User talk:Linguaddict

This is Linguaddict's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: OK Boomer (November 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Neologisms are not considered suitable for Wikipedia unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong evidence in independent, reliable, published sources. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish its notability.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs more external news sources to show widespread usage.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:OK Boomer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:OK Boomer, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:39, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Linguaddict! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:39, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: OK Boomer (November 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

Recommend adding this text to the page "Baby Boomer" as a legacy or associated topic - insufficient detail available for a standalone article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:OK Boomer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:OK Boomer, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 10:35, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:OK Boomer has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:OK Boomer. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 04:35, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: OK Boomer has been accepted

OK Boomer, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 04:37, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Honey toast has been accepted

Honey toast, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 20:16, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nice article

This was a nice addition. Thanks. Toddst1 (talk) 16:00, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hirtenmakkaroni has been accepted

Hirtenmakkaroni, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 21:32, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Journalist here

Hi Linguaddict, I'm a journalist who regularly writes about Wikipedia for Slate, the New York Times, and other publications. If you're interested, you can read some of my work here: stephenharrison.com. I'd be very interested in interviewing you via email for a potential piece about about the OK Boomer Wikipedia page. Would you mind contacting me via my Wikipedia username or at the contact information that's on my website? Thanks much for considering. Stephenbharrison (talk) 23:34, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ok boomer usage

I’m a millennial, so I might be getting this wrong. But I would suggest that one significant usage of “ok boomer” seems to be a response to people who are advocating for change when they won’t be around to deal with the consequences. I think in general, all generational cohorts are dismissive of those who don’t have to be held accountable for their actions. Enough of my cohort had reasonably priced college that was less competitive than what your cohort is experiencing. I would say that if I didn’t advocate for student loan aid in some fashion, I’m hurting others with no consequences to myself and would have earned an “ok boomer” dismissal. Taxes, climate change, healthcare, education, social security, retirement, etc are all issues with significant future impact that the boomers won’t be around to deal with. Anyway, the usages in the article do seem to read as being dismissive based on age, rather than lack of consequences and I figured if someone was willing to give some elegant prose to my interpretation, it might help alleviate some of the sore feelings on the page? I’m not sure if this is a public post or a direct message or if you’ll even see this? Or if I’ll see any responses. But I thank you for reading regardless of my accuracy in interpretation of the phrase. Your cohort is amazing and will make the world a better place. I hope us millennials will use our time with influence to pave a great path for y’all to take the reigns in the future. 71.244.146.88 (talk) 14:48, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, meant to leave a signature!

V/r Josie 71.244.146.88 (talk) 14:51, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WP:OUTING

Your real identity has apparently been WP:OUTED [1]. Did you give permission for Stephen to do that? Most folks around here shy away from that. Toddst1 (talk) 16:05, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yeah, this all happened in accordance with me, I complied to do an interview with Stephen. Thanks for notifying me though! Linguaddict (talk) 16:11, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Toddst1 (talk) 17:11, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User talk

Hi there. At least for the moment I am now a talk page watcher. I saw you recently removed a large chunk of content from here. That is certainly your right. You might, however, want to consider archiving instead as that's generally preferred. You can read up about archiving options here and known I would also be happy to answer any questions you might have. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 16:21, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2020 Jamaica earthquake

The article 2020 Jamaica earthquake has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There has been no apparent damage or casualties (even injuries) from this earthquake, and its strength itself (not that strong on a global scale, merely slightly unusual for this region) does not alone make it a notable event. WP:NOTNEWS also applies

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Buttons0603 (talk) 00:55, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2020 Caribbean earthquake for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2020 Caribbean earthquake is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2020 Caribbean earthquake until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Buttons0603 (talk) 19:55, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Gigritzpatschen concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Gigritzpatschen, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Gigritzpatschen

Hello, Linguaddict. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gigritzpatschen".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 21:41, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia page

Hello! I was wondering if you would be interested in creating a page. Don't want to overwhelm with details in case you aren't available. If interested, let me know and I can fill you in. Thank you for your time! P.s. I'm new to this and have no idea the proper way to go about asking if someone would be interested in creating a page UserKH (talk) 20:46, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Hirtenmaccharoni concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Hirtenmaccharoni, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:39, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Albanese Candy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Albanese Candy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albanese Candy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 17:09, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Snúður

Hello, Linguaddict. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Snúður".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 08:27, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Albanese Candy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Albanese Candy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albanese Candy (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HighKing⁺⁺ 19:12, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Merano railway station concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Merano railway station, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:26, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Paul Fürst

Hello, Linguaddict. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Paul Fürst".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Majash2020 (talk) 08:13, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Fiskardo shipwreck

Hello, Linguaddict. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Fiskardo shipwreck".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 08:25, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Vietnamese immigration to Hawaii

Hello, Linguaddict. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Vietnamese immigration to Hawaii".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 08:44, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of Māori foods

Hello, Linguaddict. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of Māori foods".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 09:08, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Merano railway station

Hello, Linguaddict. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Merano railway station".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Majash2020 (talk) 05:18, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Glöckler

Hello, Linguaddict. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Glöckler".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 08:36, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Albanese Candy

On 20 July 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Albanese Candy, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Albanese Candy makes gummy confectioneries in the shape of worms, snakes, butterflies, khaki-colored soldiers, and jet fighter aircraft? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Albanese Candy. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Albanese Candy), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:01, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Hirtenmaccharoni

Hello, Linguaddict. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hirtenmaccharoni".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:56, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Albanese Candy logo.jpg

The file File:Albanese Candy logo.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned image. Inferior version of File:Albanese Candy logo.png, which is already on Commons. No realistic encyclopedic use here, and no educational use to justify moving to Commons.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ajpolino (talk) 20:48, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]