Jump to content

User talk:Lil-unique1/Archive 3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5→Archive 10

broken heels

hi just to say i got the information off the website aswell hereit is so please read it :)http://www.alexandraburkeofficial.com/newsdiary/post/diary_blog_-_17th_november_2009/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Obiwan500 (talk • contribs) 20:34, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Bigger by Backstreet Boys

According to WP:NSONGS, "Articles and information about albums with confirmed release dates in the near future must be confirmed by reliable sources. Separate articles should not be created until there is sufficient reliably sourced information about a future release."

The release of Bigger has been confirmed by at least 4 reliable sources, including members of the band. Other sources include Entertainment Weekly and the United States radio program On Air with Ryan Seacrest, and an online article from a U.K. radio source that you posted on the article for This Is Us. The music video for the single has been filmed and released. It is also promoted on the band's official website, as well as their official website through their record company, Jive Records.

So, in accordance with WP:NSONGS, the single and the release date have been confirmed by the artist and/or their record label, therefore, it qualifies to have an independent article than the album. Cougars2012 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 17:36, 22 November 2009 (UTC).

Amprofon

I'm not arguing that you didn't source a valid chart on She Wolf: the problem is that you put an EP position into a single chart. Amprofon doesn't track singles.—Kww(talk) 21:45, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

I know what that chart includes. It isn't a singles chart. It's a physical CD chart which includes albums (mainly), EPs (sometimes), and singles (very occasionally). It shouldn't be included in singles articles.—Kww(talk) 22:54, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Leona Lewis "Echo"

Please STOP highlighting the countries Flanders and Wallonia. If people do not know what they are they simply click "Belgian Albums Chart" and it tells you the country is split into two for music charts.

Also I have changed Ultratop 40 & 50 to simply "Ultratop" the prior are singles charts. Thank you Jayy008 (talk) 00:42, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Flanders and Wallonia

Hi can you tell me which pages you've changed to highlight those 2 countries? I will change some of them and appreciate if you did to. Everytime I go onto someone's page I see your edit! Please don't do it in the future and I'll try change them back. Jayy008 (talk) 19:55, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Removal of PROD from WyldCard

Hello Lil-unique1, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to WyldCard has been removed. It was removed by Closedmouth with the following edit summary 'deprod, grammy nominated, but remove unsourced personal details'. Please consider discussing your concerns with Closedmouth before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to AfD for community discussion. Thank you, SDPatrolBot (talk) 19:51, 27 November 2009 (UTC) (Learn how to opt out of these messages) 19:51, 27 November 2009 (UTC)


Please Stop

Moving the pages around to your own person preference. On WK:GOODCHARTS it shows you the correct template, it's not what you did to "I Want to Know What Love Is" and others. Please don't do it again. Jayy008 (talk) 22:36, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

I do not think I have any claim to articles, I usually edit the ones prone to vandalism and unless they follow Wikipedia: Records charts I'll always revert them. There is nothing like that on Record Charts, I change the charts per the layout shown on there page. I use capitals and exclamation marks because you do not seem to listen. As for Flanders and Wallonia, you're the only person who highlights them, it says about Flanders and Wallonia on the Belgian Singles Chart pages, if they wanted a Geography lesson wouldn't they sign up for a college course? All the necessary information is listed on Ultratop 50 or 40 page.

also Taiwan International if IFPI, if you see WK: List of music recording sales certifications. It says nothing about only using 18 countries just Non-IFPI which I didn't know but now I do. I returned Taiwan but I will remove Hungary. I have low-cased my title and removed the exclamation marks in manor of good faith. Jayy008 (talk) 22:54, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Why do you keep changing the current view and style of the charts?Please stop as the other is preferred.--Petergriffin9901 (talk) 22:55, 28 November 2009 (UTC)



I Found the 18 maximum now!!

If I have offended you I apologize but I've NEVER seen that chart template before, on this talk page or on the page itself. I have added a discussion to your new made up template or whoever made it up so will you refrain if a consensus is agreed that it shouldn't be used? Jayy008 (talk) 23:13, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Do you prefere it? Jayy008 (talk) 23:23, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

I like the idea but not it's appearance, I think it's a jumble, it looks like to much is going on too much information at once.

(Australian Singles Chart 1) That's all people care about, if they wanted more information like who runs the chart they would click the link wouldn't they? Not that it matters now lol.

I do like the mentality behind it, so it automatically finds links for the charts? Really? Explain to me.... Jayy008 (talk) 23:32, 28 November 2009 (UTC)


I'm not disputing numbers now just the unnessary (Can't spell! lol) information the new template provides. Jayy008 (talk) 23:36, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for all the info I'm discussing it with KWW now and it looks promising, I still don't like the way it looks lol Jayy008 (talk) 23:45, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Stronger with Each Tear

On Mary's website, twitter updates, amazon, barnes & noble and even the album cover it's reffered to as "Stronger withEach Tear" not "Stronger with Each Tear". That withEach part isnt a typo error. So can you please email somebody to change it back to Stronger withEach Tear or could you do it yourself.--jhstith (talk) 18:07, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

So you do know that it's pronounced as "Stronger withEach Tear" and not "Stronger with Each Tear"?.--jhstith (talk) 18:22, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

OK as long as you know what the real name is, but regardless of proper grammar, it would mean a lot to me as a Mary J. Blige fan and Mary herself that her ninth album "Stronger withEach Tear" is spelled the real way on Wiki (that way that Mary and her team spelled it) not what Wiki and the community thinks how it should be spelled."?.--jhstith (talk) 19:18, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Singlescharts

Hey, I apaologize for before, I wasn't aware of any policy change or rule. Thanks for the notice.--Petergriffin9901 (talk) 08:56, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Redirect

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but one or more redirects you created have been considered disruptive and/or malicious, and have been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. SunCreator (talk) 23:01, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Re : Single Certifications

You are so funny, you always add a ton in your comments when it comes to me is crazy, always pretending to be the victim, you're so pathetic. You know what ? I will just wait than swisscharts.com publishes the certification and then i'd like to see your face. And one last thing it isn't you who will decide if i'm banned or not, so, calm your joy ! And i think the reverse is also possible... (Thestreamer (talk) 23:54, 29 November 2009 (UTC))

Bla bla bla ... I don't understand why you tell me about your life, I said you that I would wait for confirmation of swisschart.com who publishes certification, another week to wait, end of the discution (Thestreamer (talk) 00:13, 30 November 2009 (UTC))

Telephone

ohh okay, thanks! I thought Gagadaily had already confirmed it as the second single, thanks for clarifying! :) HEyyy XxMjF (talk) 00:21, 30 November 2009 (UTC)


Taiwan

this link says Taiwain is IFPI. Jayy008 (talk) 22:17, 29 November 2009 (UTC)


Then it shouldn't listed of "List of music recording sales certifications" as IFPI. I have put this for discussion before and it is allowed to be used it may be in archive 5. Jayy008 (talk) 22:28, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

No it is IFPI, I Google IFPI. The IFPI website is IPFI.org the link I showed you is IFPI.org Jayy008 (talk) 22:31, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

I still don't understand why it's from the IFPI website. Maybe it just isted listed in the list you showed yet but it's still IFPI.org Jayy008 (talk) 12:14, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Yep, I think I've got it now. (In the end LOL) Jayy008 (talk) 13:32, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Taiwan I did a little more research. This is the IFPI award levels for all countries affiliated with IFPI? Jayy008 (talk) 15:25, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Got it please give your opinion on the next stage of the 18 chart debate, we are moving towards deleting the rule completely to avoid bias and long as the information is sourced for WK:GOODCHARTS Jayy008 (talk) 16:18, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

oops

I removed your report as a duplicate. Feel free to add comments to mine.—Kww(talk) 16:46, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

18 charts

I'm going to remove the rule from Record Charts as the consensus seems to be that the rule should be destroyed. As you have been a frequent contributer to the discussion adding the 1,2,3,4 thing would you like me to add something in it's place relating to WK:GOODCHARTS? Jayy008 (talk) 17:58, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Agreed, I'll help out I removed number 1 yesterday so if you could add 2,3,4 it would be good. I'm not good at wording things well. Jayy008 (talk) 01:42, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

The X Factor

It was clearly stated several times in the show that the second song was one chosen by each acts mentor to 'get them into the final', I suggest you go and re-watch instead of relying on sources written BEFORE the show aired. (Eddyegghead (talk) 18:57, 7 December 2009 (UTC))

I Look To You Tour/H.A.T.E.U. video

As you told me once you have done alot of work on I Look To You the album. Can you keep an eye on the tour with me, everytime I link the countries together somebody puts them back in a separate column and the page looks a jumble. Would you be able to revert those edits if you see them?

Also have you seen the H.A.T.E.U. video yet? Jayy008 (talk) 13:49, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Coming from a Mariah fan, I couldn't agree me. It's so boring. I don't think there should be any more singles from the normal version now, seems kinda poinntless as radio aren't supporting and the videos are awful. I'll just hold out hopes for the remix album! and thanks (I Look To You Tour)Jayy008 (talk) 15:58, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Coming back at a later time this is: Somebody has unlinked the countries AGAIN, aren't they supposed to be joined? It makes the page look a mess if they're all individual. Don't you agree? I left a message on the use page weeks ago but they don't reply. Also should I removed the set-list do you think as it's unsourced? Jayy008 (talk) 17:45, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Doll Dom Mini.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Doll Dom Mini.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:57, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Shakira's Middle East Bonust tracks on She Wolf album

You removed sourced information.....there are 3 remixes not only one......and the source thats given mentions those 3 remixes....so why did you remove them........The source thats cited [1] mentions those remixes, so please add them back...

"Mrad’s remix has also been included on the Middle Eastern pressing of the She Wolf album as a bonus track, along with versions by Cairo’s Fahmy and Samba and Dubai’s Mindloop Collective"


—Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.96.226.88 (talk) 12:16, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

December 2009

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ego (The Saturdays song), without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Furball3 (talk) 09:09, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Fresh Out The Oven alternate Cover

By any chance, can you upload the alternate cover of "Fresh Out The Oven".



86.96.226.88 (talk) 21:31, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

I Look To You (song)

It's the ONLY single cover. It should be used rather than an album cover, the reason the album cover was used was because it was released as a promo single. The remix art from the UK and the double-a-side single with Million Dollar Bill are the only covers so you choose which one? Jayy008 (talk) 00:28, 17 December 2009 (UTC)


Somebody will put it up for deletion straight away for having two non-free images on the same page, but I think we could argue it out considering the song doesn't have a "main cover" Jayy008 (talk) 15:28, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

INVITATION to discussion of an issue you've seen occur

At S.O.S. (Let the Music Play) you have seen the issue of Chronologies in infoboxes for songs with a featured artist so I thought you might be interested in this.—Iknow23 (talk) 02:21, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

BLACK EYED PEAS

You were the one that published that Missing You was a single, not me.

I put sources of Rock That Body being a single on Australia and the UK. Besides, I wasn't the one that wrote that on the Wikipedia, I just undid your unsourced version. —Preceding unsigned comment added by HC 5555 (talk • contribs) 20:07, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Top Of The World

I will try to fing a source, but it's obviously Jessica and Melody sings with Nicole... —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheFameM (talk • contribs) 20:50, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Re: Electro Love

While I do understand your concerns, I do not get why you change and contort situations to suit yourself. You accuse me of inserting unsourced information with no citation, but didn't you see the ref I provided? Both guardian.co.uk and The Daily Free Press are considered reliable, not blogs like you mentioned. When did I ever use a blog as a ref? Also, when you say, "information about a leak is only justifiable if it invokes an artist reaction or label statement", can you provide me a link where this rule is stated on Wikipedia? When I talk about you making up your own rules, this is what I mean. Lil-unique1, I tried to be respectful, but when you repeatedly remove information I have added for no reason, I find there is no other way to get the message across. You keep ignoring me and continue to remove what I added. If you do not stop, I will be forced to report you. Please, don't make this difficult for no reason. Corn.u.co.pia • Disc.us.sion 13:25, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

But it is sourced! Don't you read the refs I provided? The Daily Free Press says, "but from the sound of most of the 20 or so leaked songs from the Electro sessions". That's where I got the number from. Also, I didn't name all the leaked songs covered by the blogs, only those from RELIABLE sources. guardian.co.uk and The Daily Free Press covered the songs, and they are reliable, independent sources. Finally, this is Wikipedia. Saying that I am advertising and encouraging people to search for leaked songs is hogwash. We have to cover all information, whether it is detrimental to the artist or not. Don't let your views as a fan distort our aim here. Corn.u.co.pia • Disc.us.sion 14:21, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Inside Out (Kat DeLuna album)

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Inside Out (Kat DeLuna album). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inside Out (Kat DeLuna album). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:05, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Make Me

Hey! http://billboard.br.com/ http://www.hot100brasil.com/chtdance.html SEU BURRO VOCÊ ACHA QUE NÃO TEM CHARTS SÓ PORQUE É UM PAÍS LATINO ! VAI DÁ O CU NA ESQUINA ! VOCÊ NÃO ENTENDE PORTUGUÊS ! SEU MERDA! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lukek26 (talk • contribs) 18:02, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Digital vs Physical Charts (round 2)

You missed me! Well, I will not go into your game, but I'll just tell you again that the digital chart is not combined with the physical chart in France so there is no main chart as you say, but as you do not like to be contradicted I'll let you believe what you want User:Thestreamer (talk) 22:24, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Look at the website of SNEP, described how the albums and singles chart are made, we can read that only sales at 500 stores in the panel (representative of stores in France) are counted, Digital albums are not counted in this chart, in 2010 we can expect that to happen but for now it's still not the case. I hope to finally have answered your questions. [2] Thestreamer (talk) 01:00, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for uploading File:51GVxiVCHLL. SL500 AA240 .jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — ξxplicit 00:42, 23 December 2009 (UTC)


Fresh Out the Oven

Hi i have a problem with charts table in that article. When i click edit and then Show preview, table is shown corretcly, but when i quit editing table is not shown correctly. Do you maybe know how to fix that? :) --SveroH (talk) 08:59, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:51GVxiVCHLL. SL500 AA240 .jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:51GVxiVCHLL. SL500 AA240 .jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:18, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Hey Lil Unique

Can you please join this discussion, I would value your input as a user who helps out alot on MC pages. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Mariah_Carey_discography#Glitter_and_Merry_Christmas

Thank you. Jamie Jayy008 (talk) 01:17, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

PCD

Hey Lil-unique1, I've seen what you've added to Pussycat Dolls' article and I really hate Nicole now. If what Kim is saying is true then Nicole should be sacked or they should get rid of Robin Antin because it looks like bullying to me and Nicole is getting away with alot. I know Kim's probably left but I think Melody is a better singer but she's always put aside for the Queen Doll and she's bound to get sick of it. I saw an advert for their fitness DVD a few days ago, it showed all the dolls (Nicole doing an exclusive interview of course!) including Melody, but it didn't show Kim, instead it showed a brunette woman (maybe Robin Antin). If Melody and other dolls are sacked then I'm showing no more interest in them unless they despose of Nicole. What do you think of the matter? Cheers--David (talk) 11:51, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

I know! Robin Antin is a rather bad manager. It appears she didn't bother listening to the other girls about Nicole's domination (that's what they should've called the second album). I only hear Melody sing verses in Painted Windows--David (talk) 16:03, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Why did you delete the Timeline on the Pussycat dolls page? Many other groups have timelines on their page, especially the ones who've had membership changes —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ofelixdacat (talk • contribs) 23:23, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Hey LilUnique

You've been on here longer than me. Do you know of any Admins apart from Legolas. Everytime I change the macros of Alexandra Burke or Cheryl Cole songs a user "ryan" something reverts it and ignores any message I sent it highly irritatin I want to suggest he be blocked. Jayy008 (talk) 18:54, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Unenforceable threats

Please don't use edit summaries like this one. There's no way you could follow through on that.—Kww(talk) 04:00, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

First, the real problem is with your call to the template. It has to be
  • {{singlechart|Czech Republic|20|year=2009|week=47}}

not

  • {{singlechart|Czech Republic|20|Year=2009|Week=47}}

The parameters are case-sensitive, and there's not much I can do to fix that. That aside, when I look at week 200947 on the Czech chart, number 20 is "Bad Boys", by Alexandra Burke. Why do you think "Fight for This Love" charted on the 47th week of 2009 in the Czech Republic?—Kww(talk) 20:54, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

It's always a good idea to check the reference the template creates. If everything has been done properly, clicking the link will take you directly to a page that confirms the figure. Sometimes you have to do a search, but not often.—Kww(talk) 16:58, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Hello

Hi LilUnique, I have added to "I Want to Know What Love Is" an extra section to the succession box for pop because Brazil hot 100 was already there. Can you please rowspan Beyonce to 2 rows and the insucument as I don't know how to do it. Thank you sorry about my spelling lol Jayy008 (talk) 23:34, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

4trak

Back in December, you warned User:4trak about shortening names to just "busbee." I've checked the liner notes and credits of songs he's written, and he is indeed credited as just "busbee," so it's fine to leave it that way. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 16:37, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Billboard Brasil

ABPD don't run a singles chart and Billboard doesn't run an albums chart so I don't know what could be different? Jayy008 (talk) 20:30, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

It is on WK:GOODCHARTS but it says we should wait until it's archived before adding it which is fine but as this song reached #1 I thought it was neccessary to add it. Jayy008 (talk) 16:09, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

I Look to You certs.

I apologize I didn't look that closely, however sales aren't needed on their as they are only shipments and you can click "list of music blarh" to get it. Germany's own website for certifications doesn't list it as Platinum. That picture of the plaque looks like it's been photoshopped on but Rap-Up is usually reliable. I just don't know why Germany lists it as Gold and literally it only did it a few days ago, if it had gone platinum wouldn't Germany's website have listed it instead of listing it gold? Jayy008 (talk) 22:29, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Yep, that's fine for all of them. Maybe the website is saving it then for when the award is presented. Still Canada it has sold 26,000 after it's main weeks I don't understand how it could have reached 80,000 but oh well it's not about personal opinion. I have however removed the sales column. The reason I added *Certifications (List of sales certifictions)* was because other pages have that so when that's there sales aren't needed they can simply click it if they're curious about sales.

PS. Mariah Carey discography, what do you think of having a separate one for singles, I think I can do some good work to the single if they have they're own page. I will put it up for discussion? Jayy008 (talk) 22:41, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

RE: Discography

Thanks, can you tell me how to make the page please? Or if you have time make it for me and I will transfer all the information across. Thank you in advance for your help. Jayy008 (talk) 22:49, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
That's what I mean, I have no idea how to make a normal one lol so when you're back tomorrow I'll wait for you to tell me then I'll do it thanks! Jayy008 (talk) 23:06, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi Lil Unique it's all up and running. If you could take a look here and add some stuff you think I've missed or anything like that. Your input would be greatly appreciated. The infobox is looking bare but I can't think of anything I can put there I will go to the Madonna singles discography for help. Jayy008 (talk) 17:40, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Please join the discussion

Talk:Mariah Carey discography#Splitting the article Jayy008 (talk) 22:27, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

imma be - the black eyed peas

you mentioned that it confused the article. how so, exactly? to avoid confusion, i clearly wrote "Although it has not been officially released outside of the United States." it gained airplay in canada, which means that it's got a chance of becoming a hit. the fact that it's got a chance of becoming a hit is significant. radio stations have been playing it on a regular basis, many times a day. this is pretty much a song that's been released as a single's treatment. i'm not saying it's a single in canada, i'm saying that it's getting played a lot. not only that, but people actually find airplay information interesting. the chart i linked helps people predict which song has got a chance of becoming a hit. other songs/singles' pages have airplay information too. (RouletteGoddess (talk) 22:41, 20 January 2010 (UTC))

Re:

at the bottom of the page, it says "ABOUT MEDIABASE MUSIC CHARTS: YELLOW HIGHLIGHT DENOTES CHART DEBUT. BULLET INDICATES INCREASE IN AIRPLAY OVER PREVIOUS WEEK. Mediabase electronically monitors more than 1,700 radio stations in the top 150 U.S. metro markets, 24-hours-a-day, seven-days-a-week. Those radio stations are broken out into specific radio "panels," and included in the most appropriate "format" above. Songs moving downward for a pre-specified number of weeks are removed from the charts. All charts are based on radio spins, with the exception of Country which is points based. Mediabase is the leading radio monitoring service with broadcast companies in the US. Mediabase also serves virtually every significant recording company, and associated entertainment industries. Copyright, Mediabase 2010. All rights reserved." this is an airplay chart. as it shows on the canadian top 40 page, "imma be" got added to the list this week. it got spinned 183 times. also, i had added two more references to two radio station playlists that were playing "imma be" throughout the day.

might as well add these links too (you have to be a member to access these pages. registration is free):

why can't it be put on top? it's technically been released. but to avoid disagreements, there's a "Release history" section at the bottom. the information could be put there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by RouletteGoddess (talk • contribs) 23:18, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Re:

yes, thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by RouletteGoddess (talk • contribs) 23:32, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Brasil Billboard

Already have :) Jayy008 (talk) 19:41, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Re:

Billboard Brasil is a good chart, and an official chart, by ABPD. Vitor Mazuco Msg 18:47, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Random/Mariah/Whitney

Thanks, that helps alot yes. Yeah I agree she seems to change one song per night lol, strangely, maybe remove the hidden notes just have on the set-list Emotions (selected dates) Always be my baby (Selected dates) since those 2 are the only ones she changes all the time. That should solve the problem and save having a note for each show. The first hidden note I will keep though because H.A.T.E.U. and the other song was only changed once.

It's fine, just not something to call you by lol.

Thank you, that's a shame. I wish I had SKY :(. Oh well I'm sure somebody will post it online.

Are you going to Whitney's show? Jayy008 (talk) 20:11, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Yeah I meant tour. I agree I defended X Factor but it was awful and I truely believe she was on something that night. I am going to her tour but that kinda but me off, however after seeing her Russian show I thought she was improving and they called them "rehersals" so I'll keep my fingers crossed lol. Jayy008 (talk) 23:41, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Haha, you'll have one. Not really heard of Melanie Fiona but I love Robin Thicke. You're lucky I tried to get AK's tickets cos she's performing on my Birthday like Beyonce did last night but the only seats left were level 4, and I find it to high lol. Leona will be incredible, apparantly her label has said she doesn't have a tour budget, let me know how both of those are too!! Jayy008 (talk) 11:44, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

PS. sorry Wiki chat isn't very efficient I always forget about what the other person rights I'm seeing her at the 02 in April. Jayy008 (talk) 11:45, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Boxes like this

Do you know if there's a page where you find templates like this?

UKThis user uses British English.

Random

Thank you Hash, really appreciate it. Btw, I want a review of Leona and Alicia Keys too! In fact I may go to Leona ... Choices lol Jayy008 (talk) 17:08, 29 January 2010 (UTC)


WOW, that is really bad. I've never liked Nicole for taking all the credit and leaving them in the shadows but I never knew it was actually her that controlled how much air-time the other girls got. She's such a bitch. I hope her solo career flops lol. I'll be supporting the others. All the line-up changes in PCD they'll soon catch up to the Sugababes lol. Jayy008 (talk) 17:54, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

RE: Memoirs

Hmmm, grrr, this is annoying, if you see the Record Charts discussion and we resolve that, then I can answer your question. If we do that I propose merging the pages and having it as a re-release rather than a separate remix album. Jayy008 (talk) 21:46, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Angels Advocate

What about Including two cronologys onto the album one for studio and one for compilation so you can go straight from Playlist or Memoirs ot Angels Advocate etc. That way everyone's happy and it is considered both a studio and compilation. What do you think? Jayy008 (talk) 17:17, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Talk: Mariah carey albums discography

Hey Unique, since you usually take place in Mariah Carey discussions, maybe you would like to voice your opinion here--Petergriffin9901 (talk) 03:54, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

User:Detty2.0, sockpuppet of banned User:Brexx

Hello, I saw you recently came across User:Detty2.0, who, as it turns out, was a sockpuppet of banned User:Brexx. I just wanted to give you a heads up in case you're not familiar with Brexx already. His identifying hallmark is an overuse of '...' and underuse of capitalization, see example:[3] You can find more info at WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Brexx and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Brexx/Archive. If User:Detty2.0 edited some articles you are familiar with, you might want to go back and double check his edits, and undo anything questionable. Edits by banned users can be reverted freely. Regards, Siawase (talk) 14:22, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Up Out My Face

Single artworks were previewed on Mariah Daily not a forum. They have never given unreliable information, the single covers are definatley official.

PS. I booked Leona tickets. Which date are you going? Jayy008 (talk) 17:03, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

"grrr" it the best I can put it. It's annoying me people keep adding that as a source for the concept. I doubt somebody like Mariah would put on her website that the song is about Nick Cannon's penis. Seriously, this is Mariah Carey. I think it's just someone adding it for a joke, do you know how to blacklist HoneyBFly as a source? When I tried to put AceShowbiz as a source for something it wouldn't let me because it said "this website is blacklisting for use on Wikipedia" so it automatically blocked it.

Oh cool, you can give me a review well before I see her then :D I'm going on the final night of the 02 shows June 18. Jayy008 (talk) 17:22, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

I wouldn't say "OMG" as my seats are awful lol. I'm on Level 1 but right at the back so I don't know how much I'll see her. Back home? Where you from? You're so lucky with Alicia Keys, that's on my birthday lol, they sold out SO fast! Jayy008 (talk) 17:30, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Ahhh yeah I know, I was happy at first with the extra date, then though no because then it wouldn't be my birthday so pointless going 3 days later. Originally London but now on the coast Clacton-on-sea, you? Jayy008 (talk) 18:14, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Tell me about it lol. & cool cool. Yeah definatley let me know if Alicia's good too :D Jayy008 (talk) 19:03, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Reply

In case you didn't notice my Talk page policy: I prefer to see both sides of a discussion together on one page. If I put a message on your talk page, I will be watching that page for a reply. If you leave a message here, I will reply here, unless you request otherwise

Hello, Lil-unique1. You have new messages at Iknow23's talk page.
Message added Put It in a Love Song. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

—Iknow23 (talk) 01:36, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

RE: tables on the right

Hello Hash, I was wandering if you could do me a favour, if you look at my user page by clicking on "jayy008" I have made some changes but I don't like where the box is. Have you got any idea how to move it over to the right hand side of the page? Thank you. Jayy008 (talk) 19:04, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Done something different now thanks in advance cos I know you would have helped lol. Jayy008 (talk) 19:28, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Question

Why did you revert my edit????????? I need a valid motivation!!!!!! ׺°”˜`”°º×ηυηzιαтιηα׺°”˜`”°º×

This is such a scandal..you edit your talk page without answering to my question!!! Sorry, it's not educate--׺°”˜`”°º×ηυηzιαтιηα׺°”˜`”°º× 19:23, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
If you'd looked at the top of your own wikipedia page you'll have a message in an orange box which says you have a message on your talk page. If you visit your talk page there should be a message there from me. that is normal practise. but since you seem to be struggling i'll say the same thing again... if you tell me which article you are refering to i'll explain why i reverted it. i work with 200+ articles so obv i cant remember every article. Lil-unique1 (talk) 19:27, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
Sorry, there isn't your edit And the article is the album of Keri Hilson In a Perfect World...--׺°”˜`”°º×ηυηzιαтιηα׺°”˜`”°º× 21:08, 6 February 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Merynancy (talk • contribs)

Whitney Houston/I Look To You/I Didn't Know My Own Strength

Please join this discussion Jayy008 (talk) 15:36, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

Point noted. I'm not to passionate about either actaully, but I can see that it would come across that way. My time with the Lady Gaga articles is only recent and likely temporary because I noticed editors not acting responsibly. Lastly when I'm being accused of making 'bad edits' and so forth that are made by another editor, then a reply is in order. Regards, SunCreator (talk)

To me the amount of none good faith edits by newbies is low on the Gaga articles, but because of the sheer numbers it looks high. Less per viewer then say a subject like Chess which you might not imagine to attract many vandals - but somehow it does. Either way, low or high vandalism that is no reason to bite the newbies, label good faith(but incorrect) edits as vandalism or ignore other policies. If editors feel a policy like WP:NSONG is incorrect they are welcome to discuss it on it's talk page. It would be good for editors on a subject like Songs (WP:SONG?) to get together and sort through some things to reduce drama. For example I think a release date in info boxes leads to unnecessary edit wars, and a simple change over to 'Charted date' or similar would save a lot of hassle as well as being much easier to reference. SunCreator (talk) 01:31, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Please add your input at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Songs#Singles release date is when FIRST being SOLD as a Single, NOT Radio Airplay

Hello, I think you may be interested in joining the discussion HERE. Thank You.—Iknow23 (talk) 10:47, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

New section

When a thing is unsourced, you put "citation needed", you don't delete it. And the thing of including the different version as a note is really ugly extetically. Also, it's horrible when i see in the discographies, the certifications of the singles in the table: it's horrible reading it!!!!!׺°”˜`”°º×ηυηzιαтιηα׺°”˜`”°º× 15:44, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Releases "Angels Advocate" singles

Right Island Records says the songs are coming out on Feb 16 but I don't know if that's for Digital or Mainstream but Up Out My Face is listed Here as being already out on Mainstream but it doesn't say when it came out. Thoughts?? Jayy008 (talk) 20:37, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

No no, I didn't mean in the infobox, I meant should we assume that it's for Digital Download or Mainstream Radio? (For the release history box, not infobox, because Radio releases are allowed in there). Jayy008 (talk) 15:47, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Airplay etc

Can you explain to me about this whole argument? I have posted a comment on the page about H.A.T.E.U. as an example. If Radio Airplay doesn't count as a release date, then songs in America with a radio only date, aren't singles, because they was never released. So the page above should be moved to an album cut or even deleted? Jayy008 (talk) 01:48, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

I know it's got so bloody confusing but I agree, Like A Surgeon was never confirmed but H.A.T.E.U. was here's an amazing solution created by somebody, no date in the infbox Please click here and judge I think this will keep everyone happy and allow radio only songs to be kept as singles. Jayy008 (talk) 23:32, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Did you look at the example I showed you? What was wrong with it? and yeah I guess for H.A.T.E.U. what you just sent me will do. But having no date and a "see: release info" like that person did could work too. Let me know what you though of it. Jayy008 (talk) 23:44, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

I'll support that if you think it's appropriate, as long as the airplay release is included in the release history (US and Canada only) No other countries as it doesn't matter in the slighest in other countries. Jayy008 (talk) 00:14, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Only if it doesn't have a digital release. I meant airplay-only. Jayy008 (talk) 00:18, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Lil-unique1/Archive_3&oldid=1141489992"