User talk:4444hhhh

Come and see my Dinosauria Common, the first ever common names for dinosaurs.

Hello, 4444hhhh, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!

Linking Ungulates

Forgive me, but, I don't think it's necessary to place a template linking to all of the ungulate pages on all of the ungulate pages. At the very least, it doesn't seem appropriate to have links about whales on pages only about giraffes or perissodactyls. Your current template is too large and unwieldy, too. It should be refined.--Mr Fink 03:15, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps it would be better if we worked on an ungulate portal, instead of having all those links cluttering up the pages?--Mr Fink 03:20, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

templates

Just so you know, if something exists as a template you can add it to an article without adding all the code, you an just add {{Template:Birds}} instead. Much simpler. I've been changing the order articles to refelect this. Interesting idea having the orders on the footer, I'd been thinking about this myself, but hadn't done anything about it. Sabine's Sunbird talk 21:54, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And even easier, you can leave off "template:" as so: {{Equidae}} - UtherSRG (talk) 12:15, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

But please don't stick {{Birds}} in the birds template. It just creates a loop. Eeekster (talk) 02:08, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't subst navigation templates. It makes maintaining the template extremely difficult. Zetawoof_(ζ) 04:00, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I've deleted Carnivora Template which I assume you mistakenly created before you created {{Carnivora}}. If the same sort of situation happens again, please let an administrator know so that the page can be deleted or simply add {{db-user}} to the page. Thanks, Pascal.Tesson 04:05, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Drawings

Hi, you are welcome to use my drawings on your website as long as proper attribution as requested by the license is provided (ex: Artwork by ArthurWeasley from Wikipedia). Cheers. ArthurWeasley 22:09, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! From User:4444hhhh

Smarters

You can upload your own images simply by going through the Wikipedia:Upload page. ArthurWeasley 05:32, 26 September 2007 (UTC) Thanks agian! From User:4444hhhh[reply]

Yep, just follow the link. Choose between the different possibilities (in the case of your personal drawings, should be under "my own work"). Select the file you want to upload and select the license of your choice. Hope this helps. ArthurWeasley 19:55, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, your image needs to be digitalized and saved into your computer in order to be uploaded onto a web page. A scanner would be good, may be you can ask people around you to use one. Another alternative is to take a digital picture of your drawing with a digital camera. ArthurWeasley 20:30, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 20:12, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Cyber Godzilla.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Cyber Godzilla.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:06, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Bovid edits

Hi - I noticed your recent edits on various bovid pages.

Just thought I'd mention that it helps if you put some kind of explanation in the "Edit Summary" box. This makes it much easier to tell proper edits from vandalism (which rarely has anything in this box), and it also makes it easier to understand the reason for the edit. For example, when I saw a large unexplained edit in Bovinae (17:10, 6 November 2007), I very nearly reverted it as a malicious deletion. I could only work out what you were doing by spending some time looking at your user contributions.

Another tip is to use the "Show preview" button before deciding on your final edit. This avoids making many small public edits – it also saves space and clutter on other users' watchlists.--Richard New Forest 16:55, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Book

Yeah, may be but that's a lot of work. If someone's writing the text then I could provide the illustrations. ArthurWeasley 18:30, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Coolness!

Thanks for creating Template:Equidae! I am adding a bit to it. There are actually HUNDREDS of horse articles out there in wikiland and the challenge will be keeping it under some kind of control once it gets "discovered." My question is if you have a wikilink to the page that discusses these templates and the guidelines for their use. I'd sort of like to add in some of the major Equestrianism articles, but not sure if that exceeds the scope. Montanabw^(talk) 15:40, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Basically, I can't find the equivalent of a guideline for "how to use" guide for these animal tmeplates the way I can find them for WP:CITE for example...where did you go to figure out how to do the template in the first place?? And I'd like to read wiki's criteria for what to do and not to do (ideally) with these templates. And did you create it on your own, or were there some other people (who could get upset if I change things) who were in on the process of figuring out what to do, what to insert, etc...? The reason I ask is that I see some big templates like this one or this one and that is easily how big the equidae one could get if we got too crazy, but the whole horse area is so disorganized, so there's an argument that this wouldn't be a bad thing (and the categories are a TOTAL mess!)...oh, and by the way, there is a proposal to create a "Wikiproject Horses" out there, but only four people have signed up, we need more support (there's three horse wikiprojects on narrow areas, but no overall umbrella). Montanabw^(talk) 22:55, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and if you could be so kind, can you toss in a small edit summary like "adding template" when you do so? The horse articles get TONS of vandalism and edits with blank summaries sometimes get tossed by the bots as vandalism...which would be a bummer here. Montanabw^(talk) 23:25, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Assorted answers

I like that you really have a lot of energy, but be careful not to reinvent the wheel. There happen to be several hundred horse articles on wikipedia, as well as Wikipedia:WikiProject horse breeds, Wikipedia:WikiProject horse training, Wikipedia:WikiProject Veterinary medicine (where there are MANY horse disease articles, some written by veterinarians), and Wikipedia:WikiProject Thoroughbred racing. So, the trick is not so much to create content but to organize what's there so that it can be found more easily, which is why I really like your template concept...if we can get that into more articles, it will help people navigate to others.

As for Wikiproject Equines, maybe go over to the page where things are being proposed and find the listing for the wikiproject horse proposal, and leave a message there that you created this. Personally, I have little interest in non-horse equines, but if this is where the energy is, it's worth a start. Also maybe leave a note at Wikipedia:WikiProject Agriculture and let them know what you have done...some egos may be bent out of shape, but none of them got off the dime and did it, so just be polite and respectful and maybe see what happens.

You wrote: <<<Oh, and one more thing is it wrong to call the Przewalski's Horse the Mongolian Tarpan and the Tarpan the Polish Tarpan and the wild horse Tarpan? Because I'm thinking writing a book on equids. --4444hhhh (talk) 00:24, 8 December 2007 (UTC)4444hhhh>>>

It would be incorrect terminology to use any of those terms. Tarpans and Przewalski's horses were/are different subspecies, though there are outdated books that probably use those other terms. Read Przewalski's horse and Tarpan, they are reasonably decent articles. You may also want to read Domestication of the horse and wild horse. The only true "wild" horse today is the Przewalski's horse. Everything else is a feral horse. Hope this helps. Montanabw^(talk) 06:13, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

December 2007

Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Equidae. Readers looking for serious articles will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you can write (almost) whatever you want. Jauerback (talk) 22:39, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just for the record, I reviewed the edit and you were not vandalizing, although the page Wild Asses now correctly redirects to Asinus, so the piped link is not necessary. I also wanted to welcome you again, and say how great it is to see another enthusiastic horse lover! I noticed you created the page Equines, (amazing it was not already created, isn't it?) and redirected it to Equines. While this does seem to be valid, Equine redirects to horse. Now, if we take a look at the rationale for redirects, they are done in way that directs a reader to the most likely result for their search term. Since the vast majority of readers searching for "Equine" (or the plural, "Equines") would be looking for the Horse article, they both should redirect there. At the top of Horse, there is a hatnote leading to the Horse (disambiguation) page, to which I have added a link to the family Equidae, for the few readers who wish to read about the taxonomic classification, instead. To that end, I went ahead and changed the redirect on Equines, to align with Equine, and the more likely search result. I realize that Wikipedia is pretty confusing at first, so feel free to ask me should you have any questions at all, and I'll be more than happy to help, or if I'm unable to, I will be able to point you to somewhere to get assistance. Thanks so much for diving in and helping, and I hope you are enjoying the project! Ariel♥Gold 12:13, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, this template is simply amazingly great work! Excellently done! Ariel♥Gold 12:15, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

After Montanabw pointed out your how your edit was indeed an edit done in good faith, I intended on removing this warning entirely, however since there is already another comment about it, I guess it should stay for context purposes. I did strike it out, though, because I don't want you to feel like that you did anything wrong. I apologize for any misconceptions on my part. Happy editing. Jauerback (talk) 14:23, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On my part, thanks for setting me straight on the gender thing. Usually I can guess gender by writing style (ArielGold is a "she" I'm pretty sure... (grin)) but I do miscalculate sometimes. Either way, keep in mind that those who care about taxonomy and genetics care deeply and so I usually do not mess with taxonomy unless I can cite to peer-reviewed literature. Call me overcautious, but oh how I HATE reverting things other people mess up in the areas where I have expertise...I just try not to do too much damage in areas where I don't know a lot!! Montanabw^(talk) 03:32, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pets and wild things

You wrote: "I usually consider pets as a supspecies of their wild ancestors."

As a general rule, most domesticated animals do get listed as different subspecies. What is weird in the equine world is that, other than Przewalski's horse and the nonw-extinct Tarpan, there are no "wild" horses; any wild horses are feral horses. If you look at those domestication and evolution articles, you will note that the "four foundations" theory suggests that the wild prototypes of the modern horse (whether one of four) may have been a totally different subspecies that so totally lent itself to domestication that all wild predecessors simply ceased to exist. Stephen Budiasky theorized that domestication may have saved the horse in Eurasia from the extinction it faced in the Americas at the end of the last Ice Age.

The taxonomy of the wild species is hotly debated, as you might note from the page history there and at wild horse. The short version is that some people claim there is such a thing as equus ferus and others consider ferus a subspecies of Equus caballus. I wonder if that's why Onagers and other wild asses are classed with Donkeys as Equus Asinus, I note that the wild ones are given an additional subspecies classification.

Anyway, it's all fascinating and though you'd be interested. User:Dysmorodrepanis seems to know something of how this taxonomy stuff all works, may be able to help figure it all out. Montanabw^(talk) 18:59, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Zebra

Hello, since your a memeber of WikiProject Equines I was wondering if you can help.

I've been expanding and cleaning up the Zebra article. I was wondering if you think the Ecology and Behavior section is representive of all the zebra species' lifestyles. I noted the difference between the Grevy zebra and the other two zebra's behavior but are their differences between the Mountain and Plains zebras that should be noted or put into their repective articles? Also there are some behaviors I attributed to the Plains zebra and I don't know if it would describe the other two as well.

Thank you

Bobisbob (talk) 18:59, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Squamates

You asked me to address any problems I have with your recent edits to Squamata here on your talk page. I'm really happy someone has taken an interest in the page, so first I just want to thank you for your contributions. I'm willing to copy edit your contributions, but I think it's really important to include sources. It makes it much easier for me to copy edit text when I can read the text the facts come from, and even if I can't get the source, having a source gives me the confidence that the language is worth refining. - Enuja (talk) 06:05, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Whenever adding new information to an article, even if that information is in another article, please cite the source the information comes from. WP:Foot and WP:Cite may be useful to you, and if information is, indeed, from another article, it should be very easy to read and then copy and paste the appropriate wiki formatting to the new article. Instead of finding new sources this time, I just copy edited the sections. If no-one finds sources for the information, I will (eventually) remove it. - Enuja (talk) 20:22, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have a suggestion. Would you mind proposing new language for the article on the talk page instead of editing the article directly? Your enthusiasm and willingness to do work to improve the article is improving it greatly, but all pages on Wikipedia are live. That is, anyone reading Squamate gets to read whatever you've put on the page. Unfortunately, much of your grammar, sentence structure and spelling in the article has serious problems. The ideal, of course, is to have elegant prose, but I think we really must require coherent prose, and I'm afraid your additions are often very hard to understand. If you could have friend proof-read your prose before you post it to the article, or if you could read it out loud and refine it several times before you post it, maybe then it would make sense to edit the article directly. If, however, the type of language you've been adding to the article is the best you can do, it really needs to be edited by other people before it should in the article. - Enuja (talk) 15:56, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Scale charts

Hi 4444hhhh! I do the scale charts in Photoshop, using a layered graph template I made a while back. For each new chart, I just make a 'stencil' of the subject and drop it into the pre-existing graph, changing the key etc. That's why it may be difficult to do the charts you requested very quickly, as it might be tough to find good source material for the stencils. But I'll see what I can do! Dinoguy2 (talk) 00:17, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Talk:Dinosaur. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Alexfusco⁵ 01:29, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dinosauria Common

Can you check my Dinosauria Common? --4444hhhh (talk) 01:27, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 4h,

It's cute, but Wikipedia isn't the place for this sort of speculative material. You should start your own web page. Firsfron of Ronchester 01:34, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I know where it is. :) Firsfron of Ronchester 01:39, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

edits to bird

I have replaced the single bird image back into bird's taxobox, please see my comments on the talk page. Sabine's Sunbird talk 01:49, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, can I make a suggestion, can you make a new version of your composite image but one that is tall and thin rather than wide so that it doesn't distort the taxobox, and you can put it forward as a potential image for the taxobox in the discussion I've started. Sabine's Sunbird talk 01:59, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Ozziesteropodon.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Ozziesteropodon.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. PurpleHz (talk) 14:11, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User page images

Please remove the pictures of the "Walking with" series box covers. They are fair use and copyrighted, and Wikipedia does not permit their use in userspace. bibliomaniac 1 5 00:35, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Proposal

There is a discussion going on about whether or not to merge WikiProject Dogs and WikiProject Dog breeds together. Your input would be greatly appreciated. Coaster1983 (talk) 18:15, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your input. There is a new proposal to make WikiProject Dog breeds a task force of WikiProject Dogs. Coaster1983 (talk) 21:14, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Wws.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Wws.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:29, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chimps and Human Evolution

Hi I was going to removed the chimps from the human evolution template, I noticed you added them. Can you comment here if you disagree, Template talk:Human Evolution. thanks GameKeeper (talk) 22:52, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Aard.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Aard.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 18:04, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Birdspettie.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Birdspettie.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 01:17, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:C.rex.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:C.rex.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:04, 27 February 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 19:04, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Casli.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Casli.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 22:10, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Birds March 2008 Newsletter

The March 2008 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:33, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article importance scale for WikiProject Equine

Hello. WikiProject Equine is discussing an article importance scale here. Your POV would be appreciated. --Una Smith (talk) 16:35, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The April 2008 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:45, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

changes to template birds footer

You were asked to discuss changes to this highly visible template before making them. I have reverted you changes for now, please make your case at the WP:BIRD talk page. Sabine's Sunbird talk 23:49, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProjet Birds May 2008 Newsletter

The May 2008 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:30, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of characters in the Cloverfield universe

I have nominated List of characters in the Cloverfield universe, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of characters in the Cloverfield universe. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Judgesurreal777 (talk) 21:08, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Birds June 2008 Newsletter

The June 2008 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 12:52, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: List of characters in the Cloverfield universe

In compliance with what you requested, I've just given the article a massive overhaul – well, for the film's characters, at least, since I'm most familiar with them – and you can check out my recent contributions at the article's history. Cinemaniac (talk • contribs • critique) 22:36, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:G3.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:G3.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:12, 5 June 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 14:12, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mammal

Please don't add complex info in the taxobox. Keep it simple. Discuss the complex information in the text. - UtherSRG (talk) 20:22, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed it from bird as well now. the taxobox is intended to be a simple reference, not a complete one. The text is for completeness. - UtherSRG (talk) 20:26, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008 Birds Project Newsletter Link

The November 2024 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. --Addbot (talk) 16:15, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Birds August newsletter

The August 2008 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Speedy deletion of Image:Godzilla History.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Godzilla History.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Godzilla History.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. TheLH (talk) 10:43, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Birds October newsletter

The October 2008 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:14, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Capezebra.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Capezebra.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:23, 6 November 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 12:23, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Birds November newsletter

The November 2024 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by TinucherianBot (talk) 07:35, 11 November 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Birds of prey

Hi. Do you have any new reference that has elevated Accipitridae ? The most recent molecular classifications place them as a family within the Falconiformes. Shyamal (talk) 02:57, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, It seems like the recent placement of the falcons next to the parrots is the cause of the reorganization. I thought it was only the Cathartidae that were the big problem. It may be good to discuss this on WT:BIRD, because it may mean a whole cluster of articles need to be reorganized so as not to have parts inconsistent. Shyamal (talk) 03:18, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

More changes to bird families

Hi. I thought the way most people felt at [[]] was that we shouldn't make big taxonomic changes without discussing them first, and in general we should wait for the ornithological unions and associations. So I think your changing to the Ciconiiformes were premature.

I don't know whether you know the history. The tradition in systematics is to present one's beliefs as the truth; that doesn't mean other biologists accept the arrangements, much less that the arrangements are right. The journals are littered with outdated classification systems, and Hackett et al. is going to be another one. Undoubtedly some of its suggestions are right, but we don't yet know which ones.

In the past few decades, many placements have been made by the American Ornithologists' Union, for instance, only to be reversed some years later. If even they jump the gun on these things, I think we should not react more quickly than they do.

If there's a consensus on changes, we can probably get a bot to do a lot of them. This includes changing the Falconidae and Ciconiiformes back. —JerryFriedman (Talk) 06:31, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Horse

Hi! Evolution of the horse and some other articles (Equidae, Equus (genus), etc.) are getting some much needed attention. Care to join us? --Una Smith (talk) 05:30, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also Template:Equidae, but first see Template talk:Equidae. --Una Smith (talk) 07:46, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Birds February newsletter

The February 2009 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

WikiProject Birds March newsletter

The March 2009 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:30, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Birds April newsletter

The April 2009 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. MeegsC | Talk 15:25, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Birds May newsletter

The May 2009 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Newsletter delivery by xenobot 06:01, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Birds June newsletter

The June 2009 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Newsletter delivery by xenobot 13:47, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Birds August newsletter

The August 2009 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Newsletter delivery by –xeno ^talk 02:16, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Avekingdom.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Avekingdom.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk) 02:48, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Walkingseries.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Walkingseries.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk) 02:49, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:TT22.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:TT22.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 02:49, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article talk pages

Hello. Please don't comment about an article within the article itself, as you did at Ivory-billed Woodpecker and Cuban Ivory-billed Woodpecker. It is best to use article talk pages to discuss any problems with the article. Thank you. 152.16.16.75 (talk) 01:35, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Higher waterbird

I have nominated Higher waterbird, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Higher waterbird. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Shyamal (talk) 03:37, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Comfortdog.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Comfortdog.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 10:38, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bustard

A google search of Otidiiforme generates next to no hits. Do you have any sources for the elevation to order of this family? Sabine's Sunbird talk 06:23, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We follow the nomenclature for common names, not the taxonomy (at least not automatically). Sabine's Sunbird talk 18:15, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Page titles

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give Cariamae a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Cariamiformes. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. R'n'B (call me Russ) 15:19, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Science lovers wanted!

Hi! I'm serving as the wikipedian-in-residence at the Smithsonian Institution Archives until June! One of my goals as resident, is to work with Wikipedians and staff to improve content on Wikipedia about people who have collections held in the Archives - most of these are scientists who held roles within the Smithsonian and/or federal government. I thought you might like to participate since you are interested in the sciences! Sign up to participate here and dive into articles needing expansion and creation on our to-do list. Feel free to make a request for images or materials at the request page, and of course, if you share your successes at the outcomes page you will receive the SIA barnstar! Thanks for your interest, and I look forward to your participation! Sarah (talk) 01:45, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Northern kiang

The article Northern kiang has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not an accepted sub species

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mirgolth (talk) 15:40, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Cervinae (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Dama

Deer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Dama

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Composite image

Hi! Would you care to share your opinion about the composite/single infobox image issue here? I would really appreciate it. Thanks! --Life is like a box of chocolates (talk) 07:09, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of fossil primates may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* '''[[[Hominoidea]]''', ''incertae sedis''

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:58, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Columbea

Hi, I'm SparrowHK. 4444hhhh, thanks for creating Columbea!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Great work on your new article!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. SparrowHK (talk) 02:23, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Cursorimorphae) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Cursorimorphae, 4444hhhh!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I'm curious: do Jarvis et al (or others) explicitly compare Cursorimorphae to Telmatorae, Charadriimorphae , etc? If not, this this may constitute original synthesis, even if true, and great care should be taken to not publish novel ideas.

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Disambiguation link notification for January 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cursorimorphae, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rail. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Accipitrimorphae, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. besieged^talk 00:01, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Accipitrimorphae, without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. The next time will result in an ARV report. besieged^talk 00:05, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:4444hhhh reported by User:Besieged (Result: ). Thank you. besieged^talk 00:08, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, 4444hhhh. You have new messages at Besieged's talk page.
Message added 03:26, 7 January 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

January 2015

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. slakr^\ talk / 13:15, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring report closed

Please see the result of Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:4444hhhh reported by User:Besieged (Result: No action). Your removal of the article tags does raise concerns. Since you are an experienced editor, you should not be at a loss for what to do in this situation. WP:Dispute resolution gives you some options. You are expected to persuade others and not simply revert. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 15:54, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ramphastides, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barbet. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fringe theories

Hi, Chatterjee's theories are regarded as fringe by most researchers, so do not add them as fact. FunkMonk (talk) 20:32, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please note Chatterjee included only Microraptor, not all of Microraptoria, in this group. Chatterjee did not perform any kind of phylogenetic analysis to support Tetrapterygidae, he placed them together by visual similarity and slotted them not a pre-existing analysis, so it is not a real cladogram. Also, if Chatterjee is right and all four-winged species form a clad,e this would actually REFUTE Bebe's tetrapteryx hypothesis, because if tetrapterygids are a sister clade to birds, they are probably not ancestral to them, but a side branch. The traditional view, with various four winged forms scattered among other groups, would support the idea that flight passed through a four-winged stage, because it implies the ancestral bird must also have had four wings. Lastly, "Tetrapterygidae" is an invalid name for a family because it does not contain a genus named Tetrapteryx, he correct name for this group would be Microraptoridae, which would have precedence anyway. Dinoguy2 (talk) 12:49, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for African golden wolf

On 12 August 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article African golden wolf, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that until this year, the African golden wolf was classified as the Eurasian golden jackal? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/African golden wolf. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 07:17, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Eurypygimorphae

Hi I just want to let you know I changed the spelling of Eurypgimorphae to Eurypygimorphae. I think it was a typo, despite the spelling with "pg" being more common on Google by about 3:1. See the talk page for more info, and please let me know if you think I was wrong. —Soap— 17:21, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cladistic Classification of Class Sarcopterygii, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Apoda and Anura. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ailuropoda may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

| subfamilia = Ailuropodinae]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:21, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Taxonomy/Baleen whale

Template:Taxonomy/Baleen whale has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 20:14, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, 4444hhhh. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Bubalina) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Bubalina, 4444hhhh!

Wikipedia editor Nick Moyes just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I'ce tidies up a few small erros in this article, but feel you ned to chekc whether I have accidentally introduced any error into the meaning of the sentence on the second classification system of Groves and Grubb.

To reply, leave a comment on Nick Moyes's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nick Moyes (talk) 16:08, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Bovina (subtribe)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Bovina (subtribe), 4444hhhh!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I trimmed some subjective or editorial-sounding terms like "incredibly", and "intense" studies. tone should be dispassionate and objective, regardless of the tone in sources. Be aware of WP:OVERLINK as well: continents, nationalities, and other commonly understood terms almost never need linking.

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

--Animalparty! (talk) 01:27, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Tragelaphini

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tragelaphini you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dunkleosteus77 -- Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 19:02, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, 4444hhhh. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Anabantiformes

Hi, I'm Abishe. 4444hhhh, thanks for creating Anabantiformes!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix.

Hello 4444hhhh: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Abishe (talk) 04:29, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Abishe (talk) 04:29, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Tragelaphini/GA1

4444hhhh, it's very important that you stop by your nomination right away if you don't wish the review to be closed. In any event, please do reply to the pings posted there by the reviewer. Thank you very much. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:08, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Tragelaphini

The article Tragelaphini you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Tragelaphini for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dunkleosteus77 -- Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 21:01, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bear classfication

Hi. If you're going to expand the list them please add more images so the section does not look dry with the large block of white background. LittleJerry (talk) 19:04, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is preferred that images line up up the species.genus mentioned in the text on the left. LittleJerry (talk) 18:38, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, 4444hhhh. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, 4444hhhh. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 4444hhhh, I'm writing to you because yuor nmae is in the list of the "WikiProject Dogs" and you're one of the last still active. There's a discussion you might be interested in, here. I'd be glad to know your opinion about this matter, so I hope that you'll read the thread I opened. Thank you in advance if you decide to join (there have been just 3 users replying so far, each one independently from the others, so there's no need to read the whole discussion but just my first message and the source included, and possibly reply on the base of that). 151.64.164.50 (talk) 10:49, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Carnivora, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Malagasy and Saharan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:37, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please check your changes to Carnivora

Please check your changes to Carnivora, it seems to me you have invalidated the link from Penis to Carnivora § Reproductive system with this edit Special:Diff/942527317. --CiaPan (talk) 11:40, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Primal (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Action.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:46, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:39, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:4444hhhh/Bully Breeds

Hello, 4444hhhh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bully Breeds".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! I-Bin-A-Bibi (talk) 18:42, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:4444hhhh/Raptores

Hello, 4444hhhh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Raptores".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! I-Bin-A-Bibi (talk) 18:43, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

STOP

There is consensus at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Palaeontology#Disruptive_editing_by_4444hhhh that you should cease making edits regarding gomphothere taxonomy. If you continue to make edits on this topic, I will revert them. This is your only warning before I will take it to WP:ANI. Hemiauchenia (talk) 18:20, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the heads up, sorry for the trouble. 4444hhhh (talk) 04:08, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cardinal (bird), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Cardinal, Bunting and Stick.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Grebe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marine.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Checking in

Hi, 4444hhhh - since you didn't respond to this ping at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Dogs#Confirmation request, I thought it best to follow up with a post to see if you are still active on WP:WikiProject Dogs. I'm updating our list of participants and removing those who are no longer active. Please ping if you respond here, or better yet, respond to the ping and let us know if you're still active. Happy editing! Atsme 💬 📧 02:09, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Rhynchotheriidae" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Rhynchotheriidae and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 12#Rhynchotheriidae until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 23:23, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, 4444hhhh. Thank you for your work on Actiocyon. User:Bruxton, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bruxton}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bruxton (talk) 16:23, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Overlinking

Hi, thanks for your work. But please don't link commonly known country-names and other non-technical terms. Ranges need an en dash (–) not a hyphen (-). Tony (talk) 00:39, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Grebe

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Grebe you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ganesha811 -- Ganesha811 (talk) 17:23, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much!! 4444hhhh (talk) 15:39, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Grebe

The article Grebe you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Grebe for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ganesha811 -- Ganesha811 (talk) 13:41, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations \| August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, 4444hhhh. Thank you for your work on Pachypanthera. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:43, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Pachypanthera

On 8 October 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Pachypanthera, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the early big cat Pachypanthera may have weighed as much as 142 kilograms (313 lb) and had teeth similar to a hyena's? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pachypanthera. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Pachypanthera), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hadrogeneios, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Molar and Canine.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Vertebrata Classes

Hello, 4444hhhh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vertebrata Classes, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:06, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024 GAN backlog drive

Good article nominations \| March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]