User talk:DrBungle

Welcome!

Hello, Tompope33, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! smileguy91^talk 22:41, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Username

Unless you are Tom Pope, you'll probably have to change your username, as it may mislead or be seen as impersonation, particularly if you're editing Port Vale F.C. or related articles - see Wikipedia:Username policy#Real names. Peter James (talk) 13:03, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Noted. Tompope33 (talk) 16:32, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DrBungle. You have new messages at Uberaccount's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Tompope33, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Tompope33! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! TheOriginalSoni (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A pie for you!

Thank you!

Bunumunu (talk) 21:51, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, DrBungle. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Help desk.
Message added John of Reading (talk) 07:24, 27 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

A cupcake for you!

I LOVE CUP CAKES VERY MUCH..............:-):-) Ishita sharda (talk) 18:51, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sujatha Singh

Thank you for reviewing article Sujatha Singh. Please find this google_link.Sujatha Singh India’s next foreign Secretary. If valid article please reconsider speedy deletion nomination.-- Raghith (Talk) 04:45, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. At the time it was a 1 line article with no references, links, or templates indicating an article under construction so with WP:BLP in mind I tagged the article.

Cheers,

Feedthepope (talk) 05:11, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reconsidering the nomination. -- Raghith (Talk) 05:24, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:AsianaAirlinesFlight214.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:AsianaAirlinesFlight214.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 17:02, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Port Vale F.C., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Sentinel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PortValeFC2013New.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PortValeFC2013New.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Malpass⁹₃! (what I've been ^up to/_drop me a ^___) 17:18, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Kudpung. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Paidimadugu, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:05, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lauren Southern

The subject of this article just tweeted a link to her own page, hence the current surge in vandalism. I believe this page is sourced (although it needs improvement in this area), however there needs to be more review of this article. — Confession0791 ^talk 04:17, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Confession0791: Given the nature of the vandalism I suspected it had been posted on 4chan or something. I've requested semi-protection at WP:RPP. Feedthepope (talk) 04:19, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

rollback

Hi Feedthepope. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
Rollback should never be used to edit war.
If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Katie^talk 17:09, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thank you for your time and assistance in protecting the integrity of the English Wikipedia. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 00:46, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Revert

Hi I edited the article 'Mashwani' in good faith and removed much fake and wrong information -- someone keeps on readding, please see Talk Page. This whole article has been a bone of contention and I have tried to fix it , but some people are bent on self-promotion nbased on fake or dubious sources or misrepresentation of facts. I hope you will please understand this. Thanks. Im going to re edit the page. Regards. 39.54.236.125 (talk) 08:49, 4 May 2016 (UTC)Prof (r) Hilda Khan[reply]

Hi

You cannot add a term like "fallaciously" without proper citing of sources and references to back that claim up. Your edits to the article at the moment only come across as your opinion.

Please read through WP:CITE

Cheers,

DrBungle (talk) 08:54, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No sir, I have cited from two sources that both say so. See the notes./refs I have given . 39.54.236.125 (talk) 08:56, 4 May 2016 (UTC)Hilda Khan[reply]

Can you explain this edit to me please and why these cited sources and references are "fake".

Thanks

DrBungle (talk) 08:59, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes indeed-- (a) some of the sources cited are self-published ones of dubious status and provenance and are not at all reliable, since the writers are neither scholars nor real historians but either old British administrators of the 19th c who had no real knowledge of tribes and people in South Asia and had their own political agendas to win over various tribes for military or other service : or (b) other sources are cited from books written by people who have written /published their own accounts, to promote themselves or their families or their tribes. I think you would benefit if you could please also visit similar pages for many other tribes and races in Pakistan , where similar problems have been faced by editors for a long time and these unreliable edits persist , time and again; and (c) thirdly, a number of references are misquoted or miscited i.e. for example where only a 'claim' is written it is interpreted as a 'fact' which isnt the case at all. I think i have cited more recent and accurate research , based on real historical facts and sources by serious researchers and scholars- and am sure I can dig up more. I think another editor has also (on Talk Page) refereed to another new research of DNA testing or some similar scientific research showing the genetic break-up of the Mashwanis, which in fact supports and backs up research by prof Dr Dani and others. I am not a vandal but a serious research academic and occasional editor here on Wikipedia and you will note that in all cases I have tried to fix errors or deliberate miscitations or false/dubious claims by various people/tribes of Pakistani origins, based on over 30 years of ethnological study and experience. Please try to see this is in a rational light. Thanks. 39.54.236.125 (talk) 09:12, 4 May 2016 (UTC)Prof (r) Hilda Khan[reply]

Having gone through the page history I must give you a quick apology for not noticing you had added a source. The way my screen was set up hid this portion of the page and all I could see, despite scrolling down, was the (to my view) IP address addition of "fallacious" with no cited references to reinforce that claim which ordinarily is obviously not desired on Wikipedia. As for the removal of those alleged problem sources I defer that this sort of thing would require the attention of an expert on the subject matter and wikipedia policy in general - the acceptance and rejection of sources on here with regards to provenance is the subject of extensive, prolonged debate and I must confess I am not able to comment on your assertion that the sources are unreliable as I am not overly familiar with the subject matter. Again, my reversions to your edits were in regards to the addition of the potentially problematic term "fallacious."

I can see you contribute much to the project. I would invite you to create a full account in order to contribute your expertise.

Many thanks

DrBungle (talk) 09:24, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks. I had added also, here, a whole list of dubious sources cited on this page, but these seem to have vanished. I just anted to help you to understand the real problem. Yes, I hope to make a proper account, at present I dont have access to a private computer but I hope to have one soon and then have my account. If you are seriously interested in this matter , it is a serious one -- about many false/fake claims by dozens of Pakistani tribes and clans etc, on Wikipedia and one has to keep on monitoring . Until the 1980s, you will generally note that here in Pakistan many of these tribes were in agreement with their real origins. But later on, as Islamization grew here under the military regime of General Zia ul Haq, many people started to fantasize and develop new 'origin stories' making them out to be either Arabs or Afghans or some sort of foreign Muslim settlers/conquerors in South Asia. Whereas, in fact, between circa 750 CE to 1947 CE, the total population of South Asian Muslims (India, Pakistan) of foreign descent never exceeded 20-22% of the total Muslim population. The vast number of Muslims, even today, in India and Pakistan and now also Bangladesh, are descended from local converts. Sorry to be so long . Regards39.54.236.125 (talk) 09:35, 4 May 2016 (UTC)Hilda Khan[reply]

F4U in Seoul War Memorial

Hello,

So, you removed my correction in F4U survivors article. Do you have any evidence of F4U presence in Seoul? Show me please, or return my correction. I was there in June. No any F4U in War Memorial.

Best wishes, WP. --178.166.194.15 (talk) 10:14, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

1) You changed "worthy" to "wortshy" for no apparent reason - indicator of problem edit number 1

2) You deleted a paragraph that had an external, published, 3rd party reliable citation without providing a cited source in the article for your revision- indicator of problem edit number 2

Please see this, this and this to help explain what I mean.

Cheers,

DrBungle (talk) 10:21, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

1. Sorry, just misprint. 2. Look, here is full list of aircraft exhibition in Seoul War Memorial: http://www.aviationmuseum.eu/World/Asia/South_Korea/Seoul/War_Memorial_Museum.htm No any F4U there. --178.166.194.15 (talk) 10:41, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	I see that you have been doing a great job in Wikipedia. But I would like to request you to not to delete the page "Darren Salkeld" as I will edit it. I was just checking if it goes live. Orator.Sahan (talk) 11:42, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:50, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, DrBungle. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, DrBungle. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DrBungle! Mutual Interest in Harold Kenworthy?

I think you had started a page on Harold Kenworthy, and I'm interested in your connection/interest? I'm working on one now! — Preceding unsigned comment added by DCyphert (talk • contribs) 18:19, 3 September 2018 (UTC) DCyphert (talk) 21:58, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]