User talk:KwameJock

KwameJack, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi KwameJack! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:10, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

Tea House

Thanks for inviting me KwameJack (talk) 01:43, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Lovelace after her marriage ceremony in 2017.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Lovelace after her marriage ceremony in 2017.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:30, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Rudolf Schirmer Ampofo-Domfeh at his wedding dinner in 2017.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Rudolf Schirmer Ampofo-Domfeh at his wedding dinner in 2017.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:30, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Rudolf & Schirmers Enterprises

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Rudolf & Schirmers Enterprises requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. TonyBallioni (talk) 04:51, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rudolf Schirmer Ampofo-Domfeh

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rudolf Schirmer Ampofo-Domfeh, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. TonyBallioni (talk) 04:52, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lovelace Schirmer Ampofo-Domfeh

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lovelace Schirmer Ampofo-Domfeh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. TonyBallioni (talk) 04:54, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked - promotion

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

It appears that you are only here to promote The Rudolf & Schirmers Enterprises and its partners/owners. Use of Wikipedia for promotion is not permitted. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 05:10, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is not in my interest to promote The Rudolf & Schirmers Enterprises and it’s owners, my interest is to create an article that will inspire other young people using their story to success as an example. This is why for 2 years now, I’ve been been researching into the owners of the company and how they made it to successful at this young age but not necessarily promoting them or their businesses. KwameJack (talk) 08:15, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:RS LOGO.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:RS LOGO.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:30, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Contest Deletion.

I admit I didn’t provide more information regarding the image I used as logo for the Rudolf & Schirmers Enterprises. Before I used the image, I placed a phone call to Studio4four, official website designer of the company’s previous website rudolfschirmer.com if usage of the logo was allowed to be adopted by a third in creating an article or news item and he got back to me days later, indicating that I was permitted to use such logo in such activities as article or related but cannot be used for such activities such as commercial or promotions.

I therefore suggest that this article should not be deleted but however can assist me in better defining the usage of the image, as it’s the official logo of the company. KwameJack (talk) 07:26, 5 June 2019 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

KwameJock (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #25483 was submitted on Jun 05, 2019 08:44:02. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 08:44, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

{{unblock-auto|2=Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "KwameJack". The reason given for KwameJack's block is: "Promotion / advertising-only account: Appears to be here to promote The Rudolf & Schirmers Enterprises and its owners".|3=Premeditated Chaos|4=9060870} KwameJack (talk) 12:35, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are blocked directly. Please use {{unblock|Your reason here}}. Please copy it when viewing this page, so it works properly. You might also want to read WP:GAB Jannik Schwaß (talk) 12:43, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KwameJock (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I admit that I didn’t provide more information regarding the images that I used to describe the subjects of my articles especially the logo of the company. Before using the logo, I placed a call to Studio4four, the developer of the official website of the company, and he ascertain to me that the logo was free to use it was designed by the market for public consumption, however ever, he indicated that it’s not permissible to use if am engaging in promotional, or commercial activities. Regarding the issue of promoting the company and it’s owners, that’s far from my intent as suggested by colleague editors, my intent for writing this article about these subjects is to use their success story to motivate young and ambitious youths of Africa to continue pursuing their dreams and aspirations regardless of the challenges. I therefore request that my account be unblocked so that I can restructure the articles and with your help, suggestions and edits be able to put them in good shape befitting Wikipedia

Decline reason:

Given off-wiki evidence I found, this is not plausible. Your relationship with that company is far, far, far closer than you are admitting here. Yamla (talk) 13:07, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sockpuppet account User:Biggio500
[edit]

~~Note that creating sockpuppets (as Confirmed by checkuser) to get around this block is not allowed. Reaper Eternal (talk) 17:15, 9 June 2019 (UTC)~~[reply]

Actually, it is. Given that wikipedia is a free public webpage (like Facebook and Google) that invites the entire world to edit and contribute, no other editor has a right to decide whether someone else is allowed to edit or not, especially somoene that visited the site, created a username and started editing themselves. KwameJock (talk) 08:09, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KwameJock (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

There really is no such thing as "block evasion". It was made up by some connoisseur who thinks they have a right to decide who is able to edit and who isn't. Don't worry, we'll be back.

Decline reason:

Good to know, we'll keep an eye out. In the meantime, since you clearly have no interest in abiding by the community's rules, I'm switching off your talkpage. Yunshui ^雲 _水 09:40, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.