User talk:Loreensherman

Loreensherman (talk) 23:12, 11 July 2010 (UTC)Hi, am I able to submit a second article and if so, how? Loreen Sherman[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Are you asking how to get feedback on an article? You can create a subpage on WP:AFC at WP:AFC/Whatever your article title is or request feedback. Mr. R00t ^Talk 23:19, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You may submit any number of articles at Articles for creation. —fetch ·comms 23:20, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You also have to add {{AFC submission/submit}} to the top of it. Mr. R00t ^Talk 23:22, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Draft

I have moved the draft article to User talk:Loreensherman/draft one, to keep this talk page free for discussion. I will write more soon. Chzz ► 23:30, 24 June 2010 (UTC) (Loreensherman (talk) 21:30, 27 June 2010 (UTC))[reply]

{{helpme}}I thank you for your help in providing guides. I see that the article has been put into draft form, what are the next steps that I need to do?(Loreensherman (talk) 21:30, 27 June 2010 (UTC))[reply]

I took a look at the article and I thought that it looked pretty good. All I really think is that you could make it longer and maybe put more sources. The only reason I say anything of sources is because most people like to see articles with lots of sources. Not necessary but helpful. As for after that you probably could move it live. I would be happy to do that for you or teach you how. Mr. R00t ^Talk 21:37, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(Loreensherman (talk) 22:16, 27 June 2010 (UTC)) {{helpme}} Please help me add the following: Submission for the Title of the Article, which is Formulaic Communication in the 21st Century[reply]

Four sources to add to the article: Reference 5 should be this Cite error: A <ref> tag is missing the closing </ref> (see the help page). Reference 13 should be Cite error: The <ref> tag has too many names (see the help page).

Reference 16 should be Cite error: The <ref> tag has too many names (see the help page).

I would greatly appreciate you helping me make this article live. Again, many thanks:)(Loreensherman (talk) 22:16, 27 June 2010 (UTC)).[reply]

Done- all done, moving live. Mr. R00t ^Talk 22:25, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Advice, further to discussions

Be careful to avoid original research and synthesis
Maintain a neutral point-of-view
Be especially careful about using sources that you wrote - see WP:COI
Do not over-use quotations
Do not write it as a personal reflection or essay

Best advice, please read some 'good articles', preferably on broadly similar topic-areas, but does not have to be exactly the same area. For example;

I chose those because I think they are also 'conceptual' in nature. You can find plenty more in WP:FA and WP:GA.

I hope this helps, Chzz ► 23:36, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome and introduction

Hi, Loreensherman. This is NOT some automated message...it's from a real person. You can talk to me right now. Welcome to Wikipedia! I noticed you've just joined, and wanted to give you a few tips to get you started. If you have any questions, please talk to us. The tips below should help you to get started. Best of luck! Chzz ► 23:36, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You don't need to read anything - anybody can edit; just go to an article and edit it. Be Bold, but please don't put silly stuff in - it will be removed very quickly, and will annoy people.

Ask for help. Talk to us live, or edit this page, put {{helpme}} and describe what help you need. Someone will reply very quickly - usually within a few minutes.

Play in your user area. For example, create User:Loreensherman/test.

Edit existing articles, before you make your own. Look at some subjects that you know about, and see if you can make them a bit better. For example, Wikipedia:Cleanup#2009.

When you're ready, read about Your first article. It should be about something well-known, and it will need references.

Good luck with editing; please drop me a line some time on my own talk page.

There's lots of information below. Once again, welcome to the fantastic world of Wikipedia!

-- Chzz ► 23:36, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Grade sources • Cite sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists • Best articles Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Pages needing attention • Peer review The missing manual

Your user page User:Loreensherman

I'm concerned about your user-page, User:Loreensherman, because at the moment, I think it could be deleted under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person.

Instead of tagging it for deletion, I thought I would ask you about it. If you could perhaps 'tone down' the promotional nature, then I think it would be OK. It's fine to say a little about yourself (and what you do) - but it is not OK to promote; as it says in WP:USERPAGE, a small amount of info is acceptable, but Pages used for blatant promotion are not. For example a 5 page résumé and advertising for your band will probably be too much, a brief 3 sentence summary that you work in field X and have a band named Y will be fine.

Thanks, Chzz ► 23:51, 24 June 2010 (UTC) (Loreensherman (talk) 11:48, 26 June 2010 (UTC)). Please review the changes to the page as I have changed the content, and thanks for the advise. (Loreensherman (talk) 11:48, 26 June 2010 (UTC)).[reply]

Yes, that looks fine now, thanks. I'll answer your other question on my talk page, as soon as possible. Thanks again, Chzz ► 16:36, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

...now archived, in User talk:Chzz/Archive_23#Question About Submitting Draft. Chzz ► 21:12, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for submitting an article to Wikipedia. Your submission has been reviewed and has been put on hold pending clarification or improvements from you or other editors. Please take a look and respond if possible. You can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Progression of the Philosophy of Formulaic Communication. If there is no response within twenty-four hours the request may be declined; if this happens feel free to continue to work on the article. You can resubmit it (by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article) when you believe the concerns have been addressed. Thank you. —fetch ·comms 00:40, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Progression of the Philosophy of Formulaic Communication

Re. Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Progression of the Philosophy of Formulaic Communication

The article is awaiting review; there is no need to use a {{helpme}} there.

Please note, at the top, it does now say "Review pending. This request is waiting to be reviewed. This might take several hours, or even days, at busy times.".

After it has been reviewed, you will be told the outcome here.

If you have any specific questions, please use a {{helpme}} here, on your own talk page. Thanks, Chzz ► 16:23, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your article submission has been declined, and Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Progression of the Philosophy of Formulaic Communication was not created. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer, and please feel free to resubmit once the issues have been addressed. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Fridae'§Doom | Talk to me 00:57, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your article submission has been declined, and Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Progression of the Philosophy of Formulaic Communication was not created. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer, and please feel free to resubmit once the issues have been addressed. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Fridae'§Doom | Spare your time? 12:28, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

The Progression of the Philosophy of Formulaic Communication, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia! Fridae'§Doom | Spare your time? 04:40, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In regards to your AfC Submission

I've just fixed up some errors, however, I noticed there were no External Links or See also links, since I don't know what websites are of relevance to the article and with you being the creator of the article you would have some knowledge on the subject so if you could find them then add a new heading for See Also or External Links that'd be great. The article is nicely done and great work with the sources. Your article is located here. Regards, Fridae'§Doom | Spare your time? 04:55, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A Live Article

I have been working on The Progression of the Philosophy of Formulaic Communication but do not know if it went live. Could you confirm? Loreen Sherman(Loreensherman (talk) 16:16, 19 July 2010 (UTC)).[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Yes, at The Progression of the Philosophy of Formulaic Communication. Bencherlite ^Talk 22:15, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Curious as to Link Article

You make links by just putting the exact article name in brackets; you can also 'pipe' a link from one wording to another, e.g.

This is a [[sausage]].

I am a [[Dentistry|dentist]].

[[John Smith (explorer)|John Smith]] was an [[England|English]] [[soldier]], [[explorer]], and [[author]].

The above appears as;

This is a sausage.

I am a dentist.

John Smith was an English soldier, explorer, and author.

For more, see WP:LINKING. Cheers, Chzz ► 19:05, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for creation/Four Tests Formulaic Communication Passes in Economics

Hi. You made an Article for creation page, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Four Tests Formulaic Communication Passes in Economics (2010-06-21), but it was never actually submitted for a review.

I have submitted it just now, so you should get feedback soon. Cheers! Chzz ► 06:05, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Four Tests Formulaic Communication Passes in Economics.
To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! – GorillaWarfare (talk) 16:48, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Loreen Sherman profile

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Loreen Sherman profile requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Feedthepope (talk) 17:09, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Four Tests Formulaic Communication Passes in Economics concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Four Tests Formulaic Communication Passes in Economics, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 17:35, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Four Tests Formulaic Communication Passes in Economics

Hello Loreensherman. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Four Tests Formulaic Communication Passes in Economics.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Four Tests Formulaic Communication Passes in Economics}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 23:01, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Loreensherman

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Loreensherman, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. shoy (reactions) 12:43, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]