User talk:Kkkksuraj

This is Kkkksuraj's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Balhampur has been accepted

Balhampur, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 17:08, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Manish Raj moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Manish Raj. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Camilear (talk) 08:25, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Kkkksuraj (talk) 09:54, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Majhaul, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 12:43, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to remove maintenance templates without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Balutola, you may be blocked from editing. Theroadislong (talk) 14:10, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Kkkksuraj (talk) 16:19, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Balutola, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 17:41, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Balutola, you may be blocked from editing. Theroadislong (talk) 18:17, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Balutola. Theroadislong (talk) 20:41, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Balhampur—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Adakiko (talk) 12:30, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Sangsangaplaz. I noticed that you recently removed content from Balhampur without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Sangsangaplaz (Talk to me! I'm willing to help) 14:45, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Balhampur shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Theroadislong (talk) 15:05, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article status

Please don't add "good article status" templates to articles that have clearly NOT been designated as "good article". It is not for you to decide this. Theroadislong (talk) 13:25, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you I will pay attention from now on Kkkksuraj (talk) 13:41, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Manish Raj

Hello Kkkksuraj,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Manish Raj for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

GrabUp - Talk 07:53, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Advice

Hi. We require all new article topics to meet the Wikipedia:Notability requirements, so I have deleted the page you tried to create. Please use draft space for any future attempts. Deb (talk) 08:36, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024 - again

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Balhampur. - Arjayay (talk) 15:11, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Balutola (November 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Deb were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

You don't seem to have learned anything from your previous experience. You can't write a long section like "History" without inline citations, and you haven't even given one source to support the story. Deb (talk) 19:53, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Balutola and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Deb (talk) 19:53, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Kkkksuraj! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Balhampur, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:39, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]