User talk:Koqkpa

April 2022

Hello, I'm Blaze Wolf. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, The Backrooms, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 16:52, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Previous accounts

Hey! I noticed that on your userpage you've put "Joined in (Previous-made Accounts): 2018". What were the usernames of these previous accounts? Also, please note that Fandom is very different from Wikipedia in how they handle content. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 17:20, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It were guest accounts Koqkpa (talk) 06:43, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ah ok so an IP. That makes sense. Thanks for clarifying. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 12:59, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do anyone acutally go to the ip? Koqkpa (talk) 15:46, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Some do, some don't. Most editors here who have been around a while have edited from accounts. But you do occasionally see an editor who's been here for a while that prefers editing as an IP. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 15:58, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Account

It was a guest account. Not an official account. Koqkpa (talk) 03:45, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:HD 10863

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:HD 10863 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.universeguide.com/star/8233/hd10863. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DanCherek (talk) 17:38, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But 1 thing, when I used a guest account why did a stranger came to my home and asked for money. Koqkpa (talk) 23:47, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I understand about HD 10863 I will never copyright again.

Koqkpa (talk) 23:47, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: HD 22333 (April 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gpkp was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:HD 22333 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:HD 22333, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gpkp [u • t • c] 07:03, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Koqkpa! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Gpkp [u • t • c] 07:03, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You made my cry. Koqkpa (talk) 07:23, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I never can make a article, just to sit and cry. I'm quiting.. I keep making it in my ideas of how I should write it without copyright, it took 3 months, just to get declined.... Koqkpa (talk) 07:24, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was also new to Wikipedia source editing.. Koqkpa (talk) 07:29, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: HD 22333 (April 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

no sources?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:HD 22333 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:HD 22333, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 07:47, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:HD 22333

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:HD 22333 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.universeguide.com/star/22333/hip22333. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DanCherek (talk) 12:06, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You said you would not copyright again, and yet you proceeded to do exactly that. If you do it again you will most likely be blocked for copy vios. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 13:16, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry bro... Koqkpa (talk) 15:46, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Make me a true Wikipedian then I'll not copyright.

Koqkpa (talk) 15:47, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But the link takes to HIP 22333 it isn't HD 22333 what do you mean by that, it's literally not proven to be deleted. Koqkpa (talk) 15:53, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Don't block me from editing, I promise! Please! I will not copyright again. Koqkpa (talk) 15:54, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We'll see if you truly don't create another copyvio. 16:46, 29 April 2022 (UTC) ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 16:46, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also, in response to you saying, "Make me a true Wikipedian then I'll not copyright." That's not how things work. You don't copyright. At all. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 16:50, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright as a verb means to apply copyright protection - usually by providing a notice, in the US. What Koqkpa is doing is not copyrighting, but violating copyright, which is the exact opposite.

(Side note: Don't copyvio :]) casualdejekyll 15:27, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Soumita Mondal (April 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ts12rAc was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Soumita Mondal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Soumita Mondal, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ts12rAc^{talk to me} 06:04, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

why Koqkpa (talk) 06:05, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Soumita Mondal (April 30)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by HitroMilanese was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Hitro talk 09:40, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bot

A Bot is a bot. Koqkpa (talk) 13:36, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are not an AfC reviewer

You are not an AfC reviewer don't do this or this. KylieTastic (talk) 14:29, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What did I did? Koqkpa (talk) 16:37, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You impersonated an AfC reviewer which is a permission granted by administrators to trusted users with enough experience. You are not on the Participants list, and you are not experienced enough to do reviews. Your own submissions show that you do not understand our notability standards. KylieTastic (talk) 17:20, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But I was making a video of how to use AfC Templates Koqkpa (talk) 17:33, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It now have 972K views Koqkpa (talk) 17:34, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly you clearly do not know how to use the AfC Templates or who can use them (or even basic editing of any templates based on how you left this ). Secondly, I do not believe for 1ms that you have nearly a million views in a few hours for a video about AfC Templates. KylieTastic (talk) 17:47, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No I did on other pages too Koqkpa (talk) 00:48, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well what's the point of you getting mad, it's my own business. Koqkpa (talk) 00:51, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted it though. Koqkpa (talk) 00:52, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was just checking out templates and tested that one out. Koqkpa (talk) 00:52, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It was just in one page so why are you so mad, I did that only for once. Koqkpa (talk) 00:53, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Make up your mind was it "I did on other pages too" or "It was just in one page"? Not that it matter as everyone can see every undeleted edit anyone has made so we know what was done (see Special:Contributions/Koqkpa). "it's my own business" - edits to your own user pages such as your sandbox User:Koqkpa/sandbox is the place to do tests, not another editors actual submission, that is their business not yours. "I deleted it though" - The first time you played with Draft:Ou Cuisine you left it in a broken state, the second time you put it back with yourself as the creator not the actual creator, both times I had to fix it. Then today you resurrect another editors user page after 11 years with no good reason, they have decided to stop editing and blank their own user page as it their choice not yours - respect other editors (See: Wikipedia:User_pages#Ownership_and_editing_of_user_pages). I am not "mad" I don't do anger as it's usually pointless, I'm just saying stop your disruptive editing, Wikipedia is not a place to come play - Wikipedia is for people Here to build an encyclopedia. KylieTastic (talk) 10:25, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Koqkpa (talk) 10:29, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Block Strike (May 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gpkp was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Block Strike and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Block Strike, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gpkp [u • t • c] 06:24, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Fornax, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. There are no stars in Fornax < 3m (Apparent magnitude), brightest is 3.85 List of stars in Fornax KylieTastic (talk) 11:17, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Koqkpa (talk) 12:55, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kyle. Koqkpa (talk) 12:55, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Block Strike (May 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

You need to actually address the issues why the draft was declined. This was not declined for problems with punctuation, but with sourcing.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Block Strike and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Block Strike, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:26, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Block Strike (May 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Fade258 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please add reliable source to justify the notability for this game. Cheers and Happy editing.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Block Strike and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Block Strike, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fade258 (talk) 06:02, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Block Strike (May 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Sources do not demonstrate notability. See WP:GNG for guidance.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Block Strike and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Block Strike, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:16, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: AI Fornacis (May 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Umakant Bhalerao was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:AI Fornacis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:AI Fornacis, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be tagged for G13 deletion.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 14:56, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:AI Fornacis

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:AI Fornacis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.universeguide.com/star/133919/lp35534. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:58, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That isn't AI Fornacis that is LP 334 Koqkpa (talk) 15:03, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Huh? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:05, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of AI Fornacis

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on AI Fornacis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.universeguide.com/star/15479/aifornacis. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DanCherek (talk) 15:00, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Slow down

You've submitted in quick succession two copies of the same AI Fornacis article, neither of which should have gone into the main article space as they were a) inadequately referenced, and b) apparent copyvios. I moved one of them into drafts, only to find out that you had immediately afterwards published the other. Both have now been tagged for speedy deletion because of the copyvio. Please don't produce any more copies, and please ensure you don't violate copyright when creating article content. Thank you, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:03, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I typed it by myself without copyright Koqkpa (talk) 15:06, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just made it looking by myself without copying by looking at one article from gen.co Koqkpa (talk) 15:07, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but that makes no sense — you "typed it by [your]self without copyright"?

Anyway, I note that there's an ANI discussion ongoing now, maybe that can get to the bottom of some of this. All I can say is, you've kept us pretty busy at AfC in these past couple of weeks.

Best, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:13, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I mean... I typed it by looking at an another article from gen.com, I didn't copyright though. Koqkpa (talk) 16:08, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, it doesn't matter whether you read and rewrite someone else's text (or even closely paraphrase it), or copy & paste it as such, either way you're not allowed to use something that isn't your own creation, unless the source has an express licence or release authorising you (and even then you have to attribute the source).

Secondly, you're not using the term 'copyright' correctly, which suggests there is a fundamental confusion somewhere. Copyright is a legal concept, which in simple terms means the content, the piece of intellectual property, is yours to do with whatever you want. When you say you "didn't copyright" something, are you trying to say you didn't violate someone's copyright? Anyway, you might want to look at eg. WP:COPYPASTE and WP:CFAQ, which explain some of the basics. Best, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:20, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is created by a bot. Koqkpa (talk) 16:39, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 15:04, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 15:45, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Koqkpa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

ok I'm saying the truth, it was my friend who hated me because I have a account to log in into Wikipedia and he doesn't have, he did that when I was sleeping. He saw me making a page then he copyrighted the page. Please so,it's not my fault..Koqkpa (talk) 16:01, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This unblock request is incoherent. Yamla (talk) 16:43, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

WP:BRO, despite being humourous, applies and it applies a lot. (Non-administrator comment) casualdejekyll 16:06, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I think I should have a more productive comment here, so here we go: After making this request, the user said "I typed it by looking at an another article from gen.com, I didn't copyright though. " (Diff: Special:Diff/1086339724) This demonstrates that the user does not understand what they did that lead to the block, and also was lying when they said it was their friend who typed it. I believe that for those reasons they should not be unblocked.(Non-administrator comment) casualdejekyll 16:13, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But ill create an other account Koqkpa (talk) 16:14, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok i won't I don't have any other password or gmails Koqkpa (talk) 16:17, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That gen.com is a lie, and this one is truth. Koqkpa (talk) 16:18, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do NOT create another account. If you do so, there's little to no chance you'll ever be unblocked. Blocks apply to you, you the person, not just to this particular account. --Yamla (talk) 16:43, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock me or ill make new account. Koqkpa (talk) 16:52, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have 26 hours Koqkpa (talk) 16:52, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Friendly advice: see law of holes. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:57, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia does not accept threats. When you create a sock, it will most likely get blocked once people find out it's you. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 16:57, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And it's not hard to find out. Canterbury Tail talk 17:26, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

They won't because Koqkpa (talk) 17:35, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'll use a username this is not near to any of your minds Koqkpa (talk) 17:36, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

TPA revoked.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:38, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]