User talk:Line Ledsgaard

This is Line Ledsgaard's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aspergillus aculeatinus has been accepted

Aspergillus aculeatinus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 07:38, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Line Ledsgaard, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Aspergillus aculeatus. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! SkyGazer 512 ^{Oh no, what did I do this time?} 13:45, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References

I've tidied up the references on Aspergillus indologenus and Aspergillus aculeatinus to use the citation templates, to link to the online copies of the journal papers, and to reuse references where possible. I could suggest you read Wikipedia:Citing sources to learn Wikipedia's preferred styles for references but, honestly, it's easier to turn-on & use Wikipedia:ProveIt which will properly format the reference given just the doi link. There's guidance on how to reuse references in Wikipedia:Citing sources#Repeated citations. Hope that helps, Cabayi (talk) 14:50, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'd also encourage you to add categories to the articles and projects to the articles' talk pages.

Adding categories to the article makes it easier for readers to find similar articles. I've added

[[Category:Aspergillus]]
[[Category:Parasitic fungi]]

to indologenus. Following the links from your article to the categories leads to a list of similar articles which, in turn, may give you ideas to reuse in your article. Just as ProveIt makes it easier to work with references, Wikipedia:HotCat makes it easier to work with categories.

Adding a project to the talk page by adding the project's template, such as

{{WikiProject Fungi}}

will advertise the article to other editors with an interest in fungi & encourage them to collaborate on your article. Again, I hope that helps, Cabayi (talk) 15:04, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Aspergillus sclerotiicarbonarius

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Line Ledsgaard, thanks for creating Aspergillus sclerotiicarbonarius!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged for two issues and a references section has been added.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 18:11, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem on Aspergillus aculeatinus and multiple other articles

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from http://ijs.microbiologyresearch.org/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijs.0.029884-0. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. All content you add to Wikipedia must be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:38, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aspergillus costaricaensis (September 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NessieVL was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Aspergillus costaricaensis instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Just edit the page at Aspergillus costaricaensis

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aspergillus costaricaensis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Aspergillus costaricaensis, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nessie (talk) 16:46, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Line Ledsgaard! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Nessie (talk) 16:46, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Specifically, punctuation should be placed before inline citations, not after - please see MOS:REFPUNCT for details. Thanks! Jmertel23 (talk) 15:44, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Aspergillus stercorarius

Thanks for creating Aspergillus stercorarius. It seems there must have been an error when you created this, as it added two references to the same work. I have fixed this, but the article requires additional references for verification.

— Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 06:24, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Aspergillus giganteus

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Line Ledsgaard, thanks for creating Aspergillus giganteus!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add stub tags to articles this length. Thanks for your hard work creating lots of new articles.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 10:14, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Aspergillus iizukae

Hi, I'm SkyGazer 512. Line Ledsgaard, thanks for creating Aspergillus iizukae!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. When creating articles, categories should be placed below the references and external links sections; usually below everything except stub templates. Also, it would be great if you could add {{Eurotiomycetes-stub}} at the bottom of very short articles you create (e.g. a short paragraph or less) if they're related to Eurotiomycetes, such as this one. Thanks and let me know if you have any questions!!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

SkyGazer 512 ^{Oh no, what did I do this time?} 16:19, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Aspergillus microthecius) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Aspergillus microthecius, Line Ledsgaard!

Wikipedia editor Bennv3771 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Would be helpful to wikilink all those compounds it produces.

To reply, leave a comment on Bennv3771's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Bennv3771 (talk) 14:12, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Aspergillus pseudoviridinutans

Hi, I'm SkyGazer 512. Line Ledsgaard, thanks for creating Aspergillus pseudoviridinutans!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Thanks again for creating all of these articles! When you do create new ones in the genus Aspergillus that aren't currently listed on List of Aspergillus species, it would be appreciated if you could go ahead and add them there, so that the article can be de-orphaned. Let me know if you need help with how to do this.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

SkyGazer 512 ^{Oh no, what did I do this time?} 14:58, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Your addition to Aspergillus labruscus has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 17:25, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Aspergillus neoniveus) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Aspergillus neoniveus, Line Ledsgaard!

Wikipedia editor Darylgolden just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please remember to add WikiProject banners on the talk page of articles you create (see the talk pages of articles I've reviewed)

To reply, leave a comment on Darylgolden's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Darylgolden^(talk) Ping when replying 08:59, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ref names

Hi there, I noticed that in several of your recent edits, you added ref names which had two apostrophes rather than double quote marks. (' ' vs. ") This is working in most cases, but isn't strictly the way to do it, as it will cause problems when using a ref name with multiple words. Ref name=' ' oneword ' ' will work, but ref name=' ' two words ' ' will create an error. Ref name="one or any number of words" is how to do it.

This may seem like a small issue, but it's in everyone's best interests if you get in the habit of phrasing ref names correctly. If I can help with anything, just let me know, Thanks, Jessicapierce (talk) 01:49, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have been gradually fixing this error in your articles, which I'm glad to do. However, I notice that in your recent submissions, you're still using two apostrophes (incorrect), rather than quote marks (correct). Can you please start using the correct version? Again, it may seem like a small issue, but it poses various problems. Aside from what I mentioned above, it is also bad precedent which may be copied by new editors. I've also run across several cases where a well-meaning editor changed a few of your ref names to the correct form, but omitted one, which created an error.

It's in everyone's best interests if you simply use the correct formatting, please. Let me know if I can help with anything. Thanks, Jessicapierce (talk) 06:55, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Categorization

Hi Line Ledsgaard, First off, thanks for all of your work! I've noticed that you've added many Aspergillus species articles to the "fungi" category in addition to the Aspergillus category. As per the categorization guidance, articles should only be added to the most specific category available (with some exceptions) - therefore, you do not need to add species-specific articles to the overarching "fungi" category if they are also included in a more specific category. Please feel free to let me know if you have any questions. Thanks! Jmertel23 (talk) 15:10, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Errors

After several weeks, I've finished (I think) fixing all the errors in your Aspergillus articles. I was glad to do it, because these are legitimate scientific articles with good content. However, going forward, I'd like to be sure you're not putting other editors in the position of having to fix hundreds of errors, however small. I assume you will be using the correct ref name phrasing in the future. If you're going to be using the same template/wording for multiple articles, can you have someone look over it, to make sure there aren't any errors? I'll volunteer for this if you like. Thanks, Jessicapierce (talk) 19:39, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Line Ledsgaard. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]