User talk:Life is like a box of chocolates

Archives

Your invitation to participate in a Wikimedia-approved survey in online behavior.

Hello, my name is Michael Tsikerdekis [1][2], currently involved as a student in full time academic research at Masaryk University. I am writing to you to kindly invite you to participate in an online survey about interface and online collaboration on Wikipedia. The survey has been reviewed and approved by the Wikimedia Foundation Research Committee.

I am contacting you because you were randomly selected from a list of active editors. The survey should take about 7 to 10 minutes to complete, and it is very straightforward.

Wikipedia is an open project by nature. Let’s create new knowledge for everyone! :-)

To take part in the survey please follow the link: tsikerdekis.wuwcorp.com/pr/survey/?user=93146760 (HTTPS).

Best Regards, --Michael Tsikerdekis (talk) 12:04, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PS: The results from the research will become available online for everyone and will be published in an open access journal.

UPDATE: This is the second and final notification for participating in this study. Your help is essential for having concrete results and knowledge that we all can share. I would like to thank you for your time and as always for any questions, comments or ideas do not hesitate to contact me. --Michael Tsikerdekis (talk) 08:52, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. :) Life is like a box of chocolates (talk) 00:35, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! :-) --Michael Tsikerdekis (talk) 11:01, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		Research Participation Barnstar
		For your participation in the survey for Anonymity and conformity on the internet. Michael Tsikerdekis (talk) 13:57, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lovatics for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lovatics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lovatics until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Zad68 (talk) 19:54, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"horse-bells"

Hello. With regards to this edit, can you tell me what a "horse-bell" is? Regards – ὁ οἶστρος (talk) 16:36, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ὁ οἶστρος,

Thanks for the message! I apologize for the late reply. To answer your question, I must admit I have no idea what "horse bells" are, so I left the wording intact. My source was p. 161 of Lynette Sheridan Burns' Understanding Journalism (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2002). Here's an excerpt

If they were looking for him and found his boat, they’d go up the Victoria River, not the Fitzmaurice. But they came. Ansell heard the sound of horse bells floating down the river and paddled towards it. He hitched the boat and ran along the horse tracks. Incredibly, he saw a man on a horse. He told the story of their meeting.

I considered leaving the "horse bells" out, but the excerpt seems to imply they played an important part in Ansell's rescue. Regards, Life is like a box of chocolates (talk) 04:47, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(I hope it's OK that I moved your above reply here, as in isolation on my talk page it doesn't make sense.)

Hey, thanks for your sourced answer. I was just wondering whether this was an Aussie thing or one of those cases where everyone else knows what it's about as a matter of course while I, for whatever reason, just don't have a clue...

Regards – ὁ οἶστρος (talk) 19:35, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bird composite

If you are amenable, I would suggest adding this passerine image

instead of one of the water birds, and a better owl image. μηδείς (talk) 02:09, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My Opinion

Hi how are you today? Um, I am really indifferent in regards to whether having multiple images or single images. I feel when you have a clade that is pretty diverse, I feel that it's okay to post two pictures, just to give the idea of things.--4444hhhh (talk) 18:57, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Harald George Carlos Swayne, Life is like a box of chocolates!

Wikipedia editor Barney the barney barney just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

good.

To reply, leave a comment on Barney the barney barney's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

DYK for Leopard attack

On 30 March 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Leopard attack, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that multi-bacterial infection resulting from the contamination of wounds by oral flora often complicates the recovery for survivors of leopard attacks? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Leopard attack. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 00:02, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Life is like a box of chocolates

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Life is like a box of chocolates, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Qxukhgiels (talk) 22:05, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Coastal desert listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Coastal desert. Since you had some involvement with the Coastal desert redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 01:23, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jonathan Leakey for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jonathan Leakey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Leakey until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:08, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Lovatic" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Lovatic. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 26#Lovatic until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 04:10, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Lovatics" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Lovatics. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 26#Lovatics until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 04:35, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]