User talk:LordVoldemort728/Archive 29

This is an archive of past discussions with User:LordVoldemort728. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 25

←

Archive 27

→

Your submission at Articles for creation: Puttanna (February 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by InterstellarGamer12321 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The existing references do not indicate that the article is particularly notable. The article needs to be expanded significantly using reliable, independent sources with significant coverage of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Puttanna and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 11:26, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Hello, LordVoldemort728! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 11:26, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Puttanna has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Puttanna. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 16:15, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Puttanna has been accepted

Puttanna, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 16:40, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Curious....

Hi LordVoldemort728, just curious as to why you think it is better go through AfC? Articles you create will still go through WP:NPP so will still be checked. S0091 (talk) 16:46, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

One time, I done a grammatical mistake in a draft and it got published and the AfC reviewer doesn't saw it and after some hours a NPP saw that mistake, then I got that it is necessary for articles created by me to go through double checking. 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️^{Let's Talk !} 16:52, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Because of English language is a secondary language in India, I do very small mistakes in 2-3 out of 100 articles. 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️^{Let's Talk !} 16:53, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

English is my native language and I make mistakes all the time. :) I do not think there is a need for you to go through AfC but if it makes you more comfortable to do so, that's fine of course. S0091 (talk) 16:58, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

It is my habit to send draft to AfC. 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️^{Let's Talk !} 17:00, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Carry on then and thank you for your contributions, LordVoldemort728. S0091 (talk) 17:04, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Thanks. Have a excellent day. 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️^{Let's Talk !} 17:10, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 February 2023

News and notes: Terms of Use update, Steward elections, and Wikipedia back in Pakistan

In the media: Arbitrators open case after article alleges Wikipedia "intentionally distorts" Holocaust coverage

Disinformation report: The "largest con in corporate history"?

Essay: Machine-written articles: a new challenge for Wikipedia

Tips and tricks: All about writing at DYK

Featured content: Eden, lost.

Gallery: Love is in the air

Traffic report: Superbowl? Pfft. Give me some Bollywood! Yours sincerely, the world

From the archives: 5, 10, and 15 years ago: Let's (not) delete the Main Page!

Cobwebs: Editorial: The loss of the moral high ground

Humour: The RfA Candidate's Song

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:02, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Story of a Brief Marriage has been accepted

The Story of a Brief Marriage, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 13:17, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Diwali in Muzaffarnagar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Diwali in Muzaffarnagar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diwali in Muzaffarnagar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

UtherSRG (talk) 13:27, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:P. R. Ramesh has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:P. R. Ramesh. Thanks! — DaxServer (t · m · c) 15:58, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: P. R. Ramesh has been accepted

P. R. Ramesh, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 17:39, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: P. R. Ramesh (February 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:P. R. Ramesh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 15:28, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

@Asilvering The article clearly passes Wikipedia:NPOL so why did you declined it? 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️^{Let's Talk !} 17:32, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

My bad, sorry about that. I misremembered it as "unelected state/national officials don't count" (he was not elected), not "candidates for state/national office who have not yet been elected don't count" (irrelevant in his case). -- asilvering (talk) 21:23, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, LordVoldemort728. Thank you for your work on P. R. Ramesh. User:MPGuy2824, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

please add the appropriate infobox

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:08, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Béla Balázs Award

Hello, LordVoldemort728,

In this instance, you moved an article in main space to Draft space that was created not only by an administrator, but an administrator who has been active on Wikipedia for over 21 years and has made over 200,000 edits. You are making some careless mistakes here. If you want to be given back the New Page Reviewer permission, you have to put more thought and care into your editing decisions. Please review the page history of this article so you can see why this was not a good article to draftify. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:52, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

I know that it was created by administrator but I draftified it because at the time when I saw it, the article was unsourced. 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️^{Let's Talk !} 04:13, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:The Paradise of Food has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:The Paradise of Food. Thanks! BuySomeApples (talk) 14:01, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Paradise of Food has been accepted

The Paradise of Food, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 05:16, 26 February 2023 (UTC)