Ushau97 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:22, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Α-Eucaine

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Α-Eucaine, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Eucaine. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:14, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Β-Eucaine

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Β-Eucaine, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Eucaine. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:16, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Β-Eucaine

The article Β-Eucaine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Nothing but a full quote here...that's in excess of fair-use. And its only claim to notability (the only sentence that is not a quote) is contradicted by it (the *first* was A-Eucaine not B)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DMacks (talk) 21:30, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Β-Eucaine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Opthalmic. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:03, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Socking

Blocked long term sock. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 01:40, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you block my account again? I'm going to leave the bath/kitchen taps in my flat running water for at least a week, if not longer as protest to my corrupt government won't even give me a proper lab/job to work. England is the shittest country. They don't care about their citizens here. I'm going to keep running my taps non-stop for days now. Like I did a month ago. That will teach people a lesson--Luklear (talk) 04:35, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay Luklear why do you want to add information on synthesis of chemicals to Wikipedia? The issue is that much of the content you add is "copied and pasted" from your sources. Additionally some have concerns that it is not appropriate for a general encyclopdia as most chemicals can be made in many ways.

Maybe we can figure out a way for you to contribute positively. Would be good to save the UK some water. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:44, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 01:40, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Luklear (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want you to unblock my account now. 79.74.7.2 (talk) 10:53, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Unblock requests must be made by the owner of the account, logged in. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:30, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Proposed deletion of Nexeridine

The article Nexeridine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

TNT

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sammy1339 (talk) 22:13, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nexeridine for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nexeridine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nexeridine until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sammy1339 (talk) 14:12, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]