User talk:LeotheBoy1110

August 2021

Hello, I'm Rdp060707. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Sonic Boom (TV series), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ----Rdp060707|talk 04:59, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Walking Weird Studios, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Walking Weird Studios! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Nick Moyes (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Walking Weird Studios/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Walking Weird Studios/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 02:53, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Sonic Boom (TV series) has been reverted.
Your edit here to Sonic Boom (TV series) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (https://sonic.fandom.com/wiki/Sonic_Boom_(TV_series), https://sonic.fandom.com/wiki/Sonic_Boom_(TV_series), https://sonic.fandom.com/wiki/Sonic_Boom_(TV_series), https://sonic.fandom.com/wiki/Sonic_Boom_(TV_series), https://sonic.fandom.com/wiki/Sonic_Boom_(TV_series)) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 16:19, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:Walking Weird Studios/sandbox has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Walking Weird Studios/sandbox. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 17:06, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your username

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Walking Weird Studios", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, service, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are permitted to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, service, or website, regardless of your username. Please also read our paid editing policy and our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please request a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, choosing a username that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 19:16, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:Walking Weird Studios/sandbox has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Walking Weird Studios/sandbox. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 19:36, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 12)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: as per previous comments, there are zero independent, reliable sources.

Theroadislong (talk) 16:18, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shnobbs' Countdowns

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Shnobbs' Countdowns requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. JTtheOG (talk) 01:54, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kyle Exum

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kyle Exum requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. JTtheOG (talk) 01:58, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

YouTube content

Hi, Walking Weird Studios! I've deleted some pages you posted like Kyle Exum and Shnobbs' Countdowns. This isn't personal; it's just that your pages met one or more criteria for speedy deletion (see the deletion logs for details). Wikipedia's rules require that content be "notable" to be included, which means that the subject must be covered in-depth in multiple reliable sources … and for YouTube is very much not one of those sources. Even if your subjects aren't notable today, it could always be that one becomes notable in the future; I've definitely had that happen. Before you post further stuff, please do your research and find the sorts of reliable sources that'll show notability—it'll save on frustration from stuff getting deleted. :) {{Nihiltres |talk |edits}} 04:09, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of name and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Orange Mike | Talk 17:49, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS 46873

UTRS appeal #46873 has been closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:12, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

LeotheBoy1110 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

LeotheBoy1110 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Walking Weird Studios is just the name of my gmail. I have no real way to prove that my page submissions don't promote something. The Shnobbs' Countdowns page I made, also the ShnobbsStudios page I made, all the links I added were strictly for source. Not because I wanted to promote them. But if I'm unblocked, I'll be sure to delete those pages if you want me to. And if you want me to change my user name, I will be happy to do so. I will work at it and be good to the roles of wikipedia.

Accept reason:

The block has already been removed by an administrator who didn't close this unblock request, so I have done it. JBW (talk) 15:07, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have fixed the formatting of your request for proper display; it must be placed outside the block notice, not overwritten over the example template. You highlight and copy the template when viewing this page, then open the edit window and paste it, filling in the information. 331dot (talk) 17:19, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have checked online, and I am convinced that your username is not the name of a real studio. However, the fact that it looks like the name of a business is likely to be misleasing (as it was this time) so it will be much better if your username is changed, to avoid confusion. Would you like to suggest another username it can be changed to?
I believe that you didn't intend your editing to be promotional. However, writing about fairly average YouTubers, who don't satisfy Wikipedia's notability guidelines, is not in line with Wikipedia's guidelines, and if it looks as though it is done to publicise them and make them better known then it will be considered promotional, whether you meant it that way or not.
My advice to new editors is that it is best to start by making small improvements to existing articles, rather than creating new articles. That way any mistakes you make will be small ones, and you won't have the discouraging experience of repeatedly seeing hours of work deleted. Gradually, you will get to learn how Wikipedia works, and after a while you will know enough about what is acceptable to be able to write whole new articles without fear that they will be deleted. Over the years I have found that editors who start by making small changes to existing articles and work up from there have a far better chance of having a successful time here than those who jump right into creating new articles from the start.
In your unblock request you said that you are willing to have your username changed, and also that you will be willing to have the pages you created deleted. If you will suggest a new username to use, and if you will not create pages which are seen as promotional, then I think it will be reasonable to give you another chance. Orangemike, do you have any opinion on this? JBW (talk) 22:19, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- JBW has summed things up quite well. --Orange Mike | Talk 00:44, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you will offer a new username to change to I will be willing to rename your account and unblock it, on the understanding that your future editing will be in line with what has been said above. Here's some information about how to get your username changed.

To save wasting time asking for a name that's alredy been taken, go to Special:CentralAuth, type your name in the box, and click on the button. If the name is already in use you will see some details about the account with that name, and if it isn't in use you'll see a red message telling you ther is no global account with that name. When you're found a suitable name come back here and post a message saying what the name is. If in that message you include {{ping|JBW}} and also make sure you finish the message with ~~~~ I will be automatically notified of your message, and will deal with it.
Unfortunately even if you choose a username which hasn't already been taken, the system may refuse to do the rename if it's very similar to a username which has been taken. To avoid having to waste time coming back to try another name, you may like to suggest some alternatives in case your first choice doesn’t work.
Once your username is changed, if you try to log in you'll be told you've used the wrong username or password. Just log in with the new username, and the same password as before. JBW (talk) 08:26, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I found a user name that I would like to use. LeotheBoy1110. Is it good? Walking Weird Studios (talk) 01:00, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can I have my username changed please? I already gave a suggestion above. Walking Weird Studios (talk) 18:42, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've renamed your account. 331dot (talk) 19:55, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks LeotheBoy1110 (talk) 17:27, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Television infobox parameters

I have noticed you are adding episode articles for The Amazing World of Gumball. Just an FYI... when using {{infobox television episode}} - if the title is the same as the page title's episode title, you do not need the "title" - the infobox handles this automatically (otherwise, it ends up in the maintenance category Category:Pages using infobox television episode with unnecessary title parameter for cleanup). Also, most of the time you will not need "italic_title" in the infobox either. The only value for italic_title is "no" so it is only used if the title ends up italicized by other (automatic) means. Refer to the template documentation if you're not sure: Template:Infobox television episode ButlerBlog (talk) 16:55, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Thanks for letting me know. LeotheBoy1110 (talk) 21:30, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. Why have my episode articles for The Amazing World of Gumball been turned into redirects? LeotheBoy1110 (talk) 18:20, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey LeotheBoy. The articles you are creating, including your recent Paw and Order (The New Adventures of Winnie the Pooh) are WP:PLOTONLY see Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Television#Background and production and Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Television#Reception for ideas of what is expected of articles. When the episode is only plot (and casting), then it doesn't add anything to what is listed at List of The New Adventures of Winnie the Pooh episodes. Please slow down with your creation of articles and actually devote enough time to each one so that it has merit to stand on its own. Also, please take a look at Template:Infobox television episode and familerize yourself with the parameters it offers. The way you added the writers in Paw and Order (The New Adventures of Winnie the Pooh) is incorrect and you've ignored ButlerBlog comment above about not to use the title parameter. Lastly, Template:IMDb episode exists, please use that instead of what you currently use. Gonnym (talk) 09:17, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of A Stuffed-up World

Hello LeotheBoy1110,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged A Stuffed-up World for deletion in response to your request.

If you didn't intend to make such a request and don't want the article to be deleted, you can edit the page and remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Tol (talk | contribs) @ 23:15, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine. That was just a test. I don't mind if it's deleted. In fact, I was hoping it would get deleted. LeotheBoy1110 (talk) 19:46, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

About "Paw and Order (The New Adventures of Winnie the Pooh)" and "Pooh Oughta Be in Pictures"

Hi. I wish to tell you that both of these articles do not have enough sourcing to pass WP:GNG. This is not your fault of course, but Wikipedia does have rules for notability. I would particularly recommend looking at Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Television in order to improve your article. If the article is not improved, it may be tagged for deletion. Please do not let this discourage you. Article writing is very difficult, after all. I would also recommend Help:Your first article. (Oinkers42) (talk) 20:27, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of How to be Ninja for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article How to be Ninja is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/How to be Ninja until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

A loose necktie (talk) 22:02, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of How to be Ninja for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article How to be Ninja is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/How to be Ninja until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

A loose necktie (talk) 22:02, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Nigahiga

A tag has been placed on Category:Nigahiga indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:06, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Debt (The Amazing World of Gumball)

Hello, LeotheBoy1110. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Debt (The Amazing World of Gumball), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.