User talk:Lonewolfcg

Welcome!

Hello, Lonewolfcg, welcome to Wikipedia! I'm Brookie, one of the thousands of editors at Wikipedia - I am also an Administrator. I hope you like the place and decide to stay; here are some helpful links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia

How to edit a page

Help pages

Tutorial

How to write a great article

Manual of Style

Fun stuff...

You will get more from the site if you spend a few moments reading the above - I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or type {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions! Also tell the community a little about yourself on your User page - again, welcome to the Wiki! Brookie :) - he's in the building somewhere! ^(Whisper...) 12:59, 24 April 2008 (UTC)File:Cordialgreetings1x pix.gif[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Roger Gardner

A tag has been placed on Roger Gardner requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. --ҚЯĀŽΨÇÉV13 21:56, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Roger Gardner

A tag has been placed on Roger Gardner requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 02:51, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of John Gardner (Texas Ranger)

A tag has been placed on John Gardner (Texas Ranger) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ttonyb (talk) 03:02, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with John Gardner (Texas Ranger)

Thnak you for adding the article John Gardner (Texas Ranger). However there aree some seerious problems with it, and unless they can be fixed this will probably be deleted.

Our verifibility policy requires that articels in wikippedia be verifiable, that is that any user can check the facts. But teh aonly support you have listed is what appears to be a password-protected geanology page.

We want facts stated in wikipedi articel to be supported by citaiosn to reliable sources. This normally means published sources, not self-published or self-witten sources.

Our notability guideline for biography sets out standards for when a person is considered notable. Coverage in reliable sources is the best way to meet this guideline.

The article currently syas "it is said" and "it was often alleged" and the like several times. In wikipedia articels we don't use that sort of language unless we can say who said or alleged soemthing, and back it up with a source.

The only source now cited is a user page on familytreemaker.genealogy.com. but it appaeers that no one else can access this apge, whaich makes it of no value as a source. we need reliabel sources that otehrs can check.

If you can add specific sources to the article it would help greatly. Id you aren't sure how to add sources, jsut leave a note on the talk page giving the details of the source and what statements it supports, and someone will help get it into the article.

If sources are not added, this article may soon be deleted. DES ^(talk) 08:03, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gardner Gang

The article Gardner Gang has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NickCT (talk) 18:10, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of John Gardner (Texas Ranger)

The article John Gardner (Texas Ranger) has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NickCT (talk) 18:10, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not replace pages with blank content, as you did with this edit to John Gardner (Texas Ranger), as this is confusing to readers. The page's content has been restored for now. If there is a problem with the page, it should be edited or reverted to a previous version if possible; if you think the page should be removed entirely, see further information. Thank you. Puffin ^{Lets talk!} 16:45, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Awful Gardner has been reverted, as it removed all content from the page without explanation. Please do not do this, as it is considered vandalism; use the sandbox for testing. If you think the page should be deleted, see here for what to do. Thank you. Puffin ^{Lets talk!} 16:48, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove all content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to Roy Gardner (bank robber). If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Puffin ^{Lets talk!} 16:49, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lige Gardner, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Fæ (talk) 16:53, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

William Gardner (knight)

Hi, you created this article a while ago. You say that Welsh sources identify Gardner as the killer of Richard, but you don't say what those sources are. Could you help by providing a reference, or tell us where you got the information from, if you can? Thanks. Paul B (talk) 17:47, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I have nominated the article for deletion. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Gardner (knight). Paul B (talk) 16:51, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Roger Gardner

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Roger Gardner requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. TheLongTone (talk) 20:27, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Roger Gardner - your talk page questions

The only previous articles about him were posted by you in December 2009: they had no more information than this one, and were deleted for the same reason.

He was added to the list article on 18 Jan 2009 in this edit by user Claddaugh (talk · contribs), who only ever made that single edit, and removed in February 2010 when the list was cleaned up to include only people with articles.

So Wikipedia has never had any reliable information about him. If you can't find any, I'm afraid he can't have an article, because of Wikipedia's WP:Verifiability policy: "any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source" and the WP:Notability requirement for references that show "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." "It is said that" and "allegedly" aren't enough for an encyclopedia article.

Regards, JohnCD (talk) 21:19, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lonewolfcg. You have new messages at JohnCD's talk page.
Message added 21:28, 15 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jack Gardner (fighter)

The article Jack Gardner (fighter) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Karl 334 ^Talk-^-Contribs 16:41, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jack Gardner (fighter)

The article Jack Gardner (fighter) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Karl 334 ^Talk-^-Contribs 17:26, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of David Gardner (fighter)

The article David Gardner (fighter) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. ♦ Tentinator ♦ 18:02, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. As part of the Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron, I have taken a look at the article about David Gardner (fighter) and recognized that this was a notable sportsman. Of course the note by another colleague was valid as you had failed to provide independent external sources about his FFC title and other fight records from reliable published sources. Now i have done what is necessary, made improvements to the article, added the required references about his record and added reference about him carrying world title for two years and more. I also thank you for introducing this valuable article to Wikipedia. Of course it still needs additional independent references, but it can at least stay for now as a valid and quite valuable Wikipedia article. werldwayd (talk) 22:11, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jack Gardner (fighter)

The article Jack Gardner (fighter) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. ♦ Tentinator ♦ 18:04, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am still working on the article. Leave it alone. Jack Gardner is not a living person, it clearly states he died in 1978 from a brain tumor.

Hello. As part of the Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron, I have taken a look at the article about Jack Gardner (fighter) and immediately recognized that this was a notable sportsman. I have made improvements to the article, added the required reference about his record and added a couple of historical photos about this individual. I also thank you for introducing this valuable article to Wikipedia. Of course it still needs additional independent references, but it can at least stay for now as a valid and quite valuable Wikipedia article. werldwayd (talk) 20:24, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article notability notification

Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote, Millard Gardner, has been recently tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: Find sources: "Millard Gardner" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 18:32, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Millard Gardner

The article Millard Gardner has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG. My Google search produced no reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jmertel23 (talk) 17:39, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]