User talk:Lad 2011

Welcome!

Hello, Lad 2011, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Mishae (talk) 18:47, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Of course it is based on ONS data, it even says source:ONS below the table. Here is the link I used: http://www.nomisweb.co.uk/reports/lmp/la/1946157127/report.aspx?town=Leeds NOMIS, that webpage, is part of the ONS. There's a telephone number and email address on that webpage you can contact them for further information about who they are.

The data I used is from the ONS, go on the website and scroll to the top, it says Office for National Statistics. Sure the web address is "nom is", but NOMIS is a service provided by the Office for National Statistics. The data is therefore independent and reliable.

I am removing the data because it is from 2010, and I have replaced it with official government data from 2013. This is not an act of vandalism, this is updating wikipedia with the latest information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.13.164.168 (talk) 21:17, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed you changed the employment statistics for the article Leeds. I updated the information to reflect the year 2012-2013 (previous data was from 2010), but you reverted it back to the 2010 data. The data I have used is from the Office for National Statistics through their publishing arm nomis and is therefore reliable. Please do not revert new data back to old data. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.13.164.168 (talk) 21:03, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Hello, I'm Charlesdrakew. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Leeds, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Charles (talk) 21:55, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Central square Leeds for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Central square Leeds is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Central square Leeds until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:23, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You recently edited the page for Leeds, so it'd be great if you could voice your opinion at Talk:Leeds#Merge_with_City_of_Leeds. Thanks. Leeds United FC fan (talk) 16:01, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Leeds has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Mr Stephen (talk) 13:55, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Mr Stephen You need to go back and look at my edit. I changed the wording. Lad 2011 (talk) 14:05, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Lad 2011. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]