User talk:Vitor Mazuco

March 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Billboard Brasil. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Victão Lopes ^{I hear you...} 17:17, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Best Damn Thing certification edits

Hey Vitor, could you please explain your removal of the Platinum certification in Canada? Me and Zylo1994 are very confused about your reasons for doing so. Especially as you seem to be the user who added that certification on the 12th of April. Thanks Cjeam (talk) 21:32, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, so you mean that certification is only for the album called 'The best damn thing' and not for the song from the album? Cjeam (talk) 22:19, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: !!

Oh, I'm sorry about that. It didn't produce a template at that location on the page that I could see, so I assumed it was just gibberish/vandalism. I wasn't aware of it's actual purpose. My apologies for the removal and the mistaken warning. MelicansMatkin (talk, contributions) 20:25, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Cosmetic Executive Women

A tag has been placed on Cosmetic Executive Women requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. PoeticVerse (talk) 04:11, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

Please stop adding the Brazil chart to Baby (Justin Bieber song). The only music chart from Brazil allowed on Wikipedia is from the ABPD per WP:GOODCHARTS. Candyo32 (talk) 16:03, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Last warning, Im reverting your addition for the following reasons. 1) The chart currently follows Chart Macro, Your revision is of the old chart. 2) Brazil Charts fall under Bad Charts, it states "Brazil Hot 100/Hot100Brasil: This chart's article was deleted by deletion discussion as a non-notable chart with dubious methodology." 3) Under Good Charts it states the following "The singles charts at Billboard Brasil are acceptable, but not archived. These charts can be included only by referencing the physical magazine, not the online chart." Your reference is not to the physical magazine. If you add it again it will be considered disruptive editing and may violate 3RR and could be blocked from editing. (CK)Lakeshade✽talk2me 22:12, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A few things on this controversy:

First, edit warring is bad. I'm not going to fiddle with any of the blocks just because Vitor Mazuco was arguably right.
Second, Crowley Broadcast Analysis is a reliable source of information: the equivalent of Nielsen for Brazil. Their charts are quite reliable, and are the basis for the Billboard Brasil charts.
Third, I've never liked it when editors find links to these internal PDFs and use them. They are basically leaks of private information. Crowley does not publish a top 20 for public consumption. Vitor should have waited until the information was published in a public source, not a random PDF.
Finally, the bit about mixing chart macros and old references is meaningless. The macro is specifically designed to be mixed with manual references. There's just no way for any macro to anticipate every case, especially with Billboard's site being as buggy as it is. There's nothing wrong about mixing manual and macro charts.—Kww(talk) 12:10, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, but and now? What will happen? You will adopt the Crowley in the charts? Vitor Mazuco ^Msg 12:30, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I never had an issue with the chart, all i wanted was a source explaining that the chart was allowed which you didnt provide, you just kept saying "its allowed". If your going to add something be prepared to back it up, Lil-unique wasnt even involved in this conflict but he managed to provide me with 3 discussions involving this here. All i needed was the discussions or some form of approval and i would have dropped the issue. I wasnt inclined to take you word for it considering you kept linking me to a page that you created which didnt discuss if it was a legitimate chart. (CK)Lakeshade✽talk2me 16:12, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See Here is from Folha de S. Paulo this is a simple test for to show the Crowley is a official and content with credibility. It show the Crowley Charts, and this website, shows all the weekly charts, but only show the Top 20. For me the just problem, is that the official website. And i look This site that show the Crowley Charts. Vitor Mazuco ^Msg 19:13, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thats not what im saying, you could link me to 500 websites if you wanted, what i needed was a discussion on Wikipedia regarding that charts and if they were proven to be factual and allowed in articles. I know they are an actual chart but i didnt know if they were to be used or not. The brazil hot 100 has dozens of googable websites but its been discussed and the result was its not to be used. I didnt know if The CBA was discussed or not, thats what i wanted :) (CK)Lakeshade✽talk2me 19:58, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The real problem is that this link will disappear in a couple of months. You need to use WebCite or something similar to provide a permanent link to the site. Otherwise, the chart position will be deleted when the link goes dead.—Kww(talk) 22:03, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think so, this website will not disappear in a couple of months, but if happen, we may to chance for a phisical charts, no? Or similar situation. But now, is necessary to change the WP:GOODCHARTS and to put Crowley how a good, not bad. Vitor Mazuco ^Msg 22:21, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Crowley isn't listed at WP:BADCHARTS. It won't be listed at WP:GOODCHARTS until it has a permanent archive. The charts you pointed out to me in January are gone from the site now. It looks like they only keep the last two months.—Kww(talk) 22:31, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Control Room – Live EP, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Please stop providing unconstructive edits to an AfD nomination. Only include discussion regarding the proposed deletion. Further disruptions may result in your loss of editing privileges. ~ [ Scott M. Howard ] ~ [ Talk ]:[ Contribs ] ~ 17:51, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Firework (Katy Perry song), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
As of now, the song is not notable. Please do not recreate it. Thank you. Yvesnimmo (talk) 00:11, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Katy

Ok, but this single has already the single cover, see here and will relase betimes. And for this, has many source that. Vitor Mazuco ^Msg 00:21, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That is a fake single cover. If you click on the picture and look at its URL, you will see that it is clearly fan-made. Also, the English Wikipedia is not the Portuguese Wikipedia, with different policies. As of now, the song is not notable enough to warrant its own article. Also, I don't know what "betimes" means. Yvesnimmo (talk) 00:24, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I'm having some difficulty understanding what you're trying to say. But I think I've made the point clear about non-notability of the song to have its own article? Yvesnimmo (talk) 00:32, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Loud (Rihanna album). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Yvesnimmo (talk) 23:18, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop adding Avril Lavigne. A sample and a collaboration are completely different things. While MTV is a reliable source, I think you have read the article wrong, and extrapolated its meaning. Thanks. Yvesnimmo (talk) 23:18, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, "I'm with You" will be sampled. This is not a collaboration. Yvesnimmo (talk) 23:24, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Writing is not collaborating. And a reliable, verifiable source is needed. Yvesnimmo (talk) 23:33, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry: I don't understand you. Yvesnimmo (talk) 23:37, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think you understand the situation here. One of Avril Lavigne's songs, "I'm with You", is being sampled for Rihanna's supposed track "Cheers". Yes, Lavigne is a co-writer of the 2002 single, but that doesn't mean she's working on Loud. Lavigne is not writing anything new specifically for this album, and nothing in the source you provided supports this. Your edits claim Lavigne is working for Rihanna's fifth studio album, but this is in fact, false. Do you understand? Yvesnimmo (talk) 23:45, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Loud (Rihanna album), you may be blocked from editing. Yvesnimmo (talk) 18:05, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop. The information you are providing is false. It is also not supported by the source. Yvesnimmo (talk) 18:05, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Again, please stop your disruptive editing. I think I've made myself clear that the edits you claim to be true are, in fact, not and unsupported by the sources. Yes, MTV News is reliable, but what you are adding is not in the article. If you continue, you may be blocked for your edits. Yvesnimmo (talk) 18:14, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've reviewed this dispute, and will say that while I am not sure whether Vitor is intentionally adding false information or is having difficulty with English comprehension, the material Vitor is in no way supported by the source he is providing. Do not reinsert it, Vitor. You will face a block for edit-warring and adding false information to articles if you do.—Kww(talk) 18:47, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, no you are not understanting about it, Avril Lavigne contribute for that album, she wrote ALL that song she is a songwriting. I'll put in that article again in a diferent form. You are not the boss in all article here, that's why i do not contribute in wiki-en, here is horrible. This notice can not stay away. Vitor Mazuco ^Msg 18:59, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, it may be a comprehension problem, but believe me, the material you added before was false, and the material that Ericorbit reverted just didn't make sense. When people start reverting you and trying to explain that your edits are wrong, you need to listen to them. It's good that your English is good enough to allow you to contribute, as long as you accept that it being your second language will cause you to make mistakes.—Kww(talk) 19:30, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I puted and that notice i'll stay there. Vitor Mazuco ^Msg 19:52, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. What can be said to make you understand the edits you are making are incorrect? Yvesnimmo (talk) 19:53, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, that notice i'll stay there. You can not remove just because you want, that notice has good refs and is important for the article. Vitor Mazuco ^Msg 19:55, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is incorrect. What do you not understand about that? Yvesnimmo (talk) 19:57, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, why i can't put this notice there? Vitor Mazuco ^Msg 19:58, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

To answer your question: your first versions were wrong because being sampled is not a form of collaboration, as Yvesnimmo told you repeatedly and patiently. The edits you made today were gibberish: they made no sense whatsoever. You've been blocked because even though you you were reverted by five different editors and warned multiple times, you proceeded. Removing the block notice isn't against the rules, but note that you won't be able to make unblock requests without it.—Kww(talk) 20:08, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for promising to repeat edit once block expires. Any admin can lift this block once Vitor states that he understands Wikipedia policies against edit warring, and indicates that he will not immediately reinstate the edit that triggered this block. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

—Kww(talk) 21:56, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|Ok i will not put that notice again, but is no necessery Block me indefinitely, i want my free acont.}}

Kww i nedeed my account, i can not stay blocked forever. Vitor Mazuco ^Msg 23:32, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure you want your account back. You were blocked not just for threatening to do it again, though. You were also blocked for not understanding our edit warring policy. Can you show me that you understand why you were blocked?—Kww(talk) 23:55, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm blocked for edit warring. Vitor Mazuco ^Msg 00:02, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Since you seem to have agreed not to continue the edit war once the block expires, I've reset the block to the original expiry time. Just remember: the talk page is there for a reason. Please make use of it. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:03, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks HJ Mitchell, but for this and others things i don't contribute here. I prefer my Wiki-pt, there is more peaceful with who wants edit in some article. Vitor Mazuco ^Msg 00:07, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think anyone's intentionally trying to create a non-"peaceful" or "horrible" environment here on the English Wikipedia. Ever. We are just trying to make you realize your recent additions to Loud (Rihanna album) are incorrect, and that should be evidenced by the persistent reversions. Yvesnimmo (talk) 00:11, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I certainly am not trying to make your life miserable, and you should note that multiple editors reverted you. The quality of your edits on Portuguese Wikipedia is probably higher, because you are dealing in your mother tongue there. If you would calm down when people start to revert you here and realize that it's probably a comprehension problem, things would go better for you.—Kww(talk) 01:56, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, my english is bad, improve that notice for me? Vitor Mazuco ^Msg 16:14, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It can't be improved if it is incorrect. That is something you have to understand. Yvesnimmo (talk) 16:16, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's right. Think it though, Vitor: Rihanna could have sampled the song in exactly the same way if Avril Lavigne was dead. That shows that Avril Lavigne is not contributing to the album.—Kww(talk) 16:27, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, put that notice correctly. Vitor Mazuco ^Msg 16:30, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Since no one added any version of it after reviewing your source, the general consensus seems to be that it is trivia. If there's a song article at some future point, I'd add the fact that it sampled a Lavigne song there.—Kww(talk) 18:37, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I give up trying to make you understand. Vitor Mazuco ^Msg 19:01, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kane31.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kane31.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:28, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kane31.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kane31.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:36, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Beyond Citizen Kane

Vitor, você poderia parar de adicionar a imagem desse dvd pirata no artigo? Primeiro que esse documentário nunca foi lançado em DVD no Brasil, portanto qualquer imagem de uma capa de DVD é pirata. Outra, quem fez esse DVD pirata nem mesmo teve a capacidade de acertar o nome do documentário em Português, que é "Muito Além do Cidadão Kane", não "Além do Cidadão Kane". Obrigado. Evenfiel (talk) 11:01, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Todas as fontes? Olha essa matéria da Folha, que diz que o documentário ganhou até mesmo uma capa improvisada - a sua. Evenfiel (talk) 11:05, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Não vejo motivo nenhum para adicionar uma capa pirata que nem mesmo consegue acertar o nome do filme. Evenfiel (talk) 11:34, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Stories Project

Hi Vitor,

My name is Victor Grigas, I'm a storyteller at the Wikimedia foundation and we're working on gathering stories from Wikipedia editors, users, donors and staff to paint a picture of who uses Wikipedia for communication and fundraising purposes. I asked Jessie Wild who would be a good interview subject, and she sent me your name. I'd be interested in speaking with you in person, over the phone or by Skype if you are interested in participating in the project. You can reach me by email at vgrigas@wikimedia.org .

Thank you for your time,

Victor — Preceding unsigned comment added by VgrigasWMF (talk • contribs) 21:38, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Huggle experiment

Hi Vitor,

Steven Walling and I are currently running some experiments on Huggle warnings, and we're interested in trying them out in other Wikipedias besides English. I noticed that Portuguese WP uses Huggle and that you're an active Huggler there – interested in helping us out? We worked out a way to deliver two different warnings randomly, and we're trying to see if changing the message makes a difference for the person receiving it. We can do the technical stuff, but we'd need a Portuguese speaker to rewrite the templates :) Please let me know if you or anyone you know can help us out. Thanks! --Maryana (WMF) (talk) 17:27, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Response on my talk page :) –Maryana (WMF) (talk) 20:34, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WP:UWTEST members update

Hi, you're getting this message because you signed up to receive updates at WP:UWTEST, the task force on testing of user warnings and other notifications.

Here's what we're up to lately:

Huggle: There are tests still running in Huggle of level 1 templates, including a new template written by DGG. A full list is available here
SDPatrolBot: There is a new test running on the talk page messages of SDPatrolBot, which warns people who remove CSD templates. (Documentation of the test is here.)
Twinkle: We've proposed a test of AFD and PROD notifications delivered via Twinkle, which has been positively received. (See: 1, 2) This test should start this week.
Shared and dynamic IPs: Maryana's proposal to test the effect of regularly archiving shared/dynamic IP talk pages is in its final stages. There are also two relevant bot flag requests: 1, 2
XLinkBot: the herders of XLinkBot have approved a test of its warning messages concerning external links. Test templates are being written and help is most welcome.

Thanks for your help and support, Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 02:38, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ending test

Hi Vitor!

Just wanted to let you know that I turned off the Huggle test on pt., since it's been exactly a month since we started. We're going to do some analysis on the data and will let you know what we find out. Stay tuned for the exciting results :) Maryana (WMF) (talk) 20:14, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WP:UWTEST update

Hi Vitor,

Just giving you a heads-up about the latest update on our template testing. Please peruse when you have a minute. Thanks! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 05:11, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WP:UWTEST update

Hi Vitor,

We're currently busy designing some new tests, and we need your feedback/input!

ImageTaggingBot - a bot that warns users who upload images but don't provide adequate source or license information (drafts here)
CorenSearchBot - a bot that warns users who copy-paste text from external websites or other Wikipedia articles (drafts here)

We also have a proposal to test new "accepted," "declined," and "on-hold" templates at Articles for Creation (drafts here). The discussion isn't closed yet, so please weigh in if you're interested.

Thanks for your help! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 01:22, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You rock!

	Template testing rockstar award
	Thanks so much for organizing a Portuguese Wikipedia template testing project and helping us spread A/B testing to other wikis! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 21:32, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Update: new user warning test results available

Hi WP:UWTEST member, we wanted to share a quick update on the status of the project. Here's the skinny:

We're happy to say we have a new round of testing results available! Since there are tests on several Wikipedias, we're collecting all results at the project page on Meta. We've also now got some help from Wikimedia Foundation data analyst Ryan Faulkner, and should have more test results in the coming weeks.
Last but not least, check out the four tests currently running at the documentation page.

Thanks for your interest, and don't hesitate to drop by the talk page if you have a suggestion or question. Maryana (WMF) (talk) 19:16, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Wikipedia and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation.

Are you ...

... a fan of Beyonce? Thanks for all those logos. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 13:12, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ping!

Hello. You have a new message at User talk:Steven (WMF)'s talk page.

Proposed deletion of Capricho Awards

The article Capricho Awards has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable "awards" - actually just an online poll on a magazine's site. Links are primary and promotional, no reliable independent coverage is evident. The magazine does not even have its own WP article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dawn Bard (talk) 12:37, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Avril Lavigne

Your adding of Avril Lavigne to every Wikipedia language in existence is very disruptive. Please stop. ~ [ Scott M. Howard ] ~ [ Talk ]:[ Contribs ] ~ 04:38, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive additions to the other wikipedia languages. Every article you create is being speedily deleted, but is causing havoc on EVERY wikipedia server as every article has bots that link to every other article. Once these articles are then speedily deleted, the bots have to go BACK through and delete them all again. ~ [ Scott M. Howard ] ~ [ Talk ]:[ Contribs ] ~ 05:30, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This absolutely can not be repeated. I can promise you that any repeat of this event will cause you to be blocked on numerous versions of Wikipedia, and I will happily start the process here. What possible good did you think building innumerable Google-translate stubs and incorrect language stubs would accomplish?—Kww(talk) 14:43, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Have you seen the havoc you caused? Half of your articles are in the speedy deletion process because they violated the policies of the various Wikis you created them on. There's been a wave of compensating edits as bots are trying to keep up with the addition wave followed by the deletion wave, adding cross-wiki links and then deleting them. You've wasted admins time across multiple projects. I wound up fully protecting our local copy to try to keep the noise out of the history of Avril Lavigne. The reason I used the "block" word was because your edits were wholly and absolutely disruptive. It's not a question of inclusionism vs. deletionism, it's a matter of disruptive editing. I really need you to understand that this was completely unacceptable.—Kww(talk) 00:23, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I was wondering what was going on. Thanks Scott and Kww. – Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 06:23, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Level one user warnings

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Level one user warnings. (This invitation sent because you signed up as a member of WP:UWTEST) Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 18:19, 27 June 2012 (UTC) Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 18:19, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Conhecimento de língua mirandesa

Viva. Segundo o registo, contribuistes para mwl.wikipedia em algum momento no passado. Na minha opinião, alguma das contribuições que analisei foi linguisticamente relevante. Ultimamente tenho andado a tentar perceber o estado linguístico de mwl.wikipedia. Seria um grande auxílio se pudésseis revelar alguma informação sobre o vosso conhecimento da língua mirandesa. Podeis contactar-me na minha página de discussão. Muito obrigado desde já. Saúde. Garsd (talk) 19:00, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Avril Lavigne (album). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Statυs (talk, contribs) 01:39, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

I replied what you wrote on my talk page but I dediced to write here to after I found out you're using en.wiki too :) My reply was: Anytime :) Yes, but if you're not bust and if you can :) I wouldn't want to cause a lot of work, you know :) Because your list is featured among other languages as it deserves. English one is so annoying like she has never won all those awards... Dkisnis (talk) 13:09, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Huggle message

Hey Vitor_Mazuco! You are receiving this message because you are subscribed at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Huggle/Members#Beta_testers

I have recently launched a new downloads for beta testers that contains nightly builds of huggle, eg. versions that are built every day from our master branch and contains latest huggle. These builds are currently provided only for Windows and Ubuntu. You can find them here: http://huggle.wmflabs.org/builds/

Please keep in mind that these don't have any automatic updates and if you download and start using nightly build, you will need to update it yourself! So don't get yourself to running old version, it's possible to install both stable and nightly huggle, which is what I suggest.

Keep the bug reports coming to phabricator: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/maniphest/task/create/?projects=Huggle Many thanks! Petrb (talk) 10:05, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Vitor Mazuco. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Associação Brasileira dos Produtores de Discos (logo).gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Associação Brasileira dos Produtores de Discos (logo).gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Muhandes (talk) 17:35, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Avril Lavigne ass.png

The file File:Avril Lavigne ass.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused. Superseded by File:Avril Lavigne's signature.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 05:37, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]