User talk:Fladrif

Indef block

You have been blocked indefinitely per the consensus forming here [1] Best. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 14:24, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page access blocked

Due to block evasion at 75.7.198.193 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) and continuing a pattern of personal attacks. Please use WP:BASC if you want to appeal your block. Dennis Brown / 2¢ / © / @ 03:50, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There are actually two routes for appealing your block. Personal attacks and block evasions won't get you very far. Your first place would be the unblock ticket request system. Should they decline your request, you can use BASC as per Dennis Brown's comments above. Regards, Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 16:06, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification motion

A case (Transcendental Meditation movement) in which you were involved has been modified by motion which changed the wording of the discretionary sanctions section to clarify that the scope applies to pages, not just articles. For the arbitration committee --S Philbrick (Talk) 20:09, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Warnborough ie logo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Warnborough ie logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:46, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Article assessment: "Holographic Will"

Hello, I hope you are well. I would like you to please consider re-assessing this article: [Will]. It is currently listed as start class, although, in my opinion, it is very well put together. I am not involved in the Law community here, so I would like your perspective on this. As far as I can surmise, it's a thoroughly detailed article, breaking down the law for a significant number of countries, with more than adequate sourcing, and provides an excellent lead. To my lay impression, this strikes me as a B class article, but at the very least, it's definitely more than a start at this point. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SpiralSource (talk • contribs) 09:10, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]