User talk:Luke Warmwater101

Luke,I see that you are working on the Guna article. This is great, I just put a banner on there asking for help with references. I see that you have added something from Maharishi. That is OK but it appears that you have quoted directly from his book. This is not permitted on Wiki unless the person is being "quoted" and then quotation marks are used. Generally we paraphrase info from sources unless there is a specific reason to quote the author. You can check WP:CS for more details. thanks --Kbob (talk) 01:10, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am finished with my edits to the Guna page. I did rearrange some of your edits by Feurstein. I hope that's alright. I will let you take care of the Maharishi quote which needs to be edited as mentioned above. --Kbob (talk) 21:05, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Kbob, I rearranged the quite and will research further to insure it's all right, I am also working on some other quotes on this article. Thanks for the inputLuke Warmater101 (talk) 22:18, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Did I say "quotes"? I meant to say "references" Luke Warmater101 (talk) 22:20, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Luke, it seems your name is mispelled in your signature, is that intentional? If not check your 'preferences'. Also when you comment on a discussion page it is traditional that each new comment is indented by putting one more colon that the previous comment. If you look at the page you'll see what I mean. Welcome to Wiki--Kbob (talk) 01:20, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Editors aren't just editors

especially when they're busy pushing the POV of their employers. We've got MUM employees, SIMS employees and others with direct finanical ties to the TM Org, busily editing the TM-related articles in between (and for all I know, during) bunny hopping sessions, repeating the same TM-Org talking points over and over and over again through 21 and counting archives in the TM article alone. These are not casual practitioners of TM. And anytime anyone who doesn't owe their livlihood to the Maharishi's vast financial empire tries to edit the article, including Administrators, they're the enemy, and pointing out that the editor is hopeless conflicted, and his or her arguments baseless is uncivil and a personal attack. Look, I've got no dog in this fight - I'm neither a devotee of, nor opponent of, TM or any other competing product/religion/ideology/whatever. (My own approach to self-improvement is "If you cant' fix it with duct tape or a martini, it isn't worth fixing.") I'm just trying to achieve a balanced, encyclopedic article.Fladrif (talk) 19:15, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your recent changes!

Thanks for your recent edits!! - 189.217.171.135 (talk) 01:47, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You Deserve a Cookie

Canada

I've posted a question for you at Talk:TM-Sidhi_program#Canada_study. Your response would be appreciated, when you have a chance. Will Beback talk 20:54, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TM editors for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Will Beback talk 21:03, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration notice

You are involved in a recently-filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests#Transcendental Meditation movement and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—

Thanks, –MuZemike 19:42, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Transcendental Meditation movement

An Arbitration case involving you has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Transcendental Meditation movement/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Transcendental Meditation movement/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Dougweller (talk) 11:22, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, and a suggestion

I hope you will be open to a small suggestion. Many of your edits are small changes to the same section. Please consider using the "Show Preview" button to verify each change and only click "Save page" when you feel that you are finished editing. This has many advantages, including reducing the "diffs" and the edit history entries stored by WP. Welcome to the TM arbitration case. David Spector 20:10, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Transcendental Meditation movement/Evidence

Hello Luke Warmwater101. Your evidence on the above page stands at over 1200 words. The limit is 1000. Please refactor it within the next 24 hours or a clerk will do it for you. Regards, Ryan Postlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 17:52, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Transcendental Meditation movement

This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. The following is a summary of the remedies enacted:

All editors who are party to this case are instructed to read the principles, to review their own past conduct in the light of them, and if necessary to modify their future conduct to ensure full compliance with them.
Editors are reminded that when editing in controversial subject areas it is all the more important to comply with Wikipedia policies. In addition, editors who find it difficult to edit a particular article or topic from a neutral point of view and to adhere to other Wikipedia policies are counselled that they may sometimes need or wish to step away temporarily from that article or subject area, and to find other related but less controversial topics in which to edit.
Any uninvolved administrator may, in his or her own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor editing Transcendental meditation or other articles concerning Transcendental meditation and related biographies of living people, broadly defined, if, after a warning, that editor repeatedly or seriously violates the behavioural standards or editorial processes of Wikipedia in connection with these articles.
Uninvolved administrators are invited to monitor the articles in the area of conflict to enforce compliance by editors with, in particular, the principles outlined in this case. Enforcing administrators are instructed to focus on fresh and clear-cut matters arising after the closure of this case rather than on revisiting historical allegations.
From time to time, the conduct of editors within the topic may be re-appraised by any member of the Arbitration Committee and, by motion of the Arbitration Committee, further remedies may be summarily applied to specific editors who have failed to conduct themselves in an appropriate manner.
User:Fladrif is (i) strongly admonished for incivility, personal attacks, and assumptions of bad faith; and (ii) subject to an editing restriction for one year. Should he make any edits which are judged by an administrator to be uncivil, personal attacks, or assumptions of bad faith, he may be briefly blocked, up to a week in the event of repeated violations. After three blocks, the maximum block shall increase to one month.
Should any user subject to a restriction or topic ban in this case violate that restriction or ban, that user may be blocked, initially for up to one month, and then with blocks increasing in duration to a maximum of one year, with the topic ban clock restarting at the end of the block.

For and on behalf of the Arbitration Committee Александр Дмитрий (Alexandr Dmitri) (talk) 18:32, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss this

AGF

Please see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Transcendental Meditation movement#Decorum and assumptions of good faith. Will you remove your personal remarks or do you require an official warning? Will Beback talk 03:49, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. It never hurts to follow the Golden Rule: treat other editors the way you'd like to be treated. Will Beback talk 05:41, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Editor input requested

In trying to get a sense of where editors stand on the TM article split merge situation It would help to have a definitve statement from each editor. This is not as I see it, to determine a change but to determine whether we can agree on this important issue and if we can't to get outside help. Input here: [1](olive (talk) 19:11, 23 October 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Suggestion #5 in the TM article

There is a discussion about the interpretation of suggestion #5 in the TM article. Your input would be appreciated. Edith Sirius Lee (talk) 19:46, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MMY talk

I'm not sure what you were intending to do, but you deleted most of the talk page. I've undone your edit - could you please redo whatever you meant to do, but without deleting everything else? Will Beback talk 02:52, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2011 ArbCom Elections confirmation

Hi, I am Bencmq and I am one of the scrutineers of the on-going 2011 Arbitration Committee Elections, and my duty is to ensure the validity of individual votes.

Vote log shows that you have casted your vote through the SecurePoll extension. However the system marked your entry as possible CSRF (Cross-site request forgery), meaning that this entry may not be made by you, but forged by malicious script script instead.

Therefore I would like to confirm with you that you have voted in the 2011 ArbCom Elections at: 04:41, 30 November 2011 (UTC) via the SecurePoll extension interface.

If you did not vote at the above-mentioned time, please let me know immediately so I can strike out the entry. If you did, this entry will be kept. As whom you voted for is still confidential and I have no access to that information. :)

Feel free to ask me if you have any questions. Thank you.

Best Regards, Ben.MQ (talk) 03:27, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute resolution survey

Dispute Resolution – Survey Invite

Hello Luke Warmwater101. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Wikipedia, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released.

Please click HERE to participate.
Many thanks in advance for your comments and thoughts.

You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated research page. Steven Zhang ^{DR goes to Wikimania!} 02:02, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your Credo Reference account is approved

Good news! You are approved for access to 350 high quality reference resources through Credo Reference.

Fill out the survey with your username and an email address where your sign-up information can be sent.
If you need assistance, ask User:Ocaasi.
A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a Credo article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free Credo pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:Credo accounts/Citations.
Credo would love to hear feedback at WP:Credo accounts/Experiences
Show off your Credo access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/Credo_userbox}} on your userpage
If you decide you no longer can or want to make use of your account, donate it back by adding your name here

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 17:20, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your Credo account access has been sent to your email!

All editors who were approved for a Credo account and filled out the survey giving their username and email address were emailed Credo account access information. Please check your email.

If you didn't receive an email, or didn't fill out the survey, please email me at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com
If you tried out Credo and no longer want access, email me at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com

If you have any other questions, feel free to contact me. I hope you enjoy your account! User:Ocaasi 15:36, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

TM movement talk page

I have a PDF of the Wash Po article. If you activate your email I can send it to you.-- — Keithbob • Talk • 20:39, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done, thanks for sending. --Luke Warmwater101 (talk) 19:49, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

New User Template

This user is a member of the
Wiki Project on Transcendental Meditation.

Hi, I am notifying all editors who are listed as participants at the Transcendental Meditation project page to let them know they may add this newly created project user template (see image at left) to their user page by adding the following code: {{User WPTranscendental Meditation}} to their page, if they so desire. Thanks! -- — Keithbob • Talk • 17:10, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter

Books and Bytes

Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013

by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs)

Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...

New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian

Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.

New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??

New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges

News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY

Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions

New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration

Read the full newsletter

Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 21:32, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library Survey

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi^{t | c} 15:42, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at WP:ANI#Content manipulation on 2012 Italian Navy Marines shooting incident in the Laccadive Sea

You are invited to join the discussion at WP:ANI#Content manipulation on 2012 Italian Navy Marines shooting incident in the Laccadive Sea. Onlyfactsnofiction (talk) 03:09, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification motion

A case (Transcendental Meditation movement) in which you were involved has been modified by motion which changed the wording of the discretionary sanctions section to clarify that the scope applies to pages, not just articles. For the arbitration committee --S Philbrick (Talk) 20:10, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Research

Hello there! I have written a chapter of my PhD on the Oral Citations Project (https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Oral_Citations) and your username appears in the chapter as having discussed the article on RS/N. Please let me know if you would like me to send you a draft of the chapter before Wednesday 12 August for you to review it. Many thanks! hfordsa (talk) 11:39, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]