User talk:Krontach

Welcome!

Hello, Krontach, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Dennis Bratland (talk) 00:11, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. Biker Biker (talk) 05:45, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 02:19, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Honda CB750: Thanks

Thank you for adding citations to Honda CB750. It's an important article it's been hanging around waiting for footnotes for far too long. Cheers! --Dennis Bratland (talk) 01:46, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. Krontach (talk) 21:29, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Diesel engine

Hello Krontach, with this edit you changed a statement about the diesel engine so that instead of referring to the Diesel cycle it now refers to the Carnot cycle. Your edit summary said the Diesel cycle was untrue. Wikipedia has an entirely legitimate article on the Diesel cycle so it is appropriate that it be used in other articles where correct to do so. Removing the link to that article and replacing with a link to Carnot cycle is a significant and surprising move. I think your change should be explained on the Talk:Diesel engine page so that interested Users can read why you think Diesel cycle is incorrect and Carnot cycle is correct. It will also give interested Users the opportunity to make their own comments on the change. Many thanks. Dolphin (t) 12:30, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 13:45, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources

You have already had the concept of original research pointed out to you. I would also like to inform you about the need to use reliable sources (WP:RS). The ExploreOz one that you just used on Diesel engine is anything but a reliable source, so I reverted it. If you want to make major changes to articles - especially ones which change the meanings - then you should discuss them on the article's talk page. See WP:BRD - you were bold in making a change, I reverted it, now go discuss what you want to change. --Biker Biker (talk) 21:13, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing

Your editing has gone from odd to bizarre to disruptive. This talk page comment that we can't say "petrol" is the latest example. Do you have a source for this absurd claim? Are you aware that the article on gasoline engines is called Petrol engine? You are wasting time and filling up talk pages with noise with this sort of nonsense, and distracting other editors having to refute it. That is disruptive and it can get you blocked from editing.

This edit is unacceptable. You may comment below others talk page comments, but do not refactor their comments with your editorial opinions. Please read Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines before you go any further. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 04:31, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How is it disruptive? Have I said something which wasn't true? Krontach (talk) 05:49, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tobias_Conradi for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:00, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User page edits

Hello. I've removed the earliest edits from Werner Motors, from before you moved the page, as they contained biographical contents obviously destined for your user page and of little relevance to the article. I would normally have merged them back into your user page instead of deleting them, but judging the contents of the edits and your current user page, I have assumed you might not be interested to have them back. You are more than welcome to ask me or another admin to still merge them back onto your userpage. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 08:12, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]