User talk:LM2000/Archive 8

A kitten for you!

Welcome brother. I failed to notice the WWE acronym in the Dwayne Johnson article. My bad lol .

Oh.. Happy New Year (belated). !!

Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:39, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's no problem, happy New Year to you as well!LM2000 (talk) 07:42, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewer newsletter February 2020

Hello LM2000,

Source Guide Discussion

The first NPP source guide discussion is now underway. It covers a wide range of sources in Ghana with the goal of providing more guidance to reviewers about sources they might see when reviewing pages. Hopefully, new page reviewers will join others interested in reliable sources and those with expertise in these sources to make the discussion a success.

Redirects

New to NPP? Looking to try something a little different? Consider patrolling some redirects. Redirects are relatively easy to review, can be found easily through the New Pages Feed. You can find more information about how to patrol redirects at WP:RPATROL.

Discussions and Resources

There is an ongoing discussion around changing notifications for new editors who attempt to write articles.
A recent discussion of whether Michelin starred restraunts are notable was archived without closure.
A resource page with links pertinent for reviewers was created this month.
A proposal to increase the scope of G5 was withdrawn.

Refresher

Geographic regions, areas and places generally do not need general notability guideline type sourcing. When evaluating whether an article meets this notability guideline please also consider whether it might actually be a form of WP:SPAM for a development project (e.g. PR for a large luxury residential development) and not actually covered by the guideline.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7095 Low – 4991 High – 7095

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

16:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Scarlett

Hi, LM2000. Can you help me? Some months ago, I wrote the character section for Scarlett Bordeaux, using her social media and some interviews for the description. however, an user removed.Since you helped me with the Cornette section, do you think you can re-write the section in a way where it's encyclopedic? Here is a version with my section. [1] Thank you --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 23:08, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of League of Nations (professional wrestling)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article League of Nations (professional wrestling) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 12:21, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of League of Nations (professional wrestling)

The article League of Nations (professional wrestling) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:League of Nations (professional wrestling) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 13:41, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Russo/cornette

Hi. Thanks for helping with the Russo Cornette section. I started the Drak Side of the Ring and both argued in the Montreal Screwjob episode. Maybe you can include it. Russo thinks Cornette style is to 60s and Jim think Russo has no respect for wrestling. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 14:57, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I started watching at the end of season one, so I missed that, but I see some sources covered the episode. I removed a claim that said Russo was involved in Cornette leaving WWF's writing team in the 90s though, do you know where I can find a source for that.LM2000 (talk) 21:58, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mean Russo left WWF because of Cornette? Or Cornette left WWF because of Russo?Anyway, maybe I can find something in wrestlinginc. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 14:09, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

this edit said Cornette left the WWF writing team after conflicts with Russo. It wasn't sourced so I removed it but it may be true. I couldn't find anything reliable.LM2000 (talk) 18:22, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I made a quick search. I found that Cornette left the commitee after attacking/insulting Kevin Dunn. [2] --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 21:56, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of League of Nations (professional wrestling)

The article League of Nations (professional wrestling) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:League of Nations (professional wrestling) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 12:02, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

- MrX 🖋 11:39, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Samuel de Champlain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chambly (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:56, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Bearer

Hello, LM. I have seen you edited Paul Bearer's C&A. Do you have any sources for the Gulf Coast Pioneer Award 2001 Member of the Board of Directors? I don0t knwo what it is. I removed because I couldn find any source, but maybe you know better. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 11:55, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You were right to remove it. It could be real but not notable but someone already added a Thesz/Tragos award he never got so we should not take our chances.LM2000 (talk) 19:55, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewer newsletter June 2020

Hello LM2000,

Your help can make a difference

NPP Sorting can be a great way to find pages needing new page patrolling that match your strengths and interests. Using ORES, it divides articles into topics such as Literature or Chemistry and on Geography. Take a look and see if you can find time to patrol a couple pages a day. With over 10,000 pages in the queue, the highest it's been since ACPERM, your help could really make a difference.

Google Adds New Languages to Google Translate

In late February, Google added 5 new languages to Google Translate: Kinyarwanda, Odia (Oriya), Tatar, Turkmen and Uyghur. This expands our ability to find and evaluate sources in those languages.

Discussions and Resources

A discussion on handling new article creation by paid editors is ongoing at the Village Pump.
Also at the Village Pump is a discussion about limiting participation at Articles for Deletion discussion.
A proposed new speedy deletion criteria for certain kinds of redirects ended with no consensus.
Also ending with no change was a proposal to change how we handle certain kinds of vector images.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 10271 Low – 4991 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Up for deletion again

The Category:Professional wrestling jobbers is up for deletion again. Davidgoodheart (talk) 02:07, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category has been kept

You probably know by now the Category:Professional wrestling jobbers has been kept. I have created a subcategory called Category:Professional wrestling jobbers to the stars to go with it. The reason for this is because "jobbers to the stars" differ greatly from regular jobbers. I have added Johnny Rodz and Koko B. Ware who are "jobbers to the stars" to it. If you know of anymore wrestlers who were "jobbers to the stars" please feel free to add them to the new subcategory. Davidgoodheart (talk) 01:33, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Terry Peder Rasmussen

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Terry Peder Rasmussen you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Larry Hockett -- Larry Hockett (talk) 01:01, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Terry Peder Rasmussen

The article Terry Peder Rasmussen you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Terry Peder Rasmussen for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Larry Hockett -- Larry Hockett (talk) 05:21, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Terry Peder Rasmussen

The article Terry Peder Rasmussen you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Terry Peder Rasmussen for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Larry Hockett -- Larry Hockett (talk) 14:41, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TheBandTNA.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TheBandTNA.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 05:10, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bull Dempsey

Hello, LM. I have one question and I think you can help me. During the Speaking Out Movement, Bull Dempsey was accused and removed from his job in NYWC promotion. I included the info with a source (411mania) but the information is always deleted by IPs. I don't know, looks suspicious, like some people trying to delete bad news. But, the last IP noticed that the promotion deleted the tweet. Do you think it's similar to James Ellsworth? Thanks --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 09:37, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

HHH Pedrigree, sorry for delayed response, I've been busy in my personal life lately. 411Mania is borderline reliable, but Fightful covered it with a passing mention. I think it's clear that James's suspension happened and that isn't a controversial claim. However, it looks like he has since been reinstated and sources haven't covered that story. If they had, I'd say we should include a short paragraph about his suspension and reinstatement, like we do with the Pat Patterson situation in the 90s. It's a tough call but in my opinion, BLP concerns favor omission of the entire story. Abuse claims should have a high bar and I don't think the coverage has enough depth to include at this point, especially since we may not be able to tell the whole story with the sources we have right now. But that's just my opinion.LM2000 (talk) 05:27, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I was thinking the same since the promotion deleted the post and has no coverage after that. Thanks --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 14:38, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I have one more question. As you can see, I'm having problems with the Melina article. PWInsider confirmed she signed a contract with WWE. However, Melina denied the information. There is some kind of policy about this? PWInsider is a reliable, independent source. As you can read, PWInsider confirmed after talking with several sources, so doesn't look like a hoax or rumor, it's a confirmation. Melina denied, but pro wrestlers denies a lot of thing. Almost no wrestler confirm a contract with a promotion. PWInsider, in 2019, also confirmed WWE signed John Morrison. Morrison and his wife, Taya, denied the information but one month later, Morrison appeared in WWE. I think the information about Melina should stay since 1, PWInsider is a reliable source 2, PWInsider had similar news in the past and they were right 3, Melina is too involved with the information. 4, PWInsider calls it a confirmation, not a rumor. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 14:45, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you. If she never does appear for the company then it can be removed but I think it should stay for now.LM2000 (talk) 00:33, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Tiny the Terrible

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tiny the Terrible you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 06:01, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Tiny the Terrible

The article Tiny the Terrible you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Tiny the Terrible for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 17:21, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Tiny the Terrible

The article Tiny the Terrible you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Tiny the Terrible for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 21:21, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bob Ryder

Thank you for creating this article LM2000!★Trekker (talk) 18:22, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. It's always good to hear from you.LM2000 (talk) 18:26, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks LM2000.★Trekker (talk) 19:35, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol December Newsletter

Hello LM2000,

Year in review

It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by Rosguill who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to JTtheOG and Onel5969 who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to John B123, Hughesdarren, and Mccapra who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by DannyS712 which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.

Rank	Username	Num reviews	Log
1	DannyS712 bot III (talk)	67,552	Patrol Page Curation
2	Rosguill (talk)	63,821	Patrol Page Curation
3	John B123 (talk)	21,697	Patrol Page Curation
4	Onel5969 (talk)	19,879	Patrol Page Curation
5	JTtheOG (talk)	12,901	Patrol Page Curation
6	Mcampany (talk)	9,103	Patrol Page Curation
7	DragonflySixtyseven (talk)	6,401	Patrol Page Curation
8	Mccapra (talk)	4,918	Patrol Page Curation
9	Hughesdarren (talk)	4,520	Patrol Page Curation
10	Utopes (talk)	3,958	Patrol Page Curation

Reviewer of the Year

John B123 has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.

NPP Technical Achievement Award

As a special recognition and thank you DannyS712 has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

18:17, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Titanic task

Hello,LM. How are you? As you know, I want to include reception and legacy section in pro wrestling articles. I have one in mind, but is huge, titanic, colossal... Vince McMahon legacy. As you know, McMahon is one of the most influential figures, as well as a plarized one. I think we have a lot of material, from the territory days, the mr mcmahon persona, the current booking 50/50 of their stars. Do you want to help me with this section? --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 16:59, 14 December 2020 (UTC) PD. The titanic task is because Titan Towers. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 16:59, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nice play on words! It's a good idea, I'll see what can be done about it.LM2000 (talk) 19:30, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Great. I think the following: Legacy about WWF becoming a national promotion and reception of other promoters at the time. The steroid scandal. Mr. McMahon character reception. Decrease of ratings since 2010. Booking 50/50. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 10:10, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

HHH Pedrigree I started it. Obviously there's some expansion to be done, but it's a start.LM2000 (talk) 05:32, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yo Ho Ho

★Trekker (talk) is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Christmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec16a}}~~~~ to your friends' talk pages.

★Trekker (talk) 17:31, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Season's greetings to you as well!LM2000 (talk) 15:19, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

PG-Era

Hello. I have seen you improved the PG-Era article. Maybe, I can help with two thing. One, on the internet is said that one of the reasons to change was the bleeding between Jericho and Michaels at GAB, but I can't find any source. Also, I remember a few name changes for the kid-friendly program. The FU was changed to Attitude Adjustment, the One Night Stand was changed to Extreme Rules. I don't remember if there are some other examples. BTW: Thanks for your edition on Vince's article :) --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 15:10, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Due to the holiday, I'm not sure how much more work I'll be able to do today, but I'll see what I can do. Happy Holidays to you.LM2000 (talk) 15:18, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays to you too :) --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 15:43, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited PG Era, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]