User talk:Cozret

December 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Weezer, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Weezer was changed by Cozret (c) (t) deleting 36932 characters on 2007-12-01T04:17:22+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot 04:17, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No just mucked up an edit ~ User:Corzet 04:17, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/AliveFreeHappy. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Please do not edit archived discussions that clearly say "Please do not modify it." AliveFreeHappy (talk) 05:04, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Cozret, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

P.S. I suggest you familiarize yourself with Wikipedia policy before you continue editing. I specifically think you should review Wikipedia:No personal attacks. Quite simply, attacking a person with insults or accusations (ad hominem), is an attack and is looked down upon. Accusing a person of deliberate censorship such as in BRMHS, and Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/AliveFreeHappy, is an attack. Discussion is encouraged on Wikipedia. Attacking editors is not.--LWF (talk) 05:17, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Mediation?

Hello - I am alerting you that we are preparing a Request for Mediation regarding Gavin.collins. BOZ (talk) 12:28, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am alerting you that we are now considering a Request for Arbitration regarding him as an alternative to mediation, and would like your opinion on the matter. BOZ (talk) 13:52, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, no problem. :) BOZ (talk) 13:52, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I

There is an AN/I thread on your behavior in re D&D articles here. -Jéské ^{(v^_^v E pluribus unum)} 19:30, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree to hold removing more of Gavin.collins tags until they are done moderating. However, once it is established that he did nothing more then cut and paste a block of tags into every RPG article he could find. I'm going right back to preventing the removal of the hard and honest work people have done. --Cozret (talk) 19:36, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Check it out

Come see what I've been working on. :) BOZ (talk) 13:49, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Enochian magic

Please be advised the per WP:PROD, articles that have been discussed at AfD are not candidates for prod. Accordingly, I have removed the prod tag from Enochian magic, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the prod template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! Varbas (talk) 12:54, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~)Varbas (talk) 12:58, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Warning not to delete content from the personal talk page of other editors

Please do not delete content from my personal talk pages by removing template tags and headings as you did here. Varbas (talk) 18:07, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why Don't We Get Drunk

What kind of cleanup are you suggesting? The article has one secondary source which barely mentions the song. You really need to read WP:NSONGS; non-charting songs are rarely notable. Simply being performed by a notable act isn't enough; otherwise, we'd be cluttered with a zillion two-sentence stubs on obscure album tracks, so we have to have some sort of minimum standards. Would you object to a merge/redirect? Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 16:10, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't ask for a merge. You asked for a delete. Also, the article you are asking be deleted has more content then two sentences. While many songs that don't make the charts aren't notable, this isn't one of them and as you can see from the other votes, you are wrong on the notability. Goodday sir, you lose.-- Cozret (talk) 20:52, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]