User talk:Lozleader/Archive 5
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Lozleader. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | → | Archive 10 |
The Bugle: Issue LXXXV, April 2013
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:21, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
Files missing description details
are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.
If the information is not provided, the images may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:30, 24 April 2013 (UTC)Disambiguation link notification for May 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Monmouthshire Regiment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Territorial Army (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXXVI, May 2013
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:14, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Files missing description details
are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 16:40, 22 May 2013 (UTC)The Bugle: Issue LXXXVII, June 2013
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 08:52, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Education and Training Board, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Cork, Ireland and Local government in Ireland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
Files missing description details
are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 16:01, 6 July 2013 (UTC)Replaceable fair use File:Her Wor arms.png
Thanks for uploading File:Her Wor arms.png. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the file description page and edit it to add
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template. - On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:38, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use File:Blythvalley arms.png
Thanks for uploading File:Blythvalley arms.png. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the file description page and edit it to add
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template. - On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:43, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Matthias Wolverley Attwood, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Sunderland and Steam Navigation Company (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Sev Trent water.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Sev Trent water.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 06:22, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXXVIII, July 2013
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:26, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
Files missing description details
are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 16:04, 26 July 2013 (UTC)Disambiguation link notification for August 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 35th (Royal Sussex) Regiment of Foot, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William of Orange (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:13, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of members of the Metropolitan Board of Works, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Daily News (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
Files missing description details
are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 16:05, 9 August 2013 (UTC)- Lozleader (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
- 81.24.248.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Block message:
Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Tupolevjet". The reason given for Tupolevjet's block is: "Edit warring".
- Blocking administrator: Materialscientist (talk • blocks)
Accept reason: User in good standing and no apparent connection to blocked user. — Daniel Case (talk) 22:29, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXXIX, August 2013
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:02, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited St Albans (UK Parliament constituency), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Essendon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Files missing description details
are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 16:05, 23 August 2013 (UTC)Orphaned non-free media (File:Sev Trent water.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Sev Trent water.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 19:46, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Annascaul, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Castlemaine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Files missing description details
are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 16:05, 31 August 2013 (UTC)Merger
Hi, you suggested merging 2nd Tangier Regiment with King's Own Royal Regiment (Lancaster) way back in June. I've just indicated my support as I agree, it's a no brainer. May I suggest you go ahead with the merger at this point? SonofSetanta (talk) 09:05, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
WikiProject Military history coordinator election
Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Kirill [talk] 16:43, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXXXX, September 2013
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:50, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Files missing description details
are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 16:07, 21 September 2013 (UTC)Mining Institute Editathon
Hello I see you have done considerable editing to Wikipedia materials concerning Nicholas Wood. This event may interest you on 6th November https://wiki.wikimedia.org.uk/wiki/Editathon,_North_of_England_Institute_of_Mining_and_Mechanical_Engineers Robertforsythe (talk) 09:21, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited French Imperial Eagle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ministry of Defence (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue XCI, October 2013
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:32, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
London County Council election, 1922
Just a heads up for you on the latest page I have just created. I thought you might be interested since you put in much of the work on the LCC member lists. Unfortunately the 1922 photo of County Hall will soon be deleted. I would appreciate your thoughts. Please feel free to add/amend the article yourself. I am planning to do the 1919 one next. I did notice that I had additional name data/links to individuals on the LCC list but failed to note these at the time.Graemp (talk) 15:31, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
Files missing description details
are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 04:37, 29 October 2013 (UTC)Disambiguation link notification for November 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited London County Council election, 1922, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alfred Baker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
Files missing description details
are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 04:39, 17 November 2013 (UTC)Disambiguation link notification for November 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Frederick William Horner, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Falmouth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue XCII, November 2013
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 05:37, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
LCC elections 1889, 1892
I think that there is some merit in following the presentation of UK constituency results elsewhere on wikipedia. The format I used for 1922 sought to use the most common format. Too much additional information, though interesting can give a confusing impression.
- I have been giving further thought to the adding of other articles about LCC elections and feel that it would be a shame if the work you did on the first two elections were not to be uploaded to wikipedia. I can understand that you might not want to go through the process of re-formatting this work. Perhaps it would be a good idea (initially) to specifically create those pages and include a direct link to the results on your London website. You never know, someone may come along in a couple of years time and decide to re-format them for you. I intend to complete the 1913 election results and I have also been working on the 1910 elections which I plan to upload soon. I don't know why I have chosen to work through these backwards. I don't have any results for 1925 onwards, apart from a few from 1937, so can't help there. I think work needs to be done to increase the links to these pages. I may systematically go through the members own wikipedia pages adding the relevant LCC bits to their political career as often this has been overlooked. Graemp (talk) 17:35, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Regarding candidate identification and red-linking, I have found the on-line version of Who's Who to be an invaluable source and a good indication of notability.Graemp (talk) 12:43, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Thomas Challis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Enfield and The Daily News
- William Cox (UK politician) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to The Daily News
- William Gordon (Chelsea MP) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to The Daily News
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Files missing description details
are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 04:40, 7 December 2013 (UTC)The Bugle: Issue XCIII, December 2013
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:09, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Charles Eric Hambro, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sunninghill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Files missing description details
are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 04:39, 25 December 2013 (UTC)Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:Annascaul village.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.
This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:56, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
- Another one of your uploads, File:Annascaul Lake.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:59, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited William Carter (London politician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Metropolitan Water Board (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
Files missing description details
are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 04:40, 14 January 2014 (UTC)The Bugle: Issue XCIV, January 2014
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:22, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
H Humfrey Edmunds
Hi Loz, He is LCC member listed for 1925 in Hackney Central. The Times 6/3/1925 lists him as Humphrey H Edmonds. I have no other sources to check so thought it best to flag this with you.Graemp (talk) 13:13, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
- Just checked in Achievement by W Eric Jackson, where he is listed as "Humfrey Edmunds". Clearly some more research needed... Lozleader (talk) 13:18, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
- I think he may be Humfrey Henry Edmunds (1890-6 April 1962), barrister and sometime Recorder of Bath, who has an obituary in The Times on 7 April 1962. Obit does not mention the LCC though.Lozleader (talk)
- Humfrey Henry Edmunds has a who's who entry which does not reveal much.Graemp (talk) 13:48, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
- So he does. I wonder if he is our man? Lozleader (talk) 14:16, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
- Humfrey Henry Edmunds has a who's who entry which does not reveal much.Graemp (talk) 13:48, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
- I think he may be Humfrey Henry Edmunds (1890-6 April 1962), barrister and sometime Recorder of Bath, who has an obituary in The Times on 7 April 1962. Obit does not mention the LCC though.Lozleader (talk)
Files missing description details
are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 04:42, 26 January 2014 (UTC)1901 Independents
I've just IDed Walter Leaf. His running mate, Dr JF Little was Dr J. Fletcher Little whose name mistakenly appeared on a published Progressive list of candidates. I was wondering if he is the same person as James Little who was co-opted in 1916 but can't confirm from my sources.Graemp (talk) 14:28, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
- They're listed as distinct individuals in Achievement, which usually seems to get these things correct. James Little was described as a barrister on his co-option (The Times, 31 May 1916, p.5), no reference to him being a doctor so different people I'd say.Lozleader (talk) 14:43, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
- It appears Dr Fletcher Little of 32 Harley Street was the (unsuccessful) Liberal candidate at Oxford at the 1895 general election. He subsequently led a delegation of residents of Marylebone who met with the president of the Board of Trade in January 1900 to complain about the state of electric lighting in the parish. His name was "mentioned" as the Liberal candidate at Marylebone East at the 1900 g.e. but he didn't go forward. At the first Metropolitan Borough elections in 1900 he wrote to The Times in connection with candidates in Marylebone nominated by the "Non Political Union", "for the interests of Marylebone... not limited to the policy of either the Progressive or Moderate party".Lozleader (talk) 14:54, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
- And the good doctor was elected to Marylebone Council in 1903 as non-political councillor supporting an electric lighting scheme. He appears as John Fletcher Little. He also stood for the LCC election in 1907 as an independent. He seems to have died in 1916, holding the office of Medical Officer for Harrow.Lozleader (talk) 15:06, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
- My mistake, he died in 1914 and here is his obituary: [1] Lozleader (talk) 15:09, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
- The detail we have found amounts to more than you would find in many wikipedia biography starts. I think you have earned the right to create it. The only additional information I have found is that the Illustrated London News (March 1901) carries a portrait of him with a caption indicating him as a Progressive. However, I assume they were referring to the Progressive list, unless he subsequently took the Progressive whip which I don't think was the case. If you don't have access to the ILN on-line, let me know and I can give you some access details.Graemp (talk) 21:16, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
- Not sure he really meets the notability guidelines for Wikipedia. I threw a few facts down here [2] where there aren't really any rules about inclusivity! Incidentally I might make an alphabetical list of LCC members there or in my userspace based on "Achievement" so we can sort the namesakes and nearly namesakes and name changers. (Some of them became baronets or peers or women members have different married names).Lozleader (talk) 11:58, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
- I have created about 90 new wikipages on individuals and am yet to have one challenged for lack of notability. My own guideline is that if an individual has an entry in Whos Who or the ODNB, then they are sufficiently notable. Graemp (talk) 15:21, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
- Not sure he really meets the notability guidelines for Wikipedia. I threw a few facts down here [2] where there aren't really any rules about inclusivity! Incidentally I might make an alphabetical list of LCC members there or in my userspace based on "Achievement" so we can sort the namesakes and nearly namesakes and name changers. (Some of them became baronets or peers or women members have different married names).Lozleader (talk) 11:58, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
- The detail we have found amounts to more than you would find in many wikipedia biography starts. I think you have earned the right to create it. The only additional information I have found is that the Illustrated London News (March 1901) carries a portrait of him with a caption indicating him as a Progressive. However, I assume they were referring to the Progressive list, unless he subsequently took the Progressive whip which I don't think was the case. If you don't have access to the ILN on-line, let me know and I can give you some access details.Graemp (talk) 21:16, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
- My mistake, he died in 1914 and here is his obituary: [1] Lozleader (talk) 15:09, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
- And the good doctor was elected to Marylebone Council in 1903 as non-political councillor supporting an electric lighting scheme. He appears as John Fletcher Little. He also stood for the LCC election in 1907 as an independent. He seems to have died in 1916, holding the office of Medical Officer for Harrow.Lozleader (talk) 15:06, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
- It appears Dr Fletcher Little of 32 Harley Street was the (unsuccessful) Liberal candidate at Oxford at the 1895 general election. He subsequently led a delegation of residents of Marylebone who met with the president of the Board of Trade in January 1900 to complain about the state of electric lighting in the parish. His name was "mentioned" as the Liberal candidate at Marylebone East at the 1900 g.e. but he didn't go forward. At the first Metropolitan Borough elections in 1900 he wrote to The Times in connection with candidates in Marylebone nominated by the "Non Political Union", "for the interests of Marylebone... not limited to the policy of either the Progressive or Moderate party".Lozleader (talk) 14:54, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Anglian water.png
Thanks for uploading File:Anglian water.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Cube00 (talk) 03:55, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Lozleader (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
- 81.24.248.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Block message:
Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Tupolevjet". The reason given for Tupolevjet's block is: "Edit warring".
- Blocking administrator: Materialscientist (talk • blocks)
Accept reason: I have softened the block on him again. Since this is the second time Materialscientist and I have played out this pas de deux (actually, maybe it's more of a pas de quatre ) in the past half-year, I strongly recommend you request IPBE so this doesn't happen again, as it seems like Tupolevjet may not learn. — Daniel Case (talk) 18:01, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
Hmm ... since this is not the usual reason I recommend people do this, it looks like it will have to be done differently. Tell you what ... I will follow procedure here and ask for a checkuser (privately), to make sure you're legit, then if it comes back good I can can grant you the IPBE myself. Daniel Case (talk) 17:39, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
Women and the LCC
hi Loz, I've been glancing through our LCC pages and think we have overlooked describing the electorate. There is reference to the status of women as candidates on London Wiki, but that is about it. I have been trying to research when women were first given the vote. I know that they had the vote in 1907, the year when they were first allowed to take their seats, but thought that they might have got it earlier than this and wondered if you knew the answer. Graemp (talk) 23:17, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
- Hello, I seem to have been busy the last couple of days!
- This might be of assistance [3]
- "The County Electors Act, 1888... extended the burgess qualification (ie occupation of premises and payment of rates) used for municipal elections to persons occupying premises in counties, subject to residence within seven miles of the county (fifteen miles for the County of London)... Single women possessing the qualification were entitled to vote.
- "The Local Government Act 1894... gave the vote not only to single women who were qualified but also to married women who were qualified (ie by occupancy) although a husband and wife could not be qualified in respect of the same property and in practice few married women were qualified."
- Also this [4] summarises the situation. Lozleader (talk) 13:30, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue XCV, February 2014
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:28, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Lozleader (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
- 81.24.248.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Block message:
Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Tupolevjet". The reason given for Tupolevjet's block is: "Disruptive editing".
- Blocking administrator: JamesBWatson (talk • blocks)
Accept reason: Looks like a shared IP (or some weird ISP routing). Cheers =) --slakr\ talk / 10:44, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- Lozleader (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
- 81.24.248.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Block message:
Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Tupolevjet". The reason given for Tupolevjet's block is: "Disruptive editing".
- Blocking administrator: JamesBWatson (talk • blocks)
Accept reason: Autoblock removed, but see my comments below. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:51, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
My commiserations. If there is anything I can do to help and there is a way you can communicate this .... Graemp (talk) 15:01, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks. It's pretty frustrating... I have made unblock requests but there doesn't seem to be much happening (well it is Sunday???) but it's reaching the point where I find I am blocked from editing *EVERY TIME* I try to add something to Wikipedia, and have to go through a tedious process. Also the current block was originally showing as ending this evening but is now extended into tomorrow afternoon. It appears the editor who has brought the ban down upon me (they seem to have the same ISP as me) has been banned indefinitely which I'm concerned may mean the end of me on Wikipedia! I was advised before to apply for IPBE but this was turned down. I don't know what else to do, this talk page is the only place I can edit now... :-( Lozleader (talk) 15:11, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
- I have just left a message here User talk:JamesBWatson. Graemp (talk) 15:27, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
I have lifted the autoblock, but evidently there is a danger it will come back. The reason that the autoblock keeps coming back, even after it was due to end, is that Tupolevjet keeps on trying to edit through the block, and re-triggering the autoblock. I can't imagine why he/she keeps doing that: by now he/she must have found that it doesn't work. You say that IPBE was turned down. Can you tell me who turned it down? Please post me a note about that on my talk page, or in an email if you are blocked again. If you can let me know who turned it down, I will see whether I can consult that person and see if there is a case for giving you IPBE now. Alternatively, if for some reason you can't put me in touch with that person, I can ask a CheckUser to look into the case. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:51, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you. It was User:DoRD apparently. Hopefully [5] will lead to the IPBE discussion. Lozleader (talk) 16:21, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
- Instead of using IPBE, I went ahead and changed Tupolevjet's block to disable the autoblock. Hopefully, that will solve the problem for you. Sorry for all the trouble this has caused you. —DoRD (talk) 16:43, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you... fingers crossed and full steam ahead :-) Lozleader (talk) 16:53, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
- Instead of using IPBE, I went ahead and changed Tupolevjet's block to disable the autoblock. Hopefully, that will solve the problem for you. Sorry for all the trouble this has caused you. —DoRD (talk) 16:43, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue XCVI, March 2014
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:04, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Reference Errors on 7 April
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the List of cities in the United Kingdom page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:28, 8 April 2014 (UTC)