User talk:Kyodaiteeter

Kyodaiteeter, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Kyodaiteeter! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Dathus (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:09, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Kyodaiteeter! Thank you for your contributions. I am Vanjagenije and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Vanjagenije (talk) 23:31, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Electricity Generation from Underutilized Energy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Electricity Generation from Underutilized Energy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electricity Generation from Underutilized Energy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tchaliburton (talk) 05:25, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hoya-Boya for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hoya-Boya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hoya-Boya until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gbawden (talk) 08:59, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because it appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.

August 2014

Hello, I'm Blakegripling ph. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Pocari Sweat, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Blake Gripling (talk) 14:15, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Obachan in Osaka

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Obachan in Osaka requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Arjayay (talk) 07:48, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Obachan in Osaka

The article Obachan in Osaka has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unencyclopaedic content / incoherent / probably a coathat. Agree with CSD: a group of "forty seven women over fifty in Osaka" unfixable mess

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Widefox; talk 08:10, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Smartphone user’s accident

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Smartphone user’s accident requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Bikeroo (talk) 06:03, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The reformation of entrance exams for unviersities

Hello Kyodaiteeter,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged The reformation of entrance exams for unviersities for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Mike1901 (talk) 08:50, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of Obachan in Osaka

A tag has been placed on Obachan in Osaka requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. Arjayay (talk) 08:53, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sports Drink

Hello Kyodaiteeter,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Sports Drink for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, [[{{{article}}}]].

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Mike1901 (talk) 08:59, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Issues with smartphone use for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Issues with smartphone use is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Issues with smartphone use until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. slakr^\ talk / 09:17, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Overuse of electronic devices

Hello Kyodaiteeter,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Overuse of electronic devices for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, Overuse of electronic.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Vanjagenije (talk) 09:56, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wo Sukuu(Mamoru) Kai

Hello Kyodaiteeter,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Wo Sukuu(Mamoru) Kai for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, Wo sukuu kai.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Vanjagenije (talk) 10:02, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about World Cup Surprise

Hello, Kyodaiteeter,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether World Cup Surprise should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Cup Surprise .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Vanjagenije (talk) 10:07, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Wo sukuu kai

The article Wo sukuu kai has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Essay consisting primarily of original research

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DAJF (talk) 11:57, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kyoto University Mudslide in Japan

The article Kyoto University Mudslide in Japan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to be a haphazard collection of details about various events with no obvious connection to Kyoto University.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DAJF (talk) 12:05, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Contribution to yuru-chara

Thanks for your contribution to the yuru-chara article, but unfortunately I have decided to revert your changes for a number of reasons: I did not think the content was up to Wikipedia standards, it had no proper references, and I don't think it was an appropriate location for this content - Mayumaro is relatively unknown compared to other more popular mascots who have little to no information on the English-language Wikipedia, yet this content was taking up nearly a quarter of this article. If you think Mayumaro is notable, please create a separate article - but I suspect it will get deleted if the content is not improved significantly. Please see here and here for more advice. --Zilog Jones (talk) 12:54, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Wo sukuu kai for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wo sukuu kai is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wo sukuu kai until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DAJF (talk) 13:39, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ultimate in Japan

added links pointing to Maplewood and Columbia High School

Kyoyasai

added a link pointing to Basin

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bocchi (Japanese) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bocchi (Japanese) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bocchi (Japanese) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vanjagenije (talk) 15:27, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mfield (Oi!) 05:11, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Creation of non encyclopedic articles

Hi, you have been blocked temporarily from editing as your continual creation of articles that don't meet our standards for inclusion is causing large amounts of work for the community to clear up. I would encourage you to read up on our community policies on subject notability and verifiability before attempting to create any more articles. Also look at our articles for creation project where you can suggest article topics and receive advice. Mfield (Oi!) 05:15, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of University clubs in Japan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article University clubs in Japan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/University clubs in Japan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gbawden (talk) 11:24, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rent a Coop

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rent a Coop requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Gbawden (talk) 12:39, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Kyodaiteeter

Hi! I've been reading the articles that you have been writing for Wikipedia. There are some very interesting topics there. Unfortunately, they are not suitable for Wikipedia so many of them are being deleted. I am an Australian living in Kobe. What topics are you interested in? If we work together I think we can make some good articles that will not be deleted. I can read and write Japanese too, so I think we can make a good team. Have a good day! AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 22:59, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Student projects?

Hi Kyodaiteeter. I noticed the comment you left on Athomeinkobe's Talk page, which implies you are a teacher uploading your students' work to Wikipedia in the form of new articles. Apart from the fact that this is causing extensive work for other editors who have to subsequently review and clean up the poor quality articles, this more importantly constitutes a rather serious copyright problem. If you are not the author or creator of the material you are uploading, then this is a copyright violation, and you need to stop immediately. If you are teaching students and you are encouraging them to create material for Wikipedia, you should first read the guidelines at Wikipedia:Student assignments thoroughly yourself, get your students to make sure they also fully understand the guidelines and Wikipedia policies, and then get them to create their own individual accounts and upload the material themselves. While I can understand that Wikipedia may seem like a great way to get students to practise their English in public, that's not what Wikipedia is intended for, and if they are Japanese natives, they may be able to contribute more constructively on the Japanese language Wikipedia. Sorry to sound harsh, but feel free to drop me a line if you still have any questions. --DAJF (talk) 03:27, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you DAJF and forgive the belated response. I will keep this in mind and I will no longer upload their articles. This is the first time I have done this, and I have learned quite a bit. Had not realize there was a Student assignments wiki. Sandbox looks like the way to go. Forgive the troubles caused and will be more careful in the future. What is interesting is that some of the topics that are on Japanese Wikipedia are not considered valuable on the English Wikipedia. This is hard for me to comprehend. Also, I am not sure why non-English sources are considered unreliable, especially when the information is often a primary source or is more detailed and actually more reliable. I feel that some of the judgement of some the others editors in this matter is a bit hasty and biased Kyodaiteeter (talk) 06:18, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Shukko

Hello, Kyodaiteeter,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Shukko should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shukko .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Imaginatorium (talk) 18:21, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of PC remote control incident

The article PC remote control incident has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to be student essay cobbled together from lots of news articles in Japanese. The author clearly admits articles of this type were just uploaded student essays See: [1].

Not sure why the above comment is relevant. This was an important incident in Japan, and the comment re: the students work is quite uncalled forKyodaiteeter (talk) 06:03, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AstroCog (talk) 02:58, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Botchi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Botchi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Botchi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Ryūlóng (琉竜) 10:54, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

yea, I expect dis kind of behaviour from Ryulong — Preceding unsigned comment added by But I wont stop! (talk • contribs) 16:56, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Shimanekko

The article Shimanekko has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence this topic passes WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:58, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]