User talk:Kkkksuraj

This is Kkkksuraj's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Balhampur has been accepted

Balhampur, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 17:08, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Manish Raj moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Manish Raj. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Camilear (talk) 08:25, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Kkkksuraj (talk) 09:54, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Majhaul, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 12:43, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to remove maintenance templates without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Balutola, you may be blocked from editing. Theroadislong (talk) 14:10, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Kkkksuraj (talk) 16:19, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Balutola, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 17:41, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Balutola, you may be blocked from editing. Theroadislong (talk) 18:17, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Balutola. Theroadislong (talk) 20:41, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article status

Please don't add "good article status" templates to articles that have clearly NOT been designated as "good article". It is not for you to decide this. Theroadislong (talk) 13:25, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you I will pay attention from now on Kkkksuraj (talk) 13:41, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]