User talk:Kuyabribri/Archive 4

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

SPEEDY DELETION NOMINATION OF: "The Biggest Loser Couples 4 (FAKE)"

I am Big_Lose and I think my article SHOULDN'T meet criteria for speedy deletion. I am making an informative article. Please do not "speedily delete" it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Big Lose (talk • contribs) 16:33, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

User space deletions

Thanks for your note. I shall certainly post that instruction, since there was no point in someone editing what was only a shell of an article which is now up and running. Viva-Verdi (talk) 18:46, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thank you for the headsup-it was a user trying to prove some point.--Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 13:18, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Previously deleted articles from AfD can be WP:SPEEDY deleted

FYI - if the article was previously deleted from an AfD [1], it is a candidate for speedy deletion WP:SPEEDY (G4 i think) Db-repost Active Banana (talk) 16:34, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

I'm aware of G4; however, the previous deletion was over 2 years ago and one of the criteria for G4 is that it is substantially similar to the deleted version. Without knowledge of what the deleted version looked like, I opted for a second AfD. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 16:38, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Guy Katsav

Hello Kuyabribri. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Guy Katsav, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article claims importance/significance of the subject. Thank you. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 19:07, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

McLean page.

The page you redirected to does not contain the full story of Mclean. It is significant that the the full information is available. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Catchmclean (talk • contribs) 20:31, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

Please see Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Criminals and crime victims which contains the notability guidelines for inclusion of articles on perpetrators of crimes. Additionally, Wikipedia is not a place for advocacy. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 20:39, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

Why are you editing the Kruse International page?

You don't appear to be in the collector car business. Is this some sort of joke to you? It isn't to those of us in the collector car selling and buying business. —Preceding unsigned comment added by CollectorCarSeller (talk • contribs) 01:51, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

The issue has already been explained to you on your talk page and I don't see the need to respond any further. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 03:44, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Kuyabribri. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Usernames_for_administrator_attention.
Message added 20:45, 17 August 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Look at Walmart llc, please. Thanks! Endofskull (talk) 20:45, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

I'm not sure what you are asking of me – I'm not an administrator and cannot impose a block. I can only identify problematic reports at UAA. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 20:58, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of people killed by dogs in the United States

An article that you have been involved in editing, List of people killed by dogs in the United States, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of people killed by dogs in the United States. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Dodo bird (talk) 02:42, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

Michelle Franzen

I am a fan of michelle franzen and originally posted her bio and without going into the details I found that she would prefer not to have a wiki. I have not updated it in years and others have not either so I nominated to remove it based on her wishes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tentrial (talk • contribs) 15:35, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Curtis Brown

A player has to play in a regular season game to pass WP:Athlete, pre season games don't count.--Yankees10 16:48, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

I don't see that distinction in the policy page (I had just gone over it before I contested the prod), but like I said I won't oppose deletion via AfD. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 18:06, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

re: Proposed deletion of 1906 (film)

Are you sure that it is ineligible for prod, even when the result of the previous AfD was delete? The Hero of This Nation (talk) 19:40, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

The policy states that the article fails prod if it has been discussed at AfD. I interpret this to mean that even if the result of said AfD was "delete", the article cannot be deleted via prod. Either way, I am not opposed to the deletion of this article and only removed the prod as a procedural step. I'm pretty sure it won't survive an AfD. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 20:42, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Hello, Kuyabribri. You have new messages at Jeepday's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Proposed move

Just wondering, how do you propose something for a move/redirection? Thanks. --☯The Dark Lord of Wiki☯ (talk) 17:55, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

See the instructions at WP:RM. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 18:03, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Hey I wanted to see what you think.

I recently edited an article cld "Captive Children" or possib ly "Children in Captivity" im thinking looking by the discussion Im not the only one. It used to have names of children in various kidnapping cases. Now some of those are eraded and instead many names of detainees from guatanomo bay are added. Now, they are in captivity, but not illegally so. Whats mnore, i don't know exactly what is going on with the article. Can you look and decide if it looks right or not? Just asking. Im not sure what to think. Oh, my edits got reversed like all the others, btw. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lollipopfop (talk • contribs) 04:19, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

I responded on Category talk:Children kept in captivity, which is what I assume you are referring to. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 04:46, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Collaborative news on quippd

Hey, I noticed that you had recently edited the Omar Khadr article, and I hoped that you could help out on another collaborative community edited project.

I run quippd, a collaboratively edited social news site, which mixes elements of Wikis, social networking, and social news sites. You can get some more information about what we are doing at: http://quippd.com/about/intro

Basically, we want to get good coverage on news stories, collaboratively edited, like Wikipedia. We are trying to take the ideas of WikiFactCheck -- to make news less biased and speedier (unlike something like Wikinews).

I hope you check us out -- and feel free to contact me with any questions, comments, or concerns.

--Yoasif (talk) 01:57, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Afro-master (comb)

An article that you have been involved in editing, Afro-master (comb), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Afro-master (comb). Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 20:26, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Added by User:Blanchardb

Hello, Kuyabribri. You have new messages at Blanchardb's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

A Missing Chromosome

Given that it fails WP:NALBUMS, the ambiguity of the comments on the talk page and at the AFD, would you object to a redirect to the band's article as WP:MUSIC recommends? 69.181.249.92 (talk) 19:58, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

I say open another AfD first; if there is no consensus redirect it to the band's discography page. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 20:08, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Clerk elections

Hi, this is just to inform you that elections for Clerkship at WP:UAA have started on the talk page. You have been sent this message because you were recently active in handling submissions or discussions. Discussion is ongoing and you are encouraged to voice your opinion on the candidates.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Fridae'sDoom (talk) at 06:44, 14 September 2010 (UTC).

Prod vs Afd

Thanks for fixing that for me. I was trying to put the notification on the page itself, but I guess I put the wrong one on. How long does it need to be in Afd before it can be deleted? Looks like no one has weighed in on the discussion yet... -Bonus Onus (talk) 02:47, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

The standard for AfD is 7 days, though it can be shorter, e.g., if it meets speedy deletion criteria, or longer if it needs to be re-listed to get consensus. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 13:48, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Emmonsite

I removed your speedy tag and added information. Bearian (talk) 22:48, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

PROD

In the edit history of Roundness (geology) you removed the Prod tag with the comment -"inappropriately used dated prod template". What do you mean the PROD tag was inappropriately used. At the moment I do not agree with your comment. However, I am interested in why you think the tag was not appropriately used. ---- Steve Quinn (talk) 17:45, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

No need for a more elaborate response. Apparently we were messaging each other on each other's talk page at the same time. The short explanation you gave is understandable and wholly reasonable. It is as if you read my mind :). Thanks for your time. ---- Steve Quinn (talk) 17:51, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

I should at least explain my comment about the "inappropriately used dated prod template", which I'm assuming refers to the edit summary of this edit. That edit was a reversion of this edit by the article creator, in which he inappropriately (and inexplicably) directly inserted the {{dated prod}} template. I asked for clarification on his talk page, which I got, and that is why I took the action as I explained on your talk page. I should also note that I completely forgot to note that I removed your prod in the edit summary when I actually did ([2]). —KuyaBriBri^Talk 18:03, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

relisting

I have commented there there Off2riorob (talk) 18:10, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

UC Pomona

The confusion might arise from the fact the terrain where Cal Poly Pomona stands belonged to the University of California system from 1932 until 1949 Reference. I have seen the university wrongly being referred as such in other places as well. 1, 2, or 3.

South Medford, Massachusetts

Real places are almost never deleted, and in any case, ProD is the wrong process. Bearian (talk) 19:14, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Trying to sort this out

Hello, Kuyabribri. You have new messages at Montanabw's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Step 3 AFD

Thanks for catching this. I use twinkle and just assumed that it would take care of that for me (or at least I think it usually does). I did have to run it twice to get it to work, so perhaps something was wrong with my connection at that time. In any case, good job! --Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib) 10:15, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Coanda-1910

Please check my last entry in my talk page. I can give you more details. Thank you in advance! --Lsorin (talk) 16:54, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Hello again, a new user Amatulic removed the POV and the Expert-subject and some references from Coanda-1910. He gave no reason. --Lsorin (talk) 20:17, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Amatulic is the admin who protected the article and has responded on the talk page. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 20:29, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

ServiceMagic AfD

Thanks for catching the non-logging of the AfD. My previous AfDs had been done automatically by Twinkle, so I was getting lazy. ScottyBerg (talk) 20:16, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

No worries. Oddly, a significant number of the non-logged AfD's I've come across were actually created using Twinkle. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 21:07, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Really? I just did a couple by Twinkle concurrently with the ServiceMagic one which I did manually, and both were logged. Sometimes Twinkle malfunctions, so it's good to know that this is one area where it doesn't always work. ScottyBerg (talk) 16:45, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Economics of cervical cancer screening

Hello Kuyabribri. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Economics of cervical cancer screening, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The reason given is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 22:10, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Archive deletion nomination

I really don't have an issue with your removing the tag, I was unsure as to the best route to talke dealing with the archiving of material prematurely. The material has been restored to the talk page and the other editor has apparently chosen to take a wiki break. It was premature to delete as it included the results of a GA review. You could leave it as it is and I could use it in the future for archiving or we could delete it now. What do you think is best and how best to go about it? Regards, Justin talk 18:55, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

Since the content has been restored to the active talk page, I have tagged it as a G6 "Housekeeping" speedy deletion. If that is declined, I see two options: 1) blank the page and leave a note to the effect of, "This is a placeholder for the next archive of Talk:Gibraltar"; or 2) list it at MfD. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 19:36, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

That sounds fine to me, thank you for your help. Justin talk 19:56, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

Prodding Illegal Activities (Animals) Act 1875

I've removed your prodding of Illegal Activities (Animals) Act 1875. While I do believe the article should probably be deleted, it was previously prodded back in April 2007, so it is ineligible to be re-prodded. Gabbe (talk) 15:50, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

I have found this Hansard site which lists Acts of Parliament, and there is no mention of it. Will you AfD it, or shall I? Regards, JohnCD (talk) 22:36, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

If it's a hoax, CSD it. But it's not

I'm following User talk:Wikindia24x7 for a few days. His district articles may be AFD firewood, there may unnecessary puffery, but Indore Zoo is not a hoax. The place exist, although there's a certain ambiguity: Chidia Ghar (Zoo), the subject of this article, is also called Kamala Nehru Park (Zoo). So says the municipal site [3]. I'd recommend you to change prod rationale for something more appropriate to the case. As you should know, a hoax verdict almost certainly leads to an indef, and it's not one of those cases.

Cheers, East of Borschov 15:43, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Ariya Astrobeat Arkestra

Hello...

I was given the code '{db-u1}' by User talk:Alexf to delete the temporary page for Ariya Astrobeat Arkestra which he originally deleted. With his assistance we have amended the new article which is here - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Wikimuso/Ariya_Astrobeat_Arkestra

Would it be possible for you to help me re-assign it?

Many thanks! Wikimuso (talk) 14:32, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Hello again... sorry to bother you. Alex has sorted it all out for me! Many thanks... (i'm a bit new to this, so it's great to have such dedicated administrators around!) Wikimuso (talk) 14:35, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Well I was going to say it looks like it's been taken care of but you beat me to the punch. And BTW I'm not an administrator. Don't start any rumors. Cheers! —KuyaBriBri^Talk 14:36, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Added by User:A341672

GBC Asset Management - a division of Pembroke Management is one of the oldest 'growth' style investment managers in Canada, and should be included in Wiki. There are many other firm, with less historical significance that are included. Evidently, I have had some difficulty describing the principles the firm has practices since 1968 -- principles that distinguish its investment philosophy and strategy from the strategies used by other firms -- without sounding like an advertisement. I would appreciate any suggestions you have that would improve the piece. Cheers, (A341672 (talk) 17:47, 5 November 2010 (UTC))

Please check the "Starting an article" and "Your first article" links in the welcome message at the top of your talk page for help. Additionally, you need to provide reliable sources that establish that this company meets notability guidelines for inclusion of companies. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 18:38, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Amusement Park WikiProject

Hello Kuyabribri. Recently, the Amusement Parks WikiProject was reformatted and revived. As part of this process other related WikiProjects (such as Disneyland, Herschend Family Entertainment, Universal Parks & Resorts and Walt Disney World) were also revived and have now become part of the Amusement Park WikiProject as task forces. If you would like to remain listed as a member on these WikiProjects please re-add your name to the appropriate lists at the participants page. All names currently on the list have been cleared. If you have any queries, please do not hesitate to contact me directly. Thank you for your cooperation, Themeparkgc  Talk  08:22, 6 November 2010 (UTC).

Re:prod Removal

from here - you know perfectly well that as an IP, I can't create pages (which is rather a flaw in the whole process of the deletion thing) - so would you mind doing it then? 212.20.248.35 (talk) 08:58, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

• Done: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of NFL records held by Jerry Rice (2nd nomination). —KuyaBriBri^Talk 14:22, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Jon Hammer redirect page

I originally created Jon Hammer as a redirect to Jon Ludvig Hammer but then noticed at the former's WhatLinksHere page that it was linked to from the articles Piranha Press and List of horror films: 1980s. In those articles the name "Jon Hammer" seemed to refer to the (apparently not very notable) comic creator and someone who was once in an obscure horror movie, respectively, but because of the redirect page I had created, those links were now redirected to the article about the chess player instead of just appearing as red links as they ought to. I instantly regretted having created the redirect page in the first place but didn't know how to have it deleted, so I decided to change it into a disambiguation page to avoid having the name "Jon Hammer" link to the wrong article. As I am now an extremely infrequent contributor to Wikipedia and may not log in again for a long time, I will leave it to you to decide on the best course of action in this case. Cheers, Bwiki (talk) 21:57, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

bye-bye jeff miller?

Hi Kuyabribri -- If you feel the Jeff Miller page is non-substantial, then please feel free to delete it. I just saw a bunch of newspapers articles on him recently, and have seen his books around, and thought he might be prominent enough, but I could be wrong. I don't have any relation to him -- never met the guy! Thanks for your tip. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pumpkin888 (talk • contribs) 18:51, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

User:Leelord, Nicolas Haywoo, and the Priory of Sion article

User:Leelord seems to be a crank obsessed with pushing the idea that “Nicolas Haywood” is the last Grand Master of the Priory of Sion, an organization which has been proven to be non-existent and part of an elaborate hoax (See his last edit of the Priory of Sion article). What can we do to neutralize this disruptive user once and for all? --Loremaster (talk) 23:35, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

At this time I see nothing that is grounds for a block or even reportable, but if he continues uploads another hoax warn with {{uw-hoax}} (a single-level warning). If he does it again, report at WP:AIV. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 03:02, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

Tiffany Midge

The text is available as GFDL from nativewiki - have included reference on talk page. (Hanksville and Nativewiki are the same site, incidentally - hanksville is an earlier iteration). Vizjim (talk) 18:14, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Otto Wood

Hello Kuyabribri. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Otto Wood, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. ϢereSpielChequers 17:06, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

Question

Do you like yugioh? Because you were obviously looking at my article. What kind of decks do you have? —Preceding unsigned comment added by KardGame (talk • contribs) 19:26, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia is an enyclopedia. It is not a webspace to collaborate on any subject not related to building the encyclopedia. See Comparison of wiki farms for a listing of sites using wiki technology that may be willing/able to host your project. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 19:51, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Alternative outlets is another page to check for a site that may be willing/able to host your project. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 19:52, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

Can you help me make Yugioh Deck a better article, I really want to create an article which shows other yugioh fans decks they can build. —Preceding unsigned comment added by KardGame (talk • contribs) 19:59, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

I have said all I needed to say in my initial reply and I am not responding to you any further. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 20:05, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the help

Thanks for the aid on the AfD for Blame sydney; as you suspected, it was a twinkle failure, and it happened at a time when I didn't have the time to figure out what all needed to be cleaned up. (Twinkle is very useful, except when it's not.) --Nat Gertler (talk) 21:39, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

my page was unjustly deleted

my page LadyKiller(band) was deleted. it should not have been. Before I completed my explanation about why it should not have been deleted as it contained many cited sources and explained an interesting relationship between world renowned recording artists and a world renowned studio - I came to find it had already been deleted. If this page has been taken down - then all of the wikipedias related to it - or any wikipedia page about any musician or band should be taken down as well. —Preceding unsigned comment added by LadyKillerRock (talk • contribs) 01:03, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Please give them a userfied copy to work on. Gigs (talk) 01:13, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Ah, you aren't an admin either. Nevermind. I'll point them at WP:REFUND Gigs (talk) 01:24, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanks Gigs for resolving this in my absence. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 14:58, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

my B.o.S.M. page

Hello, thank you for contacting me. I'm working for Wikipedia Saves Public Art, so I'm brand new at this. I was intending to make a sandbox page to get this article (bust of Sherman Minton) going, but I guess I am following the directions wrong. I'm going to try to fix it, but I'm still not sure what I'm doing. I guess if a few hours pass by and I still haven't taken it down, feel free to go ahead and delete it and I'll find some help. Thank you again for the heads-up. -twchalwick

I think you misunderstood. You are more than welcome to work on the draft at User:Twchalwick/Bust of Sherman Minton. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 19:35, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Duncan, Fraser & Bridges Insurance Agency Inc. Page Deleted -- Can you help me fix it?

Hi Kuyabribri -- Can you help me re-write my article so it can be un-deleted? I'm new to Wikipedia and I'd like to get better at this. You noted that my page was 'spam.' Is there a way to change how I word things so that it is acceptable? I'd really appreciate any help. Cordially, Cleighholder (talk) 03:16, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

First off, the official guideline concerning spam is at WP:ADVERT. User:Kuyabribri/Policies#Advertising contains some indicators I look for when looking for advertising content. Although the latter is my opinion only, it is largely based on the trends I've seen in the thousands of advertising/spam articles I've come across.

Since the article has been deleted and I am not an administrator, I don't remember exactly what flagged this article as advertising in my mind and therefore can't give you specific help on how to rewrite it. If you'd like, you can go to WP:REFUND and request that the article be undeleted and placed in your userspace to work on. Pages in the userspace are still publicly visible and subject to less scrutiny than those in the article space; however, they may still be deleted if they are blatant advertising, copyright infringements, or otherwise violate the userpage policy.

Notwithstanding everything I've just said, the article can still be deleted if it fails to meet the notability standards for inclusion of companies. Many companies simply fail these criteria and don't belong on Wikipedia. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a directory of companies. For a list of sites that may be willing to host your content without objection, see Wikipedia:Alternative outlets. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 15:08, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Salubri page deletion

Since it's been more than 7 days and no one has opposed. Can you please delete the page? As author and inventor of this minor clan it doesn't belong, as with the other minor clans. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jachilli2 (talk • contribs) 19:06, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

I am not an administrator and have no authority or ability to delete the article. An administrator will come along within a few hours and either delete the article or relist (i.e., extend) the discussion. I have no say in this matter. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 20:23, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the correction on moving a page

Even though I have done 300+ edits on articles, I still am a newbie at certain things, like how to move pages. Mahalo! Peaceray (talk) 07:24, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

/* No More Room In Hell */

We give full permission, all content is our own, may i ask what is wrong with the page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by NMRIHGothic (talk • contribs) 16:19, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Your comment indicates to me that you have not read the notices that I placed on the top of the article in a large box with a yellow border and yellow exclamation point icon. Therefore, I will only respond with the issues that are not identified in those notices. You indicate that copyright is the problem, when in fact it is not. Making a statement of "we are the developers, we know it's all true and therefore it doesn't need any references" just doesn't cut it. This is a primary source and is not allowed in the absence of reliable third-party sources. Other than that, read the notices and the links contained therein. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 16:39, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Overwolf

Hello Kuyabribri. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Overwolf, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: This is software. A7 doesn't apply. Thank you. GedUK  20:36, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for creating hatnote

Thanks for creating the hatnote in Pankaj Advani's article.
I am new to this and the article, Pankaj Advani (director) is my first contribution and I have understood the objection regarding disambiguation page. Bludust (talk) 07:44, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Christmas Card

File:Wikisanta-no motto.png

Merry Christmas At this festive time, I would like to say a very special thank you to my fellow editors, and take the time to wish you and your loved ones a very Merry Christmas, and a Happy New Year. And, in case you can't wait until the big day, I've left you each three special presents, click to unwrap :) Acather96 (talk) 10:10, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Green and Yellow Present.gif

File:Yellow and Red present.gif

File:Blue and Red Present.gif

AFD

Hello I have nominated an article that you have contributed to for deletion at

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Fingerpoke_of_Doom_(3rd_nomination) Seeker of the Torch (talk) 15:13, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4