User talk:Liance/Archive 7

Archive 1

←

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

Archive 8

Archive 9

Archive 10

Fats Domino recordings

Hello, Why you renamed this page from "Fats Domino Recordings" to "List of Fats Domino Studio Recordings"?

1. There are not only studio recordings, buth both studio and live ones, please look at entire article.
2. This is not only a list (titles only), but a session-o-graphy and discography of first release of each listed recording.

So your renaming seems be unjustified. In addition, you did this without any prior discussion, putting me as the author of the page before the fact. RocknRollArchivist (talk) 08:46, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi there, I felt that re-naming the article to a "list" was appropriate because the article primarily listed out recordings - additional information about each recording is appreciated, but does not change the fact that it a list per wiki standards despite additional table information (see Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists). However it is my mistake that I added "studio" to the title - I have since moved the draft again to rectify this mistake. Hope this helped. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 17:46, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Review Article

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Maskoor_Usmani I occasionally edit Wiki articles and one of my recent page creation requests were declined. I researched and added more information post the rejection and also found out that the article adheres to Wikipedia's notability guidelines as there are over 70 credible references on the internet mentioning him. A Youtube search also reveals that he is a regular debater on national television in India. I plan to update the article with more information over time. Could you please share some insights on what to improvise upon, I really am trying to learn contributing to Wikipedia. AkkiDeutscher (talk) 13:55, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

UK Coronavirus Cancer Monitoring Project

Hi Liance,

Thank you for the feedback for my submission of the UK Coronavirus Cancer Monitoring Project Wikipedia page. Since your review, there has been more coverage of the project, namely a commentary in a high-impact peer-reviewed medical journal (paper: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30230-8) and letters of support. Would addition of these references with other minor edits are likely to be sufficient for accepting the page?

Many thanks! TStarkeyBham (talk) 13:55, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi TStarkeyBham, so sorry for the long delay for a response. The draft seems notable enough for inclusion now. If you resubmit the article I could move it to the mainspace and accept it. Thanks, -Liance^{talk/contribs} 02:39, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Articles for Creation: List of reviewers by subject notice

Hi Liance, you are receiving this notice because you are listed as an active Articles for Creation reviewer.

Recently a list of reviewers by area of expertise was created. This notice is being sent out to alert you to the existence of that list, and to encourage you to add your name to it. If you or other reviewers come across articles in the queue where an acceptance/decline hinges on specialist knowledge, this list should serve to facilitate contact with a fellow reviewer.

To end on a positive note, the backlog has dropped below 1,500, so thanks for all of the hard work some of you have been putting into the AfC process!

Sent to all Articles for Creation reviewers as a one-time notice. To opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Regards, Sam-2727 (talk)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Declined https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Dirk_Hohndel

Hello Liance! Thank you for your feedback (within minutes versus the 5 weeks I anticipated). This is my first wiki attempt and am struggling with adding references and flow. The reason I think Dirk deserves a wiki page is that he is a an early Linux and open source contributor, going on to help found several of the open source foundations and calls to action on diversity and inclusion in this space. I have additional references to add: https://www.linuxjournal.com/article/3000 https://www.usenix.org/legacy/publications/library/proceedings/als00/2000papers/papers/full_papers/hohndel/hohndel_html/index.html and could add a list of links for keynotes. Is that would you are looking? Sincerely Malini Bhandaru (talk) 00:48, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

Rewrite of Dirk Hohndel page

Liance, I got the hang of the edit UI and a sense of flow (I think) .. hope the major re-write addresses the concerns you raised. Looking forward to hearing from you. Wishing you a good weekend. Malini Bhandaru (talk) 08:08, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi Malini Bhandaru, I took a look at the draft. However, I noticed that nearly all (except one or two) sources with coverage directly related to Dirk Hohndel were interviews - these generally don't satisfy the requirements of being independent of the subject (which is criteria needed to satisfy notability for people. Additional sources that are independent and significant coverage of the subject might be needed. Hope this helped. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 03:54, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Review Article

Hi Liance To review Alireza Kohany's page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Alireza_Kohany I am not Alireza Kohany! I'm just a fan of Alireza Kohany, If you look closely at the film's website, Alireza Kohany's roles in those films are mentioned. Is it possible to confirm the article?

Hi KohanyAlireza - firstly, I would recommend you change your username since your current name may imply that you are impersonating Alireza Kohany, which could be confusing for other editors and result in a block. Currently, the article's references do not meet the notability requirements which outline the need for additional references in secondary, independent sources; user-contributed websites like IMDb and wikipedia in other languages do not qualify for this. If you want the draft to be accepted then more sources will be needed. Hope this helped. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 03:47, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Review Article - Mish-mash (food)

Hello, Liance

Regarding your review and declining of this article on the Mish-mash dish: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Mish-mash_(food)

First of, thank you for your fast review.

I have added 3 more references to notable blogs in English. The problem is, I don't think there are many references in encyclopedias and science magazines about Balkan cuisine. This dish is neither controversial, nor widely spread around the world - it is just a beloved local dish tourists and locals eat around here. So many people around the world know what a Banitsa pastry is, or Tripe soup, yet look at the wikipedia pages on those subjects and there are no more reliable references than the ones I've provided - food blogs and local literature, something translated to English at best. My point is, I can dig up 50 more references for this stub article, and all food blogs and local cooking shows, but it will get ridiculous.

Also, is it common for a topic to be on disambiguation page, but to lack notoriety to have an article? - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mish_Mash

Also, I've asked here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk#19:15:39,_10_June_2020_review_of_draft_by_ShadowBee What is your oppinion? If you have any advise, I will appreciate it. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ShadowBee (talk • contribs) 19:58, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi ShadowBee, I have added a few more sources and accepted your draft. Thanks for your contributions! I will also add it to the mish-mash disambig page. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 21:20, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

WildEarth

Sorry to bother you, Liance. I just thought I'd say that WildEarth should be considered a "notable companies", as they are the most well-known organisation when it comes to live-streamed African safaris. If you disagree with this, and think another company is more well-known for it, feel free to let me know. Also, I updated it to include more news links, and also links to other companies and reserves that they work with. Redstoneprime (talk) 20:04, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi Redstoneprime - regardless of how 'well-known' a company is for inclusion the draft must demonstrate this by showing significant indepth coverage via multiple independent reliable sources (WP:CORP) - user contributed sources and those linked to the subject (WildEarth in this case) do not qualify, so this would include youtube, twitch, the company website itself, etc. Overall I felt that more indepth coverage was needed for this to be demonstrated. Hope this helps. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 21:26, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Liance Understood. Redstoneprime (talk) 08:25, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Great, let me know if anything else comes up -Liance^{talk/contribs} 17:38, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Liance I've added some links to more news articles. If I find anything else I'll make sure to add them. Redstoneprime (talk) 08:47, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Sinical

Hi Liance, I recently had n wiki article declined. Reason being, it read more as an advertisement. I have made numerous edits and I want to make sure the article fits the guidelines. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Sinical Mweberjr (talk) 04:35, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi Mweberjr, you should remove the external links from the body text of your draft since those are generally not used anywhere in the main content. Additionally, take a look at WP:NMUSIC for notability guidelines on music-related topics. Hope this helps. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 01:22, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

Recent decline

Hello Liance,

prior to submitting my content, I did look through most if not all the pertinent material Wiki has on inclusion. I did not include multiple sources (see below) because the article would look busy in the draft format Wiki uses. My intent would be to include two to three (cited) references. in the published version because the formatting there allows for citing.

Is this acceptable or should I give up?

https://www.thesun.co.uk/tech/5785602/virtual-girlfriend-ar-blade-runner-2049/

https://optocrypto.com/soon-virtual-girlfriend-ar-will-available-download-hololens/

https://virtualrealityreporter.com/3d-hologroup-release-3d-holo-girlfriend-ar-app/

https://www.corecommunique.com/3d-hologroup-inc-has-released-the-first-adult-oriented-augmented-reality-content-for-microsofts-hololens-and-meta-visions-meta2-with-its-opening-of-3d-holo-girlfriend/

https://mspoweruser.com/first-adult-title-comes-to-the-microsoft-hololens/

https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-best-AR-porn-sites-in-2018

https://www.deccanchronicle.com/technology/in-other-news/210318/make-virtual-girlfriend-hololens-augmented-reality-hologram.html

Mlcastellanos - these sources should be cited in the draft article via inline citations, as they are the only way a subject can establish notability on wikipedia. This can be done with <ref> tags, and external links in the body should be removed. As long as your provided sources are secondary and independent of the subject they are acceptable. Hope this helps. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 01:25, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

College of Health, Yamfo

Hello Liance, what about putting information about the college in a section about educational institutions in the article about Yamfo? Then the draft can be deleted until the college achieves enough notoriety to justify an article. Thanks, ... PeterEasthope (talk) 21:08, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi PeterEasthope, if you feel like notability can't be established at this moment if the college is notable in the area I feel that a mention in the article Yamfo would be appropriate. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 03:47, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Criteria in Wikipedia should be established objectively. Compliance should not be the opinion of one person.

CoHY is growing as rapidly as any college in my locale. Program offerings and courses will grow. Within a lifetime, CoHY is likely to become a university. In principle CoHY is as notable as many other institutions having articles. But how is notability established? With contemporary electronic communications there is no hardcopy newspaper with a story about CoHY.

Please have a look at the article about Douglas College. The references to Global News and to the Vancouver Sun give blank pages. Those references are effectively dead. The last reference is to a Province of BC page addressing accreditation of institutions in general; no mention of Douglas College. The other references are internal. The Douglas College article really doesn't have references satisfying notability criteria. Many similar examples exist and I don't mean to criticize the DC article in particular. The only way I see to satisfy notability honestly is for the institution to have faculty who publish notable scholarly work. Work which is published in scientific and other journals and can be cited. Criteria should apply honestly and without discrimination. Regards, ... PeterEasthope (talk) 14:15, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

PeterEasthope, please read up on the Wikipedia notability guidelines which require articles to be supported by reliable sources in secondary, independent publications - currently your draft reflects none of this and cannot be accepted in this form. If your subject is "as notable as many other institutions having articles" then sources must be provided to show this, otherwise that notability does not exist by Wikipedia standards. Douglas College is easily notable, there is no such thing as a "dead reference" (in that case most news articles published in the past would be considered dead, which is absurd) and Google easily brings up many more reliable sources. If you think your subject also has notability please show this through the use of references. Thx -Liance^{talk/contribs} 16:09, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedian!

Liance, thank you for the warm welcome. Working on some drafts now, valiant sir! Newmusicgeeking (talk) 03:42, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Newmusicgeeking that's great to hear, let me know if anything is needed! -Liance^{talk/contribs} 03:46, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Lary Walker page

Hi Liance, Thanks for looking at the draft page for Lary Walker. I think the content of the page is reasonable, but there is a bit of redundancy because I list some of his important publications, and then some of them also show up in the reference section. Do you think this is a problem? I SHOULD be better at all of this, because I have my students do Wiki pages for class, so apologies. But, at least this adventure is getting me to become more comfortable with the editing process! BrainMan2017 (talk) 16:29, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi BrainMan2017 - I think that should be fine, as long as academic notability is shown via reliable, independent secondary sources as well. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 00:51, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Liance, Super. Thanks for reviewing the page!! BrainMan2017 (talk) 02:50, 17 June 2020 (UTC) Liance, I actually went in and fixed one of the references, which was not active. Lary Walker is a hugely important scientist in the field of Alzheimer's disease, being the first to show how pathology spreads (along with his colleague, Matt Jucker).BrainMan2017 (talk) 03:17, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Thanks

Hi Lance,

Thanks for your recent review of my article. I'm still a newbie and I was about to ask my teacher for help regarding whether to edit the sandbox or the article directly. Your comment helped a lot. Thanks Dazen31415 (talk) 00:04, 17 June 2020 (UTC) 17/06/2020

No problem Dazen31415, glad to be of help. On the wiki we generally directly edit the articles so content can be tracked via revision history. Let me know if anything else comes up! -Liance^{talk/contribs} 00:46, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Kingdom of Jeypore

Hello Liance,

There is a problem in the page (Kingdom of Jeypore). For the past three months one user is constantly deleting and editing our work. In the beginning he deleted most of the research saying that the evidence is from sources of British Raj. Due to the neglect this area is facing from the Indian and state government since 1947, there are not enough books written on the history of the dynasty but still we tried our best and provided a lot of modern and relevant references to support our article.

However the last two paragraphs under post titlular ruler has one reference from the Times of India newspaper that mentions the coronation of the new titular king of the dynasty. But this user called Rexxx deletes it every time saying it’s unreliable. How is a big sensational news of this kind can be considered unreliable. We have many newspapers mentioning the event and we are ready to provide to whomsoever if required. But pleas please ask this man to stop editing because he is creating a bit unhealthy atmosphere and not letting us concentrate on making this article better. Mihirbhoj (talk) 03:08, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Submission of Gordon Tredgold biography

Please help to check it, I have removed all the possible primary source. Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 13:08, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Generation C

Hello again, I have added some additional references that show that the term is starting to be widely used. what do you think? — Preceding unsigned comment added by GeneralComment (talk • contribs) 21:48, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Thank you for using your time to review the Generation C entry. I have added more references to show the notability. It is true that being something so new, the references are still not thousands but you can see that the term is being used worldwide and also in some important sites. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GeneralComment (talk • contribs) 11:21, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

Regarding Gordon Tredgold Article

The submission has reached 24 hours without any response. Is it clearly shows that the article is now accepted to go for reviewing? Please I will like to have positive response from you sir Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 15:46, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

Scantrust article

Hi Liance, thank you for accepting my article on Scantrust, which is now in Mainspace. I see however at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:NewPagesFeed that "the page is still unreviewed", and so I am not not clear on what will happen next, if anything. I was wondering if it is usual for an accepted article to be unreviewed. Does this this mean that other reviewers will review it in the near future? Many thanks, Factfox (talk) 12:29, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

BIPS article deletion discussion

Hi Liance, I saw you are active in the cryptocurrency wikiproject. Would you care to weigh in at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Bitcoin_Improvement_Proposal? --187.178.163.96 (talk) 21:09, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

BCB Blockchain (Blockchain Protocol)

Hey Liance!

I have resubmitted the wiki page on BCB Blockchin as per your comments. I have added in more credible links and supporting evidences. Please do take a look at your convienient time and let me know if any further changes needed. Looking forward to hearing from you very soon. Thank you

link: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:BCB_Blockchain_(Blockchain_Protocol)&action=edit&oldid=965072351 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nisha9796 (talk • contribs) 04:31, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

KC Pandey

Hi Liance!

I have redone the topic ( K C Pandey ) I had tried during my first submission (which was refused). I did a thorough study for AFC as per Wikipedia & about the topic & worked on it! I don't want this time time to fail , so I humbly request to give a quick look at my creation & let me know the flaws if any before final review to publish. I understand about the time constraint so I'm asking for just an overview. If done I'll be able to make the changes as advised! I'll be highly thankful . Though being my 1st AFC I'll keep updating on the subject as I get to know more of it. I think I'm clear with my words.

Warm Regds, Shekhar in (talk) 01:09, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

Thank you

Thanks for moving my draft article. Still finding my feet! Reader265 (talk) 09:54, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Lito Adiwang concern

Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Lito Adiwang, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 01:22, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

Thank you for your contributions! Ezhao02 (talk) 14:18, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

References issues

My article about emteria.OS is rejected because of not enough supporting references, and I added new references and resubmitted it. While I check with other similar OS pages, my references looks the same supporting and valid. Would you help me about which parts do not have enough references in order to change or delete them from my article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Farzaneh.mostafaei (talk • contribs) 13:25, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Lito Adiwang

Hello, Liance. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lito Adiwang".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:08, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Wiki Review: BCB Blockchain (Blockchain Protocol)

Hi Liance,

Hope this finds you well. Thank you for your feedback on our BCB Blockchain (BCB Protocol) wiki entry. I understand that there was an issue with the supporting sources added in. We have edited and resubmitted the draft. I hope the revised version meets the guidelines better. Kindly let me know if we should resubmit the draft as a new entry and/or if there any changes to be made. We are new to this and are concerned about being declined again. If there are any other way we can get it reviewed successfully, kindly please let me know. Looking forward to hearing from you very soon. Best, Nisha.

˜˜˜˜ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2406:3003:2060:1221:1040:5E1B:998A:C2F7 (talk) 09:47, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Article about JJ Alfieri

In January you declined an article that I wrote about an actor. I have re-written the article and added a number of citations and links. I'm not sure about how the Wikipedia platform works and have been fumbling around with it. Can you tell me if my article has actually been submitted for review, and if you could take a look at it? Thanks! Jim Barfly (talk) 20:23, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Request on 05:39:17, 25 October 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by Rishijindal

• Rishijindal (talk · contribs)
  • User:Rishijindal/sandbox/Suresh Jindal (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

This page is a Bio of Mr Suresh Jindal

His mention can be found at as a Film Producer with notable and significant films

As a columnist he has written multiple articles for Speaking Tree a distinguished Blog 

He has also been been awarded the  "Chevalier dans l'ordre des arts et lettres", a title bestowed by the French government. 

Mr. Jindal has a B.S.E.E. from UCLA and spent four years in the Aerospace/Electronics Industry in California as an engineer He is a member of the "National Honorary Mathematics Society of America" and the "Academic Council of the Film & Television Institute of India" He is also ex-vice-president of the "Indian Motion Picture Producers Association"

Rishijindal (talk) Rishijindal (talk) 05:39, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

KUNZITE draft rejected

Hey Liance, I see that you denied my Wiki draft for my client, KUNZITE. They are a bicoastal music group who my are managed by the company where I work, Fenway Recordings. I was wondering what I can do to help get this draft approved. Sophiewilde (talk) 18:30, 4 November 2020 (UTC)Thanks so much, Sophie

Question About You Declining My Draft

So You Declined My Draft For List Of Shapes And Said It Already Exists As List Of 2D Geometric Shapes Which Is Fair Enough But It Seems Like A Big List Of Just Shapes Not Any Types Well There Are Types Of Triangles. Also Since It’s Just A List Do I Replace The First Part With What I Put Or Do I Just Put The Tables? I Don’t Know What To Do.

Edit: Actually I think I know what to do.

WikiMakersOfOurTime (talk) 14:53, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Article about 'Saraf Furniture'

Dear Liance,

An article was submitted about 'Saraf furniture' on the basis of its notable achievement of manufacturing all its furniture from pure Sheesham Wood. If you can see a video at the following link: , which states that how the company started manufacturing all its products from solid Sheesham wood. Also other recent videos stating that it is the only company manufacturing all its furniture from Government purchased Sheesahm wood. The company has also converted the un-organized furniture market in India into an organized and ratable sector. The success story and the notability factor is also highlighted at , not being media reports.

Please look into the matter and consider the genuine notable factors of the company about bringing a revolution in the furniture market of India.

Regards, Adv.devanshmalhotra (talk) 12:27, 11 November 2020 (UTC) Devansh Malhotra

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:46, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Jan 26th

Hello Liance! Thanks for the heads up as well for the welcome message :) Cestgeorge (talk) 17:27, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

No problem! Let me know if I can help at all. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 16:22, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Reviews

Hey Liance, how about letting another perspective on Draft: The Secret Of Skinwalker Ranch? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Houston,illinois (talk • contribs) 19:09, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for help in editing for article , kindly reconsider the Article again here is the link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:MERI_BHII_SUNO Ohmbunu (talk) 16:41, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi Ohmbunu - for articles to be accepted on wikipedia, they need to demonstrate notability through the use of reliable sources. Please cite sources about your article using inline citations if you wish for it to be reviewed and possibly accepted. Best, -Liance^{talk/contribs} 16:45, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Biological Museum

Hi Liance, many thanks for moving the article forward! It is my first try to make a page and I'm curious to see how the process goes. Nymphalid niklas (talk) 09:57, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

No problem. Please let me know if I can help in any way! -Liance^{talk/contribs} 16:39, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Help with sandbox and reviewing, also COI declaration

Thanks! I appreciate the advice and help everyone is giving me so far and will look at the newly located draft which you kindly moved for me today. I am learning, slowly! Kittyo (talk) 17:47, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Sorry about that

I meant to avoid putting the page in the pending category (there is a |demo=yes flag to {{AfC submission}}), but it turns out that parameter wasn't completely supported. Should be fixed now. — The Earwig ⟨talk⟩ 01:30, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you so much for letting me know! And this is my fault as well - I instinctively declined the draft as a test edit, and only afterwards did I realize it should not have been in the queue in the first place. Definitely should have asked first. Apologies! -Liance^{talk/contribs} 01:34, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Hey The Earwig - sorry for the ping but your dummy page (User:The Earwig/Sandbox/AfC submission) is currently in the AfC queue and shows up for reviewers. Just wanted to let you know in case it would be of any help! -Liance^{talk/contribs} 05:54, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, I think it's fine now. — The Earwig ⟨talk⟩ 06:55, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks! Need more tips to change.

Thanks for moving my draft to the appropriate location for Articles for Creation submissions. It was a quiet struggle for me to create an aritcle for the first time. I was informed that you have moved to Draft: NFLOW. However, when I click the Draft: NFLOW to edit, the title is changed to Draft: Nflow. The title should be in all capital letters either "NFLOW," or "E8IGHT NFLOW." Please give me the advice to change the Draft title. I really appreciate your help! :) LynnEri (talk) 07:44, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Damnthecaesars

Hey, Liance. Wikitia somehow cloned the page I was making. Is there anything I can do about this? Damnthecaesars (talk) 14:33, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Hey could you clarify what you meant by this? Thanks! -Liance^{talk/contribs} 03:17, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello Liance, I have corrected the inline citation and resubmitted for review. Can you please check the page and let me know if anything wrong. Thanks

Articles for Creation July 2021 Backlog Elimination Drive

Hello Liance:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 31 July 2021.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is currently a backlog of over 900 articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help!

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for Creation at 21:54, 7 July 2021 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future notification, please remove your name from the mailing list.

Orphaned non-free image File:Jamster new logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jamster new logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:02, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

RE: Further gudiance on SPIN-Farming article submission

Hi Liance, Thanks for taking the time to review and for your quick feedback. Your reply: This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

My question: There have been numerous newspaper and magazine articles written on SPIN-Farming, as well as research papers and studies. They are listed on the SPIN news page here: https://spinfarming.com/local-food-media/

Do any of these qualify as reliable secondary sources? Annstarlet (talk) 20:39, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Hello Annstarlet - on Wikipedia all articles must demonstrate notability via significant coverage in secondary sources independent of the subject (see WP:INDEPENDENT and WP:RS for reference). In other words, articles and papers should be not directly associated with the subject of the article and should be reliable sources to establish notability. As long as these conditions are met then they will be valid sources. Please be sure to use inline citations when referencing any content as well. Hope this helps. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 20:45, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Why declined

Why you declined my friend page instead of approving it just decline it, this outrage Yeshs167 (talk) 22:51, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Feedback was left on your talk page as to why your draft was declined. Reading it would most likely answer your question. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 22:58, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Resubmitted https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:GET_-_Guaranteed_Entrance_Token

Hey Liance, thanks for your swift review of my GET page. I thought I provided enough sources, but upon closer look they were mostly primary and indeed needed adjustments. Appreciate the work! After added sources I've resubmitted the page. I hope it's sufficient now. If not, could you provide me with some extra information to help me out? It's my first page, I've been searching a lot about what to do and what not to do, but there's so much information that it's easy to overlook something. Jeronemoo (talk) 12:11, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

Hey Jeronemoo - I looked over the draft and the TNW and IQ-mag sources you added are good, since they are reliable, show significant coverage and are independent of the subject. Unfortunately I am not sure if it meets WP:GNG quite yet and will likely need more significant coverage to fit that criteria. Note that cryptocurrency-related news outlets and blogs, along with Forbes personal sites, are generally not considered reliable sources when looking to add more. I'll leave it to another editor to review your submission this time and provide feedback for fairness, but please let me know if you have any more questions. Hope this helps! -Liance^{talk/contribs} 12:26, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

Hey Liance, I've wanted to discuss a few things with you, if you're open for them. First of all; After reading the guidelines and other articles on wiki, I must agree that GET as a seperate article has indeed not been notably in the news yet and therefore, should not have its own article until that happens. My original plan was to create a page for GET, GET Protocol and GUTS Tickets, so I could link to the earlier articles as a way to seperate information. I have revised that plan since it was clear it didn't fit the wiki guidelines. I have now created a GUTS Tickets article, where GET & GET Protocol are written about as they're part of GUTS Tickets. If you have time, perhaps you could review it; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:GUTS_Tickets. Secondly, I have added the proposed deletion to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Guaranteed_Entrance_Token, as it won't be accepted until it has enough notable sources, but it's unclear if and when this will happen. Have I done this correctly? And thirdly; After reading this message, feel free to delete this section from your talk page. Our conversation about GET has reached a (good) conclusion! Jeronemoo (talk) 08:28, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Jeronemoo Wiki articles often have subsections on related/encompassed topics so yes you could certainly write a section about the related topic and create a redirect to the section. Please note that the criteria at WP:NCORP must be met for your draft article to be accepted - it may be helpful to pick out the WP:THREE best sources to help reviewers when evaluating your article. Best, -Liance^{talk/contribs} 14:32, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

Further guidance on SPIN-Farming article how to proceed

Good day Liance. Thanks for your continued guidance on how to make this entry more useful. Your reply was: Hello Annstarlet - on Wikipedia all articles must demonstrate notability via significant coverage in secondary sources independent of the subject (see WP:INDEPENDENT and WP:RS for reference). In other words, articles and papers should be not directly associated with the subject of the article and should be reliable sources to establish notability. As long as these conditions are met then they will be valid sources. Please be sure to use inline citations when referencing any content as well. Hope this helps. -Liancetalk/contribs 20:45, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

My next step: SPIN-Farming provided models on how to make money growing food that reduced the amount of land needed to under an acre. This sub-acre scale of farming enabled more people to try farming and helped a lot of food/farming/gardening movements take root beginning in 2006, including urban agriculture, yardsharing, backyard farming, local farming, and sustainable farming. So what I need to do is make that clear and also provide articles or information sources on these various movements as secondary sources under the References area. Is that correct? (I very much appreciate your time and continued guidance).

Hello again Annstarlet, in order for inclusion on wikipedia the subject must meet notability guidelines for organizations, please see WP:ORGCRIT. You will need to provide secondary, independent, and reliable references that demonstrate the subject meets these criteria and is notable. Hope this helps. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 16:32, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Request on 04:05:49, 20 August 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Iamlait

• Iamlait (talk · contribs)
  • User:Iamlait/P.Priime (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi, thanks for the review and i'm open to corrections on my last created article so as to get it published on Wikipedia. I believe i cited enough references and the subject is eligible. I'd appreciate your assistance in getting the article published live. Thanks.

Iamlait (talk) 04:05, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Iamlait - musicians must meet the criteria established on WP:MUSICBIO to be considered notable and article-worthy. Your draft does not meet these criteria at the moment, if the subject is notable please add reliable sources that demonstrate this. Hope this helps. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 16:33, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi Liance thanks for your input, very much appreciated. in the article, i mentioned a notable work the producer has produced ( Carpe Diem ) and cited a newspaper publication that talked about it. can you please see and get back. Thanks again for your input.

Still doesn't appear to satisfy WP:MUSICBIO - which criteria? -Liance^{talk/contribs} 01:20, 21 August 2021 (UTC)