User talk:LWF/Archive 3
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:LWF. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
Thanks
Thanks for reverting vandalism on my userpage. — xaosflux Talk 22:03, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
No problem. I'm always willing to help.--LWF (talk) 22:04, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Thank you
I appreciate your welcome, LWF, thank ye very much. Oh-hey, I also support the right to bear arms, what's the template for the userbox? Cheers!Vicius (talk) 05:36, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
- {{WPGUNSMEMBER}}.--LWF (talk) 14:06, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXI (November 2007)
The November 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 02:02, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
- Rename TDI KRISS Super V to TDI KRISS Super V XSMG
The correct name was being used TDI KRISS Super V XSMG then an editor named Asams10 moved the article without any discussion to the incorrect name TDI KRISS Super V. The firearm is named by the company at their homepage here: KRISS Super V XSMG. The "KRISS Super V" refers only to the firing mechanism, which will be used in other firearms created by this company, so the XSMG, which the company included in the name of this specific firearm must be included at the end to differentiate from other firearms i.e.: it is the actual name being used by the company that manufactures the firearm. I notified Asams10 at both his talk page and the article discussion page, but he is being stubborn and moves the article back, stating that is is advertising. To avoid an edit war would other people, please get involved. Thank you Chessy999 23:44, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
- do we have any administrators available that understand about firearms? Asams10 keeps moving the article against the group consensus. Chessy999 09:54, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Actually, at the moment there is no consensus, so I recommend that no one move until a consensus can be reached. As for the administrators, there are a few, but I can't think of any names at the moment.--LWF 14:02, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
- You've got it wrong, Chessy, however you refuse to reply to me or join the conversation on that talk page. The article was moved long ago and concensus was a moot point. Please stop going around to other people trying to plead your case and keep the conversation above board and on focus on the firearm's talk page, not behind everybody's backs. --Asams10 15:03, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
- The MOVE button did not work as the article name is already created, only a #Redirect would work, and administrator SYSOP should be able to perform the MOVE. Chessy999 (talk) 15:07, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- In that case, wait till there is a true consensus, and then go to WP:RM. That is the way to fix it, if it is necessary. As it is, don't request a move till there is agreement.--LWF (talk) 20:29, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Deagle
Hi I was just wondering why 'Desert Eagle' cannot be abbreviated to 'Deagle' in 'real life'??? Could you please explain. 90.201.191.14 (talk) 00:00, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
- Simple, the only people who call it the 'Deagle' are players of certain video games, not actual users of firearms. Therefore, it is not actually called the deagle frequently, just by video gamers, especially in forums notorious for slang and abbreviations.--LWF (talk) 05:30, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
cluttered Hardballer
Hi
Somehow the removal of the pop culture section in the AMT Hardballer article completely cluttered up the References section. I'm fine with the removal of that section but please fix the reference.
// Karl —Preceding unsigned comment added by K-Man75 (talk • contribs) 18:09, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
It's fixed. It was a mixture of two things: use of the {{reflist|2}} instead of {{reflist}} template, and user:142.163.7.151's inclusion of the pop culture reference inside of the citation of Hartink.--LWF (talk) 18:16, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Ballistics
Hello! Thanks for your welcome. In the next few weeks I will try to read through all the material related to ballistics and see how to contribute.
--Mdeby (talk) 01:27, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Thank
Thanks for your support in my successful RFA. Glad I was a pleasant surprise. I hope to get a chance soon to try and finish off all the remaining cartridge infoboxes, at least the ones I have data for. AliveFreeHappy (talk) 07:21, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Warnings
I'm sorry that you feel I have a negative viewpoint of one of the editors. That is because I do. I, of course, see you to are friendly. I will not report your vandalism of my talk page, and I'm sorry to inform you I do not intend to give up on the issue he seems to have taken with the BRHMS article. I and others will continue to attempt to reach his moving goal post to provide an accurate and up-to-date entry. --Cozret (talk) 05:22, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- My vandalism of your talk page! Oh that is good for a laugh. What I did can not be considered vandalism, all I did was caution you to, as WP:NPA says "comment on content, not on the contributor."--05:30, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
M-1 Carbine Revert War
The M1 carbine article is currently on lock down. An administrator has requested some discussion from memeber of the Firearms Wikiproject. Can you take a look?Sf46 (talk) 18:34, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter — Issue XXII (December 2007)
 Issue XXII (December 2007) | ||
|
New featured articles:
New A-Class articles: | |
| ||
| ||
Tag & Assess 2007 is now officially over, with slightly under 68,000 articles processed. The top twenty scores are as follows:
Although the drive is officially closed, existing participants can continue tagging until January 31 if they wish, with the extra tags counting towards their tally for barnstar purposes. We'd like to see what lessons can be learned from this drive, so we've set up a feedback workshop. Comments and feedback from participants and non-participants alike are very welcome and appreciated. | ||
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. | ||
Note: This newsletter was automatically delivered. Regards from the automated, Anibot (talk) 23:44, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
Takur Ghar battle
Great!
Roberts Ridge, in starting it, is quite novelistic: as-it-happened descriptions, internal monologues and so on. This is good for adding dramatic depictions. But I was hoping, at the same time, to have a more clinical, scholarly source to accompany it. Hopefully Not a Good Day to Die fits the bill.
The goal would be something like what I have just done with Battle of Musa Qala (though its all news sources, as the battle just happened). It's at FAC, here. I tend to feed everything toward a featured article candidacy these days. So we could collaborate. I'll start a stub today or tomorrow. Marskell (talk) 21:00, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
- Great, just as soon as my life becomes less busy we can do it.--LWF (talk) 21:20, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
MP5K?
Thanks for the quick and pragmatic resolution to the conflict. Koalorka (talk) 01:16, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
- No problem. I wish they were all that easy to resolve.--LWF (talk) 02:01, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
HEY
Thanks for the greeting. I'm afraid that most of the knowledge I possess on firearms has already been contributed, however I am always learning more! Falcofire (talk) 13:15, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
I added myself...
...to wikiproject Firearms. Thanks for the heads-up though. --Gunny01 (talk) 11:44, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- No problem. Frankly it was as much for us as it was for you.--LWF (talk) 22:27, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIII (January 2008)
The January 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:23, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
Military history WikiProject coordinator elections
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by February 14! Kirill 03:32, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
SGC Images?
Come on, they are good images. I don't see how it's hurting anyone. Hayden120 (talk) 00:31, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
- My reason, WP:EL#Links normally to be avoided #5. I'm sure we could find a way of getting high-quality images some other way.--LWF (talk) 00:39, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
stumped, not confused
I was never confused, just stumped. User:Dorftrottel 03:25, February 18, 2008
Milhist coordinators election has started
- The February 2008 Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fifteen candidates. Please vote here by February 28! --Eurocopter tigre (talk) 17:51, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks LWF
I appreciate your hospitality and the welcome to the Firearms project. I hope I can help out and be a valued contributor. Wikidenizen (talk) 04:44, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIV (February 2008)
The February 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 05:00, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Redirect of HK WSG2000
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on HK WSG2000, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because HK WSG2000 is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting HK WSG2000, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 19:00, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Dan Wesson
Hi LWF !
Nice to meet this place - i'm a hunter and sportshooter from germany.
I work on an article group 'Dan Wesson' here my first page Dan Wesson M1911 ACP Pistol
I addet WPGUNSMEMBER3 to my userpage is that ok ?
Thanks again for help of mudwater - im afraid sometime i have to ask again for a hand :)
Best regards Tom --Dan Wesson (talk) 20:06, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
P.S. Any requests for IWA 2008[1] ? I am going there ... Tom --Dan Wesson (talk) 18:56, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
- Nothing in particular.--LWF (talk) 19:17, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
- Hi! Finished german 'DW-M1911'[2] ariticle and crosslinked it with en.wiki. BTW i'm looking for the right NaviBlock to put it under the article. Do we have something for this purpose ? For example 'NaviBlock-Handguns'.- Its to complicated for me to handle such[3] things :) Regards Tom + have a nice day --Dan Wesson (talk) 15:40, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
- Can't find any. By the way, not all changes in the firearms area have to be cleared by me. In fact, none of them actually have to be cleared. Just continue doing high-quality work, and never be afraid to seek help if you feel you need it.--LWF (talk) 16:16, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
WW2
Was a hugely good pickup ;o)--mrg3105 (comms) ♠♥♦♣ 02:19, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
Little help?
User:Michael Courtney has been splashing Hydrostatic shock references on popular articles. Could you please join the discussion on the notability of including this entry on cartridge pages? Thanks for the help. For the record, I'm asking a few others with a vested interest. --'''I am Asamuel''' (talk) 16:39, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXV (March 2008)
The March 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:55, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Magnum Research
Hey LWF, thanks for the support on changing the name for the IMI Jericho article. It would be as follows that the Desert Eagle article name be changed to Magnum Research Desert Eagle do you agree? I would like your aid in cleaning up both pages as well and monitor my progress through them as all of the Magnum Research articles need some spring cleaning. I have started on the Desert Eagle a small bit as well but have a lot to go. MRIanthony (talk) 18:17, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
- I have put in a request on the Talk:Desert Eagle page. Please Support. :)MRIanthony (talk) 18:18, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
Arbcom
Your participation in Arbcom is requested here. Thank you. 20:26, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
- Your comments would help immensely. Thanks. Yaf (talk) 17:19, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
- I will soon. I just want to come up with a good wording before I actually make my comments.--LWF (talk) 20:36, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
AK-47 at FAR
AK-47 has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here.
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVI (April 2008)
The April 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:30, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Hunting weapon
That was a long time back, but my recollection is that after far too much argument based on original research, and after far too much evasion, scot finally presented evidence using excellent sourcing that 'sporting weapon' was usage of standard English, and hunting was a sport. This convinced me of the validity of his position. In other words, his position was based on most reliable sourcing, and not personal opinion, original research or reading into ambiguous sourcing. Considering that hunting is a sport, I acquiesce that 'hunting weapon' is close enough of a term. Though I still feel it is not good English. And, I cannot recall the details of what I was thinking so long ago, but I recall that my conclusion about this took a week or so to congeal and it was likely that I was personally hurt and frustrated at the considerable incivility dumped on me during that negotiation. Therefore, it is also likely that I was not in a congenial mood. SaltyBoatr (talk) 21:51, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
Advice Please
Re Ferguson rifle article, I know having seen it that at Blair Castle, Perthshire Scotland there is a Ferguson rifle which belonged to a member of the Scottish horse a Yeomanry regiment of the British army, how do I go about gettin this info up to a standard?, Adouglasmhor (talk) 21:07, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
- It depends. How many Fergusons are still around? If there are many, then that particular Ferguson doesn't really need to be mentioned; if they are rare (very rare), then it might be notable enough to warrant inclusion in the article.--LWF (talk) 22:21, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Cluster bombs
In short, there is a very real, and very questionable bit of symbolism in that picture, specifically. I argue that we either acknowledge that symbolism (albeit sexual and perhaps taboo in nature), or we eliminate the image altogether. To ignore it completely would be to offer Wikipedia a disservice. 216.26.210.48 (talk) 02:49, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- Care to explain this clearly vandalistic edit you made?--LWF (talk) 02:55, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- Certainly. My original edit was ill-constructed and vile in its wording. I have reconsidered the presentation of this bit of info. In its current form, it presents nothing questionable. 216.26.210.48 (talk) 03:11, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVII (May 2008)
The May 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:19, 3 June 2008 (UTC)