User talk:Lion1407

Talk page discussion

You might want to participate in this discussion [1]. Niteshift36 (talk) 14:00, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Facing the Giants

Hello, I'm Sonicdrewdriver. I've been invited here as a member of WikiProject Film because of your recent edits to Facing the Giants. I understand that the current plot summary is quite short, and I know that it can be frustrating when you want to extend it. However, there are guidelines that are designed to ensure we don't have plot summaries that are overly long. Niteshift36 had two courses of action when dealing with your additions; revert them, or cut them down to 700 words, the limit specified by the guideline. I will take a look at your edits, and see if elements can be inserted into the existing summary to bring it closer to the specifications. In the meantime, I ask that you don't insult other users, especially as the editor in question was acting within the guidelines of Wikipedia. If you have any further questions, feel free to write on my talk page. Thanks. drewmunn talk 09:43, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: User:Lion1407/sandbox (March 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lion1407/sandbox.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80 (talk) 18:46, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: User:Lion1407/Eddie Vowell (Coach) (March 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lion1407/Eddie Vowell (Coach).
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80 (talk) 02:05, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Lion1407/Eddie Vowell (Coach)

Hello Lion1407. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Eddie Vowell (Coach)".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|User:Lion1407/Eddie Vowell (Coach)}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 12:08, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Texas A&M University-Commerce Lions Football concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Texas A&M University-Commerce Lions Football, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Texas A&M University-Commerce Lions Football

Hello, Lion1407. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Texas A&M University-Commerce Lions Football".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Texas A&M University-Commerce Lions Football}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Geniac (talk) 10:45, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Texas A&M–Commerce Lions football

Lion1407,

Thanks for your edits to Texas A&M–Commerce Lions football. If you wouldn't mind, could you please cite the two new sentences you have added to the article? I've tagged them with {{Citation needed}}. Thanks in advance!

Michael Barera (talk) 03:35, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please cite your contributions to Texas A&M–Commerce Lions football

Thanks for your contributions to Texas A&M–Commerce Lions football. Please be sure to cite your contributions, as I've mentioned previously. This article has been carefully written and cited, and if you cannot substantiate your additions to the article, I am able to rollback your contributions to the last verified version of this article. Michael Barera (talk) 02:18, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Willie Nelson, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Mlpearc (open channel) 18:32, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Lion1407/Eddie Vowell (Coach)

Hello, Lion1407. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Eddie Vowell (Coach)".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 14:09, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Harrison Stewart throwing against rival Texas A&M-Kingsvile.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Harrison Stewart throwing against rival Texas A&M-Kingsvile.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 23:30, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Harrison Stewart and Family.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Harrison Stewart and Family.jpg, which you've attributed to Harrison Stewart. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:51, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This also applies to

Conflict of interest editing

Hello, Lion1407. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article User:Lion1407/sandbox/Harrison Stewart (Football Player), you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. Editing for the purpose of advertising or promotion is not permitted. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:09, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lion1407. I've added the above template to your user talk apge after seeing your post at User talk:Diannaa#Harrison Stewart Photos. The template is just meant to provide you with some general information if by chance you do have some kind of connection to Stewart or his family. It's just meant to be helpful and is not intended to imply that you are doing anything wrong. Just for reference, Wikipedia doesn't expressly prohibited COI editing, but it is something highly discouraged because it often leads to more serious problems. If you are in some way connected to Stewart, then you might also want to take a look at Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide, Wikipedia:Ownership of content, and Wikipedia:An article about yourself isn't necessarily a good thing just for further reference.

With respect to football players such as Stewart, all subject of Wikipedia articles are expected to meet certain basic Wikipedia notability criteria and the most relevant Wikipedia notability guideline for athletes tends to be Wikipedia:Notability (sports). So, in order for your draft to eventually be accepted someday as an article, you're going to have to clearly establish how Stewart satisfies that guideline. I've gone ahead and posted at WT:CFL#User:Lion1407/sandbox/Harrison Stewart (Football Player) and WT:CFB#User:Lion1407/sandbox/Harrison Stewart (Football Player) to see if there are some experienced editors out there who can help you improve the draft.

As for the image licensing problems you seem to be having, I'm sure Diannaa will clarify things further, but bascially Wikipedia needs the explicit consent of the copyright holders of the photos (generally it is the photographer, not the subject of the photo, who holds said copyright) in order to accept such photos as you have licensed them. Moreover, this permission is needed in writing so that it can be kept of file for verification purposes. So, if Stewart's parents took all of the photos you uploaded and they want to release them under a free license, then they can do so; Wikipedia just needs to have something in writing directly from them saying so. You can find out some more about this in Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.

If you have any questions about any of this, feel free to ask them below. You can also ask for help at The Wikipedia Teahouse. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:33, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Luis Perez SouthwestJuco.jpg

I took this picture myself almost 5 years ago you stooge. Put it back up. Copyright my ass.

A tag has been placed on File:Luis Perez SouthwestJuco.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 20:52, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Luis Perez at Southwestern Junior College.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Luis Perez at Southwestern Junior College.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:19, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lion1407. While you might have taken this photo, it and variations of it can be seen used online prior to you uploading to Wikipedia; for example, the photo can be seen here and here. The content licensing on these other websites is not compatible with Wikipedia's which means that further verification is needed. If you take photos which often are used by other websites, then you should read c:COM:OTRS#Licensing images: when do I contact OTRS?. It might be possible for you to send in a single verification email for any similar photos you've taken which have appeared on other websites or in print publications, prior to being uploaded to Wikipedia. In general, anything found online or in print is assumed to be protected by copyright unless its claerly states otherwise, and Wikipedia typically requires email verification of copyright ownership when such photos are uploaded. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:26, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above also applies to File:Luis Perez TAMUC2017.jpg. You might have taken this photo, but a blown up version of it can be seen used here prior to being uploaded to Wikipedia; so, some kind of formal verification is going to be needed. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:44, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at WP:MCQ#File:Bobby BoundsVSPSU.jpg

You are invited to join the discussion at WP:MCQ#File:Bobby BoundsVSPSU.jpg. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:28, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you can clarify the copyright status or origin of this photo. It appears to be a scan of some newspaper (text on the reverse page is visible). Generally, newspaper photos are considered to be protected by copyright which is held by either the paper itself or the photographer who took the photo. In such case, Wikipedia is going to require some kind of formal verification from either that the pohotograph has been released under a free license. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:32, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Luis Perez TAMUC2017.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Luis Perez TAMUC2017.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:49, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am also deleting the following images:

File:Boundsthunderbolts.jpg: obvious scan from YouTube or some other video source
File: Luis Perez Throwing.jpg: from here or elsewhere online
File: The Departed playing in Irving, Texas.jpg: Copied from Facebook with no evidence of permission
File:Luis Perez at Southwestern Junior College.jpg: copied from https://elquarterbackblog.wordpress.com/2016/12/07/un-quarterback-mexicano-en-la-ncaa/
File:Bobby BoundsVSPSU.jpg: obvious copyvio of an image in a newspaper
File:Bobby Bounds Eastern New Mexico.jpg: obvious copyvio from an old magazine or yearbook
File:Bobby Bounds17.jpg: deleted presumptively, since all your other image uploads to date have been copyvio. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 01:09, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but in order to protect the rights of copyright holders we can't take your word for it that you are the copyright holder of all these various images that have been previously published elsewhere prior to their being uploaded to Wikipedia. We require proof via the OTRS ticket system, whereby copyright holders can provide evidence via email that they are the copyright holder. In the email you would also specify which license you wish to use. There's a list of compatible licenses here and a sample permission email here and detailed instructions here. These are legal requirements that keep us in compliance with the policies of this website and copyright law. Copyright law and its application are complex matters, and you should not upload any further images until you have taken the time to read and understand our copyright policy. Continuing on your present course will result in you being blocked from editing. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 01:20, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2020 Texas A&M–Commerce Lions football team

The article 2020 Texas A&M–Commerce Lions football team has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The team never played. The 2020 NCAA Division II football season was cancelled.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 20:48, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Dixie Melody Boys

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Dixie Melody Boys, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:16, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dixie Melody Boys, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tony Brown. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]