User talk:Bwiki

Welcome, from Journalist

Welcome!

Hello, Bwiki, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

^{Journalist ^C./ ^{Holla @ me!}}

Rms125a@hotmail.com

Bwiki, goddag. Thanks for doing the copy edit on the Sammy Sieger article. I have been having a hardest time with the author, Robert Sieger, User:Rms125a@hotmail.com, Sammy's grandson, trying to get to him READ, but it is like banging my head against the wall. If you scroll through the changes to the Sammy Sieger, you'll see an example. I added 96.7% the boxing info. Also if you look at Robert's talk page, I have tried and tried, while other contributors just want him banned. Hope to see you around these parts some more.

Farvel for now,

WikiDon 01:34, 14 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Discovery of the DNA Double Helix navigation box

I just want to warn you that some editors do not like the Discovery of the DNA Double Helix navigation box. I admit that it is sort of ugly. I have no graphic design skill. If you have any suggestions for making a nicer looking navigation box, please help save it from the deletionists. I think it is a useful "service" for Wikipedia readers. --JWSchmidt 17:46, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for warning me about some editors not liking the Discovery of the DNA Double Helix navigation box. I inserted it on the Rosalind Franklin page because it was the only one of the six pages linked to in the box that didn't feature the box itself. (On the Linus Pauling page, the box is not at the top of the page because he is chiefly known for other things, but it is still there, in the section on DNA.) Sorry to say, I don't have the graphic skill to make the box look nicer and maybe avoid it getting deleted. (By the way, I suspect some editors dislike this box not so much because of functionality or graphic-design concerns as because they disagree about who deserves mention and who doesn't in connection with the discovery of the double-helix structure.) Thanks again. --Bwiki 18:18, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct, User:Jmcc150 has made suggestions about additional people who could be included in the navigation box, and has also questioned if people like Delbrück should be included. --JWSchmidt 19:20, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Quotation marks don't always enclose other punctuation

Hi, I agree with all the corrections you made in this edit to the article on Functionalism versus intentionalism, except the last one. You say in the edit summary that "quotation marks always enclose punctuation," but the section on quotation marks within the Manual of Style says this:

When punctuating quoted passages, include the punctuation mark inside the quotation marks only if the sense of the punctuation mark is part of the quotation ("logical" quotations).

The section contains a number of examples, the first one being this:

Arthur said the situation was "deplorable". (The full stop [period] is not part of the quotation.)

I believe it follows that the full stop following the expression "Prophecy Speech" should not be enclosed in the quotation marks because the full stop is not part of the expression that is being quoted.

--Bwiki 23:01, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello.

Thank you for the advice regarding quotation marks and punctuation. You are correct according to the Wikipedia standard; however, I made the edit before reading the Manual of Style. Thanks to Strunk and White, I was under the impression that quotation marks must always enclose punctuation. I apologize for not fixing my edit. Thanks again for bringing it to my attention. MeredithParmer 23:11, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Shajarian concert photo

Thank you for contributing the Shajarian concert photo. Please identify the individual players in the caption if you know who's who, e.g. "Mohammad Reza Shajarian, 1st/2nd/3rd/4th from left", "Homayoun Shajarian, 1st/2nd/3rd/4th from left", etc. --Cheers, Bwiki 22:39, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. I added the names to the desc for the Shajarian concert photo. --K a s h ^{Talk | email} 11:08, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your opinion

Hello, an article in which you took part in the AFD discussion has undergone more than 20 reverts. We are trying to get truely neutral opinion about removal of some information. here Your esteemed opinion will be welcome. Thanks Taprobanus 14:07, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

Hi! Its nice to meet ya'! CupPup's meh' name! Bye! --CupPup (talk) 04:28, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidag 2012

Hej!

Den 23. september er der Wikidag 2012 i København. Der bliver workshops og oplæg og mulighed for at mødes "i den virkelige verden" med andre wikipedianere. Det vil glæde os at se en masse mennesker! --Palnatoke (talk) 21:42, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Bwiki. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Bwiki. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]