User talk:Lightlylove

Welcome!

Hi Lightlylove! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 22:32, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

October 2022

Your edit to Jennie (singer) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 05:53, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Huh Yunjin moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Huh Yunjin, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 02:21, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

No it was literally removed and deleted. Lightlylove (talk) 04:52, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

November 2022

Your edit to Chaeyeon (singer) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 05:19, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

Do you even know what are Creative Commons License? They are videos where even the thumbnail are permitted to re-use under creative purposes license cause the thumbnail still belongs to the video, is not any copyright violation. Lightlylove (talk) 05:27, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

Seoul Success Awards moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Seoul Success Awards, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 03:07, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

December 2022

Hello, I'm Paper9oll. An edit that you recently made to Talk:List of awards and nominations received by Blackpink seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 02:42, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Moonlight Sunrise for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Moonlight Sunrise is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moonlight Sunrise until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

 // Timothy :: talk  06:23, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yuna (South Korean singer) (January 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robertsky was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yuna (South Korean singer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– robertsky (talk) 15:48, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Lightlylove! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! – robertsky (talk) 15:48, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

Moving article name

You don't change an article name without a consensus. Read here: WP:RM Btspurplegalaxy 💬 🖊️ 05:46, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yeh Shuhua (March 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yeh Shuhua and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 01:29, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

I truly can't understand how she is not notable when she has larger media coverage than past member Soojin whom article is filled with unreliable sources and literally says nothing, has little information, Shuhua has had more appearances everywhere than her, and has participated in many more activities too, you can go to her page and see that its worse edited than this one and is still published, just because she had a bullying scandal doesn't make her notable, i'm just asking to be fair, this article shows that Shuhua is very notable and almost all the sources are outside (G)-idle unlike the other. Lightlylove (talk) 01:34, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jihyo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tidal. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Oh thank you so much for the reminder and for correcting it, Blessings! Lightlylove (talk) 00:09, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Stop adding unreliable sources

I have noticed that you have been using unreliable sources .Please add only reliable source.Please take a look at Wikipedia:WikiProject Korea/Reliable sources ArmyOnceBlinkMidzy (talk) 13:16, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Now which thing are you going to invent next? Ever since i started my wikipedia page i have never used not even once an unreliable source, all my edits are always filled with reliable sources and well recieved by the public sources, in WP clearly says that you can add sources that are not in the WP:Reliable Sources list which includes the sources that are verified, depricated and blacklisted but only if they have clear reputation by professionals and other websites, it clearly says that we can add sources that haven't entered to that list righteously which means if they have good reputation or not and by just looking at how it's written and what is the content involved we can distinguish the reliable ones, i don't need to read or see any of the guideline, if there is someone that understands it its me, i dare you to list me an essay of the unreliable sources claimed by WP guideline and overall websites that i have ever added here, if you continue to invent things and raise slander just to argue with me, i'm going to talk with a WP administrator, you seriously need to stop trying to find any way just to raise slander against me and defame me, in fact i have removed many unreliable sources you have added in many articles regarding K-pop, also added back lot of content you have removed, this is seriously not it, if that's not your intention then i apologize but all of these non-existent problems you are discussing can only be interpreted otherwise and very misunderstood with valid reason. Lightlylove (talk) 23:37, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

i have no intention take up a fight with anyone . i have noticed that you have added so i told .Because Instagram and Twitter aren't reliable and speaking about "in WP clearly says that you can add sources that are not in the WP:Reliable Sources list which includes the sources that are verified, depricated and blacklisted but only if they have clear reputation by professionals and other websites, it clearly says that we can add sources that haven't entered to that list righteously " .It would be better if you show me ArmyOnceBlinkMidzy (talk) 03:30, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

The thing about my adding of unreliable sources ,i think it was done when i was new here ,so i have learnt not to do it. ArmyOnceBlinkMidzy (talk) 03:33, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

If you read the page carefully you"ll see that in the Twitter and Instagram section clearly says that they are reliable when it comes from verified and official accounts/users, they are not reliable sources but when the information comes from a verified and legit account then it can be added. Lightlylove (talk) 04:39, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Go ahead to the Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources and scroll down until you see Twitter and read the description that says "Twitter is a social network. As a self-published source, it is considered generally unreliable and should be avoided unless the author is a subject-matter expert or the tweet is used for an uncontroversial self-description. In most cases, Twitter accounts should only be cited if they are verified accounts or if the user's identity is confirmed in some way. Tweets that are not covered by reliable sources are likely to constitute undue weight. So Twitter can be use as a source when it comes from a verified account. Lightlylove (talk) 04:52, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

The Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources article also gives us the guide and rules on how to use lightweight sources, how to use sources that are still not in the list, its the first written in the article. Lightlylove (talk) 04:55, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

but it never said instagram was reliable ArmyOnceBlinkMidzy (talk) 05:10, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

"if you continue to invent things and raise slander just to argue with me, i'm going to talk with a WP administrator, you seriously need to stop trying to find any way just to raise slander against me and defame me"

I never mean it .i think you are always in the mood of thinking your correct , no one else is correct expect you .Last time also you did the same . please just try to understand before you comment any thing ArmyOnceBlinkMidzy (talk) 05:19, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

There are troll who defame wikipedians .But i am not a troll . if you really think just think then say it to an administrator ArmyOnceBlinkMidzy (talk) 05:27, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

I never said you are troll and i am not a person that thinks that i am always right but i simply dont like when someone acusses me of something i have never do, that's what bothers me, i am always getting those and its really tiring Lightlylove (talk) 22:24, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

I didn't accuse you ,i just said it ArmyOnceBlinkMidzy (talk) 04:25, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Anyways, let's leave this and try to be good with each other ArmyOnceBlinkMidzy (talk) 04:33, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

With instagram is just the same, read their discussion. Lightlylove (talk) 22:22, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

where? ArmyOnceBlinkMidzy (talk) 04:25, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

@Lightlylove's talk page has a lot of complaints about their attitude and the way they edit an article, yet they can't acknowledge these things. It's such a shame that a lot of users, including us, need to waste our time just to educate this immature creature. Kenquenito (talk) 08:31, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Aren't you the one user that offends everyone you don't agree with? Or that gets mad and throw insults to people that edit/revert and collaborate on something you've done or think its right the way it is? Aren't you the one who can never collaborate with other editors peacefully? Aren't you the one always starting arguments specially when it comes to something that "i" do specifically? Aren't you the one who has used very explicit and vulgar language and have called people here "bitch"? Yes You Are That One, if you are going to invent things about me and called me "immature" at least leave hypocresy aside, cause the only "immature" person here on Wikipedia and that has attitude problems, its none other than "You" who can not have professional and friendly conversations with editors cause your too defensive and sensitive and biased and want to impose/force your opinions above others, the other day you couldn't accept the difference between an album and a extended play and reverted an accurate update just because your favorites got out of the list.

ArmyOnceBlinkMidzy was wrong in what she was trying to say about me, i simply educated and corrected her cause i won't permit anyone here to slander me just like you have been trying to do, its pointless to be here on WP and edit/collaborate/try to improve the articles when the two of you are there waiting patiently for me when i do it just to point at me, sabotage me and invent things out whatever minimal thing just to accuse me of things that i have never did and made me look "bad" in front of other editors because weirdly and shockingly everyone here sees this behaviour of her/you and decide to defend your side and come at me when its super clear what are you trying to do and that i never start arguments here unlike you/her, they know i've been respectful and that i have ignored those things but this situation already lost my patience and that's why i don't edit here frequently anymore, i just come here and there to fix things, because i know myself and i don't want to get in trouble and have people saying i start editing wars and blah blah blah knowning very well that that is not true but they just say it out of pure envy, my collaborations are so good and help WP improve so much and that's what none of you can't take or would never accept just for the sake of your own convienence, you guys want things to be like how you like not like how they should be, you can't and would never accept when you're wrong, i've corrected and educated sorry if that has hurt your guys feelings, it's okay to accept when we are wrong, the extreme bias here is blinding everyone from thinking with a neutral point of view, people here accuse me and revert my things cause they want things to stay like how they like not like how they should be/factual/neutral/improved like i do, i'm better off out here cause if i stay it would get really serious cause i know me and i don't want that, i'm simply preventing future problems and you coming here to write such nonsense bs about me won't help at all, just stay in your co-worker lane, stop trying to defame me and don't go personal with me, you want to talk to me? Simple use kind and professional language and we can solve any problem out, but if you insist in insulting me then i'll have to talk with a administrador or contact you personally and have a serious talk, cause we don't do this at Wikipedia/or at job/internet, be professional, you should have had emailed me personally to call me "immature" not here on the talk page of WP. Lightlylove (talk) 05:12, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Stop writing a novel. No one's gonna read that. Just look at your Talk page. A lot of users here have complaints about you because of your disruptive editing and immaturity. I don't have to defend myself because your Talk page already talks about the type of person you are. Kenquenito (talk) 07:02, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

@ArmyOnceBlinkMidzy@Kenquenito were right. You always bring chaos to every article with your editing style. You never listened to other users and most importantly, you don't know how to communicate. Stop pointing fingers to us when you know there are lots of user here who don't like your presence here. Solidandrewsister (talk) 09:59, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

This user @Kenquenito have called “bitch” and have used very disgusting language here to everyone, I've noticed that the every time @Lightlylove makes an edit, him and @ArmyOnceBlinkMidzy always come to form a discussion, if you look at her talk page other users are very kind and she doesn’t have many complaints, those are simply guideline comments that every new user in WP gets if you look at the date they were written, I’m a new user and i am interesting in editing topics that @Kenquenito and @ArmyOnceBlinkMidzy often edits but i haven’t start yet exactly because of them, i don’t want them to get me in trouble cause i've seen they do that, like they’re doing now with @Lightlylove if you analyze the situation properly not just go with one side, and see the origins of the issues, you’ll see that @Lightlylove has never done a disruptive edit here, it’s just them wanting to fight, they’re were mad at her/him just because she added a source from an official company waooo, what a good reason to be mad, when @Lightlylove educated her about the issue she was acussing her of, this whole thing started, she/he was just mad that @Lightlylove corrected her/him, just accept it they’re immature and can’t accept if someone scholds them, i mean it’s not a bad thing, she/he just did what she had to do, she/he followed WP rules, how’s that creating a chaos?. Multimilkp (talk) 16:22, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

@Multimilkp I haven't caused any trouble,i thought they were putting unreliable source and i told them doesn't mean i am wantedly doing it and @Lightlylove has done this several times even without seeing they start fight even thoug the opposite person didn't mean it,

It would be better if they change their behavior K-Pop Stan (✍️•📚) 02:50, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Don't listen to her explanation, @ArmyOnceBlinkMidzy. This @Multimilkp is an another account of @Lightlylove. No one wants to defend her that's why she defended herself using another account. Funny, isn't it? Kenquenito (talk) 08:14, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

I don’t specifically know what you mean by “this another account of @Lightlylove” cause my account was created on April, i joined WP one month ago, and when i wanted to make my first contribution was on a page that you’re were involved in, the first thing that i saw was a discussion between you and @Lightlylove it doesn’t take much brainwork to understand a situation that’s why i refrained to edit cause i considered you as “problematic” and to obviously prevent this type of problems, now you invented as your argument that we are the same person to hide how problematic your behavior is, this extremely serious, if you wanna say me and he/him are the same person at least bring evidence. Multimilkp (talk) 16:31, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Also it’s them that don’t know how to communicate with other editors, they just insulted her/him for being right and want to nitpick and find whatever single thing it appears to look questionable just to use it against her/him and fight. Multimilkp (talk) 16:24, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

It's you both @Multimilkp and @Lightlylove who make a big matter,the user always has done it K-Pop Stan (✍️•📚) 02:53, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

@Lightlylove has always asked why the draft is not accepted instead of thinking see thier replies above K-Pop Stan (✍️•📚) 02:58, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Me? Girl i have never ever edited in WP, I’m still yet to make my first edit, your bias is showing 💀 Multimilkp (talk) 16:21, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

I didn't say that you and the user of this talk page are same, I said you are making this matter out of control, and the matter was over at that time, but @Kenquenito@Solidandrewsister and you who aren't related this matter replied and are making it big K-Pop Stan (✍️•📚) 01:56, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

I've also noticed that. This user love to edit multiple articles with her little knowledge about citation. As long as her "source" agrees with her narrative, she will use it, even forcing other users to agree with her point of view. I hope one day, she gets the ban she deserve. Solidandrewsister (talk) 10:01, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

May 2023

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Born Pink World Tour. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 05:31, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for calling her out, @Paper9oll. This user always engages herself in edit warring and disruptive editing. You can see on her Talk page that there's a lot of complaints about her. I've also created a Talk page about Born Pink World Tour but she (along with her alleged dummy account), never listened. They keep on insisting that The Straits Times and The Korea Times are reliable even though these publications based their stories from Touring Data on TWITTER. And we all know that Twitter is not a reliable source, especially when it comes to gathering data, not unless the info was directly stated by an official account/organization. There's a reason why Pop Crave, Pop Base, and other pages are not considered reliable in Wikipedia. I hope @Lightlylove will take note of this. Kenquenito (talk) 08:23, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

If you go to your talk page, you"ll see that you have an edit war warning too, you won't fill your mouth with so much hypocrisy, you've been called worse and you inventing straight up lies won't help you either, i don't have another dummy account nor do i have many complaints in my talk page, not like you that has blanked your talk page so many times for so much complaints about your wars with other editors and using disruptive language against them and for the 1000th time i never put unreliable sources, is you that don't seem to know how WP's rules about sources work, if you do you"ll see why i put that statement on the Born Pink World Tour article, the sources were confirmed and approved, it doesn't matter if they came from Touring Data cause it was a real/truthful information that would have been revealed either ways, unreliable sources can publish reliable content from time to time, this is written very clearly on WP:Source Guideline, but they should be use with backups, there's plenty of reliable sources confirming what they reported and that should be enough to put in WP, though it should be found first the original source that Touring Data based themselves with, i recognize i didn't do that however that still doesn't matter cause the new is approved by high prestigious and reliable sources like The Korea Times and Chosun, and you should start reading WP:Source Guideline inmediately cause you don't have an idea of how much websites work here. Lightlylove (talk) 02:49, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Explain that to the administrator who agreed with me and will take necessary actions to you once you insisted your view and manner again. Good luck. Kenquenito (talk) 04:13, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

I would also explain your behaviour and what you've done to an administrator, if you keep on insisting only you can edit WP and have the reason, and that no one can change/revert/edit things here but only you, then you"ll have to invent an excuse to the admin cause there are a lot of proofs against you. Lightlylove (talk) 21:33, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Also read this page [[Wikipedia

No original research]] just a little lecture, it would help you understand why your opinion on the SpiceWorld Tour 1998 was wrong and how by thanks to that this war started, education is key, you involved me in a problem for not knowing and understanding WP:Source Guideline well.

Lightlylove (talk) 22:01, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 08:59, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Seoul Success Awards

Hello, Lightlylove. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Seoul Success Awards, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Edit warring (June 2023)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of best-selling girl groups. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. LondonBoy1989 (talk) 08:51, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

i do not appear less i am involved in edit warring, i only reverted one edit at an article cause it was disruptive, you should congratulate me instead, ever since i started here i've been the only who's been communicative with every editor but they just want to argue with me or have a thing between all of them to defame me instead, it looks like eveeyone is on the club, ever since i joined WP i have only seen me myself and i being kind and collaborative, if you accuse me of edit warring without proper reason or evidence i would unfortunately have to report you, have a good night. Lightlylove (talk) 04:43, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

I merely did what you did to other users here on Wikipedia. You accused them of edit warring even though they weren't doing it. And now that I did the same thing to you, you're going to report me? If that's the case, you're aware of your wrongdoing. LondonBoy1989 (talk) 12:18, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

If you actually do research you’ll find that this user barely has had bad conduct with anyone here, that user has never accused someone of edit warring without proof, i've seen myself them editors disrupting Wikipedia and then wanting to blame this user user for the arguments, there are three users who have been trying to sabotage Lightlylove, they’re unbearable and have a weird obsession with this fella, in every moves Lightlylove does, there they are behind her trying to get something against Lightlylove out of nowhere. Multimilkp (talk) 19:05, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

I couldn't help but notice that all your activities revolve around defending Lightlylove, even though your name wasn't mentioned in any discussions. Are you Lightlylove’s sockpuppet account? The similarity in writing style and grammatical errors is quite similar. If that's the case, it's kind of sad that you feel the need to use a different account to create an illusion that someone is defending you. I must inform you that such behavior is prohibited on Wikipedia. I will report this matter to the appropriate administrator, and they will decide how to address your account. LondonBoy1989 (talk) 19:22, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Hi @LondonBoy1989 i saw that you just recently joined Wikipedia just 5 days ago so i'm assuming you're not very well aware about the past discussions that i have been involved in due to a misunderstanding, this user @Multimilkp appeared out of nowhere in the talk page of that discussion claiming that he was a new user, that hasn't made any edit here yet and defending me which is something i highly appreciate cause no one seemed to do it ever since i started my WP account, first off i want to tell you 3 things, 1st is that i would never (even regarding of the circumstances) talk or approach people with such despective vocabulary like this user has done even though i appreciate what he/she did for me, english is not my native language that's why you would find grammatical erros no matter how much i try to write correctly, 2 is that you are not even an extended confirmed user, you just met me 5 days ago and you are already threatening me with reporting me, exactly doing what most users have done to me once i joined WP, it's like a thing where everyone is trying to ruin me or something like that, just to let you know and communicate with you clearly, the sockpuppet account can clearly be another person, 3 is that you have no authority here and you are making very serious statements about me, you're defamimg me about something you have zero evidence to back up, 3 is mostly about you having nothing to base yourself off other than that "we write similar" according to you to accuse me of such things, you have no proofs, no evidence whatsoever and that's also prohibited behaviour here on Wikipedia, and the least thing i want is to get involved in another problem here just because once again someone is trying to come for me for no reason, it has become a usual and normal thing, that's why i left WP for quite a long time and just recently comeback to see if i could update and edit some article that needed improvement but i just found myself with trouble again cause a user went on to tell lies about me due to a disagreement we had regarding a topic, and now it seems like it's happening again, so for real, from the bottom of my heart i ask, i plead you to stop, WP is about being collaborative with one another and if this keeps happening its me who would talk with an administrator cause i can't keep with personal attacks anymore, hope you can read the message, sorry for making it long, have a great night❤ Lightlylove (talk) 05:33, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

You’ve been reported.

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Solidandrewsister (talk) 09:27, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Funny how you dare to report this user when you are the biggest WP disruptive i have ever seen here, your always stirring up edit wars and reverting things as how you like, you also only add misinformation to the pages you contribute, they hypocrisy is real. Multimilkp (talk) 19:07, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Report Request

Hi Jc37, as you are one of the most experienced administrators of WP with over 17 years of activity, i want to ask if you could please give me your advice, i'm going through a difficult situation due to a user who has been wanting to ban me ever since i created my page, i had an issue with two other users months ago that was thankfully clarified and we all finished to agreed with one another, but he's using that past conflict to say and accuse me of edit warring and many more things, the user is unexperienced and only has had over 17 contributions but he consistently disruptives articles and fights with other editors if they revert his edits, i left an edit warring warning on his talk page but he didn't like it despite being well intentioned, and he reported me instead and started accusing me of being a bad user with a bad reputation, he's defaming me and left a message saying that he just reported me, i just want to ask if this behaviour is worth of reporting or blocking cause i never did anything wrong, i simply told him that there was no excusable or good reason to revert the edit of a contributor whose edit was well researched and backed up with reliable sources, yet he still kept on reverting just because he didn't agree with it. Lightlylove (talk) 20:49, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Hi Lightlylove.

I see you've also asked this at User_talk:Bennv123#Report_Request, and see the thread at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User @Lightlylove keeps harassing me.

It seems like you are already receiving some advice there, so I think I'll leave this to others. I wish you well. - jc37 05:53, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Oh yes don't worry, i wrote this message when i still haven't had seen the dicussion on the noticeboard, thank you so much for your care❤ Blessings. Lightlylove (talk) 20:40, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Friendly advise

Hi Lightlylove, apart from my advise on ANI, please take this as a friendly guidance. I have blocked two socks that have commented on your page, one against you and one supporting you. Take it from my experience, it doesn't work. Focus on editing and follow the advise I have given on the ANI forum. I am leaving a copy of this note on the Solid's page too. Thank you, Lourdes 06:06, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Oh thank you so much, you're so kind, thanks for helping me, your the first one that has done it, i thought i wouldn't find a fellow communicative editor here, i'll try my best to edit with wisdom and obviously improve my relationship with other editors, i thought this problem was going to give me a block since so many editors against me have tried to do it without reason and unfairly already, thanks for the bottom of my heart for real❤ Lightlylove (talk) 20:38, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yuna (South Korean singer) (July 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yuna (South Korean singer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:29, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Sofia Carson (album)

Hello, Lightlylove. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sofia Carson".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 00:41, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Giselle (rapper)

Hello, Lightlylove. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Giselle".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 01:53, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Blackpink sales

Hi! I posted Blackpink in the list of best-selling girl group page but this has been disputed by two users. I have taken it to the talk page to discuss. Just letting you know in case you were interested in engaging with the discussion as well. Flabshoe1 (talk) 14:52, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Gaeul

Hello, Lightlylove. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gaeul, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:05, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC)