User talk:Knowledgehome

License tagging for File:Abccd.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Abccd.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:30, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Name Dispute

Dear wikipedia editor, I would like to bring to your attention a matter concerning the use of the term Banuchi (Shitak). I have observed that you have been using both terms interchangeably, which can be confusing as there is no Pashtun tribe officially named Banuchi (Shitak). To maintain a professional and accurate standard, may I suggest that you choose one term, either Banuchi or Shitak, when referring to this group. Moreover, it is important to note that Shitak is a superclan, which means that it is the progenitor of several Pashtun tribes, including Dawar, among others. Therefore, it would be inaccurate to refer to Banuchi alone as Shitak. In fact, Banuchi is now recognized as a separate and distinct tribe. I hope that my explanation clarifies the issue and that you will take it into consideration in future communications. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely 2400:ADCC:134:6C00:D03:3CFC:F6B5:5D90 (talk) 13:13, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear editor,you are absolutely right that nowadays the tribe is famous as Banuchi but brother when we study history or talk about history of anything like person,race or a tribe we try to reach to the exact origin of that respective tribe but if u wanna stick to Banuchi only so be it but as you know many Banuchis know don't know that they are Shitaks and as you know we create those wiki articles for the readers and many new readers if they want to search the history of their tribe they will not be able to trace their true origins and they will get incomplete sense.So as far as I'm concerned it should remain Banuchi(Shitak) it's not only me who writes it like that.It was from the very start when Banuchi wiki was introduced it was written as Banuchi(Shitak).I have personally read many history books of Pashtuns like The Pathans by Olaf Caroe,Tarikh e Afghani etc.I have a very deep understanding not only about Banuchi tribe but also about many other Pashtun tribes.Hope that you will be satisfied now.Also brother you have mentioned in the infobox that Banuchis are decendents of Shah Farid Shitak.Shah farid is not the ancestor of each and every Banuchi but he was the tribal cheif of the Shitaks when he came with his tribe (Banuchis and Dawars) towards Bannu.

Regards Knowledgehome (talk) 08:55, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Knowledgehome/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 21:08, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Knowledgehome! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 21:08, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Baghdad Khan (August 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Baghdad Khan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 19:27, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Hello. Your recent edit to Bannu appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 21:12, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Bannu, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 21:12, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Baghdad Khan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Baghdad Khan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Bbb23 (talk) 19:40, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Capt. Dr. Baghdad Khan Umerkhel

Hello Knowledgehome,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Capt. Dr. Baghdad Khan Umerkhel for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Josey Wales^Parley 19:31, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Umerkhel has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Umerkhel. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 15:03, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Capt. Dr. Baghdad Khan Umerkhel

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Capt. Dr. Baghdad Khan Umerkhel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Theroadislong (talk) 18:33, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Umerkhel (January 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Deb were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

To be suitable for mainspace, your draft article needs to be about a topic that is notable, and needs to be written in good English and properly referenced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Umerkhel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Deb (talk) 18:42, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Capt. Dr. Baghdad Khan Umerkhel

Hello Knowledgehome,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Capt. Dr. Baghdad Khan Umerkhel for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Josey Wales^Parley 19:00, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Capt. Dr. Baghdad Khan Umerkhel

Without a WP:CCS, the page will just continue to be deleted every time it is reposted. Why not work on Draft:Capt. Dr. Baghdad Khan Umerkhel? You can have as much time as you need to develop the page and then submit it for review and acceptance once you are finished, thank you! 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:9890:12E8:5E1F:8654 (talk) 19:09, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Article/Draft creation

Hello, Knowledgehome,

Please work on article creation and development. Submit your drafts for review by an Articles for Creation reviewer. The articles you are creating do not belong in main space yet and it has become a cycle of you creating an article in your Sandbox, moving it to main space and then another editor moving it to Draft space which unnecessarily takes up editor time.

If you have questions about article creation, AFC or the different namespaces on Wikipedia, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:01, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Knowledgehome, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:02, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Umerkhel

Hello, Knowledgehome. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Umerkhel, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:07, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Umerkhel

Hello, Knowledgehome. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Umerkhel".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:57, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Baghdad Khan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Baghdad Khan, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Rusty 🐈 15:12, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]