User talk:Limonizia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sicilian Renaissance has been accepted

Sicilian Renaissance, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Greenman (talk) 09:45, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

italics philosophers

Cicerone può dirsi italiano? Tommaso D'Aquino può dirsi italiano e Pico della Mirandola? e Lucrezio? Eppure questi filosofi fanno parte della lista. Allora perché non Parmenide e i filosofi della Magna Grecia che sono nati nella penisola ed hanno influenzato tutta la filosofia della penisola italica? I greci della penisola greca chiamavano gli abitanti della Magna Grecia italioti Ἰταλιώτης/Ἰταλιῶται Italiōtai. Il titolo del paragrafo è Italics philosophers che non significa Italiani ma Italici. G.B. Vico nel De antiquissima italorum sapientia parla proprio della Magna Grecia come origine della cultura italica. Guardati questo https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Italian_philosophy oppure questo https://pantheon.world/profile/occupation/philosopher/country/italy/ Fronmar (talk) 00:34, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ecco qui il testo di Vico dove il filosofo napoletano dimostra l'influenza della scuola eleatica e la particolarità italica di questa scuola filosofica file:///C:/Users/WINDOWS%2010/Downloads/De%20antiquissima%20italorum%20sapientia.pdf Fronmar (talk) 00:54, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

italici e greci poi condividono un patrimonio genetico comune che può far pensare a popoli molto simili https://www.lescienze.it/news/2017/05/25/news/antichi_flussi_genetici_sud_italia_grecia_balcani-3541291/

oppure questo

https://pikaia.eu/una-grande-famiglia-lungo-le-coste-del-mediterraneo/ Fronmar (talk) 01:10, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Capisci che filosofi italiani esistono solo dopo il 1861 cioè dopo l'unità d'Italia ma l'Italia come concetto idea e come cultura esisteva già da prima e i popoli della Magna Grecia appartenevano a questa cultura. Etruschi e Romani hanno modulato il loro alfabeto da quello greco https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Italiotes Fronmar (talk) 01:26, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Questo elenco intende includere solo filosofi "italiani".

Con il termine "italiano" o "italico" si intende qualcuno o qualcosa che è originario della regione Italia o che è direttamente collegato a qualcosa in Italia.

Ad esempio, esistono le lingue italiche, originarie dell'Italia, che sono ovviamente chiamate "italiche". Esistono però anche gli Etruschi, che nonostante non parlassero una lingua italica, sono comunque considerati un popolo italico.

Ma i popoli greci che hanno abitato l'Italia non sono nativi della terra, provengono da colonie e hanno mantenuto legami con le loro terre d'origine.

Non ha senso considerare "italiani" o "italici" i filosofi greci antichi che sono nati o che hanno risieduto in Italia. Infatti, per molti di questi filosofi greci antichi, le loro vere origini sono sconosciute. Limonizia (talk) 02:24, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dimonios moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Dimonios, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:45, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Italians of Crimea, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Italian, Russian and Ukrainian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from it:Le Vignole into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Actualcpscm^{scrutinize, talk} 13:10, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Southwestern Europe

The article Southwestern Europe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:OR/WP:SYNTH. Same as with Northwestern Europe.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 21:03, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Southwestern Europe for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Southwestern Europe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Southwestern Europe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 16:40, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Dimonios

Hello, Limonizia. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dimonios, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]