User talk:LearnologyX

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sapna Choudhary (March 12)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by User4edits was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: not-notable as dancer or politician or WP:ANYBIO

User4edits (talk) 10:28, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LearnologyX! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! User4edits (talk) 10:28, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Sapna Choudhary

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Sapna Choudhary, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Sapna Choudhary (2nd nomination). (See section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. User4edits (talk) 10:28, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Seraphimblade: The subject is extensively covered in multiple reliable secondary sources, meeting WP:GNG and WP:ENT. It is possible that previous versions of the subject were not well-cited, and, in fact, the second AfD discussion was not properly contested. Deleting the draft from the Sandbox under WP:G11 is not admissible, as the article-maintained a WP:NPOV and was not written in a tone that can be considered promotional or advertorial. The subject already exists on a different Wikipedia project, which further introduces the perspective of translating the article as per WP:TRANSLATETOHERE. LearnologyX (talk) 14:36, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User page creation

Hello @User4edits:, I've noticed recent edits to my user page without my consent, specifically the addition and relocation of userboxes. According to Wikipedia guidelines (WP:UPYES), user pages are considered personal spaces, and edits should ideally be made with the user's consent. I appreciate your efforts, and in the future, I kindly request discussing any proposed changes beforehand to maintain a collaborative editing environment. Many experienced Wikipedia editors choose not to have user pages and instead display userboxes on their talk pages. LearnologyX (talk) 14:50, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@LearnologyX Hi, Thanks for your understanding. The reason why I moved your userboxes is because they were causing a glitch in talkpage(see) making it difficult to read messages on your talk page. I tried to fix it there only, but it didn't work, so I had to move it. Thanks, User4edits (talk) 14:57, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Sapna Choudhary has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sapna Choudhary. Thanks! microbiologyMarcus ^{[petri dish·growths]} 15:16, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sapna Choudhary (March 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MicrobiologyMarcus were:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sapna Choudhary and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

microbiologyMarcus ^{[petri dish·growths]} 15:18, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MicrobiologyMarcus:, I appreciate your promptness in reviewing the AfC request and providing valuable feedback that will definitely assist in improving the draft before re-requesting AfC. However, in accordance with the WP:DRV consensus, I was about to withdraw the AfC in order to improve the draft. Your comprehensive feedback on the rejected AfC is greatly appreciated. May I kindly ask for your patience and understanding, as editing conflicts arise from our end when alterations or removals are made. LearnologyX (talk) 15:59, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem. I had reviewed it because it was still listed as under submission. I have tagged my specific concerns to identify what I considered to be a problem with the article. microbiologyMarcus ^{[petri dish·growths]} 20:42, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Based on your comment left on the draft page for Draft:Sapna Choudhary, the necessary changes has been made. Please review the comment again to see if further improvements are needed. LearnologyX (talk) 18:17, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you using ChatGPT to write your comments? C F A 💬 22:31, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For Comments, why someone will use ChatGPT for writing comments? LearnologyX (talk) 11:23, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sapna Choudhary (July 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Aviram7 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sapna Choudhary and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

--- ᗩvírαm7 • (@píng mє-tαlk mє) 03:17, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Karan Bhushan Singh

Hello, LearnologyX. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Karan Bhushan Singh, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:07, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]