User talk:Krimuk2.0/Archive 28
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Krimuk2.0. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 25 | Archive 26 | Archive 27 | Archive 28 | Archive 29 |
Pathaan rank
Well the reference Bollywood hungama says its the 14th ...but the link which opens to List of highest-grossing Hindi films says it is not so...pls remove the wikipedia link....but we should show it according to Wikipedia lists not through other lists...so i would recommend that we should show that its the 24th highest-grossing Indian film according to List of highest-grossing Indian films Harharshit (talk) 08:04, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Please check the Bollywood Hungama reference cited. I'm not sure what's leading to this discrepancy. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 08:07, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
DYK for Jack Champion
On 2 February 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jack Champion, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Jack Champion had to film all his scenes in Avatar: The Way of Water twice? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jack Champion. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Jack Champion), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
BorgQueen (talk) 00:02, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
For your continuous efforts to keep the quality of Indian film articles intact even though the socks and zealous fanboys make it an impossible job. FrB.TG (talk) 08:32, 2 February 2023 (UTC) |
- Thank you so much. Much appreciated. :) Krimuk2.0 (talk) 08:33, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
RfC
From my experience, when you don't give people options or direct questions, people don't look at it. I'd recommend that you provide the following options:
- Include both in one parameter (and change the text to allow both background score and original music)
- Add "original music" category (and add another parameter "background score")
- No change needed
Shahid • Talk2me 11:05, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
- Heya, let's see if some people respond within the day. If not, I'll add these options. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 14:46, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi
Good to see you still here Krimuk. Hope you're doing well. I'll be checking in on Wikipedia from time to time. Will be back to active editing in a short while. — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 08:58, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Hey hey, so great to hear from you! Please do come back... we need you good guys back!! :)) Krimuk2.0 (talk) 12:53, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Will come back shortly. I'll focus again on film articles as usual but will branch out more into video games and pro wrestling articles as well (Particularly Pay-per-view events). Will begin once I come back full time. What are the GAs and FAs you made recently may I ask? — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 08:43, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
- None at all, haha! I am not as active as I used to be before. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 18:39, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
- Yeah me either but I will get back into it soon like I said. Also, I do see Shahid, one of our oldest editors being very active as of late, which is good. We really need all the help we can get on here. — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 08:05, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Ssven2: Come on, I'm not that old ;) Good to see you. Shahid • Talk2me 10:58, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Shahid: I meant as far as the time you've been here on Wikipedia lol. Ofc you might not be old. Good to see you too. — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 11:40, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Ssven2: Come on, I'm not that old ;) Good to see you. Shahid • Talk2me 10:58, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
- Yeah me either but I will get back into it soon like I said. Also, I do see Shahid, one of our oldest editors being very active as of late, which is good. We really need all the help we can get on here. — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 08:05, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
- None at all, haha! I am not as active as I used to be before. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 18:39, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
- Will come back shortly. I'll focus again on film articles as usual but will branch out more into video games and pro wrestling articles as well (Particularly Pay-per-view events). Will begin once I come back full time. What are the GAs and FAs you made recently may I ask? — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 08:43, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
How to add photos of actors
Hi, I recently saw you have uploaded photo of Bhuvan Arora. I would like to know the right process to obtain photos. As I like to add photos of Malayalam actors, as most of them don't have. As previously I have uploaded photos but those were rejected few times.
Is Bollywood Hungama a free source? Aadirulez8 (talk) 20:14, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- Some Bollywood Hungama photos, which are available under their "parties and events" section (and are not copyright violations) are allowed for use. Which Malayalam actors photo would you like? Krimuk2.0 (talk) 20:18, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- These are few Roshan Mathew, Darshana Rajendran, Anna Ben, Kalabhavan Shajohn, Renji Panicker Aadirulez8 (talk) 21:26, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- I have been trying to find images for the first three as well, but i guess only Mathew's is available. I'll add that. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:20, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks. So you found them in Bollywood Hungama? Is there any other sources from where we can get photos Aadirulez8 (talk) 08:00, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- I have been trying to find images for the first three as well, but i guess only Mathew's is available. I'll add that. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:20, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- These are few Roshan Mathew, Darshana Rajendran, Anna Ben, Kalabhavan Shajohn, Renji Panicker Aadirulez8 (talk) 21:26, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
"Blackbird (upcoming film)" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Blackbird (upcoming film) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 28 § Blackbird (upcoming film) until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 18:00, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Farzi
Hello! Your submission of Farzi at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Daniel Case (talk) 06:31, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Alia Bhatt filmography
Hello! Your submission of Alia Bhatt filmography at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 15:07, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
Links to draft articles
Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Ranbir Kapoor. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 10:32, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
DYK for Alia Bhatt filmography
On 21 March 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Alia Bhatt filmography, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Alia Bhatt's first screen appearance was as the younger version of Preity Zinta's character in the 1999 horror film Sangharsh? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Alia Bhatt filmography. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Alia Bhatt filmography), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
-- RoySmith (talk) 12:03, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Raashi Khanna
Dear editor Friend,
It will be better if you can take few more lines and explain why tableTBA exists for a reason. What is that reason? I have a doubt on this, hence before I could revert your edit and ask this same question. It would be better if you can explain why. So I can refrain myself from reverting. The editor friends whom I have come across exactly specify the wikipedia guidelines in the text box provided after they finish their edit and proceed to submit. Please specify the exact reason for whatever the edits you make. Thank you. Gautham offl (talk) 13:57, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- TableTBA as the name suggests is for tables in which TBA is used. Since the filmography is a table, we use TableTBA. As simple as that. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 13:59, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- I got it. Thank you. Gautham offl (talk) 14:38, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- TableTBA as the name suggests is for tables in which TBA is used. Since the filmography is a table, we use TableTBA. As simple as that. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 13:59, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
DYK for Farzi
On 4 April 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Farzi, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 2023 series Farzi tells the story of a counterfeiting ring as well as the fakeness of people? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Farzi. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Farzi), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Aoidh (talk) 00:32, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
Shah Rukh khan in Deadpool 3 and Tiger VS Pathaan
Krimuk2.0. I saw you reverted my edit. Here is proof for you if you didn’t believe my edit. https://www.bollywoodlife.com/hollywood/trending-entertainment-news-today-srks-next-in-2021-deadpool-3-confirmed-1542685/ And https://www.mensxp.com/entertainment/bollywood/132759-yrf-spy-universe-3-new-films-tiger-vs-pathaan-war-2-tiger-vs-pathaan-salman-khan-hrithik-roshan-shah-rukh-khan.html KrishJ2001 (talk) 21:54, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- Bollywood Life is not RS as it is tabloid, similar to Daily Mail. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:47, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
Promotion of Alia Bhatt filmography
- Thank you! :) Krimuk2.0 (talk) 07:10, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
Pooja Hegde
How can you say earlier images in that article was copyvio? 117.255.117.247 (talk) 16:05, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
- Coz they are. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 18:16, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
- But in the Wikimedia commons it doesn't say so. Please readd those images, coz they have more quality than Bollywood Hungama's images. 117.255.117.247 (talk) 02:12, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Alia Bhatt
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Alia Bhatt you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Shshshsh -- Shshshsh (talk) 20:42, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Alia Bhatt
The article Alia Bhatt you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Alia Bhatt for comments about the article, and Talk:Alia Bhatt/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Shshshsh -- Shshshsh (talk) 21:01, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
Need help for creating a wekipage
Hi Can you please help me with creating a weki page for a production house bassed in mumbai
Pleases contact me on 9987233044 2402:E280:3DD1:7C:E4F9:960C:E71A:E54 (talk) 09:05, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
Conflict on page name
You did a conflict by changing the page name of Asur. Remember, TV series are broadcasted on TV channels while Web series are broadcasted on OTT. If you have any confusion, discuss it on the talk page of the page.
See also is not redundant. It links to the interest of the readers. M.parvage (talk) 11:47, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
- M.parvage, like most unfortunate Indians you are using the wrong terminology. The word you are searching for is streaming television. Web series are somewhat different. What to call You, which began as a broadcast show but shifted to Netflix from season 2 onwards? TV series only. Kailash29792 (talk) 12:52, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
- Please read TV Series and Web Series. Those 2 articles can make you fortunate. And obviously after those, read Clarity M.parvage (talk) 13:27, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
- Kailash is right, listen to him. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 17:40, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
- And I added the text though the term "web series" is frequently used to refer to streaming television series to web series using this. Was I right to do so? Kailash29792 (talk) 04:11, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
- Frequently is not a term of the same. I request to be familiar with clarity M.parvage (talk) 05:08, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
- And I added the text though the term "web series" is frequently used to refer to streaming television series to web series using this. Was I right to do so? Kailash29792 (talk) 04:11, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
- Kailash is right, listen to him. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 17:40, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
- Please read TV Series and Web Series. Those 2 articles can make you fortunate. And obviously after those, read Clarity M.parvage (talk) 13:27, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
I plan to take this to GA status. Would appreciate your feedback and comments. Thanks. — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 10:38, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
- Do have a look at the article whenever you get some time ofc, my friend. Thank you. — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 11:34, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on Tu Jhoothi Main Makkaar
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Tu Jhoothi Main Makkaar, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 08:06, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
New message from Courcelles
Message added 13:25, 20 July 2023 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Just want to be sure you see this. Currently a thread on my talk page named after you. Courcelles (talk) 13:25, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive
Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive | |
August 2023 Backlog Drive:
| |
Other ways to participate: | |
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. |
Could you please comment here? It is under RM. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:18, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
TFL notification
Hi, Krimuk. I'm just posting to let you know that Alia Bhatt filmography – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for August 21. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 00:36, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
Corenswet first paragraph
Genuine question: what Wikipedia policy is causing you to repeatedly delete Corenswet Superman casting news from the lead paragraph of his bio when others place it there? I’ve read your rationale “the movie may never get made” but I can’t find any policy that says that rules out putting casting news in the first paragraph. And unlike most casting, being cast as live-action Superman by a major studio, by itself, radically and permanently skyrockets Corenswet’s bankability, visibility, and place in the culture—-internationally—-even if the movie never gets made. If you understand the movie business: it’s like getting an award. Given all that, please help me understand why you feel deleting it is important Charlie939 (talk) 20:46, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
Just saying hi
Hi Krimuk, I saw you in the Leo FAC reviews and just wanted to say hi. I hope you've been well. Have a great day! Moisejp (talk) 01:34, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
- Hey hey, so glad to hear from you! I've been well. How about you? I've been absent from the FAC for a while now, but I hope to take an article there in a month or so. Hope to see you there! :) Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:23, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
- Hi Krimuk, I've been well too, thanks! I was inactive for six months but am doing just a bit of editing these days. I don't have anything on the sidelines ready for FAC right now but am puttering away at an article that will (hopefully) get there eventually, if I don't get sidelined on another project first. ;-) I'll keep my eye out for your upcoming FAC. You can also ping me when it's up for FAC or for PR. Talk to you soon! Moisejp (talk) 04:10, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
- For sure! Good luck with your projects too. :)) Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:25, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
- Hi Krimuk, I've been well too, thanks! I was inactive for six months but am doing just a bit of editing these days. I don't have anything on the sidelines ready for FAC right now but am puttering away at an article that will (hopefully) get there eventually, if I don't get sidelined on another project first. ;-) I'll keep my eye out for your upcoming FAC. You can also ping me when it's up for FAC or for PR. Talk to you soon! Moisejp (talk) 04:10, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
Gerwig
We discussed the infobox image in the past and I wanted to let you know I updated it[1] to the headshot of the recent image. I prefer this version, but just in case you have any objections. Thanks! Nemov (talk) 20:20, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
- Nemov thank you for the message. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:40, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Image tagging for File:Aap Mujhe Achche Lagne Lage.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Aap Mujhe Achche Lagne Lage.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:30, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Posters
I don't have any issues with the posters you upload. Please make sure they don't have watermarks/image blemishes, and if they do inform me or at least tag them with {{watermark}}. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:52, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
- I did tag them with {{watermark}}. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:29, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
- Also Kailash29792, folds and blemishes are fine when you upload posters, such as this? Krimuk2.0 (talk) 07:26, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
- Yeah, not the best scanned poster. But when they're the only ones having necessary info (like release date), we use them. Alright, ignore the fold marks and blemishes until a properly scanned version is found. Kailash29792 (talk) 07:56, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
- Release date is not the only thing that matters. Release date is found in other reliable sources. Common theatrical release posters used for film distribution is what matters. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 07:57, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
- Yeah, not the best scanned poster. But when they're the only ones having necessary info (like release date), we use them. Alright, ignore the fold marks and blemishes until a properly scanned version is found. Kailash29792 (talk) 07:56, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
Ayushmann
Hi, Zyada received ₹86 crore on a ₹30 crore budget so while it wasn’t a blockbuster I think it’s inaccurate to group it in with the movies he did in 2021 and 2022 that either barely made back their budget or actually lost money. And Gulabo Sitabo didn’t get a theatrical release at all. DrBat (talk) 17:35, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- Which is why "several" or a "series of" is fine. There was a commercial setback for the actor, and it's sufficient to mention just that without numbering or naming the films. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 18:10, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
About Jaane Jaan
The movie itself called as Suspect X internationally, outside India. Check this link: https://www.netflix.com/title/81586376 Morgankarki (talk) 15:47, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
Related to posters
Hi there, seems you like to revert my image edits. First of all, you never own Wikipedia. Second thing, about posters, there are Tamil films who has posters from newspaper clippings which has release date. You can check all the Tamil film articles. I need to know do you actually own Wikipedia or any other case. Need reply and do not close the discussion in a very sane manner. SuperHero ● 👊 ● ★ 13:53, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
- Your title itself answers your question. It's called "posters" not "newspaper clippings". And yes, the discussion has to take place in a "very sane manner". Krimuk2.0 (talk) 14:11, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
- That never gives you right to revert images. Pathetic revert attempt and alleged bossing. Anyways, the newspaper consists posters with dates. I indeed condemn this pathetic revert. SuperHero ● 👊 ● ★ 16:07, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
Reception section
Almost all film articles have a critical rating with stars in the critical review section. But for Jawan you removed ratings with stars. I request you to please re add it to the article. Thanks. NaanReady (talk) 15:35, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
- Does Oppenheimer have them for all reviews? Krimuk2.0 (talk) 20:33, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
- I meant of Indian film like RRR, Pathaan, Baahubali 2, etc. Oppenheimer is an American film. So we can go with Indian films. Thanks. NaanReady (talk) 01:12, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
- I can't understand why you are removing stars in the reception section, as they are in other Indian film articles. NaanReady (talk) 12:05, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- I'm not removing stars. But over-reliance on them has no academic value. It's what the reviewer has to say that matters. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:21, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks. NaanReady (talk) 13:15, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
- I'm not removing stars. But over-reliance on them has no academic value. It's what the reviewer has to say that matters. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:21, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Sunny Deol
Have a look at these changes [2]. Thanks. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:27, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 7
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Parineeti Chopra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Girl on the Train.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:41, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
Alia Bhatt
FAC when? :-) FrB.TG (talk) 11:47, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- I've been lazy. Soon, I hope! Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:24, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
Sidharth Malhotra
Hello @Krimuk2.0, I tried to improve few lines in Sidharth Malhotra's article. I found that you disagree with my views so felt we can discuss it here and then we can come up with better answers. Kindly Check the below lines and let me know why you feel it grammatically incorrect as mentioned by you.
"Interested in pursuing an acting career, he successfully auditioned for a film to be directed by Anubhav Sinha. However, the film was shelved. He started his Bollywood career as an assistant director to Karan Johar on the 2010 film My Name Is Khan"
I appreciate your contribution to the article and also respect suggestions. Thank you. DSN18 (talk) 04:44, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
- How is it any different from what it currently says? Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:48, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
- Hello @Krimuk2.0, i agree that their is not much difference but The word "acting" is used as career in English not "film". few such minor changes i suggest. DSN18 (talk) 17:29, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Aishwarya Rai Bachchan
Hello Krimuk2.0. Hope you are well. In response to your question here, I removed that sentence as it was raised as an issue during the article's last GA review back in 2015. I personally have no problem with it and I'm glad that you like it to be included as well. Also, since you are the top contributor to that article in terms of authorship and number of edits (1), I thought it would be necessary to inform you that it is my intention to bring it to GA status (I have 3-4 other articles in the queue so this has to wait until some time during the next three months). I have been taking care of the parts that needed sources, moved some paragraphs, and introduced some new information. It certainly has come a long way since 2015 but I was wondering if you think it's a good candidate. Looking forward to your response. Best. Keivan.fTalk 23:20, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
- Heya, I'm glad that you're planning to take her article to GA. It's highly overdue, and I'd love to help out in whatever way I can help. Let me give it a c/e soon. Cheers! :) Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:36, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Actor
i add Arjun Radhakrishnan by --Sunuraju (talk) 09:57, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Killers of the Flower Moon, my excerpting EW article's Devery Jacobs quotes
I've been busy for a little while, but re your comment "John315 if you want more participants in order to form consensus, you could start a WP:RFC. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 12:47, 11 November 2023 (UTC)", I appreciate the idea, but could it be quicker if, say, just you and Opencooper (and maybe Kire1975) commented? You two (or three) seem to be the only ones raising questions about the length of Devery Jacobs quotes from the Lenker EW article. Thanks. John315 (talk) 09:01, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
- By the way, I'm about to send a similar message to Opencooper. John315 (talk) 09:02, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
- It's completely fine the way it is now imo. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 11:04, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks, but I would like a little more latitude, if you would, please, as per reasons given below. --As noted previously, my own current version has 76 words within quotes (besides "Elora Danan Postoak"... from which I could actually remove the quotes), less than Justin Chang's 81-word quote length.
- Moreover, one current quote in the "Indigenous response" section, "When it comes to Native representation, is Killers of the Flower Moon perfect? No. Is it progress? Yes. The film meaningfully moves the entertainment industry forward, making a strong statement that it's no longer acceptable to extract valuable assets from Indigenous communities – whether that be our stories or our natural resources – without our consent and input", is allowed to have, and has, 56 words.
- A more recent quote there, "See it when and only if you feel ready, and see it with people you feel safe with. You'll likely have a lot of generational grief to process", has 28 words.
- By contrast, your preferred version of my proposed post, has ...6 words of quotes: not 81, 76, 56, or even 28. Hmm.
- So, seeing that others are given latitude I am not given so far, what do you think is the absolute maximum number of quoted words I should be allowed? I think 76 is fine, but if you want to argue for a lower number, with reasons, please let me know.
- To allow me anything less than 56 words, the number that another entry there **currently has**, could look like an absurd double standard. I still prefer 76 words though. Thanks. ...Opencooper said something about paraphrasing, so, say, maybe I could paraphrase, or just omit, 20 words out of 76, to bring the count down to 56, if you wanted no more than 56.
- I'll send a similar post to Opencooper's Talk page soon. John315 (talk) 01:57, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
- It's completely fine the way it is now imo. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 11:04, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
My edit summary
Hi, sorry about the unnecessary snark in my edit summary on the Brie Larson article. It's a bad habit of mine. -- Andre Carrotflower (talk) 07:18, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Hey, haha. I can be snarky too sometimes, so I feel you. Thanks for correcting my typo though. :) Krimuk2.0 (talk) 07:19, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Seasons Greetings!
Hello there, thanks for all of your contributions to Wikipedia! Wishing you a Very Merry Christmas and here's to a happy and productive 2024! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:17, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Same to you! :) Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:22, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
"Several"
Hi. I see you changed "numerous" to "several" on The Color Purple (2023 film). However, "several" means "more than two but not many", but the film was nominated for more than 40 awards. ภץאคгöร 08:32, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- I'm not sure if "several" means "not many", but sure, "numerous" also works. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 08:35, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- You can find some mentions here: Google search, a dictionary, and Wiktionary entry. ภץאคгöร 08:47, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Talk page section headings
Please try to avoid calling out specific user names in article talk page section headings, especially the top level heading. Sometimes that can personalize the discussion for the named party(ies), and make the discussion feel more abuot the person and less about the edits. See WP:TALKHEADPOV . Better to use a more descriptive title about why the edits are being questioned, and mention the user in the text. See my change here. At the admin related boards, it's allowed because the discussion often IS about that person, but on article talk pages, always best to focus on the edits and the reasons. Ravensfire (talk) 16:37, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Noted, thanks. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:23, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Top 25
While I thank that you're appearing lately for the weekly list, wonder if you had any interest in the annual one (if only for proper write-ups to the two remaining Indian movies) igordebraga ≠ 18:07, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Hi, thank you. Will do. :) Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:23, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Halle Bailey
Hello there! I see you reverted my naming her character in The Color Purple in the lead citing it as "a fictional character". Ariel is name checked and is also a fictional character? I thought naming her role in TCP would bring a sense of continuity since her character is named in TLM. The One I Left (talk) 14:59, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Ariel has a wikilink for context. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 18:24, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
Your reversion of several of my edits of Way of Water.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Avatar:_The_Way_of_Water&diff=prev&oldid=1192605575 is the reversion in question. I think the reversion makes the article less good. Could you please explain you reasons for this reversion? Polar Apposite (talk) 12:44, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- I restored the WP:STATUSQUO. Per that, the onus is on you to explain why "your" version is better and gain WP:CONSENSUS for it. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 18:23, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Where does it say the onus is on me? Polar Apposite (talk) 07:32, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Ryan Gosling
Ryan is not grammy nominated, as per the grammy.com official website. A song he sang in the Barbie movie is nominated for a songwriting award, of which he is not a writer of - therefore no grammy nomination for him. Please remove the Grammy nominated false info in the beginning of his bio. 24.71.102.130 (talk) 10:46, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- I agree with the IP. Only the composer and writer(s) get nominated for categories like Best Song. That's why Madonna has won no Oscars, despite two songs sung by her being winners, since she didn't write or compose them. Kailash29792 (talk) 10:54, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- I only added it because Deadline listed him as a nominee. There's no reason to attack me. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 16:28, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- Relax, no one was attacking you. We both simply provided information so the info would not be reverted again. 24.71.102.130 (talk) 21:00, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- I only added it because Deadline listed him as a nominee. There's no reason to attack me. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 16:28, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
Why highest grossing hindi films and not indian films?
I recently edited SRK's page where I replaced hindi with indian and you reverted it. Can I know why? Just genuinely asking a question as I am fairly new. Air force 99 (talk) 05:22, 16 January 2024 (UTC)